Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequency of events and hazard ratio for the primary outcome in sensitivity analyses

From: Effect of multidisciplinary care on diabetic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study

Outcome: 40% eGFR decline

Events

Patients

Person-days

Incidence ratea

(95% CI)

Adjusted HR

(95% CI)

Main analysis

 Non-MDC group

679

4,575

5,005,934

1.36 (1.26–1.46)

Ref

 MDC group

150

1,039

921,928

1.63 (1.38–1.91)

1.18 (0.99–1.41)

Changing the definition of censoring

 Non-MDC group

630

4,575

4,778,767

1.32 (1.22–1.43)

Ref

 MDC group

150

1,039

921,928

1.63 (1.38–1.91)

1.21 (1.01–1.44)

Changing the definition of the MDC and non-MDC groups

 Non-MDC group

511

3,349

3,665,556

1.39 (1.28–1.52)

Ref

 MDC group

95

689

590,790

1.61 (1.30–1.97)

1.18 (0.95–1.47)

Setting an upper limit for the observation period of 3 years

 Non-MDC group

519

4,575

3,513,034

1.48 (1.35–1.61)

Ref

 MDC group

123

1,039

735,007

1.67 (1.39–2.00)

1.14 (0.94–1.39)

Changing the definition of landmark time to 2 years

 Non-MDC group

440

3,661

3,700,736

1.19 (1.08–1.31)

Ref

 MDC group

114

821

663,891

1.72 (1.42–2.06)

1.41 (1.14–1.73)

IPTW

 Non-MDC group

1,258

8,758

9,635,373

1.31 (1.23–1.38)

Ref

 MDC group

151

1,046

925,496

1.63 (1.38–1.91)

1.24 (1.00–1.53)

Overlap weighting

 Non-MDC group

1,258

8,758

9,635,373

1.31 (1.23–1.38)

Ref

 MDC group

151

1,046

925,496

1.63 (1.38–1.91)

1.13 (0.94–1.35)

  1. The adjusted models included adjustments for sex, age (categorized), number of hospital beds, eGFR (categorized), duration of diabetes (categorized), medication use, and procedures
  2. MDC Multidisciplinary care, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval, eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate, IPTW Inverse probability of treatment weighting
  3. aIncidence rate per 10,000 person-days