Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of TEAEs in the safety set

From: A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure

 

PDA10

(N = 150)

Eprex®

(N = 146)

P-value

Subjects with TEAEs

98(65.33) [273]

88(60.27) [231]

0.3678 (c)

Infection

34(22.67) [49]

35(23.97) [51]

0.7905 (c)

Infection with corresponding category

29(19.33) [35]

28(19.18) [39]

0.9730 (c)

 a. Respiratory tract infections

21(14.00) [26]

24(16.44) [33]

0.5591 (c)

 b. Gastrointestinal infections

6(4.00) [6]

4(2.74) [4]

0.7499 (f)

 c. Urinary tract infections

0

0

 d. Vascular access infections

3(2.00) [3]

2(1.37) [2]

1.0000 (f)

 No corresponding category

10(6.67) [14]

11(7.53) [12]

0.7713 (c)

Non-Infection

89(59.33) [224]

78(53.42) [180]

0.3054 (c)

Non-Infection with corresponding category

39(26.00) [60]

35(23.97) [46]

0.6871 (c)

 a. Poorly controlled BP

26(17.33) [41]

20(13.70) [26]

0.3882 (c)

 b. Ischemic coronary artery disease

3(2.00) [3]

3(2.05) [3]

1.0000 (f)

 c. Heart failure

13(8.67) [16]

8(5.48) [8]

0.2856 (c)

 d. Ischemic stroke

0

0

 e. Haemorrhagic stroke

0

0

 f. AVF thrombosis

0

7(4.79) [7]

0.0066 (f)

 g. Death

0

2(1.37) [2]

0.2424 (f)

 No corresponding category

76(50.67) [164]

61(41.78) [134]

0.1253 (c)

  1. TEAEs treatment-emergent adverse events
  2. P-value: Difference between the treatment groups (Chi-square test (c) or Fishers exact test (f))
  3. Note: Denominator of percentage is the number of subjects in the column
  4. TEAEs are displayed as number of subjects (percentage of subjects) [number of events]