Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant characteristicsa

From: Choice of dialysis modality: patients’ experiences and quality of decision after shared decision-making

Patient characteristics

The intervention sample (n = 349)

n (%)

The study sample (n = 148)

n (%)

The non-study sample (n = 201)

n (%)

Chi test or Fisher’s exact test

Hospitalsb

I

180 (52)

61 (41)

119 (59)

< 0.01

II

53 (15)

18 (12)

35 (17)

III

60 (17)

49 (33)

11 (6)

IV

56 (16)

20 (14)

36 (18)

Sex

Female

123 (35)

53 (36)

70 (35)

0.849

Male

226 (65)

95 (64)

131 (65)

Age (years)

age < 40

17 (5)

4 (3)

13 (7)

0.153c

40 ≤ age < 50

21 (6)

10 (7)

11 (6)

50 ≤ age < 60

45 (13)

18 (12)

27 (13)

60 ≤ age < 70

94 (27)

36 (24)

46 (23)

70 ≤ age < 80

112 (32)

61 (41)

63 (31)

age ≥ 80

59 (17)

19 (13)

41 (20)

eGFR (ml/min)

eGFR < 10

82 (23)

30 (20)

52 (26)

0.301c

10 < eGFR < 20

244 (70)

110 (74)

134 (67)

eGFR > 20

23 (7)

8 (6)

15 (7)

Attended kidney school

Yes

103 (30)

62 (42)

41 (20)

< 0.01

No

246 (70)

86 (58)

160 (80)

Number of meetings with dialysis coordinator

1

90 (26)

17 (12)

73 (36)

< 0.01

2

215 (62)

102 (69)

113 (56)

3

40 (11)

27 (18)

13 (7)

4

4 (1)

2 (1)

2 (1)

Chosen option

Home peritoneal dialysis

228 (65)

105 (71)

123 (61)

0.039

Home haemodialysis

26 (8)

14 (10)

12 (6)

Dialysis at hospital

87 (25)

27 (18)

60 (30)

No decision

8 (2)

2 (1)

6 (3)

  1. aData used in this table has been registered by the dialysis coordinators and is consistent with the documentation in the patients’ electronic health records
  2. bThe roman figures indicate each of the participating hospitals
  3. cExact age and eGFR were used to calculate the p-value and not the age group and eGFR group