Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Nephrology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Quality of life as indicator of poor outcome in hemodialysis: relation with mortality in different age groups

  • I. N. van Loon1, 2, 3Email author,
  • M. L. Bots4,
  • F. T. J. Boereboom1, 2,
  • M. P. C. Grooteman5,
  • P. J. Blankestijn3,
  • M. A. van den Dorpel6,
  • M. J. Nubé5,
  • P. M. Ter Wee5,
  • M. C. Verhaar3 and
  • M. E. Hamaker7
BMC NephrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:217

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0621-7

Received: 14 February 2017

Accepted: 16 June 2017

Published: 6 July 2017

Abstract

Background

Physical, cognitive and psychosocial functioning are frequently impaired in dialysis patients and impairment in these domains relates to poor outcome. The aim of this analysis was to compare the prevalence of impairment as measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life- Short Form (KDQOL-SF) subscales between the different age categories and to assess whether the association of these subscales with mortality differs between younger and older dialysis patients.

Methods

This study included data from 714 prevalent hemodialysis patients, from 26 centres, who were enrolled in the CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST NCT00205556, 09–12-2005). Baseline HRQOL domains were evaluated for patients <65 years, 65–74 years and over 75 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to assess the relation between the separate domains and 2-year mortality.

Results

Emotional health was higher in patients over the age of 75 compared to younger patients (mean level 71, 73 and 77 for increasing age categories respectively, p = 0.02), whilst physical functioning was significantly lower in older patients (mean level 60, 48 and 40, p < 0.01). A low level of physical functioning (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.72 [95%Confidence Interval (CI) 1.02–2.73]), emotional health (HR 1.85 [95% 1.30–2.63]), and social functioning (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.12–2.26]), was individually associated with an increased 2-year mortality within the whole population. The absence of effect modification suggests no evidence for different relations within the older age groups.

Conclusions

In dialysis patients, older age is associated with lower levels of physical functioning, whilst the level of emotional health is not associated with age. KDQOL-SF domains physical functioning, emotional health and social functioning are independently associated with mortality in prevalent younger and older hemodialysis patients.

Keywords

End-stage renal diseaseDialysisQuality of lifeFrailtyGeriatric nephrology

Background

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are prone to accelerated aging. [1] Common underlying pathways, such as microvascular damage and inflammation, can both cause decline of kidney function and contribute to the development of impairments such as physical dependency, cognitive impairment and depression, malnutrition and comorbidity burden. [2, 3] Accumulation and interaction of these impairments across different domains ultimately results in a frailty phenotype, which renders a patient more vulnerable to external stressors and more prone to adverse events. [4] In patients over 75 years of age with a high comorbidity burden, defined as a high comorbidity score [5] or in particular involving ischemic heart disease, [6] initiation of dialysis does not prolong life in comparison to conservative care, and the hospitalization rate may be higher in dialysis patients. [5] Therefore, in a selected population, conservative care may be a good alternative to be discussed with patients and their caregivers. An adequate estimation of prognosis of ESKD patients may support this decision-making process in frail and elderly patients and may guide choices on advanced care planning such as resuscitation and surgery. However, prediction of poor outcome remains a challenge.

In addition to classic prognostic factors, such as body mass index and laboratory values such as albumin and haemoglobin, impairments in physical, cognitive and psychosocial domains have been found to independently predict poor outcome in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population, but there is limited evidence available. [7, 8] Other studies have demonstrated that quality of life is related to survival and poor outcome in hemodialysis patients. [9, 10] The Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF) has been widely used in CKD and contains eight generic subscales that assess various aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). [11] These subscales have been shown to be useful substitutes of previously validated instruments designed to assess the presence of geriatric impairments in the general population. [12, 13] Although these subscales are self-reported, previous studies have demonstrated that the subscales for physical functioning and emotional health both related well to objective and more elaborate measurements for geriatric impairment, for instance the Geriatric Depression Scale, or to muscle mass measurements. [14, 15] Therefore, these subscales may provide additional information on the prognosis of older dialysis patients. In this analysis using data from CONTRAST, in which patients were randomized to either low-flux hemodialysis or to online hemodiafiltration [16], we compared the prevalence of impairment as measured with the KDQOL-SF subscales between younger and older patients and assessed whether the relation with two-year mortality differs between younger and older patients.

