Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Red cell distribution width associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease

Contributed equally
BMC NephrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:361

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0766-4

  • Received: 18 April 2017
  • Accepted: 20 November 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have demonstrated that red cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are often anemic and have high RDW levels. In this study, we investigated the effect of RDW on major composite CV outcomes among patients with CKD.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with CKD who were admitted to the department of cardiology of a tertiary hospital in 2011. The patients were divided into 2 groups: normal RDW (RDW < 14.5%) and elevated RDW (RDW ≥ 14.5%). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, blood investigation results, prescriptions, and outcomes were analyzed after a 3-year follow-up period. Six adjustment levels were performed to evaluate the effect of RDW on outcomes.

Results

This study involved 282 patients with CKD: 213 in the elevated RDW group and 69 in the normal RDW group. The elevated RDW group had older patients, a lower proportion of male patients, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values, lower hemoglobin levels, lower serum albumin levels, and higher creatinine levels, compared with the normal RDW group. A linear trend was observed toward higher RDW in patients with deteriorating renal function. In the final adjusted model, RDW ≥ 14.5%, older age, and lower LVEF were associated with an increased risk of major composite CV outcomes.

Conclusion

RDW is a potentially useful cost-effective indicator of major composite CV outcomes in patients with CKD.

Keywords

  • Red cell distribution width
  • Cardiovascular outcomes
  • Chronic kidney disease

Background

Red cell distribution width (RDW), a coefficient of variation in red blood cell (RBC) volume, is routinely available in reports of complete blood count. RDW is commonly increased because of erythropoiesis deficits or accelerated RBC destruction. RDW increase is often considered as an indicator of anemia caused by iron, cobalamin, or folate deficiency [1, 2]. Recent studies have indicated that patients with higher RDW levels were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and new-onset stroke [35]. Moreover, the level of RDW was positively correlated with mortality in patients with acute or critical illnesses, in those with chronic diseases, and in healthy cohorts [613]. Patel et al. reported a 14% increased risk of death for each 1% increment in RDW in a community-based elderly population [10].

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anemia are well-known risk factors for CV events and mortality. RDW significantly increases when CKD progresses from stage 1 to stage 5 [14]. According to our review of the relevant literature, few reports have focused on RDW in patients with CKD. Hsieh et al. revealed that RDW was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and infection mortality in CKD stages 3–5 [15]. Inadequate erythropoietin production is the primary feature of anemia in patients with CKD. Anemia reduces oxygen delivery and increases cardiac workload, which exacerbates heart failure and increases the risk of CV events. However, anemia is not the only possible explanation of elevated RDW in patients with CKD. The association of RDW with CV events and mortality was observed to be significant after adjustment for hemoglobin [16]. In this study, we investigated the effect of RDW on major composite CV outcomes during CKD stages 1–5. We hypothesized that elevated RDW is an independent risk factor for CV events and mortality in patients with CKD.

Methods

Study population

This study was conducted by retrospectively analyzing consecutive patients who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (a tertiary medical center) in Taiwan, from January 2011 to December 2011. Patients with CKD who were hospitalized for coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled on the date of admission. CKD was diagnosed using the existing anatomical abnormality of the kidney, persistent proteinuria, hematuria, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 for more than 3 months. We excluded patients who are aged <20 years and those who had end-stage renal disease on long-term renal replacement therapy. The Institutional Review Board at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent.

Data collection

Normal RDW was defined as a level of 11.5%–14.5%. Patients were divided into normal RDW (RDW < 14.5%) and elevated RDW (RDW ≥ 14.5%) groups. We retrieved their demographic characteristics; comorbidities; blood investigation results; and prescriptions of antiplatelet agents, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, and statins. Patients were followed up for 3 years. The primary endpoint of this study was to elucidate the effect of RDW on mortality and major composite CV events, defined as re-admission for CAD or congestive heart failure during the follow-up period. The secondary endpoints were the identification of independent predictors of major composite CV outcomes in patients with CKD and determination of the variation in RDW among different CKD stages. The follow-up ended when a major composite CV event or death occurred, or when the patient remained event free till 3 years.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous data and number (percentage) for categorical data. The 2 groups (RDW < 14.5% vs RDW ≥ 14.5%) were compared using a 2-sample t test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. The linear trend of RDW across groups of CKD stages was evaluated using a linear contrast test in a general linear model.

