Skip to main content
Download PDF

Extended infusion of rituximab combined with steroids is effective in inducing remission and reducing relapse in adult minimal change disease

BMC Nephrology volume 22, Article number: 242 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Minimal change disease is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Higher relapse rate put patients at risk of steroids toxicity due to long-term exposure. Rituximab has been suggested to maintain long time remission and withdraw steroids and other immunosuppressants with fewer adverse events. However, optimal dose and dosing interval have not been explored.

Methods

Twenty-five patients were enrolled from 2017-10 to 2020-03 in Nanfang Hospital in China. Clinical and biological data were extracted from medical records and laboratory databases. Therapy composed of 375mg/m2 rituximab once three weeks for 3 dose and corticosteroid was applied. Complete remission was defined as reduction of proteinuria to 0.3g/d. Remission rate, relapse rate, steroids used before and after rituximab therapy and adverse effects were documented at a mean time of 14.71 months.

Results

Twenty-two patients achieved complete remission for an average of 3.26 months and only 3 patients experienced one relapse respectively during the follow-up period. The mean remission maintenance time was 11.6 months, and was 5 months after steroids withdrawal. Steroids dose at last follow-up was 6.09mg/d, which was significantly reduced compared to 28.15mg/d before rituximab. Relapse rate before and after rituximab was 1.43 and 0.1, respectively. Only four minor adverse events were recorded.

Conclusions

Therapy consisted of 375mg/m2 rituximab once three weeks for 3 dose combined with corticosteroid is effective in inducing remission in adult patients with minimal change disease. Both of the relapse rate and dose of steroids used are significantly decreased with fewer side effects.

Peer Review reports

Background

Minimal change disease (MCD) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS), presented as heavy proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. It is diagnosed by the absence of glomerular lesions on light microscopy, negative immunofluorescence and extensive podocyte foot process effacement on electron microscopy in renal biopsy. MCD contributes to 70-90% of children > 1 year of age with idiopathic NS. While the proportions, decreasing with age, is about 10-15% in adult patients [1,2,3]. Corticosteroids including prednisone and methylprednisolone are the primary treatment regimen used at disease onset. Although most of the adult patients respond well to steroid treatment and the long-term prognosis is excellent with remission rate of 75-95% [4], longer remission time, higher tendency to relapse and higher incidence of acute kidney injury when compared with children, as well as no consensus on the optimal dose and duration of therapy, put adults at risk of prolonged exposure of steroids and other immunosuppressive agents [5, 6].

Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody, inhibiting CD20-mediated B-cell proliferation and differentiation, which was originally developed to treat B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [7]. It was firstly introduced to treat steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in 2004, when a child diagnosed with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and NS received RTX therapy and achieved remission [8]. Since then, more and more studies have proven the efficacy of RTX use in MCD about inducing remission, reducing relapse rate, providing long-term remission off steroids or other immunomodulatory drugs [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. RTX also showed a favorable long-term safety profile compared to traditional therapy, with lower incidence of infection, no risk of metabolic disorder such as glucose intolerance or osteoporosis, and no impact on the reproductive system. The major side effects consisted of infusion-related reaction, HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients and rarely pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) [18].

However, most of the investigation focused on MCD in children. There are only a few retrospective, observational studies regarding RTX use in adult patients [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In these limited literatures, initial RTX dosage is quite different not only between researches but also in the same article, which makes comparison between different therapeutic strategies impossible. Moreover, some studies have implicated that the serum level of RTX in patients with nephrotic syndrome is lower than that of patients in other disease like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [31] probably due to the loss of RTX in the urine. Thus, it is crucial to find the optimal dose of RTX in adult MCD, which combines the maximum remission duration with minimal side effects.

In the current analysis, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of a regimen of 3 applications of 375mg/m2 dose of RTX three weeks apart together with steroids in adult patients with biopsy-proven MCD, and to show the relapse rate and discontinuation or tapering of steroids during the follow-up period after RTX therapy.

Methods

Study population and clinical characteristics

Twenty-five adult patients (age > 18 years old) with biopsy-proven MCD were recruited in this study from 2017-10 to 2020-03 at the Department of Nephrology at Nanfang Hospital in China. One patient was excluded because of exacerbation of pruritus after first infusion of RTX. In the remaining 24 patients, previous medical history of every participant had been reviewed to define the clinical subtype of MCD: steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), infrequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (IRNS) and frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS). SDNS was defined as relapse during steroid therapy or with 15 days of discontinuation. SRNS was defined as no response to prednisone 1mg/kg per day or 2mg/kg every other day within 16 weeks. Infrequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome was defined as < 2 relapses per 6 months or < 4 relapses per 12 months. Frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome was defined as ≥ 2 relapses per 6 months or ≥ 4 relapses per 12 months [3, 32].

We also obtained age at disease onset, previous immunosuppressive therapy, disease duration, relapse rate from the medical history. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records at admission, which consisted of age at first RTX infusion, sex, comorbidities, current immunosuppressive regimen, the dosage of steroids before RTX therapy and at last follow-up. Biological data were obtained from the laboratory databases, including 24h urine protein excretion, serum albumin, absolute count of CD19+ B cell, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimated with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation at the time of RTX initiation, 3, 6, 9, 12, 20, 32, 44, 56 weeks after the first infusion of RTX therapy and at last follow-up.

The study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University and is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Rituximab therapy

Patients received 375mg/m2 RTX treatment once three weeks for 3 dose and corticosteroids which dose is maintained according to the last therapy. Before infusion, loratadine was prescribed to lower the incidence of infusion-related reaction. Infusion rate of RTX started at 20ml/hour, which was doubled after 30 minutes of infusion if no infusion-related reaction happened, until reaching the highest rate of 120ml/hour. Electrocardiogram monitor was used during the infusion period to check the vital sign of patients. Patients were all treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for a week after infusion of RTX to prevent PCP.

Remission was defined according to 2012 KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis [32]. Complete remission (CR) was defined as reduction of proteinuria to 0.3g/d, normal serum creatinine and serum albumin > 35g/L; Partial remission (PR) was defined as reduction of proteinuria to 0.3-3.5g/d and a decrease > 50% from baseline, and stable serum creatinine (change in serum creatinine < 25%). Relapse was defined as proteinuria > 3.5g/d after complete remission has been obtained.

Statistical analyses

All study data were stored in a standard Excel database. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), GraphPad version 8.3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and STATA version 15.0 for Mac (StataCorp LLC, Texas, USA). All continuous variables were expressed as mean or mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages [n(%)]. Differences between relapse and dosage of steroids before and after RTX therapy were analyzed by t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test or Fisher exact tests, if appropriate for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of complete remission. Longitudinal data analyses were performed to illustrate the variation of urinary protein, serum albumin and serum creatinine. The value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients characteristics and clinical parameters

We included 24 adult patients from 2017-10 to 2020-03 at the Department of Nephrology at Nanfang Hospital in China. Baseline characteristics of study population were presented in Table 1. The detailed information of each patient was illustrated in Table S1 in Additional file 1. All the patients were male, and were diagnosed as MCD based on clinical manifestation and pathological results from renal biopsy. 9 patients have adult-onset MCD, while 15 patients were recognized as having nephrotic syndrome during childhood. The average age at RTX infusion was 23.58 years old (18-46), and was 18.88 years old (3-46) at disease onset. The disease duration ranged from 0.25 to 14.58 years. All the patients received at least 1 course of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapy, such as Cyclosporin (11), Tacrolimus (12), Cyclophosphamide (1), Mycophenolate mofetil (8), Chlorambucil (4), Leflunomide (1), Tripterygium glycosides (3), with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) consisting of cyclosporin and tacrolimus being the most common used immunosuppressants. Only 1 patient (patient 24) avoided steroids treatment because of glaucoma induced by prednisone, and received tacrolimus treatment alone. The remaining 23 patients accepted steroids treatment since disease onset. 17 patients were defined as SDNS, 6 patients were recognized as SRNS. While, 2 patients had FRNS and 21 patients were considered having IRNS.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of study population before rituximab therapy
Full size table

Nineteen patients presented with nephrotic syndrome at the time of first infusion of RTX. 3 patients having sub-nephrotic range proteinuria and 2 patients in corticosteroids-induced CR were treated in order to improve steroids-related complication or avoid long-term toxicity of corticosteroids through steroids tapering or withdrawal. The average 24-hour urine protein excretion was 9.49g/d (0.07-30.5) and the mean serum albumin was 22.57g/L (13.9-36.8). 6 patients had elevated serum creatinine. The mean eGFR was 103.36ml/min per 1.73m2 (12.1-186.68). Pre-treatment CD19+ B cell count was 344/μL (92-1208) an average. The average follow-up time after first infusion was 14.71 months (8-36).

Rituximab therapy

Nineteen patients received 375mg/m2 RTX treatment once three weeks for 3 dose and corticosteroids which dose is maintained as prescribed previously. Four patients received the fourth dose of RTX, in which 3 patients had overt proteinuria at the beginning and before the third dose of RTX (12.1-24.73). The remaining patient was treated with the fourth dose in consideration of NS refractory to each available therapy for 93 months. Only 1 patient declined the third dose of RTX because of recurrent and uncontrolled onychomycosis.

Response to rituximab treatment

Twenty-two patients achieved CR for an average of 3.26 months (0.75-11) after the first infusion of RTX with 13 patients achieved CR during the treatment period (Table 2). The longest remission time is 11 months, while the shortest remission time is just before the second dose of RTX infusion. Two patients showed no response even acquired 4 dose of RTX. The remaining 2 patients being in remission before treatment were in maintained remission at last follow-up despite of steroids withdrawal. In 2 patients with no response (NR), 1 patient were treated with prednisone (1mg/kg) and achieved CR thereafter and 1 patient showed remarkable decrease in proteinuria from 30.5g/d initially to 7.62g/d and normal serum albumin level at last follow-up.

Table 2 Tapering doses of prednisone and relapse rate after rituximab therapy
Full size table

Cumulative incidence of remission, and changes of 24-hour urinary protein excretion, serum albumin and serum creatinine were illustrated in Table 3, Fig. 1 and Figure S1. The cumulative response rate was 91.67% (22/24), and all the patients with response to RTX therapy achieved CR. The response rate showed no differences between childhood-onset and adult-onset patients, which were showed in Tables S2 and S3.

Table 3 Change of proteinuria, serum creatinine, and serum albumin after rituximab treatment
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

A The cumulative incidence of complete remission after rituximab therapy during a 56-week follow up; B The variation of urine protein excretion after rituximab therapy; C The variation of serum albumin after rituximab therapy; D The variation of serum creatinine after rituximab therapy. Abbreviations: RTX, rituximab

Full size image

Tapering doses of steroids and relapse after RTX

Steroids tapering protocol was detailed in Additional file 2. Tapering of steroids therapy, remission maintenance time with or without steroids were illustrated in Table 2 and Table S4. Twenty-one patients experienced relapse at the dose of steroids before the first infusion of RTX. At last follow-up, the mean prednisone dose is 6.09mg/d (0-25), which is significantly reduced compared to 28.15mg/d (5-50) at the beginning of RTX therapy, which was illustrated in Fig. 2. Eleven patients were out of steroids therapy and maintained in remission during the follow-up time. The mean remission maintenance time is 11.6 months (0.25-31) in total and 5 months (1-11) after corticosteroids withdrawal.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Prednisone dose is significantly different in patients before and after rituximab treatment; B: Relapse rate is significantly different in patients before and after rituximab treatment. Abbreviations: RTX, rituximab. P value is calculated using paired t-test to demonstrate the differences in prednisone dosage and relapse rate between the two groups. **** P < 0.0001

Full size image

In 22 patients in remission after RTX therapy, 3 patients experienced relapse during steroids tapering. One patient (Patient 5) received additional dose of RTX and achieved remission rapidly. One patient (Patient 16) also achieved remission with increased prednisone dosage. The remaining patient (patient 11) experienced relapse after maintaining remission for 16 months, and was treated with the fourth dose of RTX. However, response condition was not recorded because that relapse time is near the time of last follow-up. In 3 patients with relapse, circulating CD19+ B cell count were 33/μL (patient 5), 459/μL (patient 11), and 2/μL (patient 16), respectively. The average relapse rate after RTX was significantly lower than that before (0.1% vs 1.43%), which was depicted in Fig. 2.

When dividing patients into childhood-onset and adult-onset MCD, both the steroids dosage and the relapse rate showed no significant differences before and after rituximab therapy (Table S2 and S3).

Adverse effects

During the treatment period and follow-up time, only four minor adverse events were recognized (Table 4). One patient experienced exacerbation of pruritus, which was presented before RTX treatment, and discontinued the following infusion. Two patients in the cohort experienced infusion-related reaction. One had allergic reaction presenting as urticaria and topical pruritus at first infusion, which is alleviated by temporary stop the infusion of RTX and use of anti-histamine agents. Another patient showed flu-like symptoms. The remaining patient refused the third dose of RTX because of uncontrolled onychomycosis, which already existed before RTX therapy, probably due to previous long-term use of steroids and other immunosuppressive drugs.

Table 4 Side effects of rituximab during follow-up
Full size table

Discussion

In this case series, we investigated the efficacy of rituximab combined with corticosteroids in inducing remission in adult patients with either SDNS or SRNS of MCD. To our knowledge, it is the first retrospective observational study that apply 375mg/m2 RTX infusion once three weeks for 3 dose together with steroids in adult patients with biopsy-proven MCD in China. In our research, 91.67% patients achieved CR in a mean time of 3.26 months (0.75-11), and only three patients experienced one relapse during the follow-up period. The average dose of steroids at last follow-up was significantly lower than that used before rituximab (28.15mg/d versus 6.09mg/d).

MCD is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in children, which was considered equal to steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome when renal biopsy was not performed. While in adult, MCD accounted for about 15% of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in previous research [3], and 30% of that in China [33]. The pathological hallmark of MCD is absence of visible alteration by light microscopy and podocyte foot process effacement. Although patients diagnosed as MCD responded well to corticosteroids, longer time to remission, higher relapse rate and higher incidence of AKI in adults put them at risk of steroids and other immunosuppressive drug toxicity.

RTX has been proven to be effective in inducing remission of MCD. However, most of the researches were restricted in children. There are only a few small-sampled observational studies regarding RTX use in adult patients. The reported incidence of CR of MCD after RTX therapy in adult patients ranged from 50% to 100% [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, it is difficult to draw any reliable conclusion from previous studies. Firstly, different therapeutic protocols of RTX were used not only between different researches, but also in the same study [6, 25,26,27]. Moreover, in certain researches, patients were already in remission due to previous treatment [19, 27, 29]. Adult patients with biopsy-proven focal segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGS) were enrolled in certain studies [20, 26,27,28, 30]. Last but not least is that different immunosuppressive drugs excluding steroids were used in the RTX protocols [20, 21, 25,26,27,28]. B-cell driven therapy had been used in some researches, which showed promising effects [27, 30]. However, interaction between RTX and podocyte function was also considered important of RTX therapy in MCD [34]. Some studies implied that relapse did not always happen during B cell reconstruction as well [25, 35]. In our study, CD19+ B-lymphocyte cell count at the time of relapse in 3 patients varied from 2-459/μL, which also indicated that effectiveness of RTX in MCD might not be only attributed to B cell depletion. While, we firstly apply 375mg/m2 RTX treatment once three weeks for 3 dose combined with corticosteroids in all the patients. Only 4 patients required additional infusion, and 1 patient declined the third dose of RTX resulting from uncontrolled concurrent infection. The incidence of CR in our study is 91.67%, which concluded that RTX combined with steroids is effective in inducing remission in adult MCD patients with considerable remission rate.

The optimal dose of RTX, which combines the maximum remission duration with minimal side effects, is difficult to define, even in lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis. In lymphoma, R-CHOP-21 schedule provided a longer exposure and maximized the exposure to clinical relevant concentrations of RTX, compared to R-CHOP-14 [36]. While R-CHOP-14 protocol ensured higher C-max and C-min during infusion period. Moreover, in patients manifesting nephrotic syndrome, serum RTX concentration is significantly lower than that in RA [31] or Myasthenia gravis [37]. Probably due to the loss of RTX in urine in patients with remarkable proteinuria. However, loss of RTX in urine was not documented in MCD [38]. Therefore, further investigation with respect to serum concentration of RTX in MCD and superior protocol with optimal initial dose and maintenance dose are required.

Previous researches have suggested RTX therapy was able to reduce the relapses per year and to enable discontinuation or tapering of steroids or other immunosuppressive agents, which is consistent in our study. Relapses per year and dose of steroids used in remission after RTX were considerably reduced compared to those before RTX therapy. The relapse rate is 13.64%, only 3 patients experienced one relapse during follow-up period respectively. In previous literatures, relapse rate varied from 0 to 56% [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Firstly, the time of follow-up seemed to be the reasonable factor. One study concluded that the median time to relapse is 18 months [25]. Meanwhile, patients showed relapse mostly after 6 months of RTX therapy [19, 21, 24, 25, 27,28,29,30]. Therefore, studies conducted shorter follow-up time may not reflect the true relapse rate. Secondly, populations varied across studies. Patients with treatment-naive MCD showed no relapse after RTX therapy [23]. While researches recruiting patients with FSGS demonstrated higher relapse rate [20, 27, 30]. Thirdly, different treatment strategies, either alone or combined with other immunomodulatory drugs may play an important role explaining the inconsistency between literatures. While Takei delineated that B cell reconstruction could not be a reliable parameter to indicate the relapse [21] and the effectiveness of RTX in MCD might result from its impact on podocyte function [39], we proposed not to adjust RTX infusion based on the circulating CD-19 positive B-lymphocyte cells, in order to avoid unnecessary exposure of RTX.

Furthermore, the mean dose of steroids used at last follow up is significantly reduced compared to that before RTX therapy, which is in accordance with other reported results [22, 26, 27].

Similar to previous researches, RTX use in adult patients with MCD was quite tolerable. Only 4 adverse events were recorded during the treatment and follow-up period. Infusion-related reaction was considered the most common side effect of RTX, which accounted for 50% of adverse events in our study. One infection presenting as onychomycosis, happened before RTX probably due to long-term use of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents, which was refractory to standard antimicrobial treatment during RTX treatment. HBV reactivation was not detected, as well as PCP or PML, which were considered serious side effects, requiring long term monitor.

Podocyte damage was considered to be crucial in the pathogenesis of MCD [40]. Previously, existence of a circulating mediator produced by abnormal T cells was postulated to disrupt the function of podocyte and increase the permeability of glomerular filtration barrier, which resulted in proteinuria [41, 42]. However, in the last decades, especially as the use of RTX in MCD, B lymphocyte cells were thought to play an indispensable role in the mechanize of MCD. T helper 2 (TH2) cell mediated immunity and its related cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-13 have been verified to cause proteinuria in murine model through inducing foot process effacement [43, 44]. Additionally, IgG-antibody directed against Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) was shown to cause podocyte detachment and associated with relapses of idiopathic NS in mice [45]. Apart from the direct influence on B cell, RTX has been proven to bind directly to podocyte Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase Acid Like 3b (SMPDL3b) in vitro, which demonstrated its antiproteinuric effect independent of B cell depletion [34]. A diversity of indirect effects, including lipid raft modifications, kinase and caspase activation and effects on apoptotic/antiapoptotic molecules appear to play a crucial role for the observed variability in response to RTX treatment [46]. At the same time, kruppel-like factor 15, a zinc-finger transcription factor expressed in human podocytes, contributes to mediate the beneficial effects of glucocorticoid therapy via stabilization of the actin cytoskeleton of podocytes in MCD [47]. While, in our study, only 2 patients showed no response to RTX treatment, in which one patient was considered responder because of decreasing proteinuria and increasing of serum albumin at last follow up. Thus, it is difficult for us to investigate the differences between responders and non-responders, which might contribute to the study on pathogenesis of MCD and role of B cell or RTX in this disease.

The strength of our research is that we firstly introduced 3 dose protocol of rituximab infusion combined with corticosteroids in the treatment of adult MCD and demonstrated promising efficacy in inducing remission, reducing relapse and tapering steroids without severe side effects. The fixed protocol conducted in this series makes results reliable and comparable, which further promote the use and investigation of RTX in MCD patients.

Our study still have some limitations. First of all, sampling bias is inevitable. Each physician in our department selected RTX therapy for adult MCD patients based on their clinical experience. There was no consensus on patient selection. Moreover, the lack of circulating CD19+ B lymphocyte cells measurement made it impossible to reveal the relationship between remission or relapse and lymphocyte. Additionally, follow-up time is too short that the relapse rate might be underestimated, as well as long-term adverse events. Last but not least is that the results of small sample size study will not accurately reflect the actual remission rate. Consequently, investigations including randomized controlled trials for long-term follow up regarding RTX use in adult MCD are required to further illustrate the effectiveness and safety.

Conclusion

In summary, our study concluded that 375mg/m2 RTX treatment once three weeks for 3 dose combined with corticosteroids is effective in inducing remission in adult patients diagnosed as MCD. The remission rate is 91.67%. During the follow-up period, only 3 patients experienced one relapse respectively. The relapse rate is 13.64%. Dosage of steroids and relapses per year are significantly reduced after RTX therapy compared to those before. Tolerance of RTX is excellent with no severe adverse effects documented.

Availability of data and materials

Original data was stored in a standard EXCEL database and can be requested via the corresponding author. aij1980@163.com; nfyywanggb@163.com.

Abbreviations

MCD:

Minimal change disease

NS:

Nephrotic syndrome

RTX:

Rituximab

SDNS:

Steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

ITP:

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura

PCP:

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia

PML:

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

SRNS:

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

IRNS:

Infrequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome

FRNS:

Frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

MDRD:

Modification Diet of Renal Disease

KDIGO:

Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes

TMP-SMX:

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

CR:

Complete remission

PR:

Partial remission

SD:

Standard deviation

CNI:

Calcineurin inhibitors

NR:

No response

FSGS:

Focal segmental glomerulonephritis

TH2:

T helper 2

UCHL1:

Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1

SMPDL3b:

Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase Acid Like 3b

References

  1. Nachman PH, Jennette JC, Falk RJ. Primary glomerular disease. In: Brenner BM, editor. The kidney. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 987–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Floege J, Amann K. Primary glomerulonephritides. Lancet. 2016;387:2036–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vivarelli M, Massella L, Ruggiero B, Emma F. Minimal change disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:332–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Korbet SM, Whittier WL. Management of adult minimal change disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:911–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Waldman M, Crew RJ, Valeri A, Busch J, Stokes B, Markowitz G, et al. Adult minimal-change disease: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:445–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Munyentwali H, Bouachi K, Audard V, Remy P, Lang P, Mojaat R, et al. Rituximab is an efficient and safe treatment in adults with steroid-dependent minimal change disease. Kidney Int. 2013;83:511–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maloney DG, Grillo-Ló Pez AJ, White CA, Bodkin D, Schilder RJ, Neidhart JA, et al. IDEC-C2B8 (Rituximab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with relapsed low-grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Blood. 1997;90(6):2188–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benz K, Dötsch J, Rascher W, Stachel D. Change of the course of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome after rituximab therapy. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19:794–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guigonis V, Dallocchio A, Baudouin V, Dehennault M, Hachon-Le Camus C, Afanetti M, et al. Rituximab treatment for severe steroid- or cyclosporine-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a multicentric series of 22 cases. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23:1269–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamei K, Ito S, Nozu K, Fujinaga S, Nakayama M, Sako M, et al. Single dose of rituximab for refractory steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24:1321–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sellier-Leclerc AL, MacHer MA, Loirat C, Guérin V, Watier H, Peuchmaur M, et al. Rituximab efficiency in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:1109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gulati A, Sinha A, Jordan SC, Hari P, Dinda AK, Sharma S, et al. Efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab for difficult steroid-resistant and -dependent nephrotic syndrome: multicentric report. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2207–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemper MJ, Gellermann J, Habbig S, Krmar RT, Dittrich K, Jungraithmayr T, et al. Long-term follow-up after rituximab for steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1910–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravan P, Magnasco A, Edefonti A, Murer L, Rossi R, Ghio L, et al. Short-term effects of rituximab in children with steroid- and calcineurin-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1308–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Iijima K, Sako DM, Nozu K, Mori R, Tuchida N, Kamei K, et al. Rituximab for childhood-onset, complicated, frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1273–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iijima K, Sako M, Kamei K, Nozu K. Rituximab in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: lessons from clinical trials. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018;33:1449–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansrivijit P, Cheungpasitporn W, Thongprayoon C, Ghahramani N. Rituximab therapy for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21:134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kronbichler A, Windpessl M, Pieringer H, Jayne DRW. Rituximab for immunologic renal disease: what the nephrologist needs to know. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16:633–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Papakrivopoulou E, Shendi AM, Salama AD, Khosravi M, Connolly JO, Trompeter R. Effective treatment with rituximab for the maintenance of remission in frequently relapsing minimal change disease. Nephrology. 2016;21:893–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cortazar FB, Rosenthal J, Laliberte K, Niles JL. Continuous B-cell depletion in frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin Kidney J. 2018;12:224–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Takei T, Itabashi M, Moriyama T, Kojima C, Shiohira S, Shimizu A, et al. Effect of single-dose rituximab on steroid-dependent minimal-change nephrotic syndrome in adults. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:1225–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong WY, Swaminathan R, Irish A. Our experience with rituximab therapy for adult-onset primary glomerulonephritis and review of literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:795–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fenoglio R, Sciascia S, Beltrame G, Mesiano P, Ferro M, Quattrocchio G, et al. Rituximab as a front-line therapy for adult-onset minimal change disease with nephrotic syndrome. Oncotarget. 2018;9:28799–804.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruchfeld A, Benedek S, Hilderman M, Medin C, Snaedal-Jonsdottir S, Korkeila M. Rituximab for minimal change disease in adults: long-term follow-up. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:851–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guitard J, Hebral AL, Fakhouri F, Joly D, Daugas E, Rivalan J, et al. Rituximab for minimal-change nephrotic syndrome in adulthood: predictive factors for response, long-term outcomes and tolerance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:2084–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DaSilva I, Huerta A, Quintana L, Redondo B, Iglesias E, Draibe J, et al. Rituximab for steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in adults: a retrospective, multicenter study in Spain. BioDrugs. 2017;31:239–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruggenenti P, Ruggiero B, Cravedi P, Vivarelli M, Massella L, Marasà M, et al. Rituximab in steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:850–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ren H, Lin L, Shen P, Li X, Xie J, Pan X, et al. Rituximab treatment in adults with refractory minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:93438–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. King C, Logan S, Smith SW, Hewins P. The efficacy of rituximab in adult frequently relapsing minimal change disease. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:16–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramachandran R, Bharati J, Rao I, Kashif AW, Nada R, Minz R, et al. Persistent CD-19 depletion by rituximab is cost-effective in maintaining remission in calcineurin-inhibitor dependent podocytopathy. Nephrology. 2019;24:1241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fervenza FC, Abraham RS, Erickson SB, Irazabal MV, Eirin A, Specks U, et al. Rituximab therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A 2-year study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2188–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. KDIGO Clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–274.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu X, Wang G, Chen N, Lu T, Nie S, Xu G, et al. Long-term exposure to air pollution and increased risk of membranous nephropathy in China. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:3739–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fornoni A, Sageshima J, Wei C, Merscher-Gomez S, Aguillon-Prada R, Jauregui AN, et al. Rituximab targets podocytes in recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:85ra46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sellier-Leclerc AL, Baudouin V, Kwon T, MacHer MA, Guérin V, Lapillonne H, et al. Rituximab in steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood-follow-up after CD19 recovery. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1083–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Golay J, Semenzato G, Rambaldi A, Foà R, Gaidano G, Gamba E, et al. Lessons for the clinic from rituximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. MAbs. 2013;5:826–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyer-Suavet S, Andreani M, Cremoni M, Brglez V, Benzaken S, Bernard G, et al. Rituximab bioavailability in primary membranous nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34:1423–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jacobs R, Langer-Jacobus T, Duong M, Stahl K, Haller H, Schmidt RE, et al. Detection and quantification of rituximab in the human urine. J Immunol Methods. 2017;451:118–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perosa F, Favoino E, Caragnano MA, Dammacco F. Generation of biologically active linear and cyclic peptides has revealed a unique fine specificity of rituximab and its possible cross-reactivity with acid sphingomyelinase-like phosphodiesterase 3b precursor. Blood. 2006;107:1070–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Maas RJ, Deegens JK, Smeets B, Moeller MJ, Wetzels JF. Minimal change disease and idiopathic FSGS: manifestations of the same disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:768–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shalhoub RJ. Pathogenesis of lipoid nephrosis: a disorder of T-cell function. Lancet. 1974;304:556–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Koyama A, Fujisaki M, Kobayashi M, Igarashi M, Narita M. A glomerular permeability factor produced by human T cell hybridomas. Kidney Int. 1991;40:453–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gauckler P, Il SJ, Alberici F, Audard V, Bruchfeld A, Busch M, et al. Rituximab in adult minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis - What is known and what is still unknown? Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19:102671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Den Berg JG, Weening JJ. Role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Clin Sci. 2004;107:125–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jamin A, Berthelot L, Couderc A, Chemouny JM, Boedec E, Dehoux L, et al. Autoantibodies against podocytic UCHL1 are associated with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome relapses and induce proteinuria in mice. J Autoimmun. 2018;89:149–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bezombes C, Fournié JJ, Laurent G. Direct effect of rituximab in B-cell-derived lymphoid neoplasias: Mechanism, regulation, and perspectives. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:1435–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mallipattu SK, Guo Y, Revelo MP, Roa-Peña L, Miller T, Ling J, et al. Krüppel-like factor 15 mediates glucocorticoid-induced restoration of podocyte differentiation markers. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:166–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China grant 81870489 (to G.B.W.), National Nature Science Foundation of China grant 81770765 (to J.A.), President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University grant 2018C030 (to D.K.L.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Diankun Liu and Zhanmei Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

    Diankun Liu, Zhanmei Zhou, Mengyi Wang, Sheng Nie, Jun Li, Bianxiang Hu, Wenjuan He, Guobao Wang & Jun Ai

  2. Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China

    Guobao Wang & Jun Ai

Authors
  1. Diankun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhanmei Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mengyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sheng Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bianxiang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wenjuan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Guobao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun Ai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.B.W., J.A. were responsible for conception and oversight of the study. D.K.L., Z.M.Z., M.Y.W., S.N. were responsible for collection and analysis of data. Z.M.Z was responsible for making pathological diagnosis. D.K.L., J.L., B.X.H. were involved in the interpretation of data. D.K.L., M.Y.W., W.J.H. were involved in drafting the article. J.A., D.K.L., Z.M.Z., were involved in revision of manuscript. All the authors were responsible for the authenticity of the research and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guobao Wang or Jun Ai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to rituximab treatment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Patient characteristics before rituximab therapy. Illustrating the age, immunosuppressive therapy, relapse rate, serum creatinine, serum albumin, urinary protein excretion, CD19+ B cell count of each patient before rituximab therapy. Showing rituximab courses and prednisone dosage of each participant receiving this therapy. Table S2. Baseline characteristics and outcome of rituximab therapy between patients with childhood-onset (<12y) and adult-onset MCD. Comparing the differences in the age at first rituximab infusion, 24h urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine, eGFR, serum albumin, CD19+ B cell count, response rate, prednisone dose before rituximab and at last follow up, relapse rate before and after rituximab between patients with childhood onset MCD (<12y) and patients with adult onset MCD (≥12y). Table S3. Baseline characteristics and outcome of rituximab therapy between patients with childhood-onset (<18y) and adult-onset MCD. Comparing the differences in the age at first rituximab infusion, 24h urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine, eGFR, serum albumin, CD19+ B cell count, response rate, prednisone dose before rituximab and at last follow up, relapse rate before and after rituximab between patients with childhood onset MCD (<18y) and patients with adult onset MCD (≥18y). Table S4. Change of prednisone dosage after rituximab treatment. Demonstrating the average dose of prednisone at each follow up time after rituximab therapy. Figure S1. A: The variation of urine protein excretion of each patient after rituximab therapy; B: The variation of serum albumin of each patient after rituximab therapy; C: The variation of serum creatinine of each patient after rituximab therapy. Abbreviations: RTX, rituximab.

Additional file 2.

Protocol of steroids tapering in the study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, D., Zhou, Z., Wang, M. et al. Extended infusion of rituximab combined with steroids is effective in inducing remission and reducing relapse in adult minimal change disease. BMC Nephrol 22, 242 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02437-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02437-4

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us