This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Calcified, minimally Fat-contained angiomyolipoma clinically indistinguishable from a renal cell carcinoma
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 30 September 2012
Accepted: 8 July 2013
Published: 22 July 2013
Angiomyolipomas are benign tumors of the kidney. Typical angiomyolipomas are usually recognized by identifying fat components before any intervention. On the contrary, solid renal masses without evident fatty components but containing calcifications on the computed tomography scan are suspicious for malignancy. However, as in this rare case, rules of diagnostic imaging are of exceptions.
A 40-year-old man presented with left flank pain. The plain X-ray showed multiple coarse calcifications of 4.0 x 3.2 cm in diameter on the left upper quadrant abdomen. Computed tomography scan further revealed a solid renal mass and inside the mass there were calcifications. The size of the tumor was 5.6 × 5.5 × 6.3 cm. We performed a radical nephrectomy, and the histopathology showed a minimally fat-contained angiomyolipoma of multiple calcifications. The patient was free of recurrence or metastases after a follow-up period of 3 years.
An angiomyolipoma containing calcification is rare. An angiomyolipoma with minimal fat concomitant with calcifications is an even rarer presentation. It is very difficult to differentiate a minimal-fat angiomyolipoma with calcifications from a renal cell carcinoma preoperatively. In such a circumstance, a well-planned partial nephrectomy may be optimal for the patient, regardless of the tumor size.
KeywordsAngiomyolipoma Calcifications Radical nephrectomy Renal cell carcinoma
Angiomyolipomas (AMLs) of the kidney can be diagnosed mostly based on intratumoral fat components on computed tomography (CT) examinations . AMLs containing calcification are rare and only four cases were reported in literature. In the reported cases, fat-contained tumors were generally identified by imaging [2–5]. Several studies have addressed the importance of calcifications inside a solid renal mass. Briefly, about 40% of calcified solid renal mass will be malignant, and neither the number nor the pattern of calcifications predicted malignancy . Therefore, it is challenge to differentiate an AML from a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) when the CT examinations show calcifications, especially when fatty components are not identified by imaging. To our knowledge, calcified AMLs without fat component have not been reported.
A 40-year-old man presented with intermittent left flank pain for one month. He denied having fever or any voiding symptoms. The physical examination was unremarkable. There was no weight loss, night sweat, or other constitutional symptoms.
An AML is a benign tumor lesion of the kidney composed of adipose tissue, smooth muscle and thick-walled blood vessels . The incidence of AML is approximately 0.3% . It is important to differentiate an AML from a RCC because observation and regular follow-ups can be appropriate for patients with asymptomatic small AMLs. By contrast, surgical resection is generally necessary for a RCC .
AMLs contain a variable proportion of fat as the leading presentation on CT examination and this is the most important characteristic for diagnosis . On T1-weighted MRI images, AMLs typically present with high signal intensity along with marked fat-suppressed regions of decreased intensity . In most cases of AMLs, CT examination can provide an adequate diagnosis base on this characteristic of a fatty component. AMLs account for 5.7% of renal masses suspected of being a RCC preoperatively and subjected to nephrectomy . However, minimal-fat AMLs are difficult to differentiate from RCCs because of the absence of fat or undetectable fat contents on CT imaging .
Renal epithelioid angiomyolipomas (EAMLs), also known as epithelioid PEComas, were distinct variants of AMLs, and have been reported to be less fat-contained, and more aggressive than the other common AMLs. In a report by Froemming and colleagues, 6 out of 9 cases of EAMLs had small amount of fat seen by preoperative imaging. They concluded that EAMLs can be indistinguishable from a RCC preoperatively [10, 11].
There are only four case reports on AMLs with calcification [2–5]. RCCs are highly suspected when encountering solid renal tumors without fatty components but with multiple calcifications. However, it has been reported that RCCs, in particular, papillay RCCs, may present with fat-contained tumors .
Merran et al. suggested that when the fat components fill most of the renal tumor, an AML is the more likely diagnosis; on the contrary when the predominant component is calcification, a RCC is more likely than an AML . Diffusion-weighted MRI scans show homogeneous diffusion in minimal-fat AMLs. On the contrary, clear cell RCCs present with heterogeneous diffusion imaging .
The unique nature of this case is that a preoperative CT examination showed a heterogeneously contrast-enhancing mass lesion occupying the left kidney with obvious calcification. The calcifications may be the result of previous hemorrhage, but this is only our speculation. We also did IVU and MRI to evaluate the possibility of renal stones or other renal malignancy. However, these examinations did not show other significant findings.
An AML containing small amount of fatty components along with multiple coarse calcifications is extremely rare. It is very challenge to differentiate minimal-fat AMLs from RCCs preoperatively, as is seen in our case herein. With this radiological pattern, epitheloid AMLs should be included in the differential diagnosis in the future.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
- Helenon O, Merran S, Paraf F, Melki P, Correas JM, Chretien Y, Moreau JF: Unusual fat-containing tumors of the kidney: a diagnostic dilemma. Radiographics. 1997, 17 (1): 129-144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozeki Y, Matsumoto K, Goto M, Hayashi M, Onitsuka A, Hirose M, Shimokawa K: A case of renal angiomyolipoma with bone formation. Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi. 1988, 89 (3): 458-463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merran S, Vieillefond A, Peyromaure M, Dupuy C: Renal angiomyolipoma with calcification: CT-pathology correlation. Br J Radiol. 2004, 77 (921): 782-783. 10.1259/bjr/33776173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hammadeh MY: Calcification within angiomyolipoma. Radiographics. 1998, 18 (1): 4-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deeths TM, Melson GL: Calcification in an angiomyolipoma: a case report. J Urol. 1975, 114 (4): 613-614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patterson J, Lohr D, Briscoe C, Briscoe G, Flanigan RC: Calcified renal masses. Urology. 1987, 29 (4): 353-356. 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90493-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hajdu SI, Foote FW: Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: report of 27 cases and review of the literature. J Urol. 1969, 102 (4): 396-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka H, Yoshida S, Fujii Y, Ishii C, Koga F, Saito K, Masuda H, Kawakami S, Kihara K: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of angiomyolipoma with minimal fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2011, 18 (10): 727-730. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02824.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujii Y, Komai Y, Saito K, Iimura Y, Yonese J, Kawakami S, Ishikawa Y, Kumagai J, Kihara K, Fukui I: Incidence of benign pathologic lesions at partial nephrectomy for presumed RCC renal masses: japanese dual-center experience with 176 consecutive patients. Urology. 2008, 72 (3): 598-602. 10.1016/j.urology.2008.04.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shrewsberry AB, Sica GL, Osunkoya AO, Canter DJ: Epithelioid PEComa (epithelioid angiomyolipoma) of the kidney: a rare tumor subtype for patients presenting with an enhancing renal mass. Can J Urol. 2013, 20 (1): 6643-6645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Froemming AT, Boland J, Cheville J, Takahashi N, Kawashima A: Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: imaging characteristics in nine cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013, 200 (2): W178-W186. 10.2214/AJR.12.8776.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schuster TG, Ferguson MR, Baker DE, Schaldenbrand JD, Solomon MH: Papillary renal cell carcinoma containing fat without calcification mimicking angiomyolipoma on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004, 183 (5): 1402-1404. 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/14/160/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.