Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable logistic analyses of urinary NAG for predicting risk of IgAN progression in subgroups of eGFR

From: Urinary N-Acetyl-Beta-D-Glucosaminidase levels predict immunoglobulin a nephropathy remission status

 

Cut Points

Remission failure %

Unadjusted OR (95% Cl); P

Adjusted OR (95% Cl)

Model 1a, P

Model 2b, P

Model 3c, P

Subgroup with eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 142)

 T1 + T2 urinary NAG (n = 101)

≤ 22.32

6.9

1.0 (referent)

1.0 (referent)

1.0 (referent)

1.0 (referent)

 T3 urinary NAG (n = 41)

> 22.32

31.7

6.23 (2.27–17.14); <0.001

5.62 (1.97-16.00); 0.001

5.05 (1.66–15.37); 0.004

4.01 (1.24–12.93); 0.020

Subgroup with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 71)

 T1 + T2 urinary NAG (n = 41)

≤ 22.32

14.6

1.0 (referent)

1.0 (referent)

1.0 (referent)

1.0 (referent)

 T3 urinary NAG (n = 30)

> 22.32

56.7

7.63 (2.47–23.56); <0.001

7.85 (2.38–25.87); 0.001

3.16 (0.44–22.43); 0.250

3.38 (0.46–25.01); 0.233

  1. Abbreviations: Cl, confidence interval; Cr, creatinine; OR, Odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MAP, mean arterial blood pressure; MEST-C, histologic score based on mesangial hypercellularity, the presence of endocapillary proliferation, segmental glomerulosclerosis/adhesion, and severity of tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, and crescents formation; T, tertile
  2. aModel 1 adjusted for age, sex, MAP, BMI
  3. bModel 2 adjusted for covariates in model 1 plus 24-hour proteinuria, eGFR and Oxford MEST-C score
  4. cModel 3 adjusted for covariates in model 1 and 2 plus use of renin-angiotensin system inhibition and immunosuppression during follow-up