Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From:

Original Submission
12 Jul 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Sep 2022 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Sep 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Sep 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 7
14 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 8
16 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
12 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
Resubmission - Version 9
12 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
15 Mar 2023 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12882-023-03118-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page