This report describes a case of PK by spontaneous SH, leading to acute kidney graft dysfunction, that occurred within 24 h of renal transplantation in a patient without a history of preceding trauma. The abrupt decrease in urinary output and the Doppler USG findings were the keys to the diagnosis. Early surgical intervention restored renal function.
The development of PK in an allograft patient is rare, with most cases induced by allograft biopsy, lymphocele, or trauma [1, 2, 12]. However, there have been two cases of PK that occurred early after renal transplantation in the absence of any of the above causes [7, 12]. Iovino et al. described an aggravation of graft dysfunction, with SH confirmed by Doppler USG on POD 13. Surgical intervention, including hematoma evacuation, resulted in functional recovery of the allograft. The cause of the SH was not noted. Hori et al. reported allograft dysfunction triggered by PK due to SH, which was not detected by routine USG but was instead discovered during surgical exploration [12]. In their patient, rupture of a small renal cyst was the likely cause of the SH. Allograft function was restored after capsulotomy and hematoma evacuation. Our case was unique in that PK occurred spontaneously, without any detectable lesion, early after transplantation.
Acute pain over the allograft, uncontrolled hypertension despite appropriate medicines, and a reduction of urinary output are useful signs in the diagnosis of early stage PK [1]. Other important findings are SH and an elevated RI on Doppler USG [1, 12]. Our patient could not sense graft pain as he received a continuous intravenous infusion of narcotic analgesics immediately after allograft surgery. Hypertension was well-controlled with intravenous anti-hypertensive medicines. PK was suspected based on the sudden decrease in urinary output between 6 h and 48 h post-transplantation, the absence of a decrease in the serum creatinine level, and the detection of a 28 mm deep SH via Doppler USG, routinely performed in renal transplant patients on POD 1. Although when the subcapsular bleeding started was unknown, a hemodynamic change was not apparent until 6 h after surgery.
Marginal grafts are increasingly being used in transplant recipients due to the high demand for kidney transplants, and the risk for primary non-function, delayed graft function, or acute post-surgical complications, such as capsular detachment and subsequent hematoma, are accordingly higher [7]. To address these risks, diagnostic renal biopsy is often performed, although it is the most common cause of sub-capsular bleeding [1] and surgical complications, including SH, thus increasing the risk for PK. Accordingly, PK should be considered in marginal-graft recipients with an abrupt contraction of diuresis, an increase in serum creatinine, and delayed graft function. Our patient did not receive a marginal graft, although his kidney was from a deceased donor. As SH did not occur in the recipient of the other kidney from the same deceased donor, a systemic component, such as coagulopathy, in the donor could be ruled out as the cause of the surgical complications.
Renal transplant recipients benefit from follow-up imaging and monitoring strategies, given the complexity of the surgical procedure and the need for an ICU stay for a few days after transplantation. USG is the principal imaging modality in the evaluation of renal transplants, analogous to its importance in detecting vascular pathologies. It can be easily performed at the bedside, detects possible complications, and guides further imaging or intervention [13]. Doppler USG is also used in renal biopsy, the drainage of fluid collection [14, 15], and to detect SH in allografts [5,6,7,8,9] although small hematomas may be missed [12]. Measurement of the RI in the case of presence of SH might provide valuable clues suggesting a diagnosis of PK [1, 7] and in our patient led to the restoration of renal function through early surgical treatment.
Allograft dysfunction induced by PK can be reduced by appropriate management before irreversible damage occurs [16], although the optimal intervention is a matter of debate [5, 12, 16]. Some clinicians have advocated a cautious wait-and-see approach in SH patients because of the possibility of spontaneous resolution [10, 11]. However, allograft dysfunction due to PK in a transplanted kidney may occur if the diagnosis and subsequent intervention are delayed [12]. In such cases, even partial ischemia for a prolonged period of time might result in irreversible damage, a scenario that can be avoided by early intervention. Our case was unique in that PK immediately occurred after transplantation compared to other cases that usually appear late. This naturally reminds us of the issue of the early diagnosis and decision for management. Our patient was diagnosed relatively quickly, allowing timely surgery and the complete restoration of allograft function. This experience demonstrates the importance of an early diagnosis and early surgical intervention in patients with decreased renal function due to PK in a transplanted kidney.
In conclusion, PK should be considered a cause of allograft dysfunction in the early period after transplantation. Early and accurate diagnosis followed by appropriate surgical intervention can avoid partial or permanent renal damage.