Methods

Patients and study design

The Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST NCT00205556) is a multicentre randomized controlled trial, including patients from dialysis centres in The Netherlands (26 centres), Canada (2 centres) and Norway (1 centre). CONTRAST was conducted between 2004 and 2010 and compared the effects of low-flux hemodialysis with online hemodiafiltration (HDF) on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events as described elsewhere. [17] Patients were eligible if undergoing hemodialysis 2 or 3 times a week, for at least 2 months, with a minimum dialysis urea Kt/V ≥ 1.2 (marker for dialysis adequacy) and were able to fully understand the study procedures. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, treatment by hemodiafiltration or high-flux hemodialysis within 6 months preceding randomization, severe incompliance defined as non-adherence to the dialysis prescription, a life expectancy <3 months due to causes other than kidney disease and participation in another clinical trial. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the medical ethics review boards of all participating hospitals. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to enrollment. [18] For the present analyses, both study arms were used collectively. The overall results from CONTRAST showed no benefit of HDF above HD on mortality risk. [16]

Data collection

Baseline demographical data were collected including age, gender, race and educational levels. Comorbidity data included diabetes and previous cardiovascular disease (yes/no). Other clinical characteristics included cause of kidney failure, vascular access, hemodialysis dose (single pool Kt/V urea), time on dialysis, residual renal function (present yes/no), treatment time and frequency, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI) and smoking habits. The primary endpoint in the present analyses is all-cause mortality. Deaths were reported within 24 h to the data management centre by fax or email. It is important to note that after participants discontinued with the randomized treatment, they continued to be followed to assess vital status, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation. [16] Data were collected by the CONTRAST study group (which involved MLB, MPG, PJB, MAD, MJN, PTW).

Kidney disease quality of life- short form (KDQOL-SF)

Quality of life was assessed at baseline with the KDQOL-SF version 1.3 (https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2006/P7994.pdf) as detailed previously. [18] For the present analyses, we focused on the eight generic health related quality of life (HRQOL) subscales: physical functioning, role physical, general health, bodily pain, emotional health, role emotional, social functioning and vitality (Fig. 1). All subscales have a score of 0–100, with higher scores indicating better health status. The internal consistency reliability of the generic domains of the KDQOL is moderate to high, with a Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71–0.92. [11, 19, 20] These domains proved to be valid in dialysis patients by relating positively and significantly to the EuroQol (a standardized generic measure for the description of health status) [11], to the numbers of good or bad days or the self-rating of one’s life compared to people without kidney disease. [19]
Fig. 1

36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36)

Data analysis

Data were summarized using means with standard deviation (SD), medians with interquartile ranges, or proportions when appropriate. For age we a priori defined three groups (< 65, 65–74 and ≥75 years old). All eight HRQOL domains were categorized into three groups: a score of 0–33 was defined as “low”, 34–66 as “intermediate” and 67–100 as “high”. Patients with available data on one ore more KDQOL domains were included in the analyses. Differences between the baseline characteristics of the strata were analyzed using chi-squared statistics for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. With regard to survival, chi-squared statistics were applied to compare the relation with 2-year mortality between the different categories (low, intermediate and high) per HRQOL domain and between the different age categories. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios of two-year mortality and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The proportional hazards assumption was tested for each variable using a log-minus-log plot. Potential confounders were selected based on known predictors of mortality in dialysis. These factors included demographics (sex, age), treatment related items (HD vs HDF [21], time on dialysis [22]), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus [23] and cardiovascular diseases [24]), and albumin. [25] A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. [26] A post hoc multivariate analysis was performed for the three age groups. In order to test for heterogeneity between young and old patients, we assessed whether effect modification was significantly present. Data were anonymized before analysis by the CONTRAST study group.

