Skip to main content
Download PDF

Creatinine clearance/eGFR ratio: a simple index for muscle mass related to mortality in ICU patients

BMC Nephrology volume 25, Article number: 330 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

In patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), muscle mass is inversely associated with mortality. Although muscle mass can be estimated with 24-h urinary creatinine excretion (UCE), its use for risk prediction in individual patients is limited because age-, sex-, weight- and length-specific reference values for UCE are lacking. The ratio between measured creatinine clearance (mCC) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) might circumvent this constraint. The main goal was to assess the association of the mCC/eGFR ratio in ICU patients with all-cause hospital and long-term mortality.

Methods

The mCC/eGFR ratio was determined in patients admitted to our ICU between 2005 and 2021 with KDIGO acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 0–2 and an ICU stay ≥ 24 h. mCC was calculated from UCE and plasma creatinine and indexed to 1.73 m2. mCC/eGFR was analyzed by categorizing patients in mCC/eGFR quartiles and as continuous variable.

Results

Seven thousand five hundred nine patients (mean age 61 ± 15 years; 38% female) were included. In-hospital mortality was 27% in the lowest mCC/eGFR quartile compared to 11% in the highest quartile (P < 0.001). Five-year post-hospital discharge actuarial mortality was 37% in the lowest mCC/eGFR quartile compared to 19% in the highest quartile (P < 0.001). mCC/eGFR ratio as continuous variable was independently associated with in-hospital mortality in multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio: 0.578 (95% CI: 0.465—0.719); P < 0.001). mCC/eGFR ratio as continuous variable was also significantly associated with 5-year post-hospital discharge mortality in Cox regression (hazard ratio: 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22—0.32); P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The mCC/eGFR ratio is associated with both in-hospital and long-term mortality and may be an easily available index of muscle mass in ICU patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Muscle mass is inversely associated with mortality in several patient categories, including patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) [1,2,3,4,5]. A practical method for estimating whole-body muscle mass is urinary creatinine excretion (UCE) [6, 7]. In an earlier study we used UCE derived from 24-h urine collections in ICU patients as an estimate of muscle mass and showed that a lower UCE is strongly associated with increased mortality [8]. However, it is difficult to define normal UCE values in individual patients since specific reference values for UCE with respect to age, sex, weight and height are lacking. This constraint can likely largely be overcome by using the ratio between the measured creatinine clearance (mCC) (calculated from 24-h UCE and plasma creatinine and indexed for a body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m2) and eGFR based on the CKD-EPI 2021 formula. This so-called mCC/eGFR ratio can hypothetically be viewed as an index of muscle mass. Patients with normal kidney function and a lower muscle mass compared to the average muscle mass of age- and sex-matched individuals will in general have a lower mCC/eGFR ratio. Sequential measurements of the mCC/eGFR-ratio may also serve as a tool to monitor the course of muscle mass over time. This is because the mCC is not affected by muscle loss whereas the creatinine-based eGFR progressively overestimates the true GFR in patients with ongoing muscle wasting [9]. In a recent non-ICU study in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) the mCC/eGFR ratio was related to mortality [10]. The prognostic relevance of the mCC/eGFR ratio (and its course during the ICU stay) has not yet been studied in ICU patients.

The first goal of this study was to investigate the association of the mCC/eGFR ratio, as a possible index of muscle mass at ICU admission, with both all-cause in-hospital and 5 year post-hospital mortality in patients with KDIGO AKI stage 0–2 (thus excluding stage 3). An additional goal was to examine the course of the mCC/eGFR ratio, UCE, mCC and eGFR during the first 30 days of ICU stay in a subgroup of patients with an ICU stay of at least 30 days.

Materials and methods

In this observational cohort study, we included all patients admitted ≥ 24 h to the ICU of our institution between September 2005 and June 2021. When patients had repeated ICU-admissions, data was related to the time of the first ICU-admission of the last hospital admission. The mCC is more sensitive to acute changes in renal function than eGFR, i.e. the relative change of mCC is usually greater than that of eGFR [11]. Therefore and because renal replacement therapy interferes with UCE measurements, we excluded patients with acute kidney injury (KDIGO-AKI) stage 3 [12] at any time during hospital stay to avoid an importantly disturbed correlation between mCC and eGFR. Reason for ICU admission, demographics, ICU and hospital length of stay and hospital survival, as well as long-term survival were recorded. Additionally, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score 4 (APACHE-IV) was recorded in a standardized and validated way using the data dictionary of the Dutch National Intensive Care Registry (NICE) [13].

We routinely collect daily 24 h urine samples in all ICU patients and measure plasma creatinine daily at 6.00 AM. From these data mCC was calculated. These laboratory results were included in this study starting from the first complete calendar day of the ICU stay. CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR was calculated according to the recent National Kidney Foundation Laboratory Engagement Working Group Recommendations for Implementing the CKD-EPI 2021 Race-Free Equations for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [14]. Since the CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR equation is normalized to a BSA of 1.73 m2, mCC was also normalised to 1.73 m2. Normalizing GFR to BSA should reduce variability in GFR among individuals with normal kidney function, since kidney size is proportional to body size [15].

Baseline plasma creatinine was based on the median plasma creatinine value during 7 days prior to ICU admission and was not available in 40 patients. For the association between mCC/eGFR ratio and all-cause mortality we used the median of the laboratory results up to the first three complete calendar days of the ICU stay (depending on the available laboratory samples). For the assessment of the time courses of mCC, eGFR and mCC/eGFR ratio we used the results from the first through the 30th complete calendar day in patients with an ICU stay of at least 30 days. For patients who were discharged alive we obtained long-term post-hospital discharge survival data up to 5 years from the hospital database and, when available, from the personal records database maintained by the municipalities in the Netherlands. For clarification a list of specific variables and definitions used throughout the paper is included in the supplementary material (Table S1).

Sensitivity analyses

To investigate the robustness of our data, we performed three sensitivity analyses. First, to assess possible bias in the mCC/eGFR ratio caused by overestimation of mCC due to increased tubular creatinine excretion in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a greater change in mCC compared with the change in eGFR during acute changes in renal function [11] we analyzed the relation between mCC/eGFR ratio and both in-hospital and 5 year post-hospital mortality in the subgroup of patients with a baseline plasma creatinine < 110 µmol/l and who did not develop KDIGO AKI [12]. Second, to avoid possible bias in eGFR caused by extremes in BSA we performed an additional sensitivity analysis of the association between the mCC/eGFR ratio and short- and long-term mortality without correcting the mCC to a BSA of 1.73 m2. Third, since the CKD-EPI 2009 eGFR without race correction performs better in the European population compared to the CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR [16], we performed also a sensitivity analysis in which the CKD-EPI 2009 eGFR without race correction was used in the mCC/eGFR ratio.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 28 (Armonk, NY, USA) and figures were created with R version 4.1.1 (Vienna, Austria) (http://cran.r-project.org/). Patient characteristics were expressed according to the mCC/eGFR quartiles. Normally distributed data were expressed as mean and SD, and skewed data expressed as medians and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test. Normally distributed continuous variables from mCC/eGFR ratio quartiles were compared by one-way ANOVA in case of a normal distribution and by Kruskal test in case of a skewed distribution. The course of mCC, eGFR, mCC/eGFR ratio and UCE in the subset of patients with a hospital admission of at least 30 days were graphically presented by lines fitted using a locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (loess) function and a shaded area corresponding to the 95% confidence interval, calculated using a t-based approximation. To visualize the continuous association of mCC/eGFR ratio with all-cause in-hospital mortality the mCC/eGFR ratio was plotted as a continuous variable against the odds of in-hospital mortality. Additionally, to visualize the continuous association of mCC/eGFR ratio with all-cause 5 year post-hospital mortality, mCC/eGFR ratio, as continuous variable, was plotted against the hazard ratio of 5 years post-hospital mortality. In a multivariable logistic regression model the association between mCC/eGFR ratio and in-hospital mortality was assessed with correction for variables that were predictors for in-hospital mortality in univariable logistic regression models. The relationship between mCC/eGFR ratio quartiles and both in-hospital mortality and 5-year post-hospital discharge mortality was examined with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics and outcome

Out of total of 46,652 patients admitted to our ICU, 7509 patients were included in the analysis (Figure S1). The mean age of the included patients was 61 years and 38% were female (Table 1). Median plasma creatinine prior to ICU admission was 80 µmol/l and median plasma creatinine at ICU admission was 73 µmol/l. During ICU admission incidence rates of KDIGO AKI were 20 for stage 1 and 5 for stage 2. Median (IQR) hospital stay prior to ICU-admission was 1 (0–2) days, with a median duration of ICU stay of 4 (2–8) days and median hospital stay of 17 (11–29) days. ICU-readmission occurred in 16% of patients.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics for all patients and per mCC/eGFR quartile
Full size table

Patients in lower mCC/eGFR ratio categories were older and had higher median plasma creatinine values at baseline and after ICU admission (P < 0.001 for all comparisons, Table 1). Median mCC and UCE increased in subsequent mCC/eGFR categories. Overall, median UCE was 34% lower in females compared to males (Table 1).

Correlation between the mCC/eGFR ratio and UCE

The mCC/eGFR ratio was strongly correlated with UCE in both males (Pearson correlation 0.88 (P < 0.001)) and females (Pearson correlation 0.84 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). Instead of a single UCE value corresponding to a specific mCC/eGFR ratio, there was a range of UCE values that corresponded to a specific mCC/eGFR ratio likely representing interindividual differences in age, sex, weight and height affecting UCE. The marked difference in UCE between males and females is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relation between mCC/eGFR ratio and UCE in males and females. Legend: Relation between mCC/eGFR ratios and UCE at day 1 of ICU admission in males (4677, with a Pearson’s r = 0.88; P < 0.001) and females (2832, r = 0.84; P < 0.001) separately to underscore the relation between mCC/eGFR and UCE and to demonstrate the difference in UCE range between males and females at an mCC/eGFR ratio of 1.1. The different slopes between males and females are a consequence of the higher UCE in males compared to females

Full size image

Courses of mCC, eGFR and the mCC/eGFR ratio

The courses of mCC, eGFR and mCC/eGFR ratio during the first 30 days of follow up were available in 303 patients with an ICU stay of at least 30 days. During the ICU stay, eGFR gradually increased, while mCC remained more or less stable (Fig. 2A), resulting in a progressive decline of the mCC/eGFR ratio (Fig. 2B). The decline of the mCC/eGFR ratio was accompanied by a decline in UCE, indicating loss of muscle mass (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Time course of mCC, eGFR, mCC/eGFR ratio and UCE. Legend: Graphical representation of (A) the course of eGFR and creatinine clearance during the ICU stay and (B) the course of the creatinine clearance to eGFR ratio (mCC/eGFR ratio) and urinary creatinine excretion (UCE) in patients (n = 303) with an ICU stay of at least 30 days. The lines are fitted using a locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (loess) function and the shaded area corresponds to the 95% confidence interval, calculated using a t-based approximation

Full size image

The mCC/eGFR ratio in relation to in-hospital and post-hospital discharge 5-year mortality

Overall in-hospital mortality was 16%. In-hospital mortality was 27% in the lowest mCC/eGFR quartile, 16% in the second, 13% in the third and 11% in the highest quartile (P < 0.001). Lower mCC/eGFR ratios were also associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality when the mCC/eGFR ratio was plotted as a continuous variable (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between the mCC/eGFR ratio and in-hospital mortality and mortality 5 year after hospital discharge. Legend: Graphical representation of the association of mCC/eGFR ratio with the risk of (A) in-hospital and (B) 5 years post-hospital discharge mortality. The lines show the odds ratio (OR) for short-term mortality and hazard ratio (HR) for long-term mortality. The shaded area corresponds to the 95% pointwise confidence interval (CI). P-values are < 0.001 and < 0.001 for in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality, respectively. A histogram of the mCC/eGFR ratio is plotted in the background to demonstrate the distribution of the mCC/eGFR ratio. The graph demonstrates that a lower mCC/eGFR ratio is associated with higher risk of both in-hospital and long-term mortality

Full size image

Overall actuarial mortality 5 year after hospital discharge was 27%. The actuarial mortality was 37% in the lowest mCC/eGFR quartile, 28% in the second, 27% in the third and 19% in the highest quartile (P < 0.001).

Lower mcc/eGFR ratios were associated with higher hazard ratios for 5-year post-hospital discharge mortality, when mCC/eGFR ratio was plotted as a continuous variable (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3B).

In a multivariable logistic regression analysis model, the mCC/eGFR ratio remained an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (Table S2) after correction for variables that predicted in-hospital mortality in univariable logistic regression models (Table 2).

Table 2 Univariable logistic regression model for in-hospital mortality
Full size table

Kaplan–Meier analyses of the relationship between the mCC/eGFR quartiles and both in-hospital and 5-year post-hospital mortality showed significantly higher survival rates in patients with higher mCC/eGFR ratios (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier curves over the first 30 days according to quartiles of mCC/eGFR ratio

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Kaplan–Meier curves of 5 year post-hospital discharge mortality according to quartiles of mCC/eGFR ratio

Full size image

Sensitivity analyses

In a sensitivity analysis in patients without KDIGO acute kidney injury and a baseline plasma creatinine < 110 µmol/l, lower mCC/eGFR ratios were persistently significantly associated with higher odds for in-hospital (P < 0.001) and higher hazard ratios for 5-year post-hospital discharge mortality (P < 0.001) (Figure S2). In an additional sensitivity analysis in which mCC was not normalised to a BSA of 1.73 m2, lower mCC/eGFR ratios were persistently significantly associated with both higher odds for in-hospital (P < 0.001) and higher hazard ratios for 5-year post-hospital discharge mortality (P < 0.001) (Figure S3). In a third sensitivity analysis with the CKD-EPI 2009 eGFR without race correction in the mCC/eGFR ratio, lower mCC/eGFR ratios were persistently and significantly associated with both higher odds for in-hospital (P < 0.001) and higher hazard ratios for mortality 5-year post-hospital discharge (P < 0.001) (Figure S4).

Discussion

In this study we investigated the association between the mCC/eGFR ratio and all-cause mortality in ICU patients. The main finding is that both short-term and long-term mortality are considerably higher in patients with a lower mCC/eGFR ratio. Second there is a strong correlation between the mCC/eGFR ratio and UCE, which is an established method for assessment of whole-body muscle mass.

Univariably, the mCC/eGFR ratio was a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality. The mCC/eGFR ratio remained an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in multivariable logistic regression analysis with correction for confounders like APACHE IV score, KDIGO AKI stage, baseline plasma creatinine, body length and weight.

The development of muscle loss during ICU stay can be detected by a decreasing mCC/eGFR ratio (Fig. 2B). As a result of gradual muscle loss during the ICU stay, plasma creatinine levels declined, resulting in increasing eGFR values, relative to the mCC levels, which are unaffected by muscle mass [9].

An mCC/eGFR ratio equal or above 1.1 could be considered representative for normal whole-body muscle mass in patients with a normal kidney function, since eGFR was derived mostly from ‘true’ iothalamate clearance whereas mCC overestimates the true glomerular filtration rate by approximately 10%, due to tubular secretion of creatinine in addition to glomerular filtration [17]. In patients with decreased kidney function tubular secretion of creatinine relatively increases [18] likely resulting in an even higher ‘cut-off value’ for the mCC/eGFR ratio. In our cohort, tubular secretion was not considered to be importantly increased in most patients, since the median baseline creatinine was 80 (IQR 64–103) µmol/l and AKI stage 3 patients were excluded. When we consider an mCC/eGFR ratio equal or above 1.1 representative for normal whole-body muscle mass, 43% of males and 63% of females in our study had a diminished whole-body muscle mass at ICU admission.

UCE is seen as an established method for estimating whole-body muscle mass since creatinine is generated in muscle cells proportional to muscle mass and is subsequently transported to the blood and eventually excreted in urine [6]. Compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in which only some selected muscle groups are measured, UCE is a representation of the whole body muscle mass [19]. In kidney transplant patients UCE is also related to muscle performance [20]. In earlier publications, we demonstrated that lower muscle mass as reflected by lower UCE is related to in-hospital and long-term mortality [8] and that muscle-mass expressed as UCE decreases during ICU stay [9]. In non-ICU patients after liver transplantation a relationship between lower UCE and mortality was also observed [21].

Although the prevalence of sarcopenia in ICU patients is high, a gold standard for the assessment of sarcopenia in ICU patients is lacking [22]. Further studies are needed to investigate if the mCC/eGFR ratio can be used to reliably detect sarcopenia in ICU patients and whether or not the effects of interventions such as physical therapy or long-term use of neuromuscular blockage agents can result in changes in the mCC/eGFR ratio. Further research is necessary to investigate if in obese patients the mCC/eGFR ratio has the same correlation with UCE, since (A) an eGFR formula standardized to a body surface area of 1.73 m2 underestimates the actual GFR in obese patients and (B) in obese patients total body water involved in glomerular filtration does not increase relative to the increase in body weight. Currently mCC is not routinely measured in most ICUs. However, since plasma creatinine and eGFR formula’s overestimate renal function in ICU patients due to loss of muscle mass, adding mCC to the ICU’s laboratory diagnostic routine not only improves assessment of renal function in steady state situations, but as part of the mCC/eGFR ratio probably also improves assessment of whole-body-muscle-mass.

In this study, we normalized mCC to a BSA of 1.73 m2 since the CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR equation is also normalised to a BSA of 1.73 m2. However in the non-ICU study introducing the concept of the mCC/eGFR ratio, mCC was not corrected for BSA [10]. Notably, in a sensitivity analysis without correcting mCC for BSA, we found a similar association between the mCC/eGFR ratio and all-cause mortality (Figure S3).

It should be noted that in this study we chose to use the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR formula to avoid a possible suggestion of racism [23]. This formula results in a median increase of 3.9 (2.9–4.8) ml/min/1.73 m2 in eGFR compared to the CKD-EPI 2009 eGFR formula in European populations [24]. In sensitivity analyses with the CKD-EPI 2009 formula we found a similar association between mCC/eGFR ratio and all-cause mortality (Figure S4).

The strengths of our study are that the mCC/eGFR ratio was investigated in a large ICU cohort and that it can relatively easy be applied in practice. Our study also has limitations. First, this is a retrospective analysis covering a long time period. However, laboratory data were prospectively collected and 24 h urine collections are routinely performed at our ICU which minimises the risk of misinterpretation of data. Second, although we excluded patients who developed KDIGO AKI stage 3 in a part of the selected cohort still considerable changes in renal function occurred which might have influenced the mCC/eGFR ratio. However, the exclusion of all patients with AKI would make it difficult to extrapolate our findings to real world clinical practice. Third, the mCC/eGFR ratio might also be affected by administrated drugs and fluids. Fourth, we did not compare muscle mass as assessed by the mCC/eGFR ratio with an imaging technique, for example by measuring the rectus femoris cross-sectional area [25, 26].

Conclusion

The mCC/eGFR ratio might be useful to estimate whole-body muscle mass in ICU patients independent of demographics and is independently related to both in-hospital and long-term mortality. Future research could establish the utility of the mCC/eGFR ratio.

Availability of data and materials

The anonymized data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

APACHE-IV:

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score 4

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

BSA:

Body surface area

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

mCC:

Measured creatinine clearance

NICE:

(Dutch) national intensive care registry

UCE:

Urinary creatinine excretion

References

  1. Weijs PJ, Looijaard WG, Dekker IM, Stapel SN, Girbes AR, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Beishuizen A. Low skeletal muscle area is a risk factor for mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaitovich A, Khan M, Itty R, Chieng HC, Dumas CL, Nadendla P, et al. ICU admission muscle and fat mass, survival, and disability at discharge: a prospective cohort study. Chest. 2019;155(2):322–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moisey LL, Mourtzakis M, Cotton BA, Premji T, Heyland DK, Wade CE, et al. Skeletal muscle predicts ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shibahashi K, Sugiyama K, Kashiura M, Hamabe Y. Decreasing skeletal muscle as a risk factor for mortality in elderly patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. J Intensive Care. 2017;5:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng CC, Lee ZY, Chan WY, Jamaluddin MF, Tan LJ, Sitaram PN, et al. Low muscularity as assessed by abdominal computed tomography on intensive care unit admission is associated with mortality in a critically Ill Asian population. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(3):425–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(4):601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Proctor DN, O’Brien PC, Atkinson EJ, Nair KS. Comparison of techniques to estimate total body skeletal muscle mass in people of different age groups. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(3):E489–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hessels L, Koopmans N, Gomes Neto AW, Volbeda M, Koeze J, Lansink-Hartgring AO, et al. Urinary creatinine excretion is related to short-term and long-term mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(10):1699–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Volbeda M, Hessels L, Posma RA, Bakker SJ, Nijsten MW. Time courses of urinary creatinine excretion, measured creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate over 30 days of ICU admission. J Crit Care. 2021;63:161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heaf JG, Yahya R, Dahl M. The ratio of measured to estimated glomerular filtration rate may be a marker of early mortality and dialysis requirement. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Inker LA, Titan S. Measurement and estimation of GFR for use in clinical practice: core curriculum 2021. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;78(5):736–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012;2(1):1–138.

    Google Scholar 

  13. van de Klundert N, Holman R, Dongelmans DA, de Keizer NF. Data resource profile: the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry of admissions to adult intensive care units. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(6):1850-h.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller WG, Kaufman HW, Levey AS, Straseski JA, Wilhelms KW, Yu HE, et al. National kidney foundation laboratory engagement working group recommendations for implementing the CKD-EPI 2021 race-free equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate: practical guidance for clinical laboratories. Clin Chem. 2022;68(4):511–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levey AS, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Greene T, Inker LA. Measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(1):51–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Delanaye P, Pottel H, Cavalier E, Flamant M, Stehle T, Mariat C. Diagnostic standard: assessing glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024;39(7):1088–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller BF, Winkler AW. The renal excretion of endogenous creatinine in man. Comparison with exogenous creatinine and inulin. J Clin Invest. 1938;17(1):31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer JH, Brooks CS, Burch RN. Clinical appraisal of creatinine clearance as a measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis. 1982;2(3):337–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cawthon PM, Orwoll ES, Peters KE, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Kado DM, et al. strong relation between muscle mass determined by D3-creatine dilution, physical performance, and incidence of falls and mobility limitations in a prospective cohort of older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(6):844–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stam SP, Eisenga MF, Gomes-Neto AW, van Londen M, de Meijer VE, van Beek AP, et al. Muscle mass determined from urinary creatinine excretion rate, and muscle performance in renal transplant recipients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(3):621–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stam SP, Oste MCJ, Eisenga MF, Blokzijl H, van den Berg AP, Bakker SJL, de Meijer VE. Posttransplant muscle mass measured by urinary creatinine excretion rate predicts long-term outcomes after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2019;19(2):540–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Trethewey SP, Brown N, Gao F, Turner AM. Interventions for the management and prevention of sarcopenia in the critically ill: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2019;50:287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams WW, Hogan JW, Ingelfinger JR. Time to Eliminate Health Care Disparities in the Estimation of Kidney Function. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(19):1804–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu EL, Coresh J, Grams ME, Clase CM, Elinder CG, Paik J, et al. Removing race from the CKD-EPI equation and its impact on prognosis in a predominantly White European population. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38(1):119–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haines RW, Fowler AJ, Liang K, Pearse RM, Larsson AO, Puthucheary Z, Prowle JR. Comparison of cystatin C and creatinine in the assessment of measured kidney function during critical illness. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;18(8):997–1005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Seymour JM, Ward K, Sidhu PS, Puthucheary Z, Steier J, Jolley CJ, et al. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax. 2009;64(5):418–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Eric Alberts, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands for his work in the completion of the laboratory database.

Funding

MV, CF and PvdV received a research grant from Baxter Spa, Italy unrelated to the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, EB70, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Meint Volbeda, Hendrik W. Zijlstra, Peter H. J. van der Voort & Maarten W. Nijsten

  2. Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Adrian Post & Casper F. M. Franssen

  3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Jenny E. Kootstra-Ros

Authors
  1. Meint Volbeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hendrik W. Zijlstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrian Post
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jenny E. Kootstra-Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter H. J. van der Voort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Casper F. M. Franssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maarten W. Nijsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MV, CF and MN contributed to the conception and the design of the study. MV, HZ, AP and MN contributed to the interpretation of data. MV, HZ, AP, CF, JKR, PvdV and MN contributed to the drafting and revising of the article and provided intellectual content of critical importance.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meint Volbeda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Because of the observational, retrospective, non-interventional nature of the study with collection and analysis of anonymized routinely obtained data, the Medical Ethics Review Board of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc UMCG) exempted the study from ethics review (METc 2022/287) regarding the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) and obtaining informed consent was deemed unnecessary according to national regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12882_2024_3760_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. List of variables with abbreviations and definitions. Table S2. Multivariable logistic regression model for in-hospital mortality. Figure S1. Flow chart of patient selection. Figure S2. Sensitivity analysis of mCC/eGFR ratio in patients without KDIGO acute kidney injury (AKI) and a baseline plasma creatinine < 110 µmol/l. Figure S3. Sensitivity analysis of mCC/eGFR ratio without normalizing mCC to a body surface area of 1.73 m2. Figure S4. Sensitivity analysis of mCC/eGFR ratio with CKD-EPI 2009 eGFR without race correction.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volbeda, M., Zijlstra, H.W., Post, A. et al. Creatinine clearance/eGFR ratio: a simple index for muscle mass related to mortality in ICU patients. BMC Nephrol 25, 330 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03760-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03760-2

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us