Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Analysis of the kinetics of the parathyroid hormone, and of associated patient outcomes, in a cohort of haemodialysis patients

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC NephrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:153

  • Received: 2 June 2016
  • Accepted: 11 October 2016
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Observational studies have recently associated a decrease in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) level with a higher rate of mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Decreases in PTH level can result from medical intervention (MPD) and surgical parathyroidectomy (PTX), or may occur spontaneously, usually associated with an underlying malnutrition-inflammation syndrome (SPD). The aim of our study was to prospectively identify the incidence of decreases in PTH level in a cohort of HD patients and the frequency distribution of the different causes (MPD, PTX and SPD), as well as to evaluate the survival outcomes for each PTH group (MPD, PTX and SPD) compared to patients who did not experience a PTH decrease over the first 36 months of the study (NPD).


The 197 patients receiving HD at our center in January 2010, and meeting our eligibility criteria, were enrolled in our prospective study, and were observed for a period of 60 months. A decrease in PTH level >50 % between two successive PTH measurements obtained within an interval <3 months was defined as a significant event. MPD referred to a decrease in PTH due to an increased oral calcium intake, increased dialysate calcium concentration (DCC), increased alfacalcidol use, or use of cinacalcet therapy. A surgical 7/8 PTX was performed in young patients or in patients in whom cinacalcet therapy failed. SPD referred to a decrease in PTH related to a medical or surgical event. Baseline characteristics among patients in each group (MPD, PTX, SPD, and NPD) were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. The 60-month survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariable proportional hazards models. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyzes were used identify variables with mortality. The relative risk of mortality was expressed as a hazard ratio (HR).


The distribution of the 197 patients forming our four study groups was 34 % in the NPD group, 35 % in the SPD group, 25 % in the MSD group and 6 % in the PTX group. Among patients in the SPD group, the main acute comorbid conditions were peripheral vascular and cardiac complications, sepsis, fractures, and cancers with an increase in serum CRP level (from 14.3 ± 18 to 132 ± 90 mg/L) and a decrease in serum albumin (from 33 ± 4.5 to 28.6 ± 4 g/L). In the MPD group, the main therapeutic change was an increase in DCC, either independently or in association with cinacalcet therapy. The median survival rate among patients was 10 months for SPD, compared to 22 months among patients in the MPD group (p < 0.001). Using multivariable Cox model and taking the NPD group as reference, the risk of mortality was lower among patients in the MPD group (HR, 0.42[0.2-0.87] p = 0.01), with survival being comparable for the SPD and NPD groups (HR, 1.3 [0.75-2.2]). No mortality was observed in the PTX group.


The poor outcomes associated with SPD, related to acute comorbid conditions, should not lead to undertreat secondary hyperparathyroidism whose appropriate medical or surgical therapies are associated with better outcomes.


  • Parathyroid hormone
  • Survival rate
  • Haemodialysis
  • Parathyroidectomy
  • Calcium
  • Vitamin D
  • Calcimimetics


Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and, particularly in those on hemodialysis (HD) [1]. Due to an unpredictable bone resistance to parathyroid hormone (PTH) action, maintaining a mild biological SHPT is recommended in most HD patients to favor a normal bone turnover rate. According to the most recent international Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines, experts recommend target serum PTH levels of 2 to 9 times the upper normal limit of the assay in HD patients [2]. Identification of bone turnover rate from serum PTH levels, however, is not straightforward. Bone histology studies have shown that SHPT can be excluded by lower serum PTH levels and adynamic bone disease (ABD) by higher serum PTH levels [3]. Between these two limits exists a ‘grey zone’ in which normal bone, ABD and SHPT can all be observed. Therefore, the assessment of serum bone markers and even bone biopsies, at times, are necessary to better assess the rate of bone turnover in HD patients.

Besides, the KDIGO experts suggest that “marked changes in PTH levels in either direction within the target range prompt an initiation or change in therapy to avoid progression to levels outside of this range (2C)”[2].

The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) provided evidence of an increase in mean serum PTH level being an important health issue in HD patients [4].

Beyond having consequences on the rate of bone turnover, elevated PTH is also a well-known uremic toxin which has been associated with cardiovascular calcification [5] and mortality [4]. However, it is important to note that both low [6] and high [7] serum PTH levels have been associated with poor health outcomes in HD patients. While low PTH levels commonly result from surgical parathyroidectomy (PTX) and the prescription of calcimimetics, various other causes can result in low PTH levels, including an excessive calcium and vitamin D load and hypercalcemia [8, 9], as well as the malnutrition-inflammation syndrome [1013] and prolonged immobilization [14].

Recently, two observational studies have reported an increased rate of mortality associated with low PTH levels [15, 16]. However, as these two studies failed to identify the underlying cause of low PTH levels, we believe that their suggestion of a possible risk in treating SHPT in HD patients might be misleading. To address this issue, we undertook our study to prospectively identify the incidence of PTH decrease in a cohort of HD patients and to describe the frequency distribution of the different causes of decreased PTH in this clinical cohort. A second aim of our study was to evaluate survival outcomes associated with different identified causes of decreased PTH and in patients with no PTH decrease throughout their course of treatment.


