Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimated effect of the intervention on preference-based patient participation

From: Patient participation in end-stage kidney disease care: variation over time and effects of staff-directed interventions - a quasi-experimental study

 

SDG vs CG

FIG vs CG

6 months

12 months

18 months

6 months

12 months

18 months

No. 1—Being listened to

 Median

0.99

0.31

1.25

1.10

0.51

1.52

 95 CI

0.43; 2.43

0.12; 0.79

0.50; 3.28

0.52; 2.37

0.22; 1.18

0.68; 3.39

 Post. prob

50.8%

98.9%

68.8%

60.3%

94.6%

85.7%

No. 2—Experiences being recognised

 Median

0.96

0.78

3.87

0.79

0.96

2.43

 95 CI

0.42; 2.26

0.32; 1.92

1.57; 10.38

0.37; 1.66

0.44; 2.19

1.11; 5.57

Post. Prob

54.6%

70.8%

99.7%

73.4%

53.5%

98.6%

No. 3—Reciprocal communication

 Median

1.20

0.47

1.74

1.54

0.84

1.76

 95 CI

0.39; 4.36

0.14; 1.75

0.51; 6.67

0.53; 4.77

0.26; 2.81

0.59; 6.00

 Post. Prob

63.2%

88.8%

83.1%

81.0%

63.6%

86.7%

No. 4—Sharing symptoms

 Median

1.12

0.54

1.02

0.98

0.57

1.10

 95 CI

0.49; 2.68

0.21; 1.41

0.41; 2.69

0.46; 2.04

0.25; 1.25

0.49; 2.45

 Post. Prob

60.9%

90.8%

51.9%

52.1%

92.4%

60.0%

No. 5—Explanations for symptoms

 Median

0.74

0.96

1.29

1.14

1.12

1.55

 95 CI

0.25; 2.65

0.31; 3.61

0.42; 4.79

0.42; 3.15

0.41; 3.29

0.55; 4.64

 Post. Prob

71.3%

52.4%

67.6%

61.1%

58.5%

82.1%

No. 6—Having explanations as to what will be/is being done

 Median

0.93

0.76

1.84

1.12

0.77

1.02

 95 CI

0.35; 3.03

0.27; 2.54

0.64; 6.51

0.46; 3.11

0.29; 2.26

0.39; 3.02

 Post. Prob

55.6%

70.0%

88.1%

61.0%

70.5%

51.4%

No. 7—Learning plans

 Median

1.13

1.15

1.22

1.22

0.82

1.08

 95 CI

0.46; 3.23

0.44; 3.76

0.46; 3.86

0.52; 3.02

0.34; 2.11

0.45; 2.78

 Post. prob

60.4%

62.0%

65.9%

68.4%

68.4%

56.9%

No. 8—Taking part in planning

 Median

1.91

2.58

1.33

1.46

1.51

2.29

 95 CI

0.63; 6.36

0.78; 8.95

0.41; 4.59

0.54; 4.36

0.51; 4.75

0.79; 6.99

 Post. Prob

88.6%

94.7%

69.6%

79.2%

79.8%

94.4%

No. 9—Phrasing own goals

 Median

0.83

0.90

1.29

0.72

1.02

1.15

 95 CI

0.36; 2.03

0.37; 2.27

0.54; 3.30

0.34; 1.56

0.47; 2.37

0.53; 2.61

 Post. Prob

66.6%

58.6%

71.9%

80.8%

52.7%

64.1%

No. 10—Managing symptoms

 Median

0.73

0.59

1.55

1.19

0.60

1.17

 95 CI

0.26; 2.65

0.20; 2.29

0.53; 5.94

0.48; 3.50

0.22; 1.83

0.44; 3.57

 Post. prob

72.3%

81.3%

80.0%

65.4%

84.0%

63.4%

No. 11—Managing treatment

 Median

2.24

1.16

1.16

1.12

1.01

0.88

 95 CI

0.97; 5.09

0.45; 3.00

0.47; 2.87

0.55; 2.32

0.44; 2.27

0.40; 1.98

 Post. prob

97.2%

63.5%

62.7%

61.7%

50.5%

62.4%

No. 12—Managing self-care

 Median

1.35

0.47

2.04

1.68

0.47

0.92

 95 CI

0.63; 3.01

0.19; 1.15

0.86; 4.96

0.84; 3.41

0.20; 1.05

0.43; 1.99

 Post. prob

77.6%

95.2%

94.6%

93.7%

96.7%

58.6%

  1. Note: Based on measures of the 4Ps tool. Median = the median of the posterior distribution; 95% CI = 95% compatibility intervals defined by the 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of the posterior distribution; Post. prob. = the posterior probability that the OR is > / < 1 in the direction of the median