Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Nephrology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Impact of chronic kidney disease on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes in Spain: PERCEDIME2 study

  • Antonio Rodriguez-Poncelas1, 2, 6,
  • Gabriel Coll-De Tuero1, 2, 3, 6, 7Email author,
  • Oriol Turrò-Garriga2,
  • Joan Barrot-de la Puente4, 6,
  • Josep Franch-Nadal5, 6,
  • Xavier Mundet-Tuduri6, 8 and
  • on behalf RedGDPS Study Group
BMC Nephrology201415:150

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-150

Received: 27 December 2013

Accepted: 28 August 2014

Published: 16 September 2014

Abstract

Background

The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) regardless of the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. There is controversy about the impact of each of the manifestations of CKD on the prevalence of CVD, whether it is greater with decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or increased urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR).

Methods

This study is a national cross-sectional study performed in primary care consults. We selected participants of both sexes who were aged 40 years or older, had been diagnosed with T2DM and had complete information on the study variables recorded in their medical records. The participants were classified according to eGFR : ≥ 60; 45–59; 30–44; <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR : < 30; 30–299; ≥300 mg/gr. The results were adjusted to compare the prevalence of CVD across all categories.

Results

A total of 1141 participants were included. Compared to participants with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 those with eGFR between 30–44 mL/min/m2, (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.9); and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 4.1 95% CI 1.6-10.2) showed increased likelihood of having CVD. Participants with UACR ≥ 30 mg/g compared to participants with UACR < 30 mg/g increased significantly the likelihood of having CVD, especially with UACR above 300 mg/g, (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4 for UACR = 30–299 mg/g; OR = 3.9; CI 1.6-9.5 for UACR ≥ 300 mg/g).

Conclusion

The decrease in eGFR and increase in UACR are independent risk factors that increase the prevalence of CVD in participants with T2DM and these factors are independent of each other and of other known cardiovascular risk factors. In our study the impact of mild decreased eGFR in T2DM on CVD was lower than the impact of increased UACR. It is necessary to determine not only UACR but also eGFR for all patients with T2DM, both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up, to identify those patients at high risk of cardiovascular complications.

Keywords

Type 2 diabetesChronic kidney diseaseCardiovascular disease

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a serious public health problem that increases the risk of overall mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and progression to end-stage renal disease regardless of the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors [13].

The presence of microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus has been considered one of the first clinical signs of diabetic nephropathy. Microalbuminuria can progress to macroalbuminuria, subsequently leading to a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and finally to end-stage renal disease [4]. This process was originally described for type 1 diabetes and may be different in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Controversy exists regarding the impact of each of the manifestations of CKD on the prevalence of CVD, whether it would be greater with increased urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) or a decreased eGFR. Several epidemiological studies show that increased UACR is associated with a higher prevalence of CVD; this association is observed even with low levels of UACR, and the progression of UACR influences the clinical outcome [5, 6], particularly regarding cardiovascular complications [7, 8]. It has been found that people with decreased eGFR and normal UACR have a lower CVD risk than individuals with increased UACR and normal eGFR [7, 9, 10]. In some studies in patients with T2DM, it has been observed that increased UACR and decreased eGFR are associated with the same prevalence of CVD, although the increase in UACR seems to relate more strongly to cardiovascular death [11, 12].

Most clinical practice guidelines advise determining not only UACR but also eGFR, as decreased eGFR with normal UACR is common in T2DM [1315]. The decrease in eGFR and increase in UACR are independently associated with increased overall mortality [11] and high prevalence of CVD [16, 17], which are even higher if they are both present.

This study was designed to determine the relationship of the decrease in eGFR and the increase in UACR with the prevalence of CVD in participants with T2DM being treated in primary care settings in Spain.

Methods

Study design and population

A detailed description of the methodology used has been described previously [18]. This study was a national cross-sectional study performed in primary care consults. The participants included both genders and were over 40 years old. Moreover, the participants were diagnosed with TDM2, and they had all of the variables necessary for the study included in their clinical history. Each researcher included 15 participants who met the inclusion criteria, a maximum of 3 participants per day. The participants were selected by convenience sample of the first 3 patients with diabetes each day who came to the consult for any reason and met the inclusion criteria until complete the number of participants per researcher.

The information for each participant was collected in the period from February to July 2011. The Ethical and Clinical Investigation Committee of the Institut d’ Assistència Sanitària (IAS) in Salt, Girona, Spain approved the study. To obtain the necessary data for this study from the clinical history of participants, all participants provided written informed consent.

Variables and procedure

We followed a study protocol to ensure correct collection of variables. The following variables were collected during the visit: age, gender, ethnicity, weight, height, body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided in meters squared; obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, abdominal waist circumference, cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiovascular diseases was collected through the medical record as a history of stroke (ischaemic cerebrovascular disease) included only symptomatic brain infarction, and did not include silent brain infarction, transient ischaemic attack or brain haemorrhage. Coronary heart disease included a previous history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, the presence of coronary interventions or the presence of ECG abnormalities suggestive of coronary heart disease. Peripheral arterial disease was diagnosed by an ankle-brachial pressure index of < 0.9 and/or two absent foot pulses. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL or non-fasting glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL or use of glucose-lowering drugs. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or greater, diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or greater, or use of antihypertensive medications irrespective of blood pressure. Hyperlipidemia was defined as total cholesterol ≥ 250 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol > 155 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL in men and < 48 mg/dL in women, triglycerides > 150 mg/dL or pharmacologic lipid lowering treatment. Cigarette smoking was defined as:never/past/current.

The following clinical and analytical measurements were collected: DM2 duration, arterial pressure (average of the last three determinations), drugs taken by the patient at the time the data were collected (antidiabetic, antihypertensives, hypolipemiant, antiplatelet, and anticoagulants). Basal glycaemia, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), haemoglobin, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, serum creatinine after overnight fasting for at least 12 hr, and the UACR in a urine sample collected in the first morning urine specimen, using the most recent value of the last 12 months.

In this study, the presence of CKD was based on KDOQI criteria as follows: patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or the presence of renal damage if UACR values were elevated (UACR ≥ 30 mg/g). CKD- EPI equation was used to calculate the eGFR [19]. Albuminuria was defined as a UACR of 30 mg/g or more. Microalbuminuria was defined as a UACR ranging from 30 to 299 mg/g, and macroalbuminuria was defined as a UACR of 300 mg/g or more. Two determinations of eGFR and UACR, in a period of three or more months, must be made. The cases that did not fulfil two determinations were excluded from the final analysis of the study.

The participants were classified according to simplified Kidney Disease Improvement Global Outcomes (KDIGO 2012) Guidelines [20], eGFR : ≥ 60; 45–59; 30–44; <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR : < 30; 30–299; ≥300 mg/gr.

To compare the prevalence of CVD across all categories, the results were adjusted by age and sex (Model 1); by age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking, and BMI (Model 2); and by age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking, BMI, HbA1c, and duration of diabetes (Model 3). Normal eGFR values were considered to be equal to or higher than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; decreased eGFR values were less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; normal UACR values were below 30 mg/g; and increased UACR values were above 30 mg/g.

Statistical analysis

Measurements of central tendency and dispersion were used to perform a descriptive analysis of the quantitative variables studied. Absolute and relative frequencies were used for qualitative variables. The patient groups were established according to the UACR and eGFR values. The differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups were calculated by comparison of means in quantitative variables, parametric or nonparametric according to the normal distribution of each variable, and contingency tables for qualitative variables, with a Yates correction when necessary. The prevalence of CVD was established for each of the eGFR and UACR categories. To determine the variables associated with CVD in each category, different logistic regression models were adjusted to control for potential confounders. We performed also a multivariate analysis considering the eGFR and UACR as continuous variables from point considered normal.

The results were expressed as absolute numbers, percentages, medians, standard deviations, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% CI. The statistical significance was set at 0.05 when contrasting hypotheses. The data analysis and processing were performed using the SPSS 17.0 statistical program for Windows.

Results

During the recruitment, 1279 participants were included in the study, but 138 (10.8%) participants were excluded because of incomplete or erroneous data. To rule out bias attributable to participants excluded from the study, we compared the two groups and we found no significant differences. The final sample size was 1141 participants.

Table 1 shows clinical and metabolic characteristics of the 1141 participants. Participants with GFR < 60 mL/min/m2 compared to participants with GFR ≥ 60 mL/min/m2 were more frequently older, had longer diabetes duration and had a higher rate of hypertension. When comparing participants with UACR ≥ 30 mg/g and participants with UACR <30 mg/g, those had longer diabetes duration, higher systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, higher rate of hypertension and lower eGFR.
Table 1

Clinical and metabolic characteristics of participants with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,141)

Variables

ALL

eGFR ≥60

eGFR <60

UACR < 30

UACR ≥ 30

n

1141

761

380

987

154

Age (years); mean (SD)

66.8 (11.3)

63.8 (10.9)

72.7 (9.4)

66.4 (11.2)

68.7 (11.1)

Gender (men) ,%

60.6

80.3

50.7

60.7

59.7

Duration diabetes (years), mean (SD)

9.1 (6.7)

8.4 (6.5)

10.2 (6.9)

8.8 (6.5)

10.4 (7.4)

Body mass index (kg/m2) mean (SD)

30.3 (5.2)

30.6 (5.4)

29.5 (4.8)

30.1 (5.2)

31.1 (5.5)

Abdominal waist circumference (cm); mean (SD)

100.0 (17.1)

99.9 (16.9)

99.9 (18.0)

99.5 (17.3)

101.8 (16.9)

Obesity (%)

46.5

48.9

41.3

45.9

49.4

HbA1c; mean (SD)

7.3 (1.3)

7.6 (1.4)

7.2 (1.2)

7.2 (1.3)

7.7 (1.4)

Smoking (%)

13.8

39.4

50.5

42.5

47.4

Hyperlipidemia (%)

67,9

67.1

68.9

67.5

69.5

Hypertension (%)

75.1

70.0

83.2

72.9

83.8

Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg); mean (SD)

134.5 (13.2)

134.4 (13.0)

134.8 (13.5)

134.1 (12.7)

137.4 (15.5)

Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg); mean (SD)

77.0 (9.1)

78.1 (8.7)

74.7 (9.4)

77.1 (9.0)

76.7 (9.7)

Cholesterol total (mmol/L); mean (SD)

4.70 (0.93)

187.1 (37.3)

176.8 (36.1)

183.8 (36.8)

183.3 (40.3)

Cholesterol HDL (mmol/L); mean (SD)

1.29 (0.35)

49.1 (13.1)

45.8 (13.8)

48.3 (13.4)

46.0 (12.5)

Cholesterol LDL (mmol/L); mean (SD)

2.79 (0.83)

110.4 (31.9)

103.1 (31.9)

108.4 (31.8)

105.0 (33.6)

Cholesterol non HDL (mmol/L); mean (SD)

3.49 (0.91)

137.9 (36.2)

131.2 (35.1)

135.4 (35.4)

137.5 (39.4)

Tryglicerides (mmol/L); mean (SD)

1.69 (0.96)

149.8 (91.2)

154.4 (94.2)

146.5 (83.7)

182.3 (130.7)

Plasmatic creatinina (mg/dl); mean (SD)

0.93 (0.3)

0.78 (0.13)

1.2 (0.3)

0.9 (0.3)

1.0 (0.4)

Glomerular filtration ratio mL/min/1,73 m 2 ; mean (SD)

79.9 (23.5)

89.6 (19.7)

47.6 (9.6)

76.8 (25.7)

68.3 (27.7)

Urine albumin-creatinine ratio (mg/g); mean (SD)

39.2 (144.3)

17.2 (35.2)

28.3 (52.7)

7.5 (6.2)

107 (66.2)

eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate according to CKD-EPI in mL/min/1.73 m2; UACR: urinary albumin creatinin rate in mg/gr.

Table 2 shows the number and percentage of participants classified by GFR and UACR according to adapted KDIGO Guidelines [20].
Table 2

Distribution of chronic kidney disease markers by KDIGO criteria

eGFR

UACR <10 mg/gr

UACR 10-29 mg/gr

UACR ≥ 30 mg/gr

Total

>90

246 (34.0)

90 (34.1)

40 (26.0)

376

60-90

255 (35.3)

85 (32.2)

45 (29.2)

385

45-60

46 (6.4)

20 (7.6)

26 (16.9)

92

30-45

164 (22.7)

62 (23.5)

36 (23.4)

262

<30

12 (1.7)

7 (2.7)

7 (4.5)

23

TOTAL

723

264

154

1141

KDIGO: Kidney Disease Improvement Global Outcome.

Table 3 shows the characteristics of participants according to the different combinations of UACR and eGFR. Participants with decreased eGFR were older; they had a higher prevalence of hypertension, and a higher percentage of them were receiving antihypertensive treatment. These participants had less peripheral arterial disease and higher prevalences of coronary heart disease and stroke. In the group of participants with increased UACR, we observed higher levels of HbA1c and a greater number of participants being treated with insulin. No interactions between eGFR and albumiburia were observed.
Table 3

Patient characteristics according to the glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin creatinine ratio

Variables

Values

eGFR (nm)/

eGFR (nm)/

eGFR ↓/

eGFR ↓/

P value UACR↑ vs

P value eGFR ↓ vs

UACR(nm)

UACR ↑

UACR (nm)

UACR ↑

UACR(nm)

eGFR (nm)

N

1141

674

85

311

69

154 vs 987

380 vs 761

Age (years) (SD)

66.8 (11.3)

63.7 (11.0)

64.3 (10.2)

72.4 (9.3)

74.1 (9.7)

0.048

<0.001

Gender (men,%)

691 (60.6)

345 (51.0)

44 (48.2)

254 (81.7)

51 (73.9)

0.823

<0.001

T2DM Duration (years) (SD)

9.1 (6.7)

8.4 (6.4)

8.7 (6.3)

9.6 (6.5)

12.6 (8.1)

0.007

<0.001

BMI (kg/m2) (SD)

30.3 (5.2)

30.5 (5.4)

31.2 (5.4)

29.3 (4.5)

30.9 (5.6)

0.058

0.004

BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (%)

529 (46.4)

327 (48.4)

45 (52.9)

126 (40.5)

31 (44.9)

0.424

0.016

Waist circumference (cm) (SD)

100.0 (17.1)

99.8 (16.8)

100.4 (17.5)

99.0 (18.3)

103.6 (16.1)

0.118

0.514

HbA1c mean (SD)

7.3 (1.3)

7.3 (1.3)

7.8 (1.5)

7.1 (1.2)

7.5 (1.1)

<0.001

0.052

Smoking n (%)

     

0.467

<0.001

  Current

158 (13.8)

96 (14.2)

18 (21.2)

37 (11.9)

7 (10.1)

  

  Past-smoker

334 (29.3)

164 (24.3)

22 (25.9)

122 (39.2)

26 (37.7)

  

  Never

649 (56.9)

416 (61.5)

45 (52.9)

152 (48.9)

36 (52.2)

  

Insulin n (%)

281 (24.6)

159 (23.5)

26 (30.6)

65 (20.9)

31 (44.9)

<0.001

0.725

Oral antidiabetic agents n (%)

965 (84.6)

586 (86.7)

77 (90.6)

249 (80.1)

53 (76.8)

0.953

0.001

Oral antidiabetic agents + insulin n (%)

210 (18.4)

124 (18.3)

23 (27.1)

43 (13.8)

20 (29.0)

0.001

0.261

Hyperlipidemia n (%)

773 (67.7)

228 (33.7)

22 (25.9)

93 (29.9)

25 (36.2)

0.621

0.540

Hypertension n (%)

849 (74.4)

465 (68.8)

68 (80.0)

255 (82.0)

61 (88.4)

0.004

<0.001

Antihypertensive treatment n (%)

866 (75.9)

466 (68.9)

74 (87.1)

263 (84.6)

63 (91.3)

<0.001

<0.001

Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) (SD)

134.5 (13.2)

134.0 (35.4)

137.8 (14.9)

134.4 (12.8)

136.9 (16.4)

0.018

0.539

Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) (SD)

77.0 (9.1)

78.1 (8.8)

78.2 (9.3)

74.7 (9.2)

74.8 (9.8)

0.892

<0.001

Cholesterol total (mmol/L) (SD)

183.7 (37.2)

186.9 (36.8)

189.1 (41.4)

177.0 (35.8)

176.2 (37.9)

0.853

<0.001

Cholesterol HDL (mmol/L) (SD)

135.7 (35.9)

137.4 (35.4)

142.8 (41.4)

131.2 (35.0)

131.0 (35.9)

0.514

0.004

Cholesterol LDL (mmol/L) (SD)

107.9 (32.1)

110.5 (35.4)

109.2 (33.5)

103.8 (31.6)

99.6 (33.2)

0.211

<0.001

Cholesterol non HDL (mmol/L) (SD)

48.0 (13.5)

49.5 (13.3)

46.2 (11.5)

45.8 (13.8)

45.7 (13.7)

0.055

<0.001

Tryglicerides (mmol/L) (SD)

151.3 (92.2)

146.4 (88.8)

177.3 (105.4)

146.8 (71.6)

188.4 (157.0)

<0.001

0.296

Lipid-lowering therapy n, (%)

738 (64.7)

413 (61.1)

60 (70.6)

215 (69.1)

50 (72.5)

0.060

0.012

Plasmatic creatinina (mg/dl) (SD)

0.92 (0.3)

0.78 (0.13)

0.78 (0.14)

1.17 (0.23)

1.31 (0.45)

<0.001

<0.001

Glomerular filtration ratio, mL/min/1,73 m2 (SD)

75.6 (26.1)

89.8 (19.7)

88.3 (19.9)

48.5 (9.1)

43.6 (10.6)

<0.001

<0.001

Urine albumin-creatinine ratio (mg/g) (SD)

20,9 (42,2)

7.2 (5.9)

96.7 (61.3)

8.0 (6.7)

119.8 (70.1)

<0.001

0.002

Coronary heart disease (%)

163 (14.3)

67 (9.9)

9 (10.6)

68 (21.9)

19 (27.5)

0,137

<0.001

Peripheral arterial disease (%)

91 (8.0)

32 (4.7)

8 (9.4)

33 (10.6)

18 (26.1)

<0.001

<0.001

Stroke (%)

72 (6.3)

31 (4.6)

5 (5.9)

29 (9.3)

7 (10.1)

0.416

0.002

p-value bettween interactions low eGFR and albuminuria,> 0.05 in all cases.

nm: normal; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate according to CKD-EPI in mL/min/1.73 m2; UACR: urinary albumin creatinin rate in mg/gr; BMI: body mass index.

Table 4 and Figure 1 shows the results for the prevalence of CVD based on the unadjusted model and after adjusting the results according to Models 1, 2 and 3. Compared to participants with GFR ≥ 60 mL/min/m2 those with GFR < 60 mL/min/m2 (Model 3) increased significantly the likelihood of having CVD, especially with eGFR less than 45 mL/min/m2, (OR = 1,2; 95% CI 0.9-1.8 for eGFR 45–59 mL/min/m2; OR = 2.3; CI 1.4-3.9 for eGFR 30–44 mL/min/m2 and OR = 4.1; CI 1.6-10.2 for eGFR < 30 mL/min/m2). Compared to participants with UACR < 30 mg/g those with UACR ≥ 30 mg/g (Model 3) increased significantly the likelihood of having CVD, especially with UACR above 300 mg/g, (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4 for UACR = 30–299 mg/g; OR = 3.9; CI 1.6-9.5 for UACR ≥ 300 mg/g). Both, decreased eGFR and increased UACR, had higher likelihood of having CVD.
Table 4

Multivariate analysis of chronic kidney disease impact on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease

 

Unadjusted model (OR; CI95%)

Model 1 (OR; CI95%)

Model 2 (OR; CI95%)

Model 3 (OR; CI95%)

Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

    

eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2

1

1

1

1

eGFR 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m2

2.07 (1.5-2.8)

1.2 (0.9-1.7)

1.2 (0.9-1.8)

1.2 (0.9-1.8)

eGFR 30–44 mL/min/1.73 m2

4.6 (2.9-7.3)

2.5 (1.5-4.1)

2.3 (1.4-3.8)

2.3 (1.4-3.9)

eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2

8.4 (3.6-19.9)

4.3 (1.7-10.7)

4.1 (1.6-10.2)

4.1 (1.6-10.2)

For each unit below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2

1.072 (1.06-1.09)

1.045 (1.03-1.06)

1.042 (1.02-1.06)

1.043 (1.02-1.06)

UACR

    

Normoalbuminuria

1

1

1

1

Microlbuminuria (30–299 mg/gr)

1.9 (1.4-2.7)

1.8 (1.2-2.6)

1.8 (1.3-2.7)

1.6 (1.1-2.4)

Macroalbuminuria (≥300 mg/gr)

5.0 (2.3-11.1)

4.6 (1.9-10.9)

4.2 (1.8-10.2)

3.9 (1.6 -9.5)

For each unit above 29 mg/gr

1.001 (0.99-1.01)

1.001 (0.99-1.01)

1.001 (0.99-1.01)

1.001 (0.99-1.01)

UACR (normal) + GFR (normal)

1

1

1

1

UACR ↑ and eGFR ↓

3.3 (1.5-7.3)

2.3 (1.0-5.3)

2.4 (1.0-5.4)

2.2 (0.9-5.2)

GFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate. eGFR (normal): ≥ 60 mL/min/1,73 m2. eGFR↓: < 60 mL/min/1,73 m2.

UACR: Urine albumin/creatinine ratio . UACR (normal) < 30 mg/g. UACR ↑: ≥ 30 mg/g.

Normoalbuminuria: UACR < 30 mg/g. Microalbuminuria: UACR = 30–299 mg/g . Macroalbuminuria: UACR >300 mg/g.

Model 1 Adjusted for age and sex.

Model 2 Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, dislipidaemia, tobacco and Body Mass Index.

Model 3 Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, dislipidaemia , tobacco, Body Mass Index , HbA1c and T2DM duration.

Figure 1

Odds ratio of cardiovascular disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus according to eGFR and UACR.

Discussion

In this study, we observed that in participants with T2DM treated in primary care settings, decreased eGFR and increased UACR were associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular disease. The results of our study show a higher prevalence of CVD (30.9% vs. 8.5%) than in the study by Yokoyama et al. [17] The older age of the participants (67 vs. 58 years), higher BMI (30 vs. 24 kg/m2), differences in systolic blood pressure (135 vs. 128 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (77 vs. 75 mmHg), and increased waist circumference could explain these differences.

The increase in UACR relates to the presence of renal disease and CVD [21] and indicates the probable existence of generalised endothelial damage [22]. An association has been established between increased UACR levels and increased coronary risk [23] and stroke [24]. In Brantsma et al. [7] study, the increase in UACR was a better predictor for the development of CVD than the decrease in eGFR; subjects with moderately decreased eGFR and normal UACR had no increased risk of CVD, whereas participants with moderately decreased eGFR and increased UACR had an increased risk of CVD. Notably, the number of subjects with eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was very small, and the significance of eGFR on CVD risk could have been underestimated. When comparing the risk of cardiovascular and all cause mortality by assessing different degrees of eGFR and UACR, for participants with increased UACR and eGFR greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2,the initial stages of CKD, it was found that the risk of CVD was higher in participants with macroalbuminuria than in participants with microalbuminuria. Decreased eGFR in these stages was not associated with an increased CVD risk. However, CVD risk increases progressively with decreasing eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Association between a moderate decreased eGFR and increased CVD risk has been observed in some epidemiological studies [1, 25, 26]; however, this relationship is not present, or is very weak, in other studies [27, 28]. Go et al. [29] showed a gradual association between reduced eGFR and increased risk of CVD death and hospitalisation, regardless of other known risk factors, history of CVD, and the presence of proteinuria. This risk was evident when eGFR was less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and increased significantly for subjects whose eGFR was less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 [11].

The clinical factors associated with decreased eGFR and increased UACR may be common, but could also be different. The decrease in eGFR and increase in UACR are risk factors for developing CVD; it is unknown whether this association is independent of the presence of other known cardiovascular risk factors. It has been suggested that the increase in UACR and decrease in eGFR might be renal manifestations of endothelial dysfunction and systemic atherosclerosis, respectively. It is likely that increased UACR and decreased eGFR could be markers of different pathological processes [30].

Cardiovascular and renal complications share common risk factors, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, obesity, hyperglycaemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, increased inflammatory markers, increased vascular permeability, and disorders of the coagulation system and fibrinolysis [1, 2932]. The existence of CKD may indicate that these risk factors have been present for a long period of time, causing a greater or lesser prevalence of CVD related to their duration.

According to other studies [12, 33], we observed a low prevalence of CVD in our participants with mild decreased eGFR although the relationship between eGFR as a continuous variable and the prevalence of CVD is strong. In contrast to the study by Solini et al. [34], we did not observe a significant increase in the prevalence of CVD in the group with decreased eGFR and increased UACR, most likely because of the small number of participants who had this combination in our study, which determined that the results of this group are most likely not relevant. Another possibility is that in this group of participants , most have an eGFR and UACR in closer to normal areas, with lower cardiovascular risk.

Our study showed different results from those of the meta-analysis by Lee et al. [24]; the group of participants with decreased eGFR had a higher prevalence of stroke than the group with increased UACR. Both markers of renal dysfunction, decreased eGFR and increased UACR, are associated with a higher prevalence of CVD in diabetic patients; the presence of one or both markers of renal dysfunction would indicate the presence of a vascular disorder, and the presence of CVD itself causes a deterioration of renal function [35, 36]. In this study, the OR of developing CVD increased significantly below eGFR 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and particularly with levels below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Among the study’s limitations, it should be mentioned that it is a cross-sectional study; therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established. Although the study variables were collected from the medical records of participants by the researcher, the possibility of clinical underdiagnosis cannot be ruled out. Only a small number of participants had UACR ≥ 300 mg/ and/or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, which limits the ability of the study to assess the impact of eGFR and UACR in the most advanced stages of CKD. The generalisation of our findings may be limited; all the participants in this study had T2DM and were willing to participate voluntarily in the study. However, we believe that this population is representative of the type of care that is performed in primary care settings. Finally, the serum creatinine level and UACR were not measured centrally, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Among the strengths of the study, it should be noted that this is a national study with a large sample of patients with T2DM, in which family physicians were heavily involved in the management of the disease; and at least 2 of 3 measurements had to be altered over a period of at least 3 months to establish the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease.

Conclusion

The decrease in eGFR and increase in UACR are independent risk factors that increase the prevalence of CVD in patients with T2DM. In our study the impact of mild decreased GFR in T2DM on CVD was lower than the impact of increased UACR. These results suggest that it is necessary to determine both had higher likelihood of having CVD and UACR for all patients with T2DM—at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up—to identify patients at high risk of cardiovascular complications, to establish the proper preventive measures, and to intensify control in patients with T2DM and CKD, in an effort to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Abbreviations

CKD: 

Chronic kidney disease

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

eGFR: 

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

T2DM: 

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

UACR: 

Urinary albumin creatinine ratio

BMI: 

Body mass index.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thanks the RedGDPS for the support. RedGDPS researchers participating in this study are: Alum Bou A, Angullo Martínez E, Arnaiz Arroyo J, Artola Menendez S, Avila Lachica L, Barquilla García A, Barrot de la Puente J, Barutell Rubio L, Belinchón Sánchez M, Benito Badorrey B, Bobe Molina I, Bosch Costabella R, Buil Cosiales P, Carramiñana Barrera F, Carrillo Fernández L, Carrión Valero L, Casaseca Garcia P, Colt Loredana C, Comas Samper J, Cuevas Lopez J, De la Sen C, Díez Espino J, Domínguez Coello S, Domínguez Navarro D, Egocheaga Cabello I, Ferrer Menduiña X, Franch Nadal J, García Aparicio JM, Garcia Gallego F, García Soidán FJ, Garrido Redondo N, Gómez García C, Gomez Gonzalez L, Gonzalez Pastor C, Granero Fernandez E, Grau Bartomeu J, Guruchaga Arcelus M, Gutiérrez Almarza M, Gutierrez Perez A, Hernandez Monroy A, Hidalgo Ortiz M, Iglesias González R, Igual Fraile D, Llussà Arboix J, Marín Becerra T, Martín Manzano JL, Martínez Sierra C, Massana Raurich A, Massó Orozco J, Mata Cases M, Merino Pacho J, Millaruelo Trillo JM, Morales Escobar F, Modroño Freire M, Monzon Guerra A, Muguruza Valdeolmillos J, Mundet Tuduri X, Mur Marti T, Nogales Aguado P, Ortega Ríos FJ, Otero Serra X, Otzet Gramunt I, Pascual De la Pisa B, Patitucci Gómez F, Pinto Rivero M, Piulats Egea N, Pujol Martínez R, Quindimil Vázquez J, Robles Agüero E, Rodero Nuño M, Rodríguez Poncelas A, Ruiz Tamayo I, Sagredo Perez J, Sanchez Cabrero LG, Sangrós González FJ, Sanz Rebollo G, Sedano Garcia JI, Serra Laguarta M, Serrano Martin R, Socias Buades I, Torres Baile JL, Trenchs nRodriguez M, Ulibarri del Portillo J, Vazquez de Prada I, Vergara Fernández I, Villaro Gabarros M.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
EAP Anglès
(2)
IdIBGi
(3)
University of Girona
(4)
Institut Català de la Salut, EAP Salt
(5)
Institut Català de la Salut, EAP Raval Sud
(6)
Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Barcelona Ciutat, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol)
(7)
Research Unit, Edifici Mancomunitat1, Parc Hospitalari Martí i Julià
(8)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

References

  1. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, McCullough PA, Kasiske BL, Kelepouris E, Klag MJ, Parfrey P, Pfeffer M, Raij L, Spinosa DJ, Wilson PW, American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention: Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2003, 108: 2154-2169. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095676.90936.80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF: Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation. 2007, 116: 85-97. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levey AS, Atkins R, Coresh J, Cohen EP, Collins AJ, Eckardt KU, Nahas ME, Jaber BL, Jadoul M, Levin A, Powe NR, Rossert J, Wheeler DC, Lameire N, Eknoyan G: Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Kidney Int. 2007, 72: 247-259. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mogensen CE, Christensen CK, Vittinghus E: The stages in diabetic renal disease. With emphasis on the stage of incipient diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 1983, 32 (2): 64-78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fox CS, Matsushita K, Woodward M, Bilo HJ, Chalmers J, Heerspink HJ, Lee BJ, Perkins RM, Rossing P, Sairenchi T, Tonelli M, Vassalotti JA, Yamagishi K, Coresh J, de Jong PE, Wen CP, Nelson RG, Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium: Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012, 380: 1662-1673. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61350-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mahmoodi BK, Matsushita K, Woodward M, Blankestijn PJ, Cirillo M, Ohkubo T, Rossing P, Sarnak MJ, Stengel B, Yamagishi K, Yamashita K, Zhang L, Coresh J, de Jong PE, Astor BC, Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium: Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium. Associations of kidney disease measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease in individuals with and without hypertension: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012, 380: 1649-1661. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61272-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brantsma AH, Bakker SJ, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE, Gansevoort RT, PREVEND Study Group: Extended prognostic value of urinary albumin excretion for cardiovascular events. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008, 19: 1785-1791. 10.1681/ASN.2007101065.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Schmieder RE, Mann JF, Schumacher H, Gao P, Mancia G, Weber MA, McQueen M, Koon T, Yusuf S, ONTARGET Investigators: Changes in albuminuria predict mortality and morbidity in patients with vascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011, 22: 1353-1364. 10.1681/ASN.2010091001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Lloyd A, James MT, Klarenbach S, Quinn RR, Wiebe N, Tonelli M, Alberta Kidney Disease Network: Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA. 2010, 303: 423-429. 10.1001/jama.2010.39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Angelantonio E, Chowdhury R, Sarwar N, Aspelund T, Danesh J, Gudnason V: Chronic kidney disease and risk of major cardiovascular disease and non-vascular mortality: prospective population based cohort study. BMJ. 2010, 341: c4986-10.1136/bmj.c4986. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4986View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, Gansevoort RT: Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010, 375: 2073-2081.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruno G, Merletti F, Bargero G, Novelli G, Melis D, Soddu A, Perotto M, Pagano G, Cavallo-Perin P: Estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria and mortality in type 2 diabetes: the CasaleMonferrato study. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 941-948. 10.1007/s00125-007-0616-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas MC, Weekes AJ, Broadley OJ, Cooper ME, Mathew TH: The burden of chronic kidney disease in Australian patients with type 2 diabetes (the NEFRON study). Med J Aust. 2006, 185: 140-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas MC, Macisaac RJ, Jerums G, Weekes A, Moran J, Shaw JE, Atkins RC: Nonalbuminuric renal impairment in type 2 diabetic patients and in the general population (national evaluation of the frequency of renal impairment co-existing with NIDDM [NEFRON] 11). Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 1497-1502. 10.2337/dc08-2186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ninomiya T, Perkovic V, de Galan BE, Zoungas S, Pillai A, Jardine M, Patel A, Cass A, Neal B, Poulter N, Mogensen CE, Cooper M, Marre M, Williams B, Hamet P, Mancia G, Woodward M, Macmahon S, Chalmers J, ADVANCE Collaborative Group: Albuminuria and kidney function independently predict cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 20: 1813-1821. 10.1681/ASN.2008121270.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Astor BC, Hallan SI, Miller ER, Yeung E, Coresh J: Glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, and risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the US population. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 167: 1226-1234. 10.1093/aje/kwn033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yokoyama H, Oishi M, Kawai K, Sone H, Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management Study Group: Reduced GFR and microalbuminuria are independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: JDDM study 16. Diabet Med. 2008, 25: 1426-1432. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02592.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodriguez-Poncelas A, Garre-Olmo J, Franch-Nadal J, Diez-Espino J, Mundet-Tuduri X, Barrot-De la Puente J, Coll de Tuero G: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes in Spain: PERCEDIME2 study. BMC Nephrol. 2013, 14: 46-10.1186/1471-2369-14-46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration): A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 150: 604-612. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013, 3: 5-150.Google Scholar
  21. Brantsma AH, Bakker SJ, Hillege HL, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE, Gansevoort: Cardiovascular and renal outcome in subjects with K/DOQI stage 1–3 chronic kidney disease: the importance of urinary albumin excretion. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008, 23: 3851-3858. 10.1093/ndt/gfn356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Satchell SC, Tooke JE: What is the mechanism of microalbuminuria in diabetes: a role for the glomerular endothelium?. Diabetologia. 2008, 51: 714-725. 10.1007/s00125-008-0961-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Perkovic V, Verdon C, Ninomiya T, Barzi F, Cass A, Patel A, Jardine M, Gallagher M, Turnbull F, Chalmers J, Craig J, Huxley R: The relationship between proteinuria and coronary risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e207-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050207. doi:10.1371 /journal.pmed. 0050207View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee M, Saver JL, Chang KH, Liao HW, Chang SC, Ovbiagele B: Impact of microalbuminuria on incident stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010, 41: 2625-2631. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Muntner P, He J, Hamm L, Loria C, Whelton PK: Renal insufficiency and subsequent death resulting from cardiovascular disease in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002, 13: 745-753.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Manjunath G, Tighiouart H, Ibrahim H, MacLeod B, Salem DN, Griffith JL, Coresh J, Levey AS, Sarnak MJ: Level of kidney function as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 41: 47-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Amin MG, Stark PC, MacLeod B, Griffith JL, Salem DN, Levey AS, Sarnak MJ: Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004, 15: 1307-1315. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000123691.46138.E2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Garg AX, Clark WF, Haynes RB, House AA: Moderate renal insufficiency and the risk of cardiovascular mortality: results from the NHANES I. Kidney Int. 2002, 61: 1486-1494. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00270.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY: Chronic kidney disease and therisks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351 (13): 1296-1305. 10.1056/NEJMoa041031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Stehouwer CD, Smulders YM: Microalbuminuria and risk for cardiovascular disease: Analysis of potential mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006, 17: 2106-2111. 10.1681/ASN.2005121288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Festa A, D’Agostino R, Howard G, Mykkänen L, Tracy RP, Haffner SM: Inflammation and microalbuminuria in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. RT; PREVEND Study Group. Kidney Int. 2000, 58: 1703-1710. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00331.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Coresh J, Astor B, Sarnak MJ: Evidence for increased cardiovascular disease risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2004, 13: 73-81. 10.1097/00041552-200401000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rigalleau V, Lasseur C, Raffaitin C, Beauvieux MC, Barthe N, Chauveau P, Combe C, Gin H: Normoalbuminuric renal-insufficient diabetic patients: a lower-risk group. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 2034-2039. 10.2337/dc07-0140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Solini A, Penno G, Bonora E, Fondelli C, Orsi E, Arosio M, Trevisan R, Vedovato M, Cignarelli