All patients on HD at our institution in January 2010 were screened for eligibility using the following exclusion criteria: dialysis vintage <6 months and previous surgical parathyroidectomy (PTX). Patients meeting our eligibility criteria were enrolled into the study and observed for a period of 60 months. The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided their signed consent to have their data entered in a database for analysis.

The pre-dialysis, mid-week, serum PTH level was sampled every month. For analysis, patients were classified by the presence or absence of an event of significant decrease in serum PTH level over the first 36 months of the study. A significant decrease in serum PTH level was defined as a decrease of more than 50 % between two measurement periods within an interval of less than 3 months, with the mean of two successive PTH values used to calculate the change in PTH (Fig. 1). This was based on the study from Cavalier et al. reporting that at least 40 % difference between PTH measurements is required from their intraindividual variability study [17].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Protocol design

A surgical PTH decrease was defined as a decrease in serum PTH level identified after surgical subtotal (7/8) parathyroidectomy (PTX). A medical PTH decrease (MPD) was defined as a decrease in serum PTH level associated with the use of one or more treatments known to decrease PTH, including: native vitamin D supplementation; prescription of calcitriol, or of its analogs, oral calcium, and cinacalcet; and increased dialysate calcium concentration (DCC). A spontaneous PTH decrease (SPD) was defined as a decrease in serum PTH level without any change in therapy. The underlying clinical condition was recorded together with serum levels of albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP). Patients with no identified decrease in PTH were classified in the no PTH decrease (NPD) group.

Patients were dialyzed thrice-weekly, 4 to 8-h per session, using polysulfone high-flux filters (FX 60, 80, 100, 800 and 1000; Fresenius Medical Care©, Bad Homburg, Germany) in HD or post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (HDF). Blood flow rate ranged from 220 to 400 ml/min, and the dialysate flow rate ranged from 350 to 800 ml/min. The standard dialysis calcium concentration was 1.5 mmol/L. However, a 1.25 mmol/L concentration was prescribed for patients with low PTH levels (<100 pg/mL), and a 1.75 mmol/L concentration was recommended in cases where the PTH levels were high (>400 pg/mL). Our strategy to optimize mineral and bone status during HD has been previously reported [18], and has remained stable for years.

The rate of bone turnover was assessed using the bone markers: bone alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP) and Beta(ß)-crossLaps (CTX). The prevention and treatment of SHPT included systematic cholecalciferol supplementation (100 000 U/month), individualization of DCC [19] and oral calcium or oral alfacalcidol therapy; cinacalcet was introduced as a last alternative. PTH lowering therapies were decreased for patients with acute comorbidities and SPD. Surgical 7/8 PTX was performed in patients for whom conservative therapy failed.

The following patient information was recorded: medical history, including cardiovascular events and risk factors; pharmaceutical treatment, including the use of statins, warfarin, vitamin D, cinacalcet, and phosphate binders; and baseline results from standard serum levels laboratory tests. Serum levels were sampled were obtained on a monthly basis for the measurements of: PTH, determined using a second-generation assay (ElecSysG; Roche© Diagnostics, Meylan, France, reference values 10–65 pg/mL), calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and CRP. The rate of bone turnover was evaluated every 6 months using serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP; chemiluminescence, Beckman© Access, reference values 3.7–20 μg/L), ß-CrossLaps (CTX; Elecsys, Roche© Diagnostics, Meylan, France) and 25-OHD (Abbott© Laboratories. Abbott Park, Illinois, U.S.A.). For laboratory tests, blood samples were obtained in a non-fasting state before a mid-week dialysis session, with all serum levels measured from the same blood draw. Single pool Kt/V was calculated using the second-generation logarithmic formula of Daugirdas. Daily protein intake was measured by calculating normalized protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA). Common laboratory analyses were performed by the Grand Vallon Laboratory (NOVESCIA© Lyon, France).

Statistical analysis

The data of patients who experienced more than one episode of PTH decrease were excluded from the analysis. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) was calculated for all variables. Baseline characteristics among patients in each group (MPD, PTX, SPD, and NPD) were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test, with a regression correlation applied when necessary.

The 60-month survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariable proportional hazards models. Univariate analysis was used to identify variables associated with all-cause mortality. All identified variables were included in a multivariate Cox analysis, using a backward elimination to identify independent factors associated with mortality, using a p <0.05 to retain a variable. The relative risk of mortality was expressed as a hazard ratio (HR).

Data were censored for kidney transplantation, transfer to another dialysis center or lost to follow-up, and at the end of follow-up. All statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc software version (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant in all analyzes.


