Skip to main content

Renal transplantation in Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: should we?

Abstract

Background

Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) Syndrome is a rare genodermatosis caused by a mutation on folliculin gene, with a strong link to renal cancer. To date few patients with such condition have reached dialysis stage, as nephron-sparing surgery is usually possible at the time of diagnosis. To our best knowledge no patient with BHD syndrome has been submitted to renal transplantation.

Case presentation

We report the case of a woman diagnosed with multifocal bilateral renal cell carcinoma that underwent bilateral radical nephrectomy and was started on a regular hemodialysis program at the age of 29. While on hemodialysis program she was diagnosed clinically with BHD syndrome and molecular testing confirmed an heterozygous mutation on FLCN gene. The patient has been kept on surveillance program for 2 years with no clinical complications from the genetic syndrome and in complete remission from renal cancer. Though there has not been any report of a patient with BHD being transplanted, risks and benefits for this patient were weighted. She has been considered apt by the transplant team and is currently waitlisted for cadaveric renal transplantation.

Discussion

It is a matter of discussion which should be cancer-free period for anephric patients with an inherited cancer syndrome to be candidates for renal transplant. So far BHD syndrome has not been causally associated with any other neoplastic disorder elsewhere. Accepting cancer biology is very complex and knowledge of the behaviour of this genetic syndrome is limited to a few cases reported worldwide, the authors believe that renal transplantation is the best treatment option for this young patient. The choice of post transplantation immunosuppression is debatable, but considering experience in other inherited cancer syndromes a maintenance scheme with mTOR inhibitor will be favoured.

Peer Review reports

Background

Young patients with multifocal, bilateral kidney cancers should be screened for inherited renal cancer syndromes. Although the management of the tumour invariably involves nephrectomy (nephron-sparing or not) with or without adjuvant therapies, the patient prognosis is greatly influenced by the inherited syndrome [1,2,3]. Hereditary kidney cancer syndromes follow different clinical courses and respond differently to therapy compared to sporadic kidney cancers. Most importantly, the molecular diagnosis may reveal other genetic underpinnings of the disease and its phenotypic variations alerting for possible clinical consequences. Molecular identification of involved genes will be determinant for prediction of future clinical implications, risk of recurrence and evaluation of patient’s candidacy to renal transplant.

Case report

We report the case of a 29-year-old female with a past medical history of smoking (5-pack-years) and a spontaneous pneumothorax four years earlier. The aforementioned pneumothorax was complicated by continuous re-expansion of the air chamber, resolving only after atypical basal segment lung resection and pleurodesis by video-assisted thoracotomy. The patient had no family history of spontaneous pneumothorax, cancer or consanguinity.

On April of 2014 on a routine gynaecological consultation a pelvic ultrasonography revealed multiple and bilateral hypoechogenic renal masses. The patient was immediately referred to urology care. The patient underwent percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy. Histology report identified cells suggestive of carcinoma. On computer tomography multiple masses were present on both kidneys and bilateral nephrectomy was scheduled. Two days after surgery the patient was started on a regular haemodialysis program.

The pathology report of nephrectomised samples revealed the right kidney had nine intra-renal tumoural masses, not invading the capsule and corresponding to renal cell carcinoma of chromophobe cell type. The left kidney had nineteen intra-renal masses with the same histology, without capsular involvement. The tumour was staged according to TMN classification system, 7th edition, as T1b Nx Mx, with no residual tumour. Since surgical margins were negative and there were no signs of distant metastatic disease, the patient was not proposed for adjuvant chemotherapy.

While on regular haemodialysis, multiple small whitish papules were noticed predominantly on the head and neck. These papules had been slowly appearing after the age of 20. Skin biopsy confirmed hair follicle benign tumours of trichodiscoma type [Fig. 1].

Fig. 1
figure 1

10× Amplification of Trichodiscoma, biopsied from the patient cervical region

Considering the patient past medical history and the skin lesions, Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome was considered. The hallmark features of this genodermatosis are benign skin tumours of fibrofolliculoma, trichodiscoma or acrochordon type [1, 2, 4]. This syndrome is also characterized by a strong link to renal cancer and spontaneous pneumothoraxes, with some authors reporting a 7-fold increased risk for developing renal tumours and 50-fold for developing spontaneous pneumothoraxes compared to normal population [5]. The renal tumours are multifocal or bilateral in the majority of patients with BHD and the most typical histological types are pure chromophobe, oncocytomas and hybrid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma [1, 3, 6]. According to the European Consortium guidelines, this patient had 1 major criteria and 2 minor criteria for BHD syndrome [7].

Genetic analysis confirmed an heterozygote mutation on FLCN gene, in exon 6 (C.573_574delinsT). The family was screened for the mutation and it was found on 3 other family members (father, sister, first degree cousin), which are now on surveillance program.

The patient has been on dialysis for 2 years now. Though there has not been any report of a patient with BHD being transplanted, risks and benefits for this patient were weighted. She has been considered apt by the transplant team and is currently waitlisted for cadaveric renal transplantation.

Discussion

Definite diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome requires genetic testing for folliculin mutations. Genetic transmission of this syndrome occurs through autosomal dominant pattern. To date, 194 unique DNA variants of the folliculin gene (FLCN) have been reported as responsible for this syndrome [2]. The FLCN mutation detection rate is 88% [8], due to a great variation in the expression of FLCN gene both within and between families with BHD [7].

Though it had been hypothesized FLCN protein had tumour suppressor properties and could be one of the major proteins regulating the mTOR pathway, only recently was FLCN established as a tumour suppressor gene that fits the classic two-hit model [9]. In addition to FLCN germline mutation, a second somatic mutation in the remaining FLCN allele has been found in tumour cells [10, 11]. FLCN interacts mainly with 3 proteins: folliculin interacting proteins (FNIP1 and FNIP2) and 5’-AMP activated protein kinase. Studies in vitro suggest FLCN has a role facilitating mTOR activation at the lysosome surface, however further studies are needed to clarify mechanisms involved in mTOR signalling by the FLCN/FNIP complex and possibly validate the role of mTOR inhibition in tumour progression suppression [12, 13].

Family screening for carriers of FLCN mutations is of outmost importance since kidney cancer is the most lethal potential complication of this syndrome [5, 7]. Nephron-sparing surgery should be favoured when possible [14, 15]. Surveillance is recommended to start after the age of 20, although the methods and optimal programme for surveillance are not yet established [7]. As for the respiratory complications, the role of tobacco on increasing the risk of pneumothorax on BHD-carriers is yet not established, however lifetime smoking eviction is strongly encouraged for all BHD-carriers [7]. BHD-carriers who already had a spontaneous pneumothorax are recommended to avoid exposure to great atmospheric pressure gradients, as in deep-sea diving. Currently there is no evidence against occasional air travelling.

Folliculin protein is expressed in a variety of tissues contrary to what was previously believed, however it is only known to have pathological significance in renal, lung and skin tissue [16]. BHD-associated renal cancer shares some of the clinical features of the tuberous sclerosis complex syndrome, which on its own also regulate proteins involved in the mTOR pathway, and should be part of the differential diagnosis when considering BHD.

To our knowledge there hasn’t been any report of a BHD patient having a kidney transplant, however there is some evidence of successful renal transplantation in patients with other inherited kidney cancer syndromes such as Von Hippel Lindau and Tuberous sclerosis syndrome [17,18,19]. The main concern regarding transplantation in these patients is malignancy recurrence or de novo emergence following post-transplantation immunosuppression. Though BHD syndrome has not been causally associated with cancer elsewhere apart from the kidney, the effects of immunosuppression on this complex and not completely elucidated cancer syndrome are unknown.

Choice of post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy should be individualized considering the patient malignancy risk. Calcineurin inhibitors have been associated with dose-dependent increased risk of malignancy and mTOR inhibitors have been proven to have a less cancerogenic profile and even anti-tumour properties, being used to delay progression of metastatic renal cell cancer [20]. There is evidence that mTOR inhibitors should be the favored immunosuppressant in patients with loss of VHL function [20] and has been used in transplantation of patients with Von Hippel Lindau disease.

Conclusions

It is a matter of discussion which should be cancer-free period for anephric patients with an inherited cancer syndrome to be candidates for renal transplant. KHA-CARI recommends 5 years, other authors recommending 2 years [21, 22]. As BHD syndrome has not been causally associated with any other neoplastic disorder elsewhere [1, 7, 8], the authors defend that no cancer-free period should be needed, as long as the patient is completely anephric. Accepting cancer biology is complex and knowledge of the behaviour of this genetic syndrome is limited to a few cases reported worldwide, the authors believe that renal transplantation is the best treatment option for this young patient and probably will opt for a post-transplant immunosuppressive maintenance scheme with a mTOR inhibitor.

Abbreviations

BHD:

Birt-Hogg-Dubé

FLCN:

Folliculin gene

KHA-CARI:

Kidney Health Australia – Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment

mTOR:

Mechanistic target of rapamycin

VHL:

Von Hippel Lindau

References

  1. Burowski RM, Figlin RA, Motzer RJ. Renal Cell Carcinoma Molecular targets and clinical applications. In: Humana press: springer science + business media. 2nd ed; 2009. p. 21–4. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lim DH, et al. A new locus-specific database (LSDB) for mutations in the folliculin (FLCN) gene. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(1):E1043–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen HT, McGovern FJ. Renal Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2477–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birt AR, Hogg GR, Dubé WJ. Hereditary multiple fibrofolliculomas with trichodiscomas and acrochordons. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1674–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zbar B, Alvord G, Glenn G, et al. Risk of renal and colon neoplasms and spontaneous pneumothorax in the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11(4):393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benusiglio PR, et al. Renal cell tumour characteristics in patients with the Birt-Hogg-Dubé cancer susceptibility syndrome: a retrospective, multicenter study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Menko FH, van Steensel MA, Giraud S, et al. European BHD consortium. Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: diagnosis and management. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(12):1199–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toro JR, et al. BHD mutations, clinical and molecular genetic investigations of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: a new series of 50 families and a review of published reports. J Med Genet. 2008;45(6):321–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt LS, Linehan WM. Molecular genetics and clinical features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(10):558–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okimoto K, Sakurai J, Kobayashi T, et al. A germ-line insertion in the Birt-Hogg-Dube (BHD) gene gives rise to the Nihon rat model of inherited renal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:2023–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vocke CD, Yang Y, Pavlovich CP, et al. High frequency of somatic frameshift BHD gene mutations in Birt-Hogg-Dubé-associated renal tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(12):931–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudon V, Sabourin S, Dydensborg AB, et al. Renal tumour suppressor function of the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome gene product folliculin. J Med Genet. 2010;47(3):182–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsun ZY, Bar-Peled L, Chantranupong L, et al. The folliculin tumor suppressor is a GAP for the RagC/D GTPases that signal amino acid levels to mTORC1. Mol Cell. 2013;52(4):495–505 Epub 2013 Oct 3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldfarb DA, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery and renal transplantation in patients with renal cell carcinoma and von Hippel–Lindau disease. J Intern Med. 1998;243:563–7 Blackwell Science Ltd.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stamatakis L, Metwalli AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of BHD-associated kidney cancer. Familial Cancer. 2013;12(3):397–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Warren MB, et al. Expression of Birt-Hogg-Dubé gene mRNA in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(8):998–1011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinbach F, Novick AC, Shoskes D. Renal transplantation in patients with renal cell carcinoma and von Hippel-Lindau disease. Urol. 1994;44(5):760–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leong KG, Kanellis J, Mulley WR. Transplant considerations in a man with von Hippel-Lindau disease with bilateral renal cell carcinoma and a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour. Nephrol. 2015;20:956–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hussain M, Mubarak M, Sultan G, et al. Renal transplant in a tuberous sclerosis patient with bilateral giant renal angiomyolipomas and concurrent renal carcinoma. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013;24(2):318–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Voss MH, Molina AM, Motzer RJ. mTOR inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25(4):835–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell S, et al. KHA-CARI Guideline: recipient assessment for transplantation. Nephrol. 2013;18:455–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel PH, et al. Targeting von Hippel–Lindau pathway in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2006;12:7215–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto (IMATIMUB) – Performed the histological examinations that allowed the diagnosis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JC – Drafted the manuscript and was responsible for all data acquisition, data analysis and coordinated revisions from other authors. JS – Responsible for the molecular genetic studies and critically revised the report from genetics point of view. FCT – Contributed to the diagnosis and follow up of the patient. Made substantial contributions to the conception of the report. CRS – Contributed to the critical review of the manuscript from nephrology point of view. RSC - Contributed to the critical review from transplantation point of view. RAF – Was an essential part in multidisciplinary discussion that allowed for the final outcome of the case. Encouraged main author for publication of this case report contributing to conception and design. EFR - Contributed to the follow up of the patient and gave the final approval of the version to be published. All authors have read and approved of the manuscript to be submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Coutinho.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical committee approval was not needed as this study doesn’t include research. Written consent from the patient was obtained for skin biopsy and molecular genetic testing. A copy of the consent form can be made available for review by the Editor of this Journal.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and images was obtained from the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this Journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coutinho, J., de Sa, J., Teixeira, F.C. et al. Renal transplantation in Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: should we?. BMC Nephrol 19, 267 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1064-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-1064-5

Keywords