Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Nephrology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Higher serum chloride concentrations are associated with acute kidney injury in unselected critically ill patients

  • Zhongheng Zhang1Email author,
  • Xiao Xu1,
  • Haozhe Fan1,
  • Danyu Li1 and
  • Hongsheng Deng1
BMC Nephrology201314:235

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-235

Received: 18 July 2013

Accepted: 9 October 2013

Published: 28 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Chloride administration has been found to be harmful to the kidney in critically ill patients. However the association between plasma chloride concentration and renal function has never been investigated.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary 24-bed intensive care unit from September 2010 to November 2012. Data on serum chloride for each patient during their ICU stay were abstracted from electronic database. Cl0 referred to the initial chloride on ICU entry, Clmax, Clmin and Clmean referred to the maximum, minimum and mean chloride values before the onset of AKI, respectively. AKI was defined according to the conventional AKIN criteria. Univariate and multivariable analysis were performed to examine the association of chloride and AKI development.

Results

A total of 1221 patients were included into analysis during study period. Three hundred and fifty-seven patients (29.2%) developed AKI. Clmax was significantly higher in AKI than in non-AKI group (111.8 ± 8.1 vs 107.9 ±5.4 mmol/l; p < 0.001); Cl0 was not significantly different between AKI and non-AKI patients; Clmean was significantly higher in AKI than non-AKI (104.3 ±5.8 vs 103.4 ± 4.5; p = 0.0047) patients. Clmax remained to be associated with AKI in multivariable analysis (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.08-1.13).

Conclusion

Chloride overload as represented by Clmean and Clmax is significantly associated with the development of AKI.

Keywords

Acute kidney injuryChlorideIntensive care unitCritically ill

Background

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of varieties of critical illness and acts as a major contribution to the high mortality rate in intensive care unit (ICU) [13]. A large body of evidence suggests that even a mild increase in serum creatinine will have significant negative impact on all-cause mortality [4, 5]. Thus, great effort has been made to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the development of AKI, based on which preventive or therapeutic strategies can be developed to control this devastating complication. Although there are numerous strategies for the prevention and treatment of AKI including optimization of hemodynamic status, use of vasodilators (e.g. dopamine and fenoldopam), early initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy and use of natriuretic peptides, most of them failed to show a beneficial effect [610].

Critically ill patients receive large amount of intravenous fluid administration during their ICU stay. Many commercially available crystalloid fluids are rich in chloride; for example, the most widely used saline 0.9% has 40% higher chloride than human plasma. It is intuitive that the administration of such non-physiological fluid will impair the balance of internal homeostasis. Some animal studies suggest that administration of chloride-liberal fluid induces renal vasoconstriction and a decline in glomerular filtration rate [11, 12]. More recently, Yunos NM and colleagues [13] conducted a sequential period pilot study in unselected critically ill patients and found that the incidence of AKI can be reduced by 50% by using chloride-restrictive fluids. However, these studies are preliminary and the association between chloride and kidney function remains to be elucidated. The present study aimed to investigate the association of plasma chloride and the development of AKI in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that plasma chloride was associated with the development of AKI during ICU stay.

Methods

Study population and settings

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary 24-bed mixed ICU from September 2010 through November 2012. The hospital was a large academic medical center with 2000 beds. All patients admitted to the ICU during study period were potentially eligible for the present analysis. All clinical data were abstracted from Haitai e-chart (Haitai Medical information systems Co.,LTD). Exclusion criteria were 1) patients with preexisting renal impairment as represented by a serum creatinine > 135 μmol/l in the past 30 days before this ICU admission; 2) patients with incomplete medical information that prohibit analysis; 3) patients transferred to other hospitals before recovery; and such patients were labeled as “automatically discharged” in e-chart; 4) patients had no chloride measured during their ICU stay; 5) patients younger than 18 years old. The study was approved by the ethic committee of Jinhua municipal central hospital and informed consent was waived due to retrospective nature of the study.

Physiological scores for the severity of illness such as acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were not routinely obtained for each patients; thus, we used the well validated Charlson’s comorbidity index for risk adjustment [14, 15]. Chloride was measured by automated chemistry analyzer (Sysmex, Sysmex Asia Pacific Pte Ltd and Sysmex Corporation of Japan). The reference range of chloride was 98 to 106 mmol/l. To explore the temporal association of chloride values and AKI development, only chloride values before the onset of AKI were obtained from database. For patients without development of AKI, all available chloride values during ICU stay were obtained. Cl0 referred to the initial chloride on ICU entry, Clmax, Clmin and Clmean referred to the maximum, minimum and mean chloride values before the onset of AKI, respectively. Because most critically ill patients had more than one diagnosis, we used the primary diagnosis (the one in the first sheet of medical chart) for the classification of patients, as well as for subgroup analysis.

The primary outcome was the development of AKI as defined by an increase in serum creatinine by >50% from baseline [16]. If baseline creatinine was not available, it was estimated by assuming that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in that given patient was 75 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and serum creatinine can be estimated by using the modified 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula [17, 18]. AKI patients were further classified into AKIN-1,-2 and-3 according to acute kidney injury network (AKIN) report [19]. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital mortality, use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). If a patient had more than one episode of ICU stay, ICU LOS was the sum of each.

Statistical analysis

Demographic and clinical data were compared between AKI and non-AKI patients. Parametric data were expressed using mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using t test; non-parametric data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. To determine the dose–response relationship between chloride and AKI, chloride values were compared among groups without AKI, with AKIN-1,-2 and-3 by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were made by using Bonferroni method. Variables with p < 0.1 in bivariate analysis were incorporated into Logistic regression model for risk adjustment. The goodness-of-fit of the regression model was tested using Homser-Lemeshow χ2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding patients with missing baseline creatinine. All analyses were performed using the software StataSE 11.2 (College Station, Texas 77845 USA). Conventional two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 1583 patients were identified during study period. Three hundred and sixty-two of them were excluded because 352 had preexisting renal dysfunction and 10 had incomplete medical information. As a result, a total of 1221 patients were eligible for current analysis (Table 1). Baseline serum creatinine levels were missing in 203 patients. There were 357 patients (29.2%) developed AKI during their ICU stay. As compared with non-AKI, patients with AKI were older (62.0 ± 19.8 vs 58.8 ± 19.5 years; p = 0.011), had higher Charlson comorbidity index (1[0-2] vs 0[0-2]; p = 0.0095), more likely to use mechanical ventilation (62.8% vs 43.3%, p < 0.001), and had higher hospital mortality (27.2% vs 18.2%;p < 0.001), longer hospital LOS (29 [20,41] vs 22 [15,33],p < 0.001), and longer ICU LOS (4 [3, 9] vs 3 [2, 6]; p < 0.001). Patients in coronary care setting were less likely to develop AKI (8% vs 14.4%; p = 0.002); and there was no difference in the incidence of AKI in medical, surgical and post-cardiac surgery patients. AKI patients had more fluid balance (1245 ± 782 vs 984 ± 780 ml; p < 0.001) and greater amount of saline 0.9% infusion (1052 ± 768 vs 954 ± 650 ml; p = 0.023) than non-AKI patients. Cl0 was not significantly different between AKI and non-AKI patients (104.1 ± 7.3 vs 103.4 ± 5.4 mmol/l; p = 0.07). Clmax was significantly higher in AKI than in non-AKI patients (111.8 ± 8.1 vs 107.9 ±5.4 mmol/l; p < 0.001), and Clmin was significantly lower in AKI than in non-AKI (97.2 ± 6.1 vs 98.3 ± 5.6 mmol/l; p = 0.002). Clmean was significantly higher in AKI than in non-AKI patients (104.3 ±5.8 vs 103.4 ± 4.5 mmol/l; p = 0.0047).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of included patients

Variables

Total (n = 1221)

AKI (n = 357)

Non-AKI (n = 864)

P value

Age (years)

59.7 ± 19.6

62.0 ± 19.8

58.8 ± 19.5

0.011

Sex (male, %)

788 (64.5%)

233 (65.3%)

556 (64.2%)

0.117

Charlson index (median, IQR)

0 (0-2)

1 (0-2)

0 (0-2)

0.0095

Primary Classification (n, %)

   

<0.001

  Medical

340 (27.8)

111 (31.1)

229 (26.5)

0.104

  Coronary

152 (12.4)

28 (8.0)

124 (14.4)

0.002

Post-cardiac surgery

101 (8.0)

22 (6.0)

79 (9.0)

0.085

  Surgical

628 (51.4)

196 (54.9)

432 (50.0)

0.119

Fluid balance (ml)†

1061 ± 789

1245 ± 782

984 ± 780

<0.001

Saline 0.9% administration (ml)†

983 ± 678

1052 ± 768

954 ± 650

0.023

Use of diuretics (n, %)

408 (33.42)

115 (32.21)

293 (33.91)

0.567

Use of MV (n; %)

598 (49.0)

224 (62.8)

374 (43.3)

<0.001

Survivors (n; %)

967 (79.2)

260 (72.8)

707 (81.8)

<0.001

Hospital LOS (days; median, IQR)

24 (16,35)

29 (20,41)

22 (15,33)

<0.001

ICU LOS (days; median, IQR)

3 (2,7)

4 (3,9)

3 (2,6)

<0.001

Bicarbonate (mmol/l)

23.9 ± 3.0

24.0 ± 3.2

23.9 ± 2.9

0.46

Cl0 (mmol/l)

103.6 ±6.0

104.1 ± 7.3

103.4 ± 5.4

0.07

Clmean (mmol/l)

103.7 ±4.9

104.3 ±5.8

103.4 ± 4.5

0.0047

Clmin (mmol/l)

98.0 ± 5.8

97.2 ± 6.1

98.3 ± 5.6

0.002

Clmax (mmol/l)

109.1 ± 6.6

111.8 ± 8.1

107.9 ±5.4

<0.001

Analysis was restricted to survivors; † data obtained on the day of the onset of acute kidney injury or on the day of the highest serum creatinine level.

Abbreviations: AKI acute kidney injury, IQR interquartile range, MV mechanical ventilation, Cl 0 chloride measured on ICU entry, Cl mean mean chloride during ICU stay, Cl min minimum chloride during ICU stay, Cl max maximum chloride during ICU stay.

In multiple-comparison test, a dose–response relationship was identified between Clmax and AKIN stages (Table 2). AKIN-1 had significantly higher Clmax than non-AKI (111.0 ± 7.4 vs 107.9 ± 5.4 mmol/l; p < 0.001), and AKIN-3 had significantly higher Clmax than AKIN-2 (115.9 ± 11.0 vs 111.7 ± 7.3; p < 0.05). Table 3 shows the adjustment of odds ratio with multiple regression analysis. After adjustment, Clmax and Clmean remained to be significantly associated the development of AKI with odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.08-1.13, p < 0.001) and 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02-1.07, p = 0.002), respectively. In patients with AKI, a total of 45 patients required renal replacement therapy. However, none of Clmin, Clmax or Clmean was significantly different between AKI patients with and without CRRT (data not shown).
Table 2

Dose–response relationship between chloride values and the severity of AKI

 

Non-AKI

AKIN-1

AKIN-2

AKIN-3

Cl0 (mmol/l)

103.4 ± 5.4

103.4 ± 6.6

104.2 ± 6.6

106.7 ± 10.8

Clmax (mmol/l)

107.9 ± 5.4

111.0 ± 7.4

111.7 ± 7.3

115.9 ± 11.0

Clmin (mmol/l)

98.3 ± 5.6

97.3 ± 6.0

97.0 ± 5.2

96.7 ± 8.4

Clmean (mmol/l)

103.4 ± 4.5

103.8 ± 5.5

104.2 ± 5.1

106.7 ± 7.8

Note: Differences among the four groups were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni method.

Indicates the chloride value in the present AKI stage is significantly higher than that in the milder stage in the left cell. For example, Clmax in AKIN-1 was significantly higher than that in non-AKI (108.9 vs 107.8, p < 0.001).

Table 3

Logistic regression model to test independent variables associated with AKI

Variables

Odds ratio

95% confidence interval

P

Cl0

1.02

0.998-1.05

0.06

Clmax

1.10

1.08-1.13

<0.001

Clmin

0.96

0.94-0.98

0.001

Clmean

1.04

1.02-1.07

0.002

Abbreviations: MV mechanical ventilation.

Note: the Logistic regression model was fitted by incorporating all potentially confounding factors including bicarbonate level, use of diuretics, age, sex, comorbidity score and primary diagnosis.

Subgroup analysis was performed by restricting to patients with cardiovascular diseases, trauma, pancreatitis, abdominal problem, shock, without MV and without CRRT. The results were generally consistent with the overall analysis (Figure 1). Sensitivity analysis by excluding patients with missing baseline creatinine was performed, and the results remained unchanged (data not shown).
Figure 1

Subgroup analysis restricting to patients with cardiovascular diseases, trauma, pancreatitis, abdominal problem, shock, without MV and without CRRT. OR, odds ratio; MV, mechanical ventilation; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy.

Discussion

Our study for the first time demonstrated that higher Clmax and Clmean were associated with subsequent development of AKI, while higher Clmin was protective against the development of AKI. Furthermore, Clmax was positively correlated to the severity of AKI as staged by AKIN criteria.

Our result supports the notion that excessive chloride intake has negative impact on renal function. In animal study, Wilcox CS showed that chloride can induce vasoconstriction and such effect is specific for the renal vessels [11]. Other negative effects of chloride on kidney include the reduction in cortical perfusion and the increase in systemic inflammation. In a clinical trial, Wu BU and colleagues [20] compared Ringer’s solution and saline 0.9% on their effect on inflammatory response. The result showed that patients who received saline 0.9% appeared to have higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) levels. Since SIRS is a well known risk factor for AKI, it is not surprising that elevated inflammatory level will pose the kidney at increased risk of injury [2123]. In another study, Chowdhury AH and colleagues [24] found that administration of saline 0.9% ([Cl] 154 mmol/L) significantly reduced renal cortical tissue perfusion and mean renal artery flow velocity as compared to the infusion of Plasma-Lyte 148 ([Cl] 98 mmol/L). Alternative explanation for the linkage between higher chloride and AKI may be that these patients are more hypotensive and require more saline. Another finding in our study is that Clmin is protective against the development of AKI, which can be explained by the fact that the optimal serum chloride is within the normal range, and hypochloremia has negative impact on renal function. However, there is no compelling evidence demonstrating the negative impact of hypochloremia, and this mandates further investigations. In a landmark study, Yunos NM and coworkers [13] only reported that chloride-restrictive arm received significantly less amount of chloride infusion during study period (496 vs 694 mmol per patient), but did not report serum chloride levels in both arms. This limits the interpretation of the finding with respect to whether use of chloride-restrictive fluid will benefit overall population or just patients with hyperchloremia. According to our findings, we speculate that chloride-restrictive strategy may not benefit patients with already existing hypochloremia. Thus, it is of great interest to conduct a randomized controlled trial by stratifying patients according to their baseline serum chloride levels.

Several other studies show neutral effect of chloride-restrictive strategy in protecting renal function [2529]. However, these studies are performed in patients with contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). It is probable that the protective effect of chloride-restrictive fluid is not universal and can only be found in critically ill patients. In CIN setting, the total amount of chloride infusion is limited even in chloride-libel arm. In contrast, during fluid resuscitation in ICU setting the amount of infused fluid is much larger than that in CIN setting, allowing the beneficial effect of chloride restriction large enough to be detected.

In our study, we failed to identify an association between chloride and the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT). This is in contrast to the study by Yunos NM and coworkers in which chloride-restrictive strategy is associated with reduced need for RRT. However, because we excluded patients with preexisting renal impairment on ICU entry, the number of patients requiring RRT is extremely low in our study (4%). Such a small sample size significantly limited the statistical power of our study. Secondly, indications for the initiation of RRT vary considerably across different areas and institutions, and thus the comparison between our findings and results from other institutions should be cautious.

Many biomarkers in critical care medicine are found to be predictive of clinical outcomes. For the prediction of mortality, CRP, B-type natriuretic peptide and red cell distribution width are found to be promising; [30, 31] and for the prediction of AKI, cystatin C and NGAL are thought to be promising [32, 33]. Such early identification of adverse outcome may inform clinicians to adopt preventive strategies to reduce the risk of adverse outcome. The clinical implication of our finding is that while initial chloride value is not predictive of the AKI development, the handling of chloride during treatment is of vital importance. For a patient with hyperchloremia on ICU entry, the use of chloride-restrictive strategy will effectively reduce the risk of AKI. Conversely, if excessive saline 0.9% is infused to a patient with normal serum chloride level, he or she will be put on high risk of AKI development. However, due to the observational nature of our study; the result can only be served as hypothesis-generating. Further well designed controlled trials may help to solve this uncertainty [34].

There are several limitations in our study that should be mentioned in interpretation of the results. First, the measurement of serum chloride was not scheduled and the obtained Clmax and Clmin might not reflect the true values. Second, disease severity score such as SOFA or APACHE ǁ was not incorporated into analysis, which significantly limited the reliability of our result. However, we used Charlson’s comorbidity index, which is accessible from administrative database, for risk stratification. Although not as good as disease severity scores involving physiologic parameters, Charlson’s index has been validated for use in critical care setting [14, 15]. Third, although we have tried our best to control bias and confounders by using multivariate model, many other known or unknown factors may still exist. Thus, the conclusion of the study is at best hypothesis-generating, and further experimental studies are mandatory to confirm current findings.

Conclusion

In aggregate, the study shows that higher Clmean and Clmax are associated with the development of AKI, indicating that chloride overload during ICU treatment may increase the risk of AKI. Furthermore, higher Clmin is found to be protective against AKI, indicating that restricting chloride infusion is no longer beneficial in patients with hypochloremia.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would thank Qiang Su for his help in data acquisition. The study was supported partly by the Science and Technology Research plan of Jinhua city (2012-03-31).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University

References

  1. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW: Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005, 16 (11): 3365-3370. 10.1681/ASN.2004090740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Levy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI: The effect of acute renal failure on mortality: a cohort analysis. JAMA. 1996, 275 (19): 1489-1494. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530430033035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Garcia S, Ko B, Adabag S: Contrast-induced nephropathy and risk of acute kidney injury and mortality after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012, 94 (3): 772-776. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lassnigg A, Schmidlin D, Mouhieddine M, Bachmann LM, Druml W, Bauer P, Hiesmayr M: Minimal changes of serum creatinine predict prognosis in patients after cardiothoracic surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004, 15 (6): 1597-1605. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000130340.93930.DD.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Uchino S, Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Bates S, Ronco C: An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34 (7): 1913-1917. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000224227.70642.4F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vincent JL: Relevance of albumin in modern critical care medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009, 23 (2): 183-191. 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.11.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wiedermann CJ: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis. BMC Emerg Med. 2008, 8: 1-10.1186/1471-227X-8-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedrich JO, Adhikari N, Herridge MS, Beyene J: Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death. Ann Intern Med. 2005, 142 (7): 510-524. 10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cogliati AA, Vellutini R, Nardini A, Urovi S, Hamdan M, Landoni G, Guelfi P: Fenoldopam infusion for renal protection in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a randomized clinical study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007, 21 (6): 847-850. 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.02.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Valsson F, Ricksten SE, Hedner T, Zäll S, William-Olsson EB, Lundin S: Effects of atrial natriuretic peptide on renal function after cardiac surgery and in cyclosporine-treated heart transplant recipients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994, 8 (4): 425-430. 10.1016/1053-0770(94)90282-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilcox CS: Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest. 1983, 71 (3): 726-735. 10.1172/JCI110820.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilcox CS: Renal haemodynamics during hyperchloraemia in the anaesthetized dog: effects of captopril. J Physiol. 1988, 406: 27-34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, Story D, Ho L, Bailey M: Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012, 308 (15): 1566-1572. 10.1001/jama.2012.13356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cıldır E, Bulut M, Akalın H, Kocabaş E, Ocakoğlu G, Aydın SA: Evaluation of the modified MEDS, MEWS score and Charlson comorbidity index in patients with community acquired sepsis in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med. 2013, 8: 255-60. 10.1007/s11739-012-0890-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen S, Johansen MB, Christiansen CF, Jensen R, Lemeshow S: Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care. Clin Epidemiol. 2011, 3: 203-211.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group: KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney inter. 2012, 2 (Suppl): 1-138.Google Scholar
  17. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P: Acute dialysis quality initiative workgroup: acute renal failure-definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care. 2004, 8 (4): R204-R212. 10.1186/cc2872.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. National Kidney Foundation: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002, 39 (2 Suppl 1): S1-S266.Google Scholar
  19. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnock DG, Levin A, Acute Kidney Injury Network: Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007, 11 (2): R31-10.1186/cc5713.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, Repas K, Delee R, Yu S, Smith B, Banks PA, Conwell DL: Lactated Ringer’s solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011, 9 (8): 710-717. 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yegenaga I, Tuglular S, Ari E, Etiler N, Baykara N, Torlak S, Acar S, Akbas T, Toker K, Solak ZM: Evaluation of sepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute kidney injury, and RIFLE criteria in two tertiary hospital intensive care units in Turkey. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010, 115 (4): c276-c282. 10.1159/000313486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Takahashi K, Mizukami H, Kamata K, Inaba W, Kato N, Hibi C, Yagihashi S: Amelioration of acute kidney injury in lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome by an aldose reductase inhibitor, fidarestat. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (1): e30134-10.1371/journal.pone.0030134.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Cartin-Ceba R, Kashiouris M, Plataki M, Kor DJ, Gajic O, Casey ET: Risk factors for development of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012, doi:10.1155/2012/691013Google Scholar
  24. Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DNA: A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2012, 256 (1): 18-24. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256be72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Klima T, Christ A, Marana I, Kalbermatter S, Uthoff H, Burri E, Hartwiger S, Schindler C, Breidthardt T, Marenzi G, Mueller C: Sodium chloride vs. sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2012, 33 (16): 2071-2079. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zoungas S, Ninomiya T, Huxley R, Cass A, Jardine M, Gallagher M, Patel A, Vasheghani-Farahani A, Sadigh G, Perkovic V: Systematic review: sodium bicarbonate treatment regimens for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151 (9): 631-638. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Adolph E, Holdt-Lehmann B, Chatterjee T, Paschka S, Prott A, Schneider H, Koerber T, Ince H, Steiner M, Schuff-Werner P, Nienaber CA: Renal insufficiency following radiocontrast exposure trial (REINFORCE): a randomized comparison of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Coron Artery Dis. 2008, 19 (6): 413-419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brar SS, Shen AY, Jorgensen MB, Kotlewski A, Aharonian VJ, Desai N, Ree M, Shah AI, Burchette RJ: Sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008, 300 (9): 1038-1046. 10.1001/jama.300.9.1038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maioli M, Toso A, Leoncini M, Gallopin M, Tedeschi D, Micheletti C, Bellandi F: Sodium bicarbonate versus saline for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 52 (8): 599-604. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Z, Ni C: C-reactive protein as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011, 39 (5): 854-861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Xue Y, Xu X, Ni H: Prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its potential role in guiding fluid therapy in critically ill septic patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012, 20: 86-10.1186/1757-7241-20-86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N: Cystatin C in prediction of acute kidney injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011, 58 (3): 356-365. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.02.389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Valette X, Savary B, Nowoczyn M, Daubin C, Pottier V, Terzi N, Seguin A, Fradin S, Charbonneau P, Hanouz JL, Du Cheyron D: Accuracy of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in the early diagnosis of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39 (5): 857-65. 10.1007/s00134-013-2826-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Allison SJ: Acute kidney injury: restriction of intravenous chloride intake may reduce the incidence of AKI in critically ill patients. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012, 8 (12): 679-10.1038/nrneph.2012.221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/14/235/prepub

Copyright

© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement