Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Yield of diagnostic tests in unexplained renal hypophosphatemia: a case series

BMC Nephrology volume 19, Article number: 220 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Isolated renal hypophosphatemia may be inherited or acquired. An increasing number of patients with unexplained renal hypophosphatemia is being referred to our clinics, but the optimal diagnostic work-up is not known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield in these patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated all patients who were referred because of unexplained isolated renal hypophosphatemia to two academic tertiary referral centers in The Netherlands in the period of 2013–2017.

Results

We evaluated 17 patients. In five female patients renal hypophosphatemia could be attributed to the use of oral contraceptives. The other 12 patients had a median age of 48 years (10 males). There were no other signs of tubulopathy and none of the patients used drugs known to be associated with hypophosphatemia. FGF23 levels were above normal (> 125 RU/ml) in 2/12 patients. Genetic testing, performed in all patients, did not identify a mutation in genes known to be associated with renal phosphate wasting. A scan with a radiolabeled somatostatin analogue was performed in 8 patients. In one patient, with an FGF23 level of 110 RU/ml, an increased uptake of the somatostatin analog was observed due to tumor induced osteomalacia (TIO).

Conclusions

Oral contraceptive use is an important but under-recognized cause of renal hypophosphatemia. The cause of isolated renal hypophosphatemia remained unexplained in the majority of other patients despite extensive and expensive additional investigations. The pre-test probability for tumor-induced osteomalacia or inherited renal hypophosphatemia in a patient with aspecific complaints and a normal FGF23 level is low. Further research is needed to investigate which patients should be screened for TIO. At present we suggest to perform somatostatin scans only in patients with severe complaints, elevated FGF23 levels, or progressive disease.

Peer Review reports

Background

Phosphate is freely filtered by the glomerulus and 80–90% is reabsorbed at the brush border membrane of the proximal tubule, through apical sodium-dependent phosphate transporters (primarily NaPi2a and NaPi2c). The principal regulators of this transcellular phosphate reabsorption are dietary phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 (1,25OHD3) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). A defect in one of these transporters or perturbation in one of the regulating factors can result in increased renal phosphate loss. Various inherited phosphate wasting disorders have been identified, including X-linked autosomal hypophosphatemia (XLH; due to a mutation in PHEX), autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR; due to impaired cleavage of FGF23 caused by a mutation in FGF23), autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets (ARHR; due to a mutation in DMP1) and Fanconi renotubular syndrome-2 (dysfunction of NaPi2a due to homozygous mutations in SLC34A1) [1]. Some of these inherited disorders, such as ADHR, can become apparent after childhood, which can make the differentiation with acquired disorders difficult. The most common causes of acquired isolated renal hypophosphatemia are drugs (for example acetazolamide, bisphosphonates, diuretics, glucocorticosteroids, imatinib, acyclovir, aminoglycosides, tenofovir and valproic acid), hyperparathyroidism and tumor induced osteomalacia (TIO) [2]. TIO is a rare disorder in which there is renal phosphate wasting due to tumors that secrete phosphaturic factors (most commonly FGF23) [3,4,5].

The cause of hypophosphatemia is often identified during the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with (renal) hypophosphatemia. Yet, an increasing number of patients is being referred to our clinics because of unexplained chronic renal hypophosphatemia. The optimal diagnostic work-up of these patients is not known. We report the diagnostic yield of extensive evaluation in these patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated all patients who were referred because of unexplained chronic renal hypophosphatemia,which was confirmed on several occasions, to two university hospitals in The Netherlands in the period of 2013–2017. In these patients, well-known causes of acquired renal hypophosphatemia had been previously excluded. Renal hypophosphatemia was defined as a serum phosphate below 0.70 mmol/l and an inappropriately high renal phosphate excretion. Fractional excretion of phosphate was calculated as (urine phosphate * serum creatinine)/(serum phosphate * urine creatinine). TmP/GFR was calculated by the method of Bijvoet [6]. All measurements were performed during low serum phosphate levels. The reference value for serum phosphate in our centers is 0.80–1.40 mmol/l (variation coefficient of 3.7%). In most patients a fasting serum phosphate was measured at 8.00 am because it is known that serum phosphate shows a circadian rhythm with the lowest value between 8.00–11.00 am [7, 8]. To exclude that the hypohosphatemia was due to this circadian rhythm, we determined serum phosphate in 100 fasting anonymous samples of patients visiting the outpatient clinic with an eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, withdrawn between 8.00–10.00 am. The mean serum phosphate level was 1.06 mmol/l (SD 0.17, range 0.67–1.42 mmol/l), indicating that the hypophosphatemia in our patients was not the result of the early morning blood sampling.

General (proximal) tubular dysfunction was assessed by measuring glucose, pH, urate and α1-microgobulin in urine. Glucose, calcium, potassium, creatinine (enzymatic method) and phosphate were measured on a Cobas c6000 (Roche, Switzerland) or c18000 (Abbott, USA) analyzer.

The α1-microgobulin concentration in urine was measured on a BNII nephelometer (Siemens, Germany) and urinary pH was measured with a PHM220 potentiometer (Hach Lange Nederland, the Netherlands). Genetic testing for mutations in genes that are known to be associated with renal phosphate wasting (DMP1, FGF23, FGFR1, GALNT3, PHEX, SLC34A1, SLC34A3, SLC9A3R1) was done by Sanger sequencing and MPLA on genomic DNA derived from peripheral blood cells. Vitamin D was measured by LC-MSMS. Intact PTH (second generation) was measured by an ECLIA on a modular E170 analyzer (Roche, Switzerland). FGF23 was measured by an ELISA of Immutopics measuring both intact FGF23 and C-terminal fragments, San Clemente, CA, USA. Somatostatin scans were performed per protocol in all patients with an elevated FGF23 level. In addition, somatostatin scans were performed in some patients with a normal FGF23 level at the discretion of the treating physician. These scans use somatostatin analogs (pentetreotide, TOC, TATE or NOC), which are labelled with tracer molecules (111Indium, 68Gallium or 99 Technetium) and sometimes a chelator molecule (DOTA). The somatostatin scans that were used in our clinics are the 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT scan and the 111Indium-pentetreotide SPECT/CT scan.

Results

Seventeen patients with unexplained chronic renal hypophosphatemia were evaluated. The median age was 42 years old, 10 patients were male and there were no other signs of tubulopathy in any of these patients.

Five female patients used oral contraceptives, containing estrogens, at the time of referral. Their demographical and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. After discontinuing the oral contraceptives, renal hypophosphatemia resolved in all patients with normalisation of serum phosphate levels (Fig. 1). TmP/GFR was measured in three patients before and after stopping the oral contraceptives and increased from 0.58 mmol/l (range 0.30–0.62) to 0.92 mmol/l (range 0.78–0.95). A re-challenge with the oral contraceptive was performed in one patient after which renal hypophosphatemia re-emerged. Characteristics of the other 12 patients are shown in Table 1. PTH was above normal (8.7 pmol/l) in only one patient. This patient did not have vitamin D deficiency and calcium excretion was normal (5 mmol/day). One patient had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) level below 50 nmol/l together with a slightly elevated 1,25OHD3 level of 206 pmol/l. 1,25OHD3 was above normal in another four patients and FGF23 was above 125 RU/ml in two patients.

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Course of serum phosphate levels before and after stopping oral contraceptives in 5 women

Full size image

Genetic testing, which was performed in all remaining patients, did not show any mutation in genes known to be associated with renal phosphate wasting.

The two patients with an FGF23 level above 125 RU/ml both underwent an 111Indium-pentetreotide SPECT/CT. These scans did not show increased somatostatin uptake that would have been suggestive of TIO. Three additional patients, with normal FGF23 levels, underwent an 111Indium-pentetreotide SPECT/CT and three additional patients a 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT scan, at the discretion of the treating physician. One of these six scans, a 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT scan, showed increased uptake in the right lateral femur suggestive of TIO. This patient had a normal serum FGF23 level of 110 RU/ml but progressive hypophosphatemia which required increasing doses of phosphate replacement. In this patient the tumor in the femur was resected (histology showed an enchondroma) after which renal hypophosphatemia resolved.

Discussion

Our study shows that in female patients presenting with previously unexplained renal hypophosphatemia, estrogen-induced hypophosphatemia due to oral contraceptive use appears to be frequent. In 5 out of 7 female patients the hypophosphatemia could be attributed to the use of oral contraceptives. This is a relatively unknown and often overlooked cause of renal phosphate loss. No previous study reported hypophosphatemia as the result of oral contraceptive use, but a decrease in serum phosphate has been described in response to estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women [9,10,11,12]. This decrease in serum phosphate was accompanied by a decrease in TmP/GFR, confirming renal phosphate wasting [11, 12]. The estrogen content of the replacement therapy that was used in these postmenopausal women was higher than the estrogen content in oral contraceptives in our patients (50 μg to 62.5 μg compared to 30 μg). Treatment with even higher doses of diethylstilbestrol diphoshate in male patients with metastatic prostate cancer also resulted in lowering of serum phosphate in 16 out of 18 patients [13]. Urinary parameters were measured in three of these patients, and were compatible with increased renal phosphate loss. Thus, the pathophysiological mechanism of the renal phosphate loss with oral contraceptive use is most likely related to the estrogen content. Indeed, estrogen treatment in ovariectomized rats and mice results in renal hypophosphatemia. In these animals both NaPi2a en NaPi2c in the proximal tubule were shown to be down regulated [14,15,16].

In 11/12 of the remaining patients the underlying cause of renal hypophosphatemia remained unknown, despite extensive diagnostic evaluation. Although genetic testing did not reveal a mutation, this does not rule out genetic causes as we might still have missed mutations of which the significance is not yet understood.

One patient was diagnosed with TIO. This diagnosis was made after this patient underwent a somatostatin scan, despite a normal serum level of FGF23, because he suffered from progressive hypophosphatemia.

Although most reported patients with TIO have clearly elevated serum FGF23 levels, fourteen TIO patients with normal FGF23 levels have been described in literature previously [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In these patients another phosphaturic hormone could be involved or FGF23 levels could have been misinterpreted due to the use of incorrect reference values and/or FGF23 assays.

Intact FGF23 (iFGF23) is degraded by proteolytic cleavage into inactive N- and C-terminal fragments [26, 25]. Since iFGF23 is rapidly degraded ex-vivo, special sampling procedures are required with the use of protease inhibitors [27]. In routine clinical practice in our country, a commercially available assay is used that measures both intact FGF23 and the C-terminal fragments. Therefore, we cannot exclude that some patients might have had increased iFGF23 values in the presence of normal cFGF23 values. Furthermore, reference values are based on studies in healthy volunteers. Ideally, FGF23 values in our patients with hypophosphatemia should be compared to FGF23 values in persons with FGF23-independent hypophosphatemia. Although iFGF23 is decreased in such patients [17, 28, 29], validated reference values of FGF23 adjusted for severe phosphate deficit do not exist.

We could have missed TIO’s because a somatostatin scan was not performed in all patients and because of low sensitivity of the scanning technique. Scans with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are being used for the diagnosis of TIO as these tumors are of mesenchymal origin and frequently express somatostatin receptors (mostly SSTR 2 and 5) [22, 30,31,32]. The scans differ in affinity for SSTR’s and spatial resolution. PET-based imaging has better spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratios as compared to SPECT-based imaging. The somatostatin analogues also differ in their affinity for various somatostatin receptor subtypes. DOTA-conjugated peptides have 4–8 higher affinity to SSTR2 than 111Indium-pentetreotide [22, 33, 31]. DOTANOC has affinity for a wide range of receptors like SSTR1, 2, 3 and 5, while DOTATATE and DOTATOC bind more avidly to SSTR2 [34, 35]. The exact percentage of SSTR positive tumours in TIO is not known, neither is the exact sensitivity of the different scanning techniques for diagnosing TIO.

Since tumors causing TIO typically are slow growing neoplasms that are benign in behaviour, a defensive diagnostic approach seems justified. We therefore do not advocate to immediately perform a somatostatin scan in all patients with unexplained chronic renal hypophosphatemia. We suggest to perform somatostatin scans only in patients with severe complaints including bone pain and fractures, elevated FGF23 levels, progressive disease and/or increasing FGF23 levels.

Another striking finding is the male predominance of the group of patients with an unexplained renal hypophosphatemia. This raises the question whether endogenous testosterone, in analogy to exogenous estrogen, plays a role in the phosphate loss. Supporting this theory is the negative correlation between serum testosterone and serum phosphate in men in the general population [36]. Data about the effect of testosterone therapy on serum phosphate is conflicting [37, 38] but testosterone depletion (states) seems to induce an increase in serum phosphate due to increased tubular phosphate re-absorption [39,40,41]. We did not test whether serum testosterone levels were elevated in our patients.

A main limitation of our paper is the retrospective study design, in which the analyses were performed to the discretion of the treating physician. Another limitation is the lack of other proximal tubular function markers such as aminoaciduria, which could be helpful to differentiate isolated renal hypophosphatemia from a more general proximal tubular defect as seen in Fanconi syndrome.

Conclusions

In conclusion, oral contraceptive use is an important but under-recognized cause of isolated chronic renal hypophosphatemia. The cause of chronic renal hypophosphatemia remained unexplained in the majority of other patients despite extensive and expensive additional investigations. The pre-test probability for TIO or inherited renal hypophosphatemia in a patient with aspecific complaints and a normal FGF23 level is low. Further research is needed to investigate which patients should be screened for TIO with measurements of both cFGF23 and iFGF23 and DOTA-conjugated SPECT scans. At present we suggest to perform somatostatin scans only in patients with severe complaints including bone pain and fractures, elevated FGF23 levels, progressive disease and/or increasing FGF23 levels. This strategy seems justified in view of the benign course of TIO.

Abbreviations

ADHR:

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets

ARHR:

Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets

FGF23:

Fibroblast growth factor 23

MPLA:

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificiation

LC-MSMS

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

PTH:

Parathyroid hormone

SSTR:

Somatostatin receptors

TIO:

Tumor induced osteomalacia

TMP/GFR:

Ratio of renal maximum tubular reabsorption of phosphate to GFR

XLH:

X-linked autosomal hypophosphatemia

References

  1. Gattineni J, Baum M. Genetic disorders of phosphate regulation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27(9):1477–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Liamis G, Milionis HJ, Elisaf M. Medication-induced hypophosphatemia: a review. QJM. 2010;103(7):449–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weidner N, Santa Cruz D. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. A polymorphous group causing osteomalacia or rickets. Cancer. 1987;59(8):1442–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang Y, Xia WB, Xing XP, et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: an important cause of adult-onset hypophosphatemic osteomalacia in China: Report of 39 cases and review of the literature. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(9):1967–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Minisola S, Peacock M, Fukumoto S, Cipriani C, Pepe J, Tella SH, Collins MT. Tumour-induced osteomalacia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;13(3):17044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walton RJ, Bijvoet OL. Nomogram for derivation of renal threshold phosphate concentration. Lancet. 1975;2(7929):309–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jubiz W, Canterbury JM, Reiss E, Tyler FH. Circadian rhythm in serum parathyroid hormone concentration in human subjects: correlation with serum calcium, phosphate, albumin, and growth hormone levels. J Clin Invest. 1972;51(8):2040–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker GJ, Walker RG, Hewitson TD, Pedagogos E. Phosphate levels--time for a rethink? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(8):2321–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adami S, Gatti D, Bertoldo F, et al. The effects of menopause and estrogen replacement therapy on the renal handling of calcium. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2(4):180–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Castelo-Branco C, Martínez de Osaba MJ, Pons F, González-Merlo J. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal bone loss. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992;44(2):131–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stock JL, Coderre JA, Mallette LE. Effects of a short course of estrogen on mineral metabolism in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;61(4):595–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Uemura H, Irahara M, Yoneda N, et al. Close correlation between estrogen treatment and renal phosphate reabsorption capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(3):1215–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Citrin DL, Elson P, Kies MS, Lind R. Decreased serum phosphate levels after high-dose estrogens in metastatic prostate cancer. Possible implications. Am J Med. 1984;76(5):787–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Webster R, Sheriff S, Faroqui R, Siddiqui F, Hawse JR, Amlal H. Klotho/fibroblast growth factor 23- and PTH-independent estrogen receptor-α-mediated direct downregulation of NaPi-IIa by estrogen in the mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;311(2):F249–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burris D, Webster R, Sheriff S, et al. Estrogen directly and specifically downregulates NaPi-IIa through the activation of both estrogen receptor isoforms (ERα and ERβ) in rat kidney proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;308(6):F522–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Faroqui S, Levi M, Soleimani M, Amlal H. Estrogen downregulates the proximal tubule type IIa sodium phosphate cotransporter causing phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemia. Kidney Int. 2008;73(10):1141–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Endo I, Fukumoto S, Ozono K, et al. Clinical usefulness of measurement of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) in hypophosphatemic patients: proposal of diagnostic criteria using FGF23 measurement. Bone. 2008:1235–9.

  18. Jonsson KB, Zahradnik R, Larsson T, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 in oncogenic osteomalacia and X-linked hypophosphatemia. N Engl J Med. 2003:1656–63.

  19. Amblee A, Uy J, Senseng C, Hart P. Tumor-induced osteomalacia with normal systemic fibroblast growth factor-23 level. Clin Kidney J. 2014:186–9.

  20. Jadhav S, Kasaliwal R, Lele V, et al. Functional imaging in primary tumour-induced osteomalacia: relative performance of FDG PET/CT vs somatostatin receptor-based functional scans: a series of nine patients. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;81(1):31–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Honda R, Kawabata Y, Ito S, Kikuchi F. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, mixed connective tissue type, non-phosphaturic variant: report of a case and review of 32 cases from the Japanese published work. J Dermatol. 2014;41(9):845–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Breer S, Brunkhorst T, Beil FT. 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT allows tumor localization in patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia but negative 111In-octreotide SPECT/CT. Bone. 2014;64:222–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Agrawal K, Bhadada S, Mittal BR, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG and 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT in localization of tumor causing oncogenic osteomalacia. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(1):e6–e10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu WJ, He JW, Fu WZ, Wang C, Zhang ZL. Reports of 17 Chinese patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia. J Bone Miner Metab. 2017;35(3):298–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. González G, Baudrand R, Sepúlveda MF, et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: experience from a south American academic center. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(7):2187–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Goetz R, Nakada Y, Hu MC, et al. Isolated C-terminal tail of FGF23 alleviates hypophosphatemia by inhibiting FGF23-FGFR-klotho complex formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(1):407–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith ER, Ford ML, Tomlinson LA, et al. Instability of fibroblast growth factor-23: implications for clinical studies. Clin Chim Acta. 2011:1008–11.

  28. Magen D, Berger L, Coady MJ, Ilivitzki A, Militianu D, Tieder M, Selig S, Lapointe JY, Zelikovic I, Skorecki K. A loss-of-function mutation in NaPi-IIa and renal Fanconi's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25;362(12):1102–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lorenz-Depiereux B, Benet-Pages A, Eckstein G, et al. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria is caused by mutations in the sodium-phosphate cotransporter gene SLC34A3. Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;78(2):193–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Seufert J, Ebert K, Müller J, et al. Octreotide therapy for tumor-induced osteomalacia. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(26):1883–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clifton-Bligh RJ, Hofman MS, Duncan E, et al. Improving diagnosis of tumor-induced osteomalacia with Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):687–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reubi JC, Schaer JC, Laissue JA, Waser B. Somatostatin receptors and their subtypes in human tumors and in peritumoral vessels. Metabolism. 1996;45(8 Suppl 1):39–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, et al. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34(7):982–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cescato R, Schulz S, Waser B, et al. Internalization of sst2, sst3, and sst5 receptors: effects of somatostatin agonists and antagonists. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(3):502–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hesse E, Moessinger E, Rosenthal H, et al. Oncogenic osteomalacia: exact tumor localization by co-registration of positron emission and computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(1):158–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Meng J, Ohlsson C, Laughlin GA, et al. Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOs) Study Group. Associations of estradiol and testosterone with serum phosphorus in older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men study. Kidney Int. 2010;78(4):415–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pedersen L, Christensen LL, Pedersen SM, Andersen M. Reduction of calprotectin and phosphate during testosterone therapy in aging men: a randomized controlled trial. J Endocrinol Investig. 2017:529–38.

  38. Sih R, Morley JE, Kaiser FE, Perry HM, Patrick P, Ross C. Testosterone replacement in older hypogonadal men: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(6):1661–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stĕpán JJ, Lachman M, Zvĕrina J, Pacovský V, Baylink DJ. Castrated men exhibit bone loss: effect of calcitonin treatment on biochemical indices of bone remodeling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(3):523–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leder BZ, LeBlanc KM, Schoenfeld DA, Eastell R, Finkelstein JS. Differential effects of androgens and estrogens on bone turnover in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(1):204–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Burnett-Bowie SM, Mendoza N, Leder BZ. Effects of gonadal steroid withdrawal on serum phosphate and FGF-23 levels in men. Bone. 2007;40(4):913–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Financial support was received from the Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars (Innovation Funds Dutch Health Insurance Companies).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    A. P. Bech, J. F. M. Wetzels & T. Nijenhuis

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus medical center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    E. J. Hoorn & R. Zietse

Authors
  1. A. P. Bech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. J. Hoorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Zietse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. F. M. Wetzels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Nijenhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors made significant contributions to the manuscript. Research idea and study design: APB, EJH, RZ, JFMW, TN. Data acquisition: APB, EJH. Data analysis/interpretation: APB, EJH, RZ, JFMW, TN. Supervision: EJH, RZ, JFMW, TN. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Bech.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Given the retrospective character, no ethical approval was necessary. This is in accordance to our Dutch law on medical scientific research (WMO; Wet medisch-wetenschappelijk onderzoek) and local ethical policies. The law states that no ethical approval is necessary for retrospective research in which patients are not subjected to actions or codes of conduct which are imposed on them. Patients consented in use of their data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The results presented in this paper have not been published previously. None of the authors has a conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bech, A.P., Hoorn, E.J., Zietse, R. et al. Yield of diagnostic tests in unexplained renal hypophosphatemia: a case series. BMC Nephrol 19, 220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1017-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1017-z

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us