Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of participants according to quintiles (Q) of the empirical lifestyle index for insulin resistance

From: High insulinemic potential of diet and lifestyle is associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease incident in adults

 

Empirical lifestyle index for insulin resistance

P Value*

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Age (years)

40.0 ± 13.4

38.4 ± 12.8

36.9 ± 12.5

37.7 ± 12.3

36.5 ± 12.6

< 0.001

Men (%)

37.8

40.2

42.8

48.3

60.0

< 0.001

Body mass index (kg/m2)

25.9 ± 4.1

27.0 ± 4.7

26.7 ± 4.8

27.2 ± 4.8

27.8 ± 5.0

< 0.001

Smoking (%)

10.3

10.5

11.6

13.2

16.2

< 0.001

Physical activity (MET/hour/week)

63.5 (20.8–105.7)

62.5 (22.2–102.7)

63.1 (23.6–105.9)

68.6 (26.9–107.8)

71.4 (27.7–108.3)

0.001

Academic education, (%)

23.1

22.7

27.2

23.1

24.5

0.078

Creatinine (mg/dl)

1.00 ± 0.14

1.01 ± 0.14

1.02 ± 0.14

1.03 ± 0.15

1.06 ± 0.14

< 0.001

Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2)

78.4 ± 12.6

79.2 ± 12.5

80.4 ± 12.3

79.7 ± 12.1

81.1 ± 12.2

< 0.001

Hypertension (%)

8.2

10.2

8.6

9.4

10.7

0.227

Diabetes (%)

4.6

4.3

4.0

4.1

4.1

0.933

Empirical dietary index for insulin resistance

0.37 ± 0.23

0.58 ± 0.27

0.71 ± 0.28

0.89 ± 0.30

1.38 ± 0.47

< 0.001

Empirical lifestyle index for insulin resistance

2.31 ± 0.34

3.20 ± 0.24

4.17 ± 0.32

5.43 ± 0.42

8.88 ± 2.62

< 0.001

Nutrient Intake

     

< 0.001

 Energy(Kcal/d)

1984 ± 634

2239 ± 666

2307 ± 687

2431 ± 664

2801 ± 670

< 0.001

 Carbohydrate(% of energy)

57.3 ± 7.4

57.9 ± 6.8

57.4 ± 6.5

58.7 ± 11.9

59.8 ± 6.4

< 0.001

 Protein(% of energy)

15.5 ± 3.7

14.9 ± 3.6

14.4 ± 2.8

14.3 ± 11.4

13.2 ± 2.1

< 0.001

 Fat(% of energy)

31.4 ± 6.9

30.7 ± 6.4

31.3 ± 6.3

31.0 ± 6.0

28.9 ± 6.4

< 0.001

Food groups

 Refined grains(serving/d)

1.31 (0.96–1.61)

2.30 (1.92–2.68)

3.59 (3.20–4.03)

5.17 (4.73–5.72)

8.62 (7.32–11.01)

< 0.001

 Red meat (serving/week)

0.21 (0.28–0.84)

0.56 (0.35–0.98)

0.70 (0.35–1.26)

0.77 (0.42–1.26)

0.84 (0.56–1.47)

< 0.001

 Tomatoes(serving/d)

0.47 (0.31–1.11)

0.63 (0.31–1.11)

0.63 (0.31–1.11)

0.63 (0.31–1.11)

0.63 (0.31–1.11)

< 0.001

 Fruit juice(serving/d)

0.03 (0.00–0.09)

0.04 (0.01–0.10)

0.04 (0.01–0.10)

0.04 (0.01–0.10)

0.04 (0.01–0.11)

0.644

 Potatoes(serving/d)

0.06 (0.01–0.09)

0.06 (0.02–0.12)

0.06 (0.02–0.12)

0.06 (0.03–0.12)

0.06 (0.04–0.15)

< 0.001

 Processed meat(serving/week)

0.06 (0.01–0.14)

0.10 (0.02–0.24)

0.13 (0.04–0.30)

0.13 (0.05–0.32)

0.16 (0.08–0.42)

< 0.001

 Other vegetables(serving/d)

1.70 (1.01–3.12)

2.00 (1.28–2.97)

1.91 (1.15–2.87)

1.91 (1.10–3.12)

1.84 (1.08–2.74)

0.079

 Tea(serving/d)

2.08 (1.04–3.12)

2.08 (1.04–3.12)

2.08 (1.04–3.12)

2.08 (1.04–3.12)

2.08 (1.04–3.12)

< 0.001

 Coffee(serving/week)

0.01 (0.00–0.13)

0.02 (0.00–0.13)

0.03 (0.00–0.24)

0.02 (0.00–0.24)

0.03 (0.00–0.25)

0.600

 High-fat dairy products(serving/d)

1.27 (0.85–1.97)

1.19 (0.78–1.88)

1.18 (0.72–1.91)

1.14 (0.72–1.85)

1.10 (0.66–1.61)

< 0.001

 Green leafy vegetables(serving/d)

0.33 (0.15–0.63)

0.34 (0.17–0.64)

0.29 (0.14–0.56)

0.27 (0.13–0.52)

0.24 (0.11–0.48)

< 0.001

  1. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation, or median (interquartile) for continuous variables and number and percent for categorical variables
  2. *Chi-square and linear regression were used to test the trend of continuous and categorical variables across quintiles of the empirical dietary index for insulin resistance (as the median value in each quartile), respectively