Among the 235 patients receiving HD in January 2010, 21 were excluded for dialysis vintage <6 months and 10 for previous PTX. The data of another seven patients were excluded at the end of the study due to more than one episode of PTH decrease. The distribution of the 197 remaining patients among the four causative groups of a PTH decrease (NPD, SPD, MPD, and PTX) is shown in Fig. 2 and summarized as follows: NPD, 34 % (n = 67); SPD, 35 % (n = 70); MPD, 25 % (n = 50); and PTX, 6 % (n = 10). Baseline characteristics of patients among the four groups are reported in Table 1. The characteristics of patients requiring PTX during the study period were quite different from those of patients in the other groups. Namely, patients in the PTX group were younger and had a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and malnutrition-inflammation syndrome, but with higher baseline serum PTH levels and DCC, as well as a more frequent use of alfacalcidol and cinacalcet. Compared to patients in the SPD and NPD group, patients in the MPD group had started HD more recently (i.e., shorter dialysis vintage) and had a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Specific comparison of baseline characteristics among patients in the SPD and MPD groups is reported in Table 2. Compared to patients in the MPD group, patients in the SPD group showed lower serum PTH and albumin levels, lower DCC and higher CRP levels. The median serum PTH value decrease was −75 % in the SPD group and −70 % in the MPD group.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Relative frequency of patients in the 4 groups. 0 = no PTH decrease. Spontaneous = Spontaneous PTH decrease. Medical = medical PTH decrease. PTX = PTX patients

Table 1

Baseline characteristics


No PTH decrease N = 67

Spontaneous PTH decrease N = 70

Medical PTH decrease N = 50

Surgical PTX N = 10

Age (years)

66.8 ± 14

71.2 ± 12

64.1 ± 16

51 ± 15 *

Female gender (%)


27.1 *



Dialysis vintage (months)

75.1 ± 98

71.5 ± 73

53 ± 61 *

90.5 ± 94

Diabetes (%)



24.5 *

0 *

Cardiac disease (%)



10 *

10 *

Peripheral vascular disease (%)



8 *

0 *

Stroke (%)



4 *

0 *

Cancer (%)





BMI (kg/m2)

25.8 ± 5

24.7 ± 5

24.6 ± 4

25 ± 4

Body weight (kg)

71.1 ± 18

69.7 ± 16

67.4 ± 13

70.5 ± 17

Dialysis session time (min)

330 ± 95

322 ± 90

327 ± 92

410 ± 100 *

Central catheter (%)





HDF (%)




12.5 *

Dialysate calcium (mmol/L)

1.5 ± 0.16

1.47 ± 0.16

1.53 ± 0.14

1.7 ± 0.18 *


2.3 ± 0.7

2.1 ± 0.6

2.4 ± 0.7

2.7 ± 1 *

nPNA (g/kg/day)

1.42 ± 0.6

1.14 ± 0.2

1.3 ± 0.4

1.43 ± 0.3

PTH (pg/mL)

198.6 ± 152

218 ± 126

280 ± 144

498 ± 315 *

Calcaemia (mmol/L)

2.26 ± 0.14

2.23 ± 0.14

2.25 ± 0.12

2.31 ± 0.12

Phosphataemia (mmol/L)

1.42 ± 0.3

1.34 ± 0.36

1.36 ± 0.3

1.26 ± 0.2

b-ALP (μg/L)

18 ± 10

21 ± 15

19 ± 11

35.6 ± 27 *

25-OHD (nmol/L)

106 ± 49

112 ± 39

104 ± 41

120 ± 28

Serum Albumin (g/L)

33.5 ± 4

31.1 ± 4

33.8 ± 4

36.8 ± 3 *

C-reactive protein (mg/L)

11.7 ± 16

14.6 ± 18

7.6 ± 8

4.3 ± 3 *

Cholecalciferol (%)





Alfacalcidol % (μg/week)

10 (2.2)

10 (1.6)

25 (2.5)

50 (2.9) *

CacCO3 % (g/day)

27 (1.2)

16 (1.1)

30 (2)

30 (2.4)

Sevelamer % (g/day)

39 (1.8)

21 (1.2)

37 (1.8)

20 (2)

Cinacalcet % (mg/day)

22 (35)

7 (30)

6 (39)

50 (60) *

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.005 with at least one other value

Table 2

Comparison between spontaneous PTH decrease (SPD) and medical PTH decrease (MPD) groups









PTH pg/mL median (95 % CI)

330 (125 – 785)

80 (10 – 200)**

490 (190 – 1230)

147 (122 – 178) **

Calcaemia mmol/L

2.22 ± 0.15

2.2 ± 0.12

2.35 ± 0.18

2.24 ± 0.13 *

Phosphataemia mmol/L

1.38 ± 0.4

1.21 ± 0.4 *

1.45 ± 0.4

1.35 ± 0.4 *

Serum albumin g/L

33 ± 4.5

28.6 ± 4 **

34 ± 4

34.2 ± 4.3

CRP mg/L median (95 % CI)

8.1 (8 – 50)

105 (15 – 300) **

3,6 (0 – 25)

4,5 (0 – 29)

Dialysate calcium mmol/L

1.51 ± 0.17

1.35 ± 0.2 *

1.52 ± 0.18

1.65 ± 0.15 *


73 %

24 %

Median survival time

10 months

24 months

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.005 between T-1 and T-2

After the initial serum PTH value decrease, PTH level remained stable after 6 months in the MPD group, but tended to increase in the surviving SPD patients. This could be due to therapeutic adjustments or acute comorbidity improvement. No significant serum PTH level increase was observed using the same criteria (>50 % from baseline in less than 3 months) in the NPD group.

The overall mortality rate among patients in the SPD group was 73 %, compared to a rate of 24 % among patients in the MPD group (p < 0.001), with a median survival time of 10 months for the SPD group and 24 months for the MPD group (p < 0.001).

The comorbid conditions and therapeutic changes associated with a decrease in PTH in the SPD and the MPD groups are reported in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Among patients in the SPD group, the main acute comorbid conditions were peripheral vascular and cardiac complications, sepsis, fractures, and cancers with an increase in serum CRP level (from 14.3 ± 18 to 132 ± 90 mg/L) and a decrease in serum albumin (from 33 ± 4.5 to 28.6 ± 4 g/L). In the MPD group, the main therapeutic change associated with a decrease in PTH was an increase in DCC, either independently or in association with cinacalcet therapy, and less frequently associated with the prescription of oral calcium or alfacalcidol.
Table 3

Comorbid conditions associated with spontaneous PTH decrease (SPD)


N = 68 (35 %)


Peripheral vascular disease-arterial by-pass-amputation (n = 15)


Severe sepsis (n = 10)


Factures (n = 10)


Osteoarthritis (n = 10)


Cancer (n = 7)


Cachexia (n = 4)


Gut infection (n = 4)


Cardiac disease (n = 3)


Postoperative (n = 3)


Stroke (n = 2)

Table 4

Changes in treatments associated with medical PTH decrease (MPD)


N = 50 (25.5 %)


↑ CCD 1.5 to 1.75 mmol/L (n = 25)


↑ CCD from 1.25 to 1.5 mmol/L (n = 4)


↑CCD from 1.5 to 1.75 mmol/L + Cinacalcet (n = 10)


Oral calcium (n = 6)


Alfacalcidol (n = 5)

The Kaplan-Meier univariate survival analysis is summarized in Fig. 3. Data from the PTX group was not included in the analysis due to the limited number of patients in this group, with no incidence of death over the study period. The rate of mortality was higher among patients in the SPD group than among patients in the MPD group (p < 0.001), with a HR of 3.5 (range, 2–6) for the SPD group and a HR of 1.36 (range, 0.8– 2.3) for the MPD group. Moreover, the mortality rate among patients in the MPD group was lower than the rate among patients in the NPD group (HR, 0.38; range, 0.22–0.66; p < 0.001). Using a multivariate Cox model, the mortality rate among patients in the MPD group remained significantly lower than the rate among patients in the NPD group (HR, 0.42; range, 0.2–0.87; p = 0.01) or the SPD group (HR, 0.36; range, 0.18–0.73; p = 0.004), after adjustment for age, dialysis vintage, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, diabetes, cardiac disease, serum albumin, central venous catheter and warfarin use. The HR of mortality, for both the univariate and multivariate Cox model, are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Survival curve (Kaplan-Meier) comparing patients of the 4 groups

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Hazard Ratio of mortality according to the PTH decrease groups. No decrease group as reference. ------ Univariate. ____ Multivariate Cox


To our knowledge, this is the first study to stratify HD patients according to their underlying causes of decreases in serum PTH levels in patients on HD, and the resultant effects of decreases in PTH levels on the survival outcomes of these patients. Among the 197 HD patients forming our study group, a decrease in PTH level was associated to an acute comorbid condition in one-third of patients (SPD group) and to a change in medical therapy (MPD group) or PTX in another one-third of patients. Survival over the 60-month period of the study was lower among patients in the NPD and SPD groups, compared to the survival rate among patients in the MPD and PTX groups. Even after adjustment for possible influencing variables, the prognosis remained dramatically lower among patients in the NPD and SPD groups.

Regulation of PTH

SHPT is normally observed in patients with CKD stage 4 to 5, resulting from a prolonged decrease in serum levels of calcium and vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3) or an increase in serum phosphate level. SHPT in this clinical population has been associated to an increase in PTH gene expression, synthesis, and secretion, and to a proliferation of parathyroid cells in chronic cases [20]. More recently, the role of Klotho deficiency, resistance of parathyroid cells to fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 action, due to a decrease of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 expression [21], and a decrease of serum 1,25(OH)2D3 due to the excess FGF-23 synthesis, have been postulated to influence SHPT in patients with end-stage CKD [22].

Tertiary hyperparathyroidism, with an increase of the set-point calcium-PTH and frequent hypercalcemia, represents the response of the autonomous function of one or more parathyroid glands to long-standing SHPT [23]. The consequences of prolonged SHPT include bone disease, previously known as osteitis fibrosa, with an increased risk for radiological demineralization [24], fractures [25] and brown tumors [26], as well as an increased risk for cardiovascular calcification [5] and mortality [2].

High PTH-related morbidity and mortality

In a recent metaanalysis of HD patients, Natoli et al. reported that only a high serum PTH level was associated with mortality [27]. Using the Fresenius US database, Block et al. reported an increased rate of mortality only among patients with a serum PTH level >600 pg/mL in an adjusted model, whereas in an unadjusted model, only low PTH levels were associated with a higher rate of mortality [11]. The same findings were confirmed for patients with CKD not on dialysis by Kovesdy et al. [7] and Nakai et al. in Japan [28]. The mechanism of PTH toxicity is poorly understood. However, an elevated calcium x phosphorus (Ca x P) product associated with tertiary HPT and a high serum PTH level, associated with high serum FGF-23level, have been associated with a risk for progression of cardiovascular calcification [5, 29].

Low PTH-related mortality

In patients with CKD and in those on HD in particular, both low and high serum PTH levels have been associated with a higher rate of mortality [30]. Twenty years ago, Fournier et al. reported that a persistently low PTH state could result from aluminum intoxication, older age, diabetes, and excessive calcium and vitamin D use, as well as being frequently observed in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis [31, 32]. The toxicity of a serum level of PTH that is within normal range, and even judged to be too low in HD patients, is probably related to an underlying condition, such as hypo phosphatemia and poor nutrition [33]. Over the last century, the excessive use of calcium and vitamin D to treat hyperphosphatemia and prevent SHPT has led to iatrogenic ABD, with the resulting hypercalcemia increasing the risk of extraosseous calcifications and mortality [8, 34]. Based on the data in the Taiwan HD registry, Lin et al. found that a low serum PTH level increased the risk of mortality usually when associated with hypercalcemia [35]. Today, in industrialized countries, non-calcium phosphate binders and higher serum PTH targets are used to prevent an excessive calcium load and hypercalcemia and, therefore, iatrogenic ABD is infrequently reported [4].

In addition to iatrogenic causes of low serum PTH, Fukagawa et al. suggested that a low serum PTH level may reflect a malnutrition status, which would explain the poor prognosis of these patients [36]. In HD patients, Mehrotra et al. reported an inverse relationship between age and serum levels of PTH [37], with a further association between low serum albumin levels and low PTH level in a Japanese cohort of HD patients [38]. The malnutrition-inflammation syndrome was associated with low PTH levels and poor outcomes [10, 39]. In their study of 748 HD patients, Dukkipati et al. also reported that low PTH (<150 mg/mL) was associated with protein energy wasting and inflammation. They further reported that a PTH level between 100 and 150 pg/mL to be associated with a greater survival compared to other PTH levels [40].

The effect of inflammation of PTH levels was described by Bologa et al. who reported that, in vitro, PTH secretion is suppressed by IL-6 [41], with IL-1ß inhibiting PTH secretion in parathyroid tissue slices [42], with IL-1 specific receptors upregulating the calcium-sensing receptor mRNA. Therefore, the KDIGO experts recommend maintaining serum PTH levels in a large range, from to 2–9 times the upper limit of the assay in HD patients to lower the risk of severe osteitis fibrosa and ABD [2] and to favor survival, based on the U-shape survival curve associated with serum PTH level. Hence, it is advisable to treat SHPT in HD patients in order to prevent health complications related to SHPT and improve survival, but without surpassing target levels due to the risk of ABD and related hypercalcemia.

Treatment for SHPT

Available treatments for SHPT include the use of native vitamin D [43], oral calcium [44], high DCC [19], calcitriol and analogs [45], and cinacalcet [46], as well as surgical PTX [47]. In a randomized controlled study evaluating the relative effectiveness of using calcium salt and non-calcium phosphate binders in the treatment of SHPT, outcomes were frequently worse for patients receiving calcium salts due to an inadequate calcium load, resulting in higher calcemia and more frequent episodes of hypercalcemia and extraosseous calcification [48]. By comparison, observational studies have described the use of oral calcium to be associated with better outcomes when prescribed adequately [49, 50]. The outcomes associated with the use of DCC are difficult to evaluate as few centers adjust DDC to levels of calcemia and bone turnover markers in patient-specific ways as we do in our center [19]. However, an observational study in a French regional cohort of HD patients identified no deleterious effects of high DCC (1.75 mmol/L) when prescribed for patients with hypo- or normo-calcemia [51].

A large observational study based in the United States (US) identified the use of calcitriol, and of its analogs, as being effective in lowering the risk of mortality in HD patients [52], as we previously reported in our regional cohort [53]. Randomized trials did not provide evidence of a survival advantage with the use of cinacalcet therapies, compared to high doses of calcitriol, or of its analogs [54]. In secondary analyzes of the data from this trial, cinacalcet therapies were associated with a lower incidence of fractures [55] and calciphylaxis [56]. The long-term prognosis of cinacalcet therapies, compared to PTX, has yet to be evaluated. In our study, we reported better outcomes among patients in the MPD group than among those in the NPD and SPD groups who were using calcium therapy (DCC and oral calcium), cinacalcet and alfacalcidol. When calcium, vitamin D or cinacalcet are used to lower serum levels of PTH, it is not possible to differentiate the impact of these therapies on survival from the impact of changes in serum levels of vitamin D or the Ca x P product on survival.

Low PTH levels after surgical PTX has been reported to improve outcomes in a US-based study of HD patients [57]. However, Konstantidinis et al. recently reported that only a few patients meeting the biological criteria for PTX actually accepted the surgery in the US, even if the PTX allowed achieving biological KDOQI targets of PTH [58]. In Japan, the survival rate after PTX has been reported to be very good, with an early mortality rate of only 0.15 % [59]. In our study, patients who underwent surgical PTX had excellent mid-term outcomes; however, the majority of these patients underwent kidney transplantation by the end of the study period and, therefore, the longer term survival could not be evaluated.

Causes and impact of a decreased PTH level

In a French observational study, using the KDIGO biological target of PTH level, Merle et al. reported that a decrease in serum PTH level after one year, including both changes from normal to low levels and from high-to-low levels, was associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular-related mortality [16]. Among factors associated with a higher risk of mortality, Merle et al. identified a high serum CRP level and a high DCC (1.75 mmol/L). Of importance is their finding that mortality risk increased when high DCC and a low albumin level were associated with a PTH decrease; high DDC was not associated with an increased rate of mortality among patients in whom PTH level remained in the low range. However, Merle et al.’s study was based only on biannual PTH sampling, and information on acute comorbid conditions or changes in therapeutic intervention was not available between sampling periods. Moreover, high DCC was prescribed in their study based on usual care rather than being individualized based on PTH values. We consider that using the KDIGO target level (i.e., low-normal-high level classification) to study PTH variations may be questionable as a small variation in PTH level could be associated with a change in target zone classification. In the COSMOS study of 4500 European HD patients evaluated at 6-month intervals, Fernandez-Martin et al. reported that a serum PTH decrease was not associated with an increased rate of mortality when baseline PTH levels were within the KDIGO range of normal (168 – 674 pg/mL), with the risk of mortality significantly increasing among patient with a baseline PTH level <168 pg/mL [15]. Again, no data on acute comorbid conditions or change in therapeutic intervention was provided. We hypothesize that a decrease in PTH among patients in the low level KDIGO range would reflect an acute comorbid condition, rather than a medical decision on treatment, which would explain the finding of a higher rate of mortality. In their large US-based cohort study of HD patients, Streja et al. reported that an increased in serum PTH level from <150 pg/mL to 150–300 pg/mL was associated with a lower risk of mortality [60]. Once again, this was an observational study with no information on the underlying cause of variation in PTH level provided.


The fact that we conducted a monocentric study with a small number of patients limits the generalization of our results. However, the treatment using a strategy that has been homogenous for 20 years, as well as using monthly serum PTH sampling, allowed us to identify factors associated with variation in serum PTH levels.


In our study, we determined the survival outcomes associated with different causes of a decrease in PTH level in HD patients. A SPD, resulting from an acute comorbid condition, is associated with poor survival outcomes, with MPD and PTX being associated with lower rates of mortality. The poor outcomes associated with SPD should not lead to underestimate the risk of SHPT that is highly prevalent in HD patients. Medical or surgical therapy should be implemented in order to prevent a negative impact of SHPT on bone and vascular health.



Adynamic bone disease


Body mass index


Chronic kidney disease


C - reactive protein




Dialysate calcium concentration


Dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study






Medical parathyroid hormone decrease


No parathyroid hormone decrease


Normalized protein nitrogen appearance


Parathyroid hormone




Standard deviation


Secondary hyperparathyroidism


Spontaneous parathyroid hormone decrease





No funding was obtained for this study.

Availability of data and material

No data has been submitted to any open access databases. All data supporting the study is presented in the manuscript or is available upon request.

Authors’ contributions

GJ: Conception and design; Data analysis and interpretation; Provision of study patients; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. JCS: Data analysis and interpretation; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. EZ: Data analysis and interpretation; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. JMH: Conception and design; Data analysis and interpretation; Provision of study patients; Final approval of manuscript. PD: Data analysis and interpretation; Provision of study patients; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. BM: Provision of study patients; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. CL: Provision of study patients; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. MM: Data analysis and interpretation; Provision of study patients; CC: Provision of study patients; Manuscript writing; Final approval of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interest

Charles Chazot declares to receive salary from Fresenius Medical Care France. Guillaume Jean to be consultant for Fresenius Medical Care and Sanofi Genzyme.

Consent for publication

The manuscript did not report any individual person’s data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

The study protocol was ethical according to national standards of human experimentation.

All patients provided their signed consent to have their data entered in a database for analysis.

Due to the observational design of the study, ethic committee advice was not mandatory (loi 2004–806 – Art L1121.1).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

NEPHROCARE Tassin-Charcot, 7, Avenue Maréchal FOCH, 69110 Sainte Foy-Les-Lyon, France
Université Paris Descartes, Inserm U845, and Hôpital Necker, Service d’explorations fonctionnelles, Paris, France
NOVESCIA Rhône-Alpes, Laboratoire du Grand Vallon, 69110 Sainte Foy-les-Lyon, France


  1. Wolf M. Forging Forward with 10 Burning Questions on FGF23 in Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(9):1427–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. KDIGO C-M. Work Group KDIGO Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int. 2009;76 Suppl 113:S1–130.Google Scholar
  3. Qi Q, Monier-Faugere MC, Geng Z, Malluche HH. Predictive value of serum parathyroid hormone levels for bone turnover in patients on chronic maintenance dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26(4):622–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tentori F, Wang M, Bieber BA, Karaboyas A, Li Y, Jacobson SH, et al. Recent changes in therapeutic approaches and association with outcomes among patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism on chronic hemodialysis: the DOPPS study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(1):98–109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jean G, Bresson E, Lorriaux C, Mayor B, Hurot JM, Deleaval P, et al. Increased levels of serum parathyroid hormone and fibroblast growth factor-23 are the main factors associated with the progression of vascular calcification in long-hour hemodialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(3):c132–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jean G, Lataillade D, Genet L, Legrand E, Kuentz F, Moreau-Gaudry X, et al. Association between very low PTH levels and poor survival rates in haemodialysis patients: results from the French ARNOS cohort. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(2):c211–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kovesdy CP, Ahmadzadeh S, Anderson JE, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is associated with higher mortality in men with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2008;73(11):1296–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. London GM, Marty C, Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, Metivier F, de Vernejoul MC. Arterial calcifications and bone histomorphometry in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(7):1943–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. London GM, Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, Boutouyrie P, Metivier F, de Vernejoul M-C. Association of Bone Activity, Calcium Load, Aortic Stiffness, and Calcifications in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(9):1827–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Rambod M, Bross R, Zitterkoph J, Benner D, Pithia J, Colman S, et al. Association of Malnutrition-Inflammation Score with quality of life and mortality in hemodialysis patients: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(2):298–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus JM, Ofsthun N, Lowrie EG, Chertow GM. Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(8):2208–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jean G, Lataillade D, Genet L, Legrand E, Kuentz F, Moreau-Gaudry X, et al. Association between Very Low PTH Levels and Poor Survival Rates in Haemodialysis Patients: Results from the French ARNOS Cohort. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;118(2):c211–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jean G, Lafage-Proust MH, Souberbielle JC, Granjon S, Lorriaux C, Hurot JM, et al. How to deal with those low parathyroid hormone values in dialysis patients? Nephrol Ther. 2013;9(2):103–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bilancio G, Lombardi C, Pisot R, Mekjavic IB, De Santo NG, Luciano MG, et al. Effects of prolonged immobilization on sequential changes in mineral and bone disease parameters. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):845–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez-Martin JL, Martinez-Camblor P, Dionisi MP, Floege J, Ketteler M, London G, et al. Improvement of mineral and bone metabolism markers is associated with better survival in haemodialysis patients: the COSMOS study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(9):1542–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Merle E, London G, Jean G, Hannedouche T, Bouchet JL, Drüeke T, Fouque D, Daugas E, for the French Calcium and Phosphate Observatory. Low parathyroid hormone status induced by high dialysate calcium is an independent risk factor of cardiovascular death in haemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2016;89(3):666–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavalier E, Delanaye P, Moranne O. Variability of new bone mineral metabolism markers in patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis: implications for clinical decision making. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):847–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jean G, Vanel T, Terrat JC, Hurot JM, Lorriaux C, Mayor B, et al. Treating mineral metabolism disorders in patients undergoing long hemodialysis: A search for an optimal strategy. Hemodial Int. 2009;13(13):526–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jean G, Mayor B, Hurot JM, Deleaval P, Lorriaux C, Zaoui E, et al. Biological impact of targeted dialysate calcium changes in haemodialysis patients: the key role of parathyroid hormone. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(1):176–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Silver J, Levi R. Regulation of PTH synthesis and secretion relevant to the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005;67(S95):S8–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Yan J, Jingbo C, Wang D, Xie S, Yuan L, Zhong X, et al. A correlation between decreased parathyroid alpha-Klotho and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 expression with pathological category and parathyroid gland volume in dialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(4):701–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Felsenfeld AJ, Levine BS, Rodriguez M. Pathophysiology of Calcium, Phosphorus, and Magnesium Dysregulation in Chronic Kidney Disease. Semin Dial. 2015;28(6):564–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Krause MW, Hedinger CE. Pathologic study of parathyroid glands in tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Hum Pathol. 1985;16(8):772–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rix M, Andreassen H, Eskildsen P, Langdahl B, Olgaard K. Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with predialysis chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;56(3):1084–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Danese MD, Kim J, Doan QV, Dylan M, Griffiths R, Chertow GM. PTH and the risks for hip, vertebral, and pelvic fractures among patients on dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(1):149–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Peces R, Gil F, Gonzalez F, Ablanedo P. Multiple brown tumors in a female hemodialyzed patient with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Nefrologia. 2002;22(1):79–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Natoli JL, Boer R, Nathanson BH, Miller RM, Chiroli S, Goodman WG, et al. Is there an association between elevated or low serum levels of phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and calcium and mortality in patients with end stage renal disease? A meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakai S, Akiba T, Kazama J, Yokoyama K, Fukagawa M, Tominaga Y, et al. Effects of serum calcium, phosphorous, and intact parathyroid hormone levels on survival in chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan. Ther Apher Dial. 2008;12(1):49–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Di Lullo L, Gorini A, Bellasi A, Morrone LF, Rivera R, Russo L, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and parathyroid hormone predict extent of aortic valve calcifications in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8(6):732–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kuwae N, Regidor DL, Kovesdy CP, Kilpatrick RD, Shinaberger CS, et al. Survival predictability of time-varying indicators of bone disease in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;70(4):771–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fournier A, Moriniere P, Cohen Solal ME, Boudailliez B, Achard JM, Marie A, et al. Adynamic bone disease in uremia: may it be idiopathic? Is it an actual disease? Nephron. 1991;58(1):1–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fournier A, Moriniere P, Marie A. Adynamic bone disease--is it actually a disease? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10(4):454–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fouque D, Horne R, Cozzolino M, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Balancing nutrition and serum phosphorus in maintenance dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(1):143–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodman WG, Goldin J, Kuizon BD, Yoon C, Gales B, Sider D, et al. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1478–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin YC, Hsu CY, Kao CC, Chang FC, Chen TW, Chen HH, et al. Effect Modifying Role of Serum Calcium on Mortality-Predictability of PTH and Alkaline Phosphatase in Hemodialysis Patients: An Investigation Using Data from the Taiwan Renal Registry Data System from 2005 to 2012. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0129737.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukagawa M, Akizawa T, Kurokawa K. Is aplastic osteodystrophy a disease of malnutrition? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2000;9(4):363–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehrotra R, Supasyndh O, Berman N, Kaysen G, Hurst L, Leonardi M, et al. Age-related decline in serum parathyroid hormone in maintenance hemodialysis patients is independent of inflammation and dietary nutrient intake. J Ren Nutr. 2004;14(3):134–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Akizawa T, Kinugasa E, Kurihara S. Risk factors for the development of parathyroid hormone deficiency in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:561.Google Scholar
  39. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Shah A, Duong U, Hechter RC, Dukkipati R, Kovesdy CP. Kidney bone disease and mortality in CKD: revisiting the role of vitamin D, calcimimetics, alkaline phosphatase, and minerals. Kidney Int Suppl. 2010;117:S10–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Dukkipati R, Kovesdy CP, Colman S, Budoff MJ, Nissenson AR, Sprague SM, et al. Association of relatively low serum parathyroid hormone with malnutrition-inflammation complex and survival in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2010;20(4):243–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Bologa RM, Levine DM, Parker TS, Cheigh JS, Serur D, Stenzel KH, et al. Interleukin-6 predicts hypoalbuminemia, hypocholesterolemia, and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(1):107–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nielsen PK, Rasmussen AK, Butters R, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Bendtzen K, Diaz R, et al. Inhibition of PTH secretion by interleukin-1 beta in bovine parathyroid glands in vitro is associated with an up-regulation of the calcium-sensing receptor mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;238(3):880–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kandula P, Dobre M, Schold JD, Schreiber Jr MJ, Mehrotra R, Navaneethan SD. Vitamin D Supplementation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;6(1):50–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jamal SA, Vandermeer B, Raggi P, Mendelssohn DC, Chatterley T, Dorgan M, et al. Effect of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9900):1268–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hansen D, Rasmussen K, Danielsen H, Meyer-Hofmann H, Bacevicius E, Lauridsen TG, et al. No difference between alfacalcidol and paricalcitol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients: a randomized crossover trial. Kidney Int. 2011;80(8):841–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Quarles LD, Sherrard DJ, Adler S, Rosansky SJ, McCary LC, Liu W, et al. The calcimimetic AMG 073 as a potential treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism of end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(3):575–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Llach F. Parathyroidectomy in chronic renal failure: indications, surgical approach and the use of calcitriol. Kidney Int Suppl. 1990;29:S62–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Chertow GM, Burke SK, Raggi P. Sevelamer attenuates the progression of coronary and aortic calcification in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62(1):245–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jean G, Lataillade D, Genet L, Legrand E, Kuentz F, Moreau-Gaudry X, et al. Calcium carbonate, but not sevelamer, is associated with better outcomes in hemodialysis patients: results from the French ARNOS study. Hemodial Int. 2011;15(4):485–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kovesdy CP, Kuchmak O, Lu JL, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Outcomes associated with phosphorus binders in men with non-dialysis-dependent CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(5):842–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Jean G, Lataillade D, Genet L, Legrand E, Kuentz F, Moreau-Gaudry X, et al. Higher dialysate calcium is not associated with mortality in hemodialysis patients: Results from the French ARNOS study. Nephrol Ther. 2013;9:103–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Teng M, Wolf M, Lowrie E, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R. Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(5):446–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Jean G, Lataillade D, Genet L, Legrand E, Kuentz F, Moreau-Gaudry X, et al. Impact of Hypovitaminosis D and Alfacalcidol Therapy on Survival of Hemodialysis Patients: Results from the French ARNOS Study. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;118(2):c204–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Chertow GM, Block GA, Correa-Rotter R, Drueke TB, Floege J, Goodman WG, et al. Effect of cinacalcet on cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing dialysis. New Eng J Med. 2012;367(26):2482–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Moe SM, Abdalla S, Chertow GM, Parfrey PS, Block GA, Correa-Rotter R, et al. Effects of Cinacalcet on Fracture Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: The EVOLVE Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(6):1466–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Floege J, Kubo Y, Floege A, Chertow GM, Parfrey PS. The Effect of Cinacalcet on Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy Events in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: The EVOLVE Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(5):800–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Kestenbaum B, Andress DL, Schwartz SM, Gillen DL, Seliger SL, Jadav PR, et al. Survival following parathyroidectomy among United States dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2004;66(5):2010–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Konstantinidis I, Nadkarni G, Divino CM, Lapsia V. Utilization of parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease. Clin Kidney J. 2013;6(3):277–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Tominaga Y. Current status of parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in Japan. NDT Plus. 2008;1 Suppl 3:iii35–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Streja E, Wang HY, Lau WL, Molnar MZ, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Mortality of combined serum phosphorus and parathyroid hormone concentrations and their changes over time in hemodialysis patients. Bone. 2014;61:201–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2016