Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis of overall Urolithiasis

From: Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to urolithiasis: a meta-regression and meta-analysis

Study author

Year

Country

Ethnicity

Sex

cases/controls

Total cases/controls

Age

case/control (Mean)

Genotyping method

Quality

score

FokI (rs2228570)

 Chen et al. (b)

2001

China

Asian

M = 101/42

F = 45/48

146 / 90

44.2 / 55.5

PCR–RFLP

6

 Shaogang et al.

2003

China

Asian

M = 89/ 58

F = 61/22

150 / 80

43.6 ± 16/ 49 ± 19.6

PCR–RFLP

6

 Rendina et al.

2004

Italy

European

M = 94/72

F = 65/52

159 / 124

43 ± 10.8 / 41.9 ± 10.4

PCR–RFLP

7

 Mossetti et al.

2004

Italy

European

M = 66/ 73

F = 44/54

110 / 127

41.3 ± 13.5 / 41.06 ± 13.9

PCR–RFLP

6

 Relan et al.

2004

India

Asian

M = 105/76

F = 45/24

150 / 100

39.3 ± 1.1 / 43.2 ± 2.05

PCR–RFLP

7

 Bid et al. (a)

2005

India

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

113 / 132

21–72 / 22–58

PCR–RFLP

6

 Bid et al. (b)

2005

India

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

50 / 60

2–14 / 4–16

PCR–RFLP

5

 Liu et al.

2007

China

Asian

M = 161/159

F = 74/72

235 / 231

50.1 ± 12.3 / 51.7 ± 11.1

PCR–RFLP

8

 Seo et al.

2009

Korea

Asian

M = 93/ 220

F = 185/313

278 / 533

49.9 / 40.1

PCR–RFLP

8

 Mittal et al.

2010

India

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

125 / 150

40 ± 11.5 / 41.5 ± 10.5

PCR–RFLP

7

 Basiri et al.

2012

Iran

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

102 / 106

43.4 ± 6.9 / 38.4 ± 6.9

SSP-PCR

6

 Kaysar et al.

2012

China

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

74 / 103

NR

PCR–RFLP

5

 Wang et al.

2012

China

Asian

M = 279/263

F = 185/187

464 / 450

50.01 ± 10.19 / 50.45 ± 11.22

PCR–RFLP

8

 Guha et al.

2015

India

Asian

M = 133 / 112

F = 67 / 78

200 /200

39.93 ± 11 / 38.13 ± 10

PCR

7

 Cakir et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = 65 / 52

F = 33 / 18

98 / 70

47.2 ± 16.3 / 42.6 ± 13.5

PCR–RFLP

6

 Ergon et al.

2017

Turkey

European

M = NR

F=NR

27 / 13

7.12 ± 2.64 / 6.92 ± 2.48

Tag-man

5

 Subasi et al.

2017

Turkey

European

M = 26/22

F = 26/29

52 / 51

9.8 ± 3.5 / 10.3 ± 3.7

SNaPshot

5

 Li et al.

2018

China

Asian

M = 100/60

F = 100/60

200 / 120

35.88 ± 14.2 / 36.16 ± 15.20

PCR

7

 Huang et al.

2019

China

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

130 / 224

4.55 ± 3.19 / 5.02 ± 3.50

PCR–RFLP

7

 Amar et al.

2019

Pakistani

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

235 / 243

NR

PCR–RFLP

7

TaqI (rs731236)

 Jackman et al.

1999

USA

American

M = NR

F=NR

17 / 37

NR

PCR–RFLP

5

 Nishijima et al.

2002

Japan

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

83 / 83

51.8 ± 15.6 / 54.4 ± 13.1

PCR–RFLP

5

 Ozkaya et al.

2003

Turkey

European

M = 26/ 47

F = 38/43

64 / 90

6.7 ± 3.5 / 7.2 ± 2.3

PCR–RFLP

5

 Mossetti et al.

2003

Italy

European

M = NR

F=NR

220/114

40.87 ± 14.95 / 40.37 ± 14.07

PCR–RFLP

7

 Shaogang et al.

2003

China

Asian

M = 89/ 58

F = 61/22

150 / 80

43.6 ± 16 / 49 ± 19.6

PCR–RFLP

6

 Mossetti et al.

2004

Italy

European

M = 66/ 73

F = 44/54

110 / 127

41.3 ± 13.5 / 41.06 ± 13.9

PCR–RFLP

6

 Gunes et al.

2006

Turkey

European

M = 67/ 73

F = 43/77

110 / 150

49.22 ± 1.33 / 48.15 ± 1.62

PCR–RFLP

7

 Sayan et al.

2007

Turkey

European

M = 65/ 25

F = 15/15

80 / 40

10.9 ± 0.6 / 10.5 ± 0.6

PCR–RFLP

5

 Moyano et al.

2007

Spain

European

M = 22/ 9

F = 29/12

51 / 21

45.5 ± 13.5 / 48.6 ± 15.4

PCR–RFLP

5

 Seo et al.

2009

Korea

Asian

M = 93/ 220

F = 185/313

278 / 533

49.9 / 40.1

PCR–RFLP

8

 Mittal et al.

2010

India

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

125 / 150

40 ± 11.5 / 41.5 ± 10.5

PCR–RFLP

7

 Basiri et al.

2012

Iran

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

102 / 106

43.4 ± 6.9 / 38.4 ± 6.9

SSP-PCR

6

 Wang et al.

2012

China

Asian

M = 279/263

F = 185/187

464 / 450

50.01 ± 10.19 / 50.45 ± 11.22

PCR–RFLP

8

 Aykan et al.

2015

Turkey

European

M = 100/87

F = 64/ 80

164 / 167

24–58 / 38–54

PCR–RFLP

7

 Guha et al.

2015

India

Asian

M = 133 / 112

F = 67 / 78

200 / 200

39.93 ± 11 / 38.13 ± 10

PCR

7

 Rendina et al.

2016

Italy

European

M = NR

F=NR

372 / 88

41.2 ± 13.3 / 40.8 ± 14.1

PCR–RFLP

7

 Cakir et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = 65 / 52

F = 33 / 18

98 / 70

47.2 ± 16.3 / 42.6 ± 13.5

PCR–RFLP

6

 Goknar et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = NR

F=NR

78 / 60

6.94 ± 3.8 / 7.5 ± 3.2

PCR–RFLP

6

 Subasi et al.

2017

Turkey

European

M = 26/22

F = 26/29

52 / 51

9.8 ± 3.5 / 10.3 ± 3.7

SNaPshot

5

 Li et al.

2018

China

Asian

M = 100/60

F = 100/60

200 / 120

35.88 ± 14.2 / 36.16 ± 15.20

PCR

7

 Yang et al.

2019

China

Asian

M = 627/614

F = 316/361

943 / 975

51.2 ± 14.13 / 54.33 ± 18.11

iMLDR

8

 Amar et al.

2019

Pakistani

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

227 / 243

NR

PCR–RFLP

7

BsmI (rs1544410)

 Ruggiero et al.

1999

Italy

European

M = 18/NR

F = 9/ NR

27 / 150

NR

PCR–RFLP

6

 Chen et al. (a)

2001

China

Asian

M = 94/55

F = 30/ 35

124 / 90

44.1 ± 11.5 / 53 ± 10.1

PCR–RFLP

6

 Ozkaya et al.

2003

turkey

European

M = 26/ 47

F = 38/43

64 / 90

6.7 ± 3.5 / 7.2 ± 2.3

PCR–RFLP

5

 Rendina et al.

2004

Italy

European

M = 94/72

F = 65/52

159 / 124

43 ± 10.8 / 41.9 ± 10.4

PCR–RFLP

7

 Mossetti et al.

2004

Italy

European

M = 66/ 73

F = 44/54

110 / 127

41.3 ± 13.5 / 41.06 ± 13.9

PCR–RFLP

6

 Relan et al.

2004

India

Asia

M = 105/76

F = 45/24

150 / 100

39.3 ± 1.1 / 43.2 ± 2.05

PCR–RFLP

7

 Gunes et al.

2006

turkey

European

M = 67/ 73

F = 43/77

110 / 150

49.22 ± 1.33 / 48.15 ± 1.62

PCR–RFLP

7

 Moyano et al.

2007

Spain

European

M = 22/ 9

F = 29/12

51 / 21

45.5 ± 13.5 / 48.6 ± 15.4

PCR–RFLP

5

 Wang et al.

2012

China

Asian

M = 279/263

F = 185/187

464 / 450

50.01 ± 10.19 / 50.45 ± 11.22

PCR–RFLP

8

 Cakir et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = 65 / 52

F = 33 / 18

98/ 70

47.2 ± 16.3 / 42.6 ± 13.5

PCR–RFLP

6

 Goknar et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = NR

F=NR

72/ 53

6.94 ± 3.8 / 7.5 ± 3.2

PCR–RFLP

6

 Subasi et al.

2017

turkey

European

M = 26/22

F = 26/29

52 / 51

9.8 ± 3.5 / 10.3 ± 3.7

SNaPshot

5

 Li et al.

2018

China

Asian

M = 100/60

F = 100/60

200 / 120

35.88 ± 14.2 / 36.16 ± 15.20

PCR

7

 Yang et al.

2019

China

Asian

M = 627/614

F = 316/361

943 / 975

51.2 ± 14.13 / 54.33 ± 18.11

iMLDR

8

ApaI (rs7975232)

 Nishijima et al.

2002

Japan

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

83 / 83

51.8 ± 15.6 / 54.4 ± 13.1

PCR–RFLP

5

 Shaogang et al.

2003

China

Asian

M = 89/ 58

F = 61/22

150 / 80

43.6 ± 16 / 49 ± 19.6

PCR–RFLP

6

 Ozkaya et al.

2003

Turkey

Asian

M = 26/ 47

F = 38/43

64 / 90

6.7 ± 3.5 / 7.2 ± 2.3

PCR–RFLP

5

 Rendina et al.

2004

Italy

European

M = 94/72

F = 65/52

159 / 124

43 ± 10.8 / 41.9 ± 10.4

PCR–RFLP

7

 Gunes et al.

2006

Turkey

European

M = 67/ 73

F = 43/77

110 / 150

49.22 ± 1.33 / 48.15 ± 1.62

PCR–RFLP

7

 Moyano et al.

2007

Spain

European

M = 22/ 9

F = 29/12

51 / 21

45.5 ± 13.5 / 48.6 ± 15.4

PCR–RFLP

5

 Seo et al.

2009

Korea

Asian

M = 88/ 220

F = 185/305

273 / 525

49.9 / 40.1

PCR–RFLP

8

 Mittal et al.

2010

India

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

125 / 150

40 ± 11.5 / 41.5 ± 10.5

PCR–RFLP

7

 Kaysar et al.

2012

China

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

74 / 103

NR

PCR–RFLP

5

 Wang et al.

2012

China

Asian

M = NR

F=NR

463 / 450

50.01 ± 10.19 / 50.45 ± 11.22

PCR–RFLP

8

 Cakir et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = 65 / 52

F = 33 / 18

98/ 70

47.2 ± 16.3 / 42.6 ± 13.5

PCR–RFLP

6

 Goknar et al.

2016

Turkey

European

M = NR

F=NR

78/ 60

6.94 ± 3.8 / 7.5 ± 3.2

PCR–RFLP

6

 Ergon et al.

2017

Turkey

European

M = NR

F=NR

27 / 13

7.12 ± 2.64 / 6.92 ± 2.48

Tag-man

5

 Subasi et al.

2017

Turkey

European

M = 26/22

F = 26/29

52 / 51

9.8 ± 3.5 / 10.3 ± 3.7

SNaPshot

5

 Li et al.

2018

China

Asian

M = 100/60

F = 100/60

200 / 120

35.88 ± 14.2 / 36.16 ± 15.20

PCR

7

 Yang et al.

2019

China

Asian

M = 627/614

F = 316/361

943 / 975

51.2 ± 14.13 / 54.33 ± 18.11

iMLDR

8

  1. Abbreviations: NR not reported, M male, F female