Results

Patient characteristics

The CONTRAST study included 714 patients of which 62% were male. Mean age was 64 (SD ± 14) years and 24% of the patients were over 75 years old. Median time on dialysis before entering the study, was 2 years (interquartile range 1–4 years). Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the included patients by the three age cohorts. Information on covariates was complete for all patients, except for some missing values on diabetes (3.5% missing) and albumin (1.2% missing).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Demographics

< 65 years

65–74 years

≥ 75 years

 

(n = 328)

(n = 212)

(n = 174)

p value

 Age (years)

51.9 ± 9.8

70.3 ± 2.8

79.4 ± 3.3

 

 Sex (% male)

60%

63%

66%

0.41

 High educational statusa

22%

17%

22%

0.30

Vascular access

  arteriovenous fistula

84%

78%

72%

0.01

  graft

11%

12%

20%

0.03

  central venous catheter

5%

9%

8%

0.16

 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)b

80 ± 11

73 ± 12

70 ± 11

<0.001

 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)b

148 ± 21

148 ± 20

147 ± 24

<0.001

 Time on RRT (years)

3.1 ± 3.2

2.8 ± 2.6

2.7 ± 2.3

0.16

 Dialysis frequency 3×/week

95%

93%

91%

0.17

 Session time (hours)

3.8 ± 0.4

3.8 ± 0.3

3.7 ± 0.4

0.02

 Residual renal functionc

48%

54%

60%

0.04

 Body mass index (kg/m2)

25.2 ± 5.1

25.8 ± 4.59

25.3 ± 4.4

0.30

 Current smoker

26%

16%

10%

<0.001

 Diabetes Mellitus

24%

29%

21%

0.24

 Cardiovascular disease

31%

52%

59%

<0.001

 Kt/v urea

1.40 ± 0.22

1.40 ± 0.21

1.38 ± 0.21

0.62

 Hemoglobin (mmol/L1)

7.3 ± 0.8

7.3 ± 0.8

7.4 ± 0.7

0.46

 Albumin (g/L)

41.0 ± 3.9

40.2 ± 3.8

39.4 ± 3.5

<0.001

 Phosphate (mmol/L)

1.74 ± 0.52

1.59 ± 0.47

1.51 ± 0.43

<0.001

Health related QoL domains

 Physical functioning

60 ± 27

48 ± 28

40 ± 28

< 0.001

 Role physical

47 ± 43

41 ± 44

39 ± 44

0.10

 General health

43 ± 21

44 ± 21

44 ± 19

0.26

 Bodily pain

73 ± 26

69 ± 28

70 ± 28

0.44

 Emotional health

71 ± 20

73 ± 21

77 ± 18

0.02

 Role emotional

68 ± 43

65 ± 44

68 ± 43

0.63

 Social functioning

68 ± 27

69 ± 29

67 ± 28

0.78

 Vitality

54 ± 21

53 ± 23

53 ± 21

0.99

Legend: values are means +/− SD, median (interquartile range) or number (percentage), RRT renal replacement therapy, Kt/V urea fractional clearance of body water of urea, QoL quality of life

aUniversity bBefore dialysis cResidual kidney function if diuresis ≥100 ml/24 h

P value reflects the result of a univariable model (ANOVA or chi-square test)

Health-related quality of life at baseline

The response rate for HRQOL was 96% (n = 686) for at least one domain and 87% (n = 620) for all HRQOL domains at baseline. Mean level of physical functioning of the oldest patients (≥ 75 years) was 20 points lower (mean ± SD: 40 ± 28) compared to the youngest group (mean ± SD: 60 ± 27) (p < 0.01). The distribution of the response, reflected by the standard deviation around the mean, was similar across all age groups for all domains. A decreased level of physical functioning (defined as a score < 66) was reported by 58% of the patients under 65 years old, 72% of the patients aged 65–74 years and 78% of the patients ≥75 years (p < 0.01). In contrast, higher levels of emotional health were associated with older age. Of the oldest patients 79% reported a good level of emotional health (defined as a score of 67–100), whilst those patients aged below 65 and those aged 65–74 years old, this was 65% and 66% respectively. The levels of the other baseline HRQOL domains (role physical, general health, bodily pain, role emotional, social functioning, vitality) were comparable between the age groups.

