Skip to main content

Table 5 The performance of the voting classifier and various models that voting classifier combines

From: Use machine learning to help identify possible sarcopenia cases in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Metric

Male

Female

LR

Adaboost

LGBM

VCd

SVM

VCd

ACCTRSa

73.18% ± 3.07%

80.61% ± 3.68%

89.39% ± 1.92%

86.59% ± 1.89%

66.73% ± 4.28%

66.73% ± 4.28%

ACCTESb

75.36% ± 3.37%

77.86% ± 6.74%

78.93% ± 6.48%

80.71% ± 4.29%

74.29% ± 8.57%

74.29% ± 8.57%

AVADc

4.77% ± 3.87%

7.55% ± 5.54%

10.47% ± 6.76%

6.61% ± 3.63%

12.72% ± 5.77%

12.72% ± 5.77%

Precision

71.28% ± 10.45%

75.37% ± 12.04%

75.39% ± 8.86%

79.28% ± 9.86%

81.86% ± 7.58%

81.86% ± 7.58%

Sensitivity

77.50% ± 14.93%

76.67% ± 12.80%

76.67% ± 13.84%

77.50% ± 11.21%

76.15% ± 13.95%

76.15% ± 13.95%

Specificity

73.75% ± 11.11%

78.75% ± 13.17%

80.62% ± 8.59%

83.12% ± 9.70%

71.25% ± 15.86%

71.25% ± 15.86%

F1 Score

72.29% ± 6.08%

74.67% ± 7.84%

75.25% ± 9.37%

77.32% ± 5.36%

78.04% ± 8.85%

78.04% ± 8.85%

AUC

86.20% ± 4.89%

85.31% ± 6.38%

85.03% ± 5.82%

87.40% ± 4.41%

77.69% ± 7.92%

77.69% ± 7.92%

  1. aAccuracy of Training Set
  2. bAccuracy of Test Set
  3. cAbsolute Value of Accuracy Difference between Training Set and Test Set
  4. dVoting Classifier