Skip to main content
Download PDF

The clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate combined with ACEI/ARB in the treatment of immunoglobulin A nephropathy

BMC Nephrology volume 24, Article number: 63 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulopathy worldwide, and lacks the effective treatment. The study was aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate aerosol combined with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor / angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) in the treatment of IgAN.

Methods

142 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN at Shenzhen People?s hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into the supportive care plus fluticasone group and the supportive care group. The patients of the supportive care plus fluticasone group were treated with fluticasone propionate aerosol (250 ?g Bid) combined with ACEI/ARB, while the supportive care group was merely treated with ACEI/ARB. The patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Primary outcomes include changes in proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results

The level of proteinuria in the supportive care plus fluticasone group was significantly lower compared with the supportive care group at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months. Meanwhile, during the follow-up period, no serious adverse events were recorded during the study in either group. However, fluticasone treatment did not alleviate the decline in eGFR.

Conclusion

Fluticasone propionate aerosol combined with ACEI/ARB can reduce the level of proteinuria in thetreatment of IgAN, and has no significant effects on renal function.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) was first described by Jean Berger in 1968 as a kind of primary glomerulopathy, in which immunoglobulin A (IgA) predominantly deposits in glomerular mesangium. Subsequent researches have manifested that IgAN is the most common primary glomerulopathy worldwide, and it is one of the causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) [1, 2]. The incidence of IgAN in China is approximately 24% and about 20%~40% of patients will develop into ESRD within 10 ~ 20 years [3]. However, the efficacy of corticosteroids is controversial, and adverse side effects are well documented [4, 5]. At present, the use of rituximab in IgAN therapy has limited evidence, and has not achieved satisfactory efficacy in clinical randomized trials [6]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are antihypertensive drugs and the most commonly non-immunosuppressive drugs [7]. In patients with IgAN, ACEI and ARBs could reduce the passage of macromolecules through the glomerulus [8], thereby reducing the level of proteinuria, but with the side effect of dizziness [9]. Therefore, some novel, effective and safe therapeutic options need to be addressed.

It has been observed that IgAN is mediated by mucosal immunization since the 1970s. Upper respiratory tract infections could aggravate clinical manifestations of IgAN in the early stage. The episodes of macroscopic hematuria associated with upper respiratory tract infections are common in these patients. It has been reported that various pathogens in the upper respiratory tract activate the immunological system by giving rise to tonsillitis, which is involved in the pathogenesis of IgAN [4]. Fluticasone propionate, similar to glucocorticoid, has the function of anti-inflammation. It could inhibit inflammatory lymphocytes and inflammatory mediators they release, so that hinder inflammatory cells on the surface of the airway from being generated or activated [10].

The present study was designed to provide an estimation of the efficacy and safety assessment of fluticasone propionate aerosol in IgAN and help in determining whether a larger multicenter trial with clinical outcomes is warranted.

Materials and methods

General information

142 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN at Shenzhen people’s hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were enrolled. Inclusive criteria: (1) Age range is between 18 and 55; (2) Blood pressure is kept below 130/90 mmHg after 3-month treatment of maximum tolerable dose of ACEI/ARB; (3) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by using CKD-EPI formula is no less than 45ml/mim/1.73m2; (4) The quantity of the urinary protein ≥ 1.0 g/d or first-morning urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 0.8 g/g twice in a row. Exclusive criteria: (1) Secondary IgAN; (2) Using corticosteroid or immunosuppressive agents within the year before treatment; (3) Having a history of allergies to ACEI and or ARB; (4) Albumin < 30 g/L; (5) BP < 90/60 mmHg; (6) Plasma K+ > 5.5 mmol/L; (7) Acute respiratory infections; (8) Unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis; (9) Women who are pregnant or nursing; (10) Serious heart, brain, liver or hematopoietic system disorders or other nasty diseases influencing the survival; (11) Engaged in other clinical research. The experimental flow chart is shown in Fig. 1. Ethical approval to conduct this trial was obtained from the ethics committees of Shenzhen People’s Hospital (LL-KY-2,019,293). All subjects signed informed consent forms.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The chart of experimental flow

A total of 142 patients who had completed the three-month break-in phase participated in the subsequent 9-month trial phase. Of these, 96 had a eGFR of at least 60 ml/min/1.73m2, and 46 had a eGFR of 45 to 59 ml/min/1.73m2. These patients were randomly assigned to continue support therapy or receive additional fluticasone

Full size image

Treatment method

This study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. In order to eliminate inter-group eGFR interference, we divided all patients into 2 modules according to the eGFR value (eGFR ≥ 60 ml/mim/1.73m2, 96 cases; and 45 ≤ eGFR < 60 ml/mim/1.73m2, 46 cases). Then, the patients in the two modules were randomly divided into two groups as followed: supportive care plus fluticasone group and the supportive care group (n = 71 in each group). The detailed procedures for grouping were displayed in Fig. 1. The patients in the supportive care plus fluticasone group were given fluticasone propionate inhalation aerosol (250 µg Bid) manufactured by GlaxoWellcome for the Basic treatment of ACEI/ARB. The supportive care group continued the original treatment option. Calcium Channel Blocks (felodipine sustained release tablets or nifedipine controlled release tablets) would be given to patients whose blood pressure is over 140/90 mmHg. Hyperlipidemia, infection and hypercoagulable states should be dealt with appropriately if necessary. Glucocorticoid and immunodepressants were prohibited in this study.

Follow-up

The patients were followed up for 9 months after treatment. Three patients of the supportive care group withdrew from the study early due to withdrawal of informed consent. Three patients of supportive care plus fluticasone group were lost to follow-up (Fig. 1). The level of proteinuria was detected at 3, 6 and 9 months of follow-up, and the renal function was evaluated by eGFR. In addition, the adverse reactions and serious adverse events that occurred in the patients during the follow-up period were also recorded. Adverse events and severe adverse events are defined in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) issued by the Chinese food and drug administration (CFDA).

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 24.0 system software (SPSS, USA). All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Count data were expressed as constituent ratio and the chi-square test was used for comparison. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), non-normally distributed data were presented as median with interquartile range (IQR). The t-test was used for the comparison of normally distributed continuous variables, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied for the comparison of non-normally distributed continuous variables. An independent samples t-test was used on variables of the two groups compared. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

From June 2018 to June 2020, a total of 142 potentially eligible patients were screened for the study and underwent random assignment. Among 142 patients, 96 cases (68%) had eGFR ≧ 60ml/min/1.73 m2, and the eGFR of 46 cases (32%) was 45–59 ml/min/1.73m2 (Fig. 1). 71 cases were assigned to supportive care and 71 cases were assigned to supportive care plus fluticasone propionate inhalation aerosol. Overall, the comparison of baseline characteristics between groups showed no statistically significant difference (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients
Full size table

Impact of fluticasone propionate aerosol on the proteinuria of IgAN patients

The curative effect was evaluated by detecting the level of proteinuria in the two groups after treatment. The results showed that the level of proteinuria in the patients gradually decreased during 9 months after fluticasone propionate aerosol combined with Supportive care treatment, and was significantly lower than that of the Supportive care group (Table 2). It indicates that fluticasone propionate aerosol may have a good therapeutic effect on patients with IgAN.

Table 2 Comparison of proteinuria between two groups at different time points
Full size table

Impact of fluticasone propionate aerosol on the renal function of IgAN patients

To further evaluate the effect of fluticasone propionate aerosol on renal function by detecting the eGFR of the two groups during the follow-up period. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the eGFR decline between the two groups at 3, 6 and 9 months after treatment (Table 3). In addition, the patient rinsed with water after each inhalation of fluticasone propionate, and no obvious local or systemic adverse reactions were observed (i.e., any increase in liver enzymes or differences in blood cell counts, including leukopenia, and immunosuppressive combined malignant tumors).

Table 3 Comparison of eGFR decline from baseline in the two groups at different time points
Full size table

Discussion

In this trial, we found that fluticasone propionate combined with ACEI/ARB effectively decreased urinary protein level, but did not delay eGFR decrease in IgAN patients with biopsy-proven with mild to moderate proteinuria.

It is known that macroscopic hematuria and/or increase of urinary protein occur in most IgAN patients after upper respiratory tract or alimentary tract infection, which implies that the development and progress of IgAN is closely related to immune system dysfunction [11,12,13]. Previous studies have reported that the level of hematuria and/or proteinuria improved after tonsillectomy in IgAN patients with recurrent tonsillitis [14]. Furthermore, research has discovered that RSV infection could result in more severe pathological changes in the kidneys of IgAN mice with a significant increase of proinflammatory Th cells and its inflammatory factors released [15]. Therefore, regulating the mucosal immune function of the upper respiratory tract may play a protective role in renal prognosis of IgAN patients. This is consistent with the results of this study.

Fluticasone propionate has the function of anti-inflammation to inhibit inflammatory lymphocytes and inflammatory mediators they release, so that it could hinder inflammatory cells on the surface of the airway from being generated or activated [10]. In in vitro studies, the affinity of fluticasone propionate to human glucocorticoid receptor is 18 times higher than that of dexamethasone, and over 3 times higher than budesonide [16, 17]. In our study, fluticasone propionate aerosol could reduce the level of urinary protein in IgAN patients. Growing evidence suggests that the descending rate of eGFR will slow down if the urinary protein decreases even slightly [4, 18, 19]. But no reduction in eGFR was observed in our study after combination therapy, suggesting that the treatment option of fluticasone propionate combined with ACEI/ARB is not good for slowing the decline of eGFR in IgAN patients.

Compared with other similar glucocorticoids, fluticasone propionate is less absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and has a significant liver first pass effect. After inhalation, the dose of fluticasone propionate into the circulatory system through swallowing is almost zero [20]. In our study, no adverse events such as impaired glucose intolerance, steroid diabetes, blood pressure rising, weight gain and severe infections were observed in patients after fluticasone propionate inhalation, indicating that the drug has good safety and tolerability in IgAN patients.

There are several limitations of this study. The primary limitation was the size and duration of the trial. It was a small-sample and single-center trial with short follow-up. Additionally, no hard endpoint was met. A larger trial of longer duration may demonstrate differences in endpoint. Therefore, further studies are needed to see if fluticasone propionate aerosol is useful for improving long-term outcomes for IgAN patients. This study demonstrated that fluticasone propionate combined with ACEI/ARB can effectively lower urinary protein level in IgAN patients even if the eGFR decrease is not delayed, and no adverse events were observed, which suggests that fluticasone propionate may provide a new treatment option for IgAN patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study found that inhalation of fluticasone propionate could significantly reduce the level of proteinuria in IgAN patients, but not eGFR. This suggests that fluticasone propionate can treat IgAN to a certain extent and should be further investigated.

Data Availability

Datasets used in this article are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hassler JR. IgA nephropathy: a brief review. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2020;37(3):143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Imai E, Usui J, Kaneko S, Kawamura T, Suka M, Yamagata K. The precise long-term outcomes of adult IgA nephropathy by mail questionnaires: better renal survival compared to earlier cohort studies. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0233186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang C, Zeng X, Li Z, Wang Z, Li S. Immunoglobulin a nephropathy: current progress and future directions. Transl Res. 2015;166(2):134–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lv J, Zhang H, Wong MG, Jardine MJ, Hladunewich M, Jha V, et al. Effect of oral methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(5):432–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, et al. Intensive supportive care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2225–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lafayette RA, Canetta PA, Rovin BH, Appel GB, Novak J, Nath KA, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Rituximab in IgA Nephropathy with Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(4):1306–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ji Y, Yang K, Xiao B, Lin J, Zhao Q, Bhuva MS, et al. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(3):3689–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dillon JJ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for IgA nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24(3):218–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaz de Castro PAS, Bitencourt L, Pereira BWS, Lima AQR, Hermida HS, Moreira Neto CR, et al. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for IgA nephropathy in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2022;37(3):499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson M. Anti-inflammatory properties of fluticasone propionate. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1995;107(1–3): 439 – 40.

  11. Floege J, Feehally J. The mucosa-kidney axis in IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(3):147–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hotta O, Tanaka A, Oda T. Chronic epipharyngitis: a missing background of IgA nephropathy. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(8):835–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu X, Feng J, Zhou Q, Luo L, Meng T, Zhong Y, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus exacerbates kidney damages in IgA Nephropathy mice via the C5a-C5aR1 Axis orchestrating Th17 cell responses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu X, Feng J, Deng S, Tang J, Liao Z, Luo L, et al. Anaphylatoxins enhance Th9 cell recruitment via the CCL20-CCR6 axis in IgA nephropathy. J Nephrol. 2020;33(5):1027–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchwald P. Glucocorticoid receptor binding: a biphasic dependence on molecular size as revealed by the bilinear LinBiExp model. Steroids. 2008;73(2):193–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Valotis A, Neukam K, Elert O, Högger P. Human receptor kinetics, tissue binding affinity, and stability of mometasone furoate. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(5):1337–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Derendorf H, Nave R, Drollmann A, Cerasoli F, Wurst W. Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids to asthma. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(5):1042–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fellstrom BC, Barratt J, Cook H, Coppo R, Feehally J, de Fijter JW, et al. Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10084):2117–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson A, Carroll K, L AI, Floege J, Perkovic V, Boyer-Suavet S, et al. Proteinuria reduction as a surrogate end point in trials of IgA Nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(3):469–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubner M, Hochhaus G, Derendorf H. Comparative pharmacology, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of inhaled glucocorticosteroids. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2005;25(3):469–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Renal, grant number ZDSYS201504301616234; Youth Research Cadre Cultivation Project of Shenzhen People’s Hospital, grant number SYKYPY201904, and Guangdong Science and Technology Project, China, grant number A2019416.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Renal, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

    Liping Sun, Xinyi Zi, Zhen Wang & Xinzhou Zhang

  2. The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China

    Liping Sun

Authors
  1. Liping Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinyi Zi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinzhou Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.W. and X.Z.Z designed the study. L.P.S. and X.Y.Z. wrote the first draft of the paper, had full access to the study design information, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors provided input for the preparation of subsequent drafts and approved the final version for submission. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liping Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenzhen People’s Hospital (LL-KY-2019293). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, L., Zi, X., Wang, Z. et al. The clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate combined with ACEI/ARB in the treatment of immunoglobulin A nephropathy. BMC Nephrol 24, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03106-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03106-4

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us