We used different multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the association between RDW and primary outcomes. Various confounding factors, including demographic variables, comorbidities, and serum lipids, were further adjusted in the models. In addition to adjusting for variables related to the Framingham cardiovascular risk score, we adjusted for baseline characteristics that presented a significant difference between the 2 groups in the multivariable models (P < .05). The following models were used: (1) unadjusted model; (2) model adjusted for age and sex; (3) model further adjusted for diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and smoking; (4) model further adjusted for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and systolic blood pressure (BP); (5) model further adjusted for hemoglobin and albumin; and (6) model further adjusted for creatinine and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

The cumulative survival curves for major composite CV outcomes during the 3-year follow-up period were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method, whereas the difference between the 2 groups was evaluated using a log-rank test. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. This study used IBM SPSS 22 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp) for data analysis.

Results

A total of 282 patients with CKD who were admitted for CAD in 2011 were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into normal RDW (RDW < 14.5%; n = 213) and elevated RDW (RDW ≥ 14.5%, n = 69) groups. The baseline characteristics of the study cohort are presented in Table 1. The elevated RDW group had older patients than did the normal RDW group (68.2 ± 13.1 vs 63.7 ± 13.8, P = .018) and also had a lower proportion of male patients (62.3% vs 77.9%, P = .017). Moreover, patients in the elevated RDW group presented significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 48.4 ± 18.4 vs 55.6 ± 15.7, P = .017), lower hemoglobin levels (11.3 ± 2.1 vs 13.4 ± 2.3, P < .001), lower serum albumin levels (3.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.8 ± 0.5, P = .005), and higher creatinine levels (1.89 ± 1.58 vs 1.31 ± 0.93, P < .001), compared with those in the normal RDW group. The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar in terms of comorbidities, systolic and diastolic BP, leukocyte count, platelet count, alanine aminotransferase levels, sodium levels, potassium levels, sugar levels, total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein levels, HDL levels, and medications. During the 3-year follow-up period, the elevated RDW group exhibited a higher incidence of major composite CV outcomes (46.4% vs 17.8%, P < .001). No statistical difference was observed; however, a trend toward higher mortality was noted in the elevated RDW group (10.1% vs 3.8%, P = .059).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients according to RDW

Characteristics

RDW < 14.5% (n = 213)

RDW ≥ 14.5% (n = 69)

P

Age, year

63.7 ± 13.8

68.2 ± 13.1

0.018

Male gender, n (%)

166 (77.9)

43 (62.3)

0.017

Diabetes mellitus, n (%)

85 (39.9)

35 (50.7)

0.125

Hypertension, n (%)

135 (63.4)

43 (62.3)

0.887

Old CVA, n (%)

21 (9.9)

5 (7.2)

0.636

Smoker, n (%)

80 (37.6)

34 (49.3)

0.092

Systolic BP, mmHg

125.2 ± 25.6

129.0 ± 29.2

0.293

Diastolic BP, mmHg

70.3 ± 15.6

66.2 ± 14.4

0.056

LVEF, %

55.6 ± 15.7

48.4 ± 18.4

0.002

Lab data

 Leukocyte count, 1000/ml

9.9 ± 3.3

9.6 ± 3.0

0.492

 Hemoglobin, g/dl

13.4 ± 2.3

11.3 ± 2.1

<0.001

 Platelet count, 1000/ml

209.6 ± 60.3

207.3 ± 84.0

0.811

 ALT, u/l

40.5 ± 41.5

32.8 ± 44.0

0.185

 Albumin, mg/dl

3.8 ± 0.5

3.6 ± 0.5

0.005

 Creatinine, mg/dl

1.31 ± 0.93

1.89 ± 1.58

<0.001

 Na, mmol/L

139.4 ± 3.3

138.8 ± 3.5

0.212

 K, mmol/L

3.9 ± 0.5

4.0 ± 0.5

0.416

 Sugar, mg/dl

162.6 ± 77.5

155.0 ± 73.0

0.477

 Total cholesterol, mg/dL

197.1 ± 37.5

198.9 ± 37.9

0.721

 LDL, mg/dL

109.5 ± 32.4

111.6 ± 31.3

0.649

 HDL, mg/dL

42.7 ± 12.7

46.1 ± 16.0

0.068

Medications, n (%)

 Anti-platelet agents

207 (97.2)

66 (95.7)

0.461

 Beta-blocker

202 (94.8)

63 (91.3)

0.380

 ACEi/ARB

182 (85.4)

54 (78.3)

0.189

 Statin

196 (92.0)

62 (89.9)

0.621

Outcomes, n (%)

 Mortality

8 (3.8)

7 (10.1)

0.059

 Major composite CV outcome

38 (17.8)

32 (46.4)

<0.001

RDW red cell distribution width, CVA cerebrovascular accident, BP blood pressure, LEVF left ventricular ejection fraction, ALT alanine aminotransferase, LDL low-density lipoprotein, HDL high-density lipoprotein, ACEi angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, CV cardiovascular

Continuous variables were compared using a t test and categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test

We analyzed the RDW levels across CKD stages (Fig. 1). RDW increased when renal function deteriorated from CKD stage 1 to stage 5. We also observed a linear trend toward higher RDW after stratifying patients according to their CKD stage (P for linear trend < .001).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

RDW levels in groups across CKD stages

Table 2 presents the associations between RDW and the risk of major composite CV outcomes during the 3-year follow-up period in the 6 models. In the unadjusted model, RDW ≥ 14.5% was associated with an increased risk of major composite CV outcomes (Hazard ratio [HR], 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01–5.15). We first adjusted the variables of the Framingham CV risk score, including age, sex, diabetes, HTN, smoking, total cholesterol, HDL, and systolic BP. The association was significant after adjustment for age and sex (model 2: HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.94–5.12); further adjustment for DM, HTN, and smoking (model 3: HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.92–5.13); and further adjustment for total cholesterol levels, HDL levels, and systolic BP (model 4: HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.99–5.31). We then adjusted for demographic variables that exhibited a significant difference (Table 1): hemoglobin, albumin, creatinine, and LVEF levels in models 5 and 6. Despite the adjustments for hemoglobin and albumin levels (model 5: HR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.70–4.70) and further adjustment for creatinine and LVEF levels (model 6: HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.54–4.32), RDW ≥ 14.5% was independently associated with a higher risk of major composite CV outcomes in patients with CKD.
Table 2

Association between RDW and risk of major composite cardiovascular outcomes in various adjustment models

Model

Presence of RDW ≥ 14.5%

HR

95% CI of HR

P value

Model 1, unadjusted model

3.22

2.01–5.15

<0.001

Model 2, adjusted for age, gender

3.15

1.94–5.12

<0.001

Model 3, further adjusted for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking

3.14

1.92–5.13

<0.001

Model 4, further adjusted for total cholesterol, HDL, Systolic BP

3.25

1.99–5.31

<0.001

Model 5, further adjusted for hemoglobin, albumin

2.83

1.70–4.70

<0.001

Model 6, further adjusted for creatinine, LVEF

2.58

1.54–4.32

<0.001

RDW red cell distribution width, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, HDL high-density lipoprotein, BP blood pressure, LEVF left ventricular ejection fraction

Major composite CV events developed in 32 of the 69 patients in the RDW ≥ 14.5% group (46.4%) and 38 of 213 patients (17.8%) in the elevated RDW group during the 3-year follow-up period. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves of major composite CV outcomes according to RDW status are presented in Fig. 2. Patients in the elevated RDW group exhibited significantly lower event-free survival (P value of log rank test < .001).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of major composite CV outcomes during a 3-year follow-up period according to RDW levels

In the final multivariable model (model 6 in Table 2), RDW ≥ 14.5% (HR, 2.581; 95% CI, 1.541–4.322) and older age (HR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.001–1.043) were associated with an increased risk of major composite CV outcomes (Table 3). However, higher LVEF values were associated with a lower CV risk (HR, 0.975; 95% CI, 0.961–0.989).
Table 3

Factors associated with major composite CV outcomes during a 3-year follow-up period

Variable

HR

95% CI of HR

P value

RDW ≥ 14.5%

2.581

1.541–4.322

<0.001

Age (year)

1.022

1.001–1.043

0.037

Male gender

1.587

0.849–2.964

0.148

Diabetes mellitus

0.971

0.580–1.627

0.911

Hypertension

1.004

0.566–1.781

0.989

Smoking

0.907

0.552–1.491

0.701

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

1.001

0.995–1.007

0.683

HDL (mg/dL)

0.987

0.969–1.006

0.174

Systolic BP (mmHg)

1.001

0.991–1.011

0.873

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

0.941

0.823–1.076

0.373

Albumin (mg/dl)

0.844

0.489–1.459

0.545

Creatinine (mg/dl)

1.113

0.914–1.355

0.286

LVEF, %

0.975

0.961–0.989

0.001

CV cardiovascular, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, RDW red cell distribution width, HDL high-density lipoprotein, BP blood pressure, LEVF left ventricular ejection fraction

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association of RDW with major composite CV outcomes and mortality in patients with CKD. The elevated RDW group had older patients, a lower proportion of male patients, lower LVEF levels, lower hemoglobin levels, lower albumin levels, and higher serum creatinine levels compared with the normal RDW group. RDW levels exhibited a graded increase across different stages of CKD. RDW ≥ 14.5% was associated with a significantly higher incidence of major composite CV outcomes and a trend toward higher mortality. A greater than 2-fold risk of major composite CV outcomes was observed in the elevated RDW group (HR = 2.581, CI = 1.541–4.322, P < .001). Age and impaired LVEF were additional covariates that were independent predictors of major composite CV outcomes in patients with CKD. The incidence of outcomes is higher than that reported in a previous study, because our patients were confirmed to have CAD [15].

Patients with higher RDW levels are often considered to have erythropoietic stress. In the general population, patients with higher RDW levels are likely to be older and have smoking habits, higher body mass index, lower hemoglobin levels, lower mean corpuscular volume, and higher serum creatinine levels [12, 16, 17]. Elevated RDW was correlated with higher serum levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), a larger left atrium, and lower LVEF values in patients with CV risk [5, 18]. RDW levels were also positively associated with C-reactive protein, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ferritin, and fibrinogen and negatively associated with albumin levels [6, 12, 14, 17]. Consequently, RDW was supposed to be a marker of inflammation, oxidative stress, and nutritional status [9, 19].

The pathophysiology of elevated RDW toward unfavorable CV outcomes has not been elucidated. Anemia and elevated serum creatinine, commonly occurring in patients with CKD, were risk factors for CV events. Our results reveal that the effect of RDW on major composite CV outcomes was independent of hemoglobin and creatinine levels. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies, which have reported that the level of RDW, even within the normal reference range, was associated with a higher risk of CV events and mortality irrespective of anemia, ferritin levels, and renal impairment [9, 10, 1317]. There should be other explanations for the poor prognostic effect of RDW on major composite CV outcomes in patients with CKD. Two novel risk factors for CV events, oxidative stress and inflammation, could be possible underlying mechanisms.

Oxidative stress and inflammation suppress erythropoiesis and shorten RBC survival, resulting in heterogeneity in the size of circulating erythrocytes (also called anisocytosis). Human erythrocyte damage starts during the initial stages of oxidative stress [20]. A low level of serum selenium, an essential trace element involved in the antioxidant system, was an independent predictor of higher RDW in community-dwelling adults [21]. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), a proinflammatory cytokine, was positively correlated with RDW in adult patients with heart failure and congenital heart disease [22, 23]. IL-6 stimulates hepatic hepcidin expression, which inhibits duodenal iron absorption and induces ferritin transcription, thus increasing iron storage within macrophages [24]. Inflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, and interleukin-10 might compromise iron metabolism, impair erythroid progenitor cell proliferation, and blunt erythropoietin response to anemia [24]. We supposed that elevated RDW could reflect oxidative and inflammatory stress, which is correlated with the risk of CV events and mortality [12, 23]. In a small randomized trial of patients undergoing hemodialysis, the use of a vitamin E-bonded cellulose membrane dialyzer, which was supposed to provide an antioxidant effect, reduced RDW levels and improved atherosclerosis [25]. This hypothesis must be investigated further in the future.

Recent studies have demonstrated that elevated RDW was associated with renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, autonomic regulation, malnutrition, and endothelial dysfunction. Erythropoiesis has been proven to be associated with chronic activation of the RAAS and could be influenced by catecholamine [2629]. Vashistha et al. reported that for every 1 g/dL increase in the albumin level, RDW decreased by 0.7%. Solak et al. revealed that a higher RDW level was independently associated with impaired endothelial function and increased carotid intima media thickness in patients with CKD [14]. In addition, RDW was associated with an abnormal pattern of circadian BP variation. RDW was higher in patients designated as nondippers compared with those designated as dippers [30]. These characters are well-described risk factors for CV events and might be possible pathways underlying the association between RDW and CV outcomes. Additional studies are warranted to verify these potential mechanisms.

The association between RDW and mortality was linear and consistent across various RDW levels, ranging from the normal reference level to RDW ≥ 17.5% [6, 16]. We demonstrate the prognostic significance of RDW in this study. Because biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation such as myeloperoxidase, IL-6, and interferon-γ are not routinely available in general practice, RDW might be a cost-effective tool for physicians for identifying populations at high CV risks. However, similar to other markers of infection or inflammation, RDW is not specific for a particular disease. Therefore, the feasibility of its use in clinical applications remains unclear.

Some limitations of our study must be discussed. First, because we retrospectively analyzed our study cohort, we could determine only the association between increased RDW and CV outcomes but not the causality. Second, the study was conducted at a single center and included a relatively small number of patients; hence, our sample might not reflect the entire cohort. Third, although we controlled for several variables influencing RDW, there might be relevant confounders that we were unable to completely adjust. A well-designed prospective study with a larger cohort may be performed to verify our results.

Conclusions

In patients with CKD, a linear trend toward higher RDW was observed with the progress of the disease. Our results suggest RDW to be an indicator of CV events in patients with CKD during a 3-year follow-up period. Moreover, old age and decreased LVEF were additional risk factors for CV events. Oxidative stress and inflammation could be possible pathways underlying the association between RDW and unfavorable CV outcomes. Moreover, RAAS activation, autonomic regulation, malnutrition, and endothelial dysfunction might be potential mechanisms.

Abbreviations

BP: 

Blood pressure

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CI: 

Confidence interval

CKD: 

Chronic kidney disease

CV: 

Cardiovascular

DM: 

Diabetes mellitus

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

HR: 

Hazard ratio

HTN: 

Hypertension

IL-6: 

Interleukin 6

LVEF: 

Left ventricular ejection fraction

NT-proBNP: 

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

RAAS: 

Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system

RBC: 

Red blood cell

RDW: 

Red cell distribution width

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by a research grant from Chang Gung Medical Foundation (CMRPG3F1651). The researchers were independent of the funders who had no influence on study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, decision to publish, or writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

YA and PC drafted the manuscript. CC, VC analyzed and interpreted the patient data. YCT and CW supervised the study and provided final approval. YCC provided intellectual content of critical importance to the work described, and revised the article. CH concepted and designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, No. 5 Fusing Street, Gueishan Dist, Taoyuan City, 333, Taiwan, Republic of China
(2)
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No.259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist, Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan, Republic of China
(3)
Department of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist, Keelung City, 20401, Taiwan, Republic of China

References

  1. Dugdale AE. Predicting iron and folate deficiency anaemias from standard blood testing: the mechanism and implications for clinical medicine and public health in developing countries. Theor Biol Med Model. 2006;3:34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoffmann JJ, Urrechaga E, Aguirre U. Discriminant indices for distinguishing thalassemia and iron deficiency in patients with microcytic anemia: a meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(12):1883–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gurbuz O, Kumtepe G, Ozkan H, Karal IH, Ercan A, Ener S. Red blood cell distribution width predicts long term cardiovascular event after on-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Sahin I, Karabulut A, Kaya A, Gungor B, Avci II, Okuyan E, Can MM, Sigirci S, Ayca B, Dinckal MH. Increased level of red cell distribution width is associated with poor coronary collateral circulation in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2015;43(2):123–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee KH, Park HW, Cho JG, Yoon NS, Kim SS, Kim MR, Kim MC, Cho KH, Kim HK, Kim CH, et al. Red cell distribution width as a novel predictor for clinical outcomes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17 Suppl 2:ii83–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vashistha T, Streja E, Molnar MZ, Rhee CM, Moradi H, Soohoo M, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Red cell distribution width and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(1):110–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu S, Wang P, Shen PP, Zhou JH. Predictive values of red blood cell distribution width in assessing severity of chronic heart failure. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:2119–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bazick HS, Chang D, Mahadevappa K, Gibbons FK, Christopher KB. Red cell distribution width and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(8):1913–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Felker GM, Allen LA, Pocock SJ, Shaw LK, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Wang D, Yusuf S, Michelson EL, et al. Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM program and the Duke databank. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(1):40–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Patel KV, Semba RD, Ferrucci L, Newman AB, Fried LP, Wallace RB, Bandinelli S, Phillips CS, Yu B, Connelly S, et al. Red cell distribution width and mortality in older adults: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(3):258–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Otero TM, Canales C, Yeh DD, Hou PC, Belcher DM, Quraishi SA. Elevated red cell distribution width at initiation of critical care is associated with mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2016;34:7–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Patel KV, Ferrucci L, Ershler WB, Longo DL, Guralnik JM. Red blood cell distribution width and the risk of death in middle-aged and older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):515–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Luo R, Hu J, Jiang L, Zhang M. Prognostic value of red blood cell distribution width in non-cardiovascular critically or acutely patients: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Solak Y, Yilmaz MI, Saglam M, Caglar K, Verim S, Unal HU, Gok M, Demirkaya E, Gaipov A, Kayrak M, et al. Red cell distribution width is independently related to endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Med Sci. 2014;347(2):118–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsieh YP, Chang CC, Kor CT, Yang Y, Wen YK, Chiu PF. The predictive role of red cell distribution width in mortality among chronic kidney disease patients. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0162025.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lippi G, Targher G, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Zoppini G, Guidi GC. Relationship between red blood cell distribution width and kidney function tests in a large cohort of unselected outpatients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2008;68(8):745–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lippi G, Targher G, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Zoppini G, Guidi GC. Relation between red blood cell distribution width and inflammatory biomarkers in a large cohort of unselected outpatients. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(4):628–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Osadnik T, Strzelczyk J, Hawranek M, Lekston A, Wasilewski J, Kurek A, Gutowski AR, Wilczek K, Dyrbus K, Gierlotka M, et al. Red cell distribution width is associated with long-term prognosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13:113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ozturk ZA, Unal A, Yigiter R, Yesil Y, Kuyumcu ME, Neyal M, Kepekci Y. Is increased red cell distribution width (RDW) indicating the inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD)? Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56(1):50–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tozzi-Ciancarelli MG, Di Giulio A, Troiani-Sevi E, D’Alfonso A, Amicosante G, Oratore A. Human erythrocyte damage at the initial stages of oxidative stress. Cell Biophys. 1989;15(3):225–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Semba RD, Patel KV, Ferrucci L, Sun K, Roy CN, Guralnik JM, Fried LP. Serum antioxidants and inflammation predict red cell distribution width in older women: the Women’s Health and Aging Study I. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(5):600–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyamoto K, Inai K, Takeuchi D, Shinohara T, Nakanishi T. Relationships among red cell distribution width, anemia, and interleukin-6 in adult congenital heart disease. Circ J. 2015;79(5):1100–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Allen LA, Felker GM, Mehra MR, Chiong JR, Dunlap SH, Ghali JK, Lenihan DJ, Oren RM, Wagoner LE, Schwartz TA, et al. Validation and potential mechanisms of red cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2010;16(3):230–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):1011–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kobayashi S, Moriya H, Aso K, Ohtake T. Vitamin E-bonded hemodialyzer improves atherosclerosis associated with a rheological improvement of circulating red blood cells. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1881–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kato H, Ishida J, Imagawa S, Saito T, Suzuki N, Matsuoka T, Sugaya T, Tanimoto K, Yokoo T, Ohneda O, et al. Enhanced erythropoiesis mediated by activation of the renin-angiotensin system via angiotensin II type 1a receptor. FASEB J. 2005;19(14):2023–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vlahakos DV, Kosmas EN, Dimopoulou I, Ikonomou E, Jullien G, Vassilakos P, Marathias KP. Association between activation of the renin-angiotensin system and secondary erythrocytosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Med. 1999;106(2):158–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Penn A, Mohr AM, Shah SG, Sifri ZC, Kaiser VL, Rameshwar P, Livingston DH. Dose-response relationship between norepinephrine and erythropoiesis: evidence for a critical threshold. J Surg Res. 2010;163(2):e85–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Biaggioni I, Robertson D, Krantz S, Jones M, Haile V. The anemia of primary autonomic failure and its reversal with recombinant erythropoietin. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(3):181–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Su D, Guo Q, Gao Y, Han J, Yan B, Peng L, Song A, Zhou F, Wang G. The relationship between red blood cell distribution width and blood pressure abnormal dipping in patients with essential hypertension: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010456.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement