Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of patients and dialysis parameters in the training and test data

From: Predicting dry weight change in Hemodialysis patients using machine learning

 

All (n = 314)

Train data (n = 237)

Test data (n = 77)

Demographics

      

Age, years

66.4

± 12.4

66.4

± 12.5

66.3

± 12.3

Gender (Male/Female)

224

/90

170

/67

54

/23

Race, n (%)

      

Asian (Japanese)

312

(99.4)

235

(99.2)

77

(100.0)

Asian (Southeast Asian)

2

(0.6)

2

(0.8)

0

(0.0)

Dialysis vintage, years

4.0

(2.0–8.0)

4.0

(2.0-8.8)

4.0

(2.0–6.0)

Body mass index, kg/m2

22.2

± 4.3

22.1

± 3.8

22.6

± 5.4

Primary disease, n (%)

      

Diabetic nephropathy

133

(42.4)

95

(40.1)

38

(49.4)

Chronic glomerulonephritis

61

(19.4)

51

(21.5)

10

(13.0)

Nephrosclerosis

52

(16.6)

40

(16.9)

12

(15.6)

Polycystic kidney disease

12

(3.8)

11

(4.6)

1

(1.3)

Others

56

(17.8)

40

(16.9)

16

(20.8)

Dialysis parameter

      

UF (L/session)

2.4

± 0.97

2.4

± 0.95

2.6

± 1.03

UFR (L/hr)

0.61

± 0.24

0.60

± 0.24

0.64

± 0.25

Dry Weight (kg)

59.7

± 14.2

59.3

± 12.8

60.8

± 17.6

Dialysis mode, n (%)

      

HD

5047

(7.3)

3238

(6.2)

1809

(10.4)

HD + ECUM

306

(0.4)

146

(0.3)

160

(0.9)

OHDF

63,700

(91.8)

48,320

(93.0)

15,380

(88.2)

OHDF + ECUM

254

(0.4)

185

(0.4)

69

(0.4)

ECUM

68

(0.1)

46

(0.1)

22

(0.1)

  1. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or percent frequency
  2. UF, ultrafiltration; UFR, ultrafiltration rate; HD, hemodialysis; ECUM, extracorporeal ultrafiltration method; OHDF, online hemodiafiltration