From: Interventions to reduce falls among dialysis patients: a systematic review
Study/Setting | Na | Population | Intervention (Content and delivery characteristics) | Control | Outcomes and summary of results | Follow-up/drop outs/sample size analysed | Risk of bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heung et al., 2010 [23] Cohort study of Outpatient Hemodialysis Center in USA | N-96 Gender-ND | Adult hemodialysis patients Mean age of those who experienced a fall 62.6 ± 13.4 years, with 7 (58%) being females | Targeted interventions that included the following; 1. Formal staff education program 2. Implementation of fall risk assessment tool 3. Active and passive patient education programs 4. Construction of in-ground scale 5. Full lighting during shift change periods 6. Routine use of towels around dialysis machines to wick leaked fluid 7. Installation of support bars in patient restroom | Period before the interventions (4-year baseline period) | Incidence of falls that occurred at dialysis center’s premises Results: There were 2 patient-related falls in the postintervention period, a reduction in fall incidence to 9 (95% CI 0 to 21) falls per 100,000 dialysis treatments (P = 0.06) | Follow up: 21 months Drop outs: ND Sample size analysed: ND | Moderateb |
Malhotra et al., 2023 [24]. Randomised controlled trial conducted at single academic outpatient HD facility in the USA | N = 55 Male IG-15 CG-13 Female IG-13 CG-14 | Participants with ESKD receiving hemodialysis who were able to walk with or without assistive devices | The wearable activity tracker plus structured feedback (intervention) arm. Patients received face-to-face goalsetting counseling in the dialysis facility along with feedback graphs and charts to visualise their progress | Patients had a wearable activity tracker alone (comparator) arm | Step count and absolute change in daily step count, averaged per week, from baseline to completion of 12 weeks intervention Results: There were 2 reported falls in the intervention arm and 1 fall in the comparator arm. Falls data was based on patient interviews | Follow up: 3 months Drop outs:9 IG:5 CG:4 Sample size analysed: n = 46 IG: n = 23, CG: n = 23 | Moderatec |
Young et al., 2020 [25] A mixed-methods Randomised controlled trial conducted at three HD centres within the UK East Midlands Renal Network | N = 51 Male: IG-17 CG-22 Female: IG-7 CG-5 | Prevalent adult HD patients of the CYCLE-HD trial with a Clinical Frailty Scale Score of 4–7 (vulnerable to severely frail) Mean age 63 ± 12 years | Patients in the intervention group had three times per week supervised, moderate-intensity exercises following a one month run-in. The duration of the intervention was six months. Cycling resistance was progressively increased to maintain the rate of perceived exertion in response to exercise adaptation. Progressive training was also allowed for patients unable to complete 30 min of continuous cycling until the set target was reached | Patients were managed according to the usual centre practice | Primary outcomes were related to feasibility. Secondary outcomes were falls incidence measured from baseline to 1 year following intervention completion, and exercise capacity, physical function, physical activity and patient-reported outcomes measured at baseline and 6 months Results: 11 and 5 falls were observed in the CG and IG respectively. The crude falls incident rate ratio (IRR) was 1.95 (95% CI 0.63 to 7.18), suggestive of an almost two-fold increased incidence of falls within the usual care group. Falls data was obtained from medical records and hospital episode statistics | Follow up: 12 months Drop out: n = 6 IG: n = 4 CG: n = 2 Sample size analysed: n = 45 IG: n = 20 CG: n = 25 | Moderatec |
Hiroki et al., 2022 [27]. Single-center, prospective, non-RCT (Japan) | N = 65 IG-31 CG-34 Gender-ND | HD patients (79.3 ± 6.7 years | The exercise group was offered 3 years of intradialytic exercise training three times a week. The training program involved both resistance and aerobic training exercises. Four types of resistance exercises were performed using an elastic tube. The aerobic exercise program consisted of 20 min of ergometer cycling. The grip strength (GS), leg extremity muscle strength (LES), short physical performance battery (SPPB) score and 10-min walk speed at baseline were evaluated in both groups. These physical functions were re-evaluated each year in the exercise group only | Patients were managed according to the usual centre practice | Physical functioning which was measured at baseline then 1-, 2- and 3-year time points and number of falls observed during follow up Results: 8 (9.4%, 1 of exercise, and 7 of control group) falls were observed; one of the cases had a fracture. The exercise group showed no significant differences in any physical functioning between each measurement time point. However, the exercise intervention was significantly associated with a reduction in falls in the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank test. Falls data was based on patient interviews at dialysis | Follow up: 35 months (interquartile range: 22–35 months) Drop out: n = 12 IG: n = 12 CG: n = 0 Sample size analysed: n = 53 IG: n = 19 CG: n = 34 | Moderateb |
Gengler et al., 2020 [26]. Before and after study within a dialysis unit in USA | N-ND Gender-ND | All patients identified as having a high fall risk were placed on the Fall Prevention Bundle. Age-ND | Fall Prevention Bundle This bundle includes evidence-based interventions such as nonskid socks, use of gait belts, bed and chair alarms, hourly rounding, and safety education | Period before the intervention | Rate of falls Results: The fall rate went from 4.56 (2018) to 2.98 (2019), a 35% reduction. The falls with injury rate decreased from a rate of 0.99 (2018) to 0.14 (2019), an 86% reduction. It is not clear how falls data was obtained | Follow up: 12 months | Highb |