Relation between quality of life domains and mortality

The incidence of all-cause mortality of CONTRAST was 12 per 100 patient years. Two-year mortality was 24%; 10% in patients under 65 years, 19% in patients between 65 and 74 years, and 40% in the patients over 75 years (p < 0.001). In the unadjusted analysis all domains, with the exception of the subscale role emotional, were significantly related to 2-year mortality (Table 2). The association with mortality was most distinct within the domain of physical functioning, as patients with a poor baseline level of physical functioning had a 3.6 times higher risk of dying after two years compared to those with good baseline functioning.
Table 2

2-year mortality

Baseline performance

2-year mortality

HRQoL subscales

Score

All age

p

< 65 year

p

65–74 year

p

≥ 75 year

p

Physical functioning

Poor

36%

<0.01

23%

<0.00

35%

<0.00

46%

0.12

 

Intermediate

15%

 

6%

 

18%

 

34%

 
 

Good

10%

 

8%

 

5%

 

28%

 

Role physical

Poor

24%

0.01

13%

0.16

23%

0.28

44%

0.28

 

Intermediate

13%

 

3%

 

13%

 

46%

 
 

Good

15%

 

8%

 

15%

 

31%

 

General health

Poor

26%

0.01

15%

0.17

31%

0.01

50%

0.11

 

Intermediate

17%

 

8%

 

13%

 

37%

 
 

Good

14%

 

8%

 

19%

 

22%

 

Bodily pain

Poor

32%

0.01

17%

0.24

34%

0.06

50%

0.49

 

Intermediate

20%

 

11%

 

18%

 

37%

 
 

Good

17%

 

8%

 

15%

 

37%

 

Emotional health

Poor

28%

0.04

19%

0.43

33%

0.05

50%

0.01

 

Intermediate

25%

 

11%

 

28%

 

63%

 
 

Good

17%

 

9%

 

15%

 

33%

 

Role emotional

Poor

23%

0.28

10%

0.86

27%

0.27

44%

0.51

 

Intermediate

18%

 

12%

 

14%

 

50%

 
 

Good

18%

 

9%

 

17%

 

35%

 

Social functioning

Poor

30%

0.02

20%

0.12

30%

0.36

50%

0.02

 

Intermediate

22%

 

8%

 

19%

 

50%

 
 

Good

17%

 

10%

 

18%

 

29%

 

Vitality

Poor

30%

0.02

15%

0.44

24%

0.69

58%

0.05

 

Intermediate

18%

 

9%

 

19%

 

36%

 
 

Good

17%

 

9%

 

17%

 

31%

 

Score: Poor (0–33), Intermediate (34–66), Good (67–100). P value reflects the result of a univariable model (ANOVA)

When focusing on the different age categories, the association with mortality and impaired HRQOL domains was also noted. In the unadjusted analyses, physical functioning was significantly associated with 2-year mortality risk in patients <65 and 65–74 years old. For patients over the age of 75, a lower level of physical functioning was also associated with a higher mortality rate, although not statistically significant. In the age group 65–74 years old, good levels of general health and emotional heath were associated with better 2-year survival, whilst a good level of emotional health, social functioning and vitality were associated with better 2-year survival in the oldest population.

After adjustment for age and other relevant patient and treatment factors, a decreased level (defined as a score of ≤66) of physical functioning (hazard ratio (HR) 1.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–2.73]), emotional health (HR 1.85 [95% CI 1.30–2.63]) and social functioning (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.12–2.26]) were significantly associated with mortality during a follow-up of two years (Table 3). All other domains were not significantly related to 2-year mortality. In addition, physical functioning and emotional health were associated with 2-year mortality in the 65–74 year group and general health, whilst emotional health and social functioning were associated with 2-year mortality in the oldest group. The magnitude of the relation between HRQOL domains and mortality does not appear to differ with aging as indicated by the absence of significant effect modification (data not shown). The HRs for the association between the different domains and mortality for the whole group and the subanalyses may be found in Table 3.
Table 3

Cox adjusted 2 year-mortality for decreased HRQOL domainsa

Domain

HRb

95% CI

p

 Physical functioning

1.72

(1.02–2.73)

0.02

 Role physical

1.37

(0.92–2.03)

0.12

 General health

1.50

(0.84–2.68)

0.17

 Bodily pain

1.37

(0.97–1.95)

0.07

 Emotional health

1.85

(1.30–2.63)

0.001

 Role emotional

1.27

(0.87–1.84)

0.22

 Social functioning

1.59

(1.12–2.26)

0.01

 Vitality

1.37

(0.91–2.06)

0.13

a. Age < 65 year

 Physical functioning

0.76

(0.33–1.74)

0.51

 Role physical

1.07

(0.49–2.31)

0.87

 General health

1.01

(0.33–3.65)

0.89

 Bodily pain

1.07

(0.50–2.27)

0.86

 Emotional health

1.02

(0.49–2.16)

0.95

 Role emotional

0.76

(0.33–1.47)

0.51

 Social functioning

0.97

(0.47–2.00)

0.92

 Vitality

0.84

(0.35–2.01)

0.70

b. Age 65–74 years

 Physical functioning

5.70

(1.74–18.69)

0.04

 Role physical

1.49

(0.71–3.12)

0.29

 General health

0.99

(0.41–2.38)

1.00

 Bodily pain

1.63

(0.84–3.13)

0.15

 Emotional health

2.41

(1.26–4.60)

0.01

 Role emotional

1.49

(0.76–2.91)

0.24

 Social functioning

1.41

(0.74–2.70)

0.30

 Vitality

1.23

(0.60–2.55)

0.57

c. Age ≥ 75 years

 Physical functioning

1.47

(0.73–2.97)

0.28

 Role physical

1.45

(0.81–2.63)

0.21

 General health

2.59

(0.92–7.32)

0.07

 Bodily pain

1.30

(0.77–2.18)

0.33

 Emotional health

2.11

(1.22–3.64)

0.01

 Role emotional

1.43

(0.80–2.54)

0.22

 Social functioning

2.01

(1.20–3.52)

0.01

 Vitality

1.67

(0.89–3.14)

0.11

Adjusted for age, sex, treatment modality, time on dialysis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, albumin

aDecreased score defined as 0–66. bReference group: patients with a score of 67–100

When we applied a multivariate analysis using a cut-off value of 50, which approaches the value of the domains with the lowest means, we found the same results for the three domains. (Additional file 1). A higher chosen cut-off value of 75 only resulted in a significant relation with 2-year mortality for the domain emotional health (HR 2.15 [95% CI 1.12–4.14] p = 0.02). When we insert the domains as continuous variables, we found all HRQOL domains were significantly associated with 2-year mortality (Additional file 1).

Discussion

Due to the aging of society, more and more patients will develop ESKD and consequently the dialysis population will be increasingly characterized by patients with impairments such as functional dependencies, cognitive decline and psychosocial impairment. [4] In our study, a significant lower level of physical functioning was seen in the advanced age groups, and the lowest level of phyical functioning was seen in patients aged over 75 years old. Although the HRQOL emotional health subscale, including five questions relating to mood, was affected in all age groups, it was relatively preserved in dialysis patients over 75 years old in comparison to younger dialysis patients. Levels of the other baseline HRQOL domains were comparable between the age groups. Finally, this analysis of CONTRAST shows that an impaired level of physical functioning, emotional health and social functioning domains are strongly and independently associated with 2-year mortality independent of age and other confounders. In older dialysis patients this knowledge may contribute to advanced care planning.

The results of this study add to a growing body of evidence which shows that impairments across the physical and psychosocial domains are related to poor outcome in the CKD and dialysis population. [7, 27] In the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), among 10.030 patients with a mean age of 60.5 ± 15.2 years) all eight subscales of the KDQOL-SF were shown to be related to mortality with an adjusted RR per 10-point lower HRQOL score varying from 1.03 (role physical) to 1.10 (physical functioning). [10] Although the individual HRQOL domains have also been found to be valid in the elderly, [12] evidence on the use of the separate domains is limited within the elderly population. In the CONTRAST population, emotional health was shown to be significantly better in patients over 75 years of age compared to younger patients. Others have shown that, for patients over 75 years old, the mental component score (MCS), including domains role emotional, social functioning and vitality, was comparable for dialysis patients and the general elderly population. [28] The relatively good emotional health in elderly patients may reflect lower expectations and a higher level of satisfaction with being alive despite functional disabilities. [29] For the physical functioning subscale, the low mean score in elderly patients is in accordance with previous studies which document a high rate of physical impairment and functional dependencies within this population. [30, 31] Prior research has shown a graded response between the Physical Component Score (PCS) and mortality for increasing age strata, but this relationship was lost in the oldest age category (85 years old or older). [32] The lack of discriminatory power in the highest age group was suggested to be due to competing mortality risk in the elderly. In the CONTRAST population, the 2-year mortality rate of the oldest age group was 46% for patients with low physical functioning compared to 35% and 28% for those with intermediate impairment and good physical functioning respectively (p = 0.12). This is much higher than the expected chance of mortality in the general (non ESKD) elderly (≥ 75 years) population. Based on the data of the national life tables available at Statistics Netherlands, the expected 2-year mortality for an age- and sex-matched population would be 11.6% (± 6.1). [33] Potentially, the relation between physical functioning and mortality in the oldest group was not statistically significant due to small sample size. Similarly, the small sample size for subgroup analyses most likely accounts for the lack of statistical significance between the domain social functioning and two-year mortality in the 65–74 year age group. However, the effect sizes of the multivariate analyses of the domains physical functioning and social functioning for the older age groups were in the same direction as they were in the primary mortality analysis. In addition, the interaction term of age was not statistically significant, and thus the relation of the HRQOL domains and mortality does not appear to be different across age groups. [34]. Appreciating the limitation of the sample size, we can conclude that the domains physical functioning, emotional health and social functioning are also related to two-year mortality in patients aged over 65 years.

The KDQOL domains emotional health and physical functioning have been used separately as substitute tests of impairment in physical performance and mood. The subscale emotional health has been used within the dialysis population to detect depressive symptoms and was shown to be related to the Beck Depression Inventory, a self-reported inventory which has been extensively used in order to detect depression. [15] The physical functioning subscale showed to be significantly related with more elaborate measurements, such as gait speed, and was considered a valid substitute test of physical performance. [14] Given the association between these quality of life domains and mortality, assessment of these domains may aid in establishing patients’ biological reserves and identifying vulnerable ESKD patients. It might help in selecting patients who would benefit from (preventive) interventions, such as physical exercise [31] and (pharmacological) treatment of depression. [35] In addition, this information might contribute in providing a long-term care plan, counseling and in end-of-life discussions, especially in the elderly (patients over 75 years old), for whom such decisions are frequently challenging. However, future research should assess whether these less elaborate tests could be beneficial here.

In addition to the previous mentioned limitation, this study has raised some other issues, which need to be addressed. The prevalence of impairment is likely an underestimation of what is found in the general dialysis population. Patients in the poorest health and with the highest risk of death may be either excluded from participation in the trial or decided not to participate. In addition, CONTRAST was conducted in three countries with a high quality health care system and a good financial and social network for the elderly. If we had corrected for multiple testing using a more stringent p-value (e.g. Bonferroni method 0.05/24 = 0.002), only physical functioning (univariate analysis) and emotional health (multivariate analysis) would have been statistically significant. However, our analyses were of explorative nature instead of clinical trial analyses, and a too stringent significance level may cause loss of relevant information regarding potential relations. The consistently statistically significant relations of all but one domain with mortality, made us decide not to discard these relations, as there are more significant relations than would have been expected based on change only. Therefore we decided to base our conclusions on significant relations on p-values <0.05 thereby not allowing for correction for multiple testing. We have chosen the covariates based on clinical relevance, however, we can not rule out residual confounding, such as the influence of socioeconomic background. Finally, we arbitrarily divided the HRQOL domains into tertiles, and considered only the highest tertile to be “good”, thus enhancing interpretation by the clinician. Based on the means and SD in our cohort (Table 1), we can conclude that for roles of physical, general health and vitality the cut-off value of 66 for a normal score might be too high. Consequently this may have resulted in underestimation of the effect on mortality. However, although the height of the cut-off value is under debate, our results show the robustness of the association with 2-year mortality for the domains physical functioning, emotional health and social functioning.

Conclusion

In dialysis patients, advanced age is associated with lower levels of physical functioning, while levels of emotional heath are not associated with age. As measured with the KDQOL-SF, the subscales physical functioning, emotional health and social functioning are strongly associated with 2-year mortality independent of age. Given this association, assessment of physical, mental and social domains may be of help in identifying frail patients at risk for poor outcomes and could form a starting point for preventive interventions. The subscales could also be useful in treatment decisions and end-of-life discussions, particularly in the elderly (patients over 75 years old) where such decisions are frequently challenging. This should be explored in more detail through future research.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

CI: 

Confidence Interval

CKD: 

Chronic kidney disease

CONTRAST: 

CONvective TRAnsport STudy

ESKD: 

End-stage kidney disease

HD: 

Hemodialysis

HDF: 

Hemodiafiltration

HR: 

Hazard Ratio

HRQOL: 

Health-related quality of life

KDQOL-SF: 

Kidney Disease Quality of Life- Short Form

MCS: 

Mental component score

PCS: 

Physical component score

SD: 

Standard deviation

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all patients and technical and medical staff who participated in this project.

The members of the CONTRAST executive committee are: P.J. Blankestijn (chair), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; M.L. Bots, Julius Centrum for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; M.A. van den Dorpel, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, M.P.C. Grooteman, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam; M.J. Nubé, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam; P.M. ter Wee (chair), VU Medical Center, Amsterdam; The Netherlands.

CONTRAST investigators in Canada: Georges-L. Dumont Regional Hospital, Moncton: M. Dorval; CHUM St. Luc Hospital, Montréal: R. Lévesque. In the Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam: M.G. Koopman; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven: C.J.A.M. Konings; Dialysis Clinic Noord, Beilen: W.P. Haanstra; Dianet Dialysis Centers, Utrecht: M. Kooistra and B. van Jaarsveld; Fransiscus Hospital, Roosendaal: T. Noordzij; Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede: G.W. Feith; Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda: H.G. Peltenburg; Haga Hospital, The Hague: M. van Buren; Isala Clinics, Zwolle: J.J.G. Offerman; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Hertogenbosch: E.K. Hoogeveen; Maasland Hospital, Sittard: F. de Heer; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam: P.J. van de Ven; Martini Hospital, Groningen: T.K. Kremer Hovinga; Medical Center Alkmaar: W.A. Bax; Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam: J.O. Groeneveld; Oosterschelde Hospital, Goes: A.T.J. Lavrijssen; Rijnland Hospital, Leiderdorp: A.M. Schrander-Van der Meer; Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem: L.J.M. Reichert; Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem: J. Huussen; St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg: P.L. Rensma; St. Fransiscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam: Y. Schrama; University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen: H.W. van Hamersvelt; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht: W.H. Boer; VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo: W.H. van Kuijk; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam: M.G. Vervloet; Zeeuws-Vlaanderen Hospital, Terneuzen: I.M.P.M.J. Wauters. In Norway: Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen: I. Sekse.

Funding

This work was made possible by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) Grant 170,882,802. The Convective Transport Study is financially supported by Dutch Kidney Foundation (NierstichtingNederland) Grant C02.2019 and unrestricted grants from Fresenius Medical Care Netherlands and Gambro Lundia AB, Sweden. Additional support was received from the Dr. E.E. Twiss Fund, Roche Netherlands, the International Society of Nephrology/Baxter Extramural Grant Program and the Cornelis de Visser Stichting.

The funding sources have played no role in the design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, interpretation of data, writing the manuscript, or decision to submit this manuscript for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the international collaboration, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MB, MG, PB, MN, MD, PW participated in the CONTRAST study, including design and data collection. IN, MB, MH and MV carried out the present analyses and wrote the draft of the manuscript. MG, PB, MN, MD, PW and FTB critically revised the draft and contributed with comment to improve the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Central approval was obtained by the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center. Local approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Committees of all participating centers, which are listed in the acknowledgements.

Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dianet Dialysis Center
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
(3)
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht
(4)
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht
(5)
Department of Nephrology, VU University Medical Center
(6)
Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital
(7)
Department of Geriatrics, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht

References

  1. Kooman JP, Kotanko P, Schols AM, Shiels PG, Stenvinkel P. Chronic kidney disease and premature ageing. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(12):732–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Roshanravan B, Robinson-Cohen C, Patel KV, Ayers E, Littman AJ, de Boer IH, et al. Association between physical performance and all-cause mortality in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(5):822–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Taraz M, Taraz S, Dashti-Khavidaki S. Association between depression and inflammatory/anti-inflammatory cytokines in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease patients: a review of literature. Hemodial Int. 2015;19(1):11–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Swidler M. Considerations in starting a patient with advanced frailty on dialysis: complex biology meets challenging ethics. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(8):1421–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandna SM, Da Silva-Gane M, Marshall C, Warwicker P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(5):1608–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Murtagh FE, Marsh JE, Donohoe P, Ekbal NJ, Sheerin NS, Harris FE. Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(7):1955–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Couchoud C, Labeeuw M, Moranne O, Allot V, Esnault V, Frimat L, et al. A clinical score to predict 6-month prognosis in elderly patients starting dialysis for end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(5):1553–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thamer, M., Kaufman, J. S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Cotter, D. J., & Bang, H. (2015). Predicting early death among elderly dialysis patients: development and validation of a risk score to assist shared decision making for dialysis initiation. Am J Kidney Dis. Google Scholar
  9. Lowrie EG, Curtin RB, LePain N, Schatell D. Medical outcomes study short form-36: a consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(6):1286–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mapes DL, Lopes AA, Satayathum S, McCullough KP, Goodkin DA, Locatelli F, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). Kidney Int. 2003;64(1):339–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Korevaar JC, Merkus MP, Jansen MA, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, et al. Validation of the KDQOL-SF: a dialysis-targeted health measure. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(5):437–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Whitson HE, Sanders LL, Pieper CF, Morey MC, Oddone EZ, Gold DT, et al. Correlation between symptoms and function in older adults with comorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(4):676–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman B, Heisel M, Delavan R. Validity of the SF-36 five-item mental health index for major depression in functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(11):1978–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansen KL, Painter P, Kent-Braun JA, Ng AV, Carey S, Da Silva M, et al. Validation of questionnaires to estimate physical activity and functioning in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2001;59(3):1121–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van den Beukel TO, Siegert CE, van Dijk S, Ter Wee PM, Dekker FW, Honig A. Comparison of the SF-36 five-item mental health inventory and Beck depression inventory for the screening of depressive symptoms in chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(12):4453–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grooteman MP, van den Dorpel MA, Bots ML, Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, Mazairac AH, et al. Effect of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(6):1087–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Penne EL, Blankestijn PJ, Bots ML, van den Dorpel MA, Grooteman MP, Nube MJ, et al. Effect of increased convective clearance by on-line hemodiafiltration on all cause and cardiovascular mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients - the Dutch CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST): rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN38365125]. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2005;6(1):8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazairac AH, de Wit GA, Grooteman MP, Penne EL, van der Weerd NC, den Hoedt CH, et al. Effect of hemodiafiltration on quality of life over time. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(1):82–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(5):329–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hays RD. Kidney Disese quality of life short form (KDQOL-SF), version 1.3. A manual for use and scoring. Google Scholar
  21. Cheung AK, Levin NW, Greene T, Agodoa L, Bailey J, Beck G, et al. Effects of high-flux hemodialysis on clinical outcomes: results of the HEMO study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(12):3251–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McCullough PA, Sandberg KR, Dumler F, Yanez JE. Determinants of coronary vascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: a systematic review. J Nephrol. 2004;17(2):205–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Miles AM, Friedman EA. Dialytic therapy for diabetic patients with terminal renal failure. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1993;2(6):868–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Longenecker JC, Coresh J, Powe NR, Levey AS, Fink NE, Martin A, et al. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in dialysis patients compared with the general population: the CHOICE study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(7):1918–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Spiegel DM, Breyer JA. Serum albumin: a predictor of long-term outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;23(2):283–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310(6973):170.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Farrokhi F, Abedi N, Beyene J, Kurdyak P, Jassal SV. Association between depression and mortality in patients receiving long-term dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(4):623–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamping DL, Constantinovici N, Roderick P, Normand C, Henderson L, Harris S, et al. Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in the North Thames dialysis study of elderly people on dialysis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2000;356(9241):1543–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Apostolou T. Quality of life in the elderly patients on dialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(2):679–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cook WL, Jassal SV. Functional dependencies among the elderly on hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2008;73(11):1289–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nonoyama ML, Brooks D, Ponikvar A, Jassal SV, Kontos P, Devins GM, et al. Exercise program to enhance physical performance and quality of life of older hemodialysis patients: a feasibility study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42(4):1125–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Knight EL, Ofsthun N, Teng M, Lazarus JM, Curhan GC. The association between mental health, physical function, and hemodialysis mortality. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1843–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Netherlands, 2013; http://www.cbs.nl.
  34. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2189–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagler EV, Webster AC, Vanholder R, Zoccali C. Antidepressants for depression in stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety with recommendations by European renal best practice (ERBP). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(10):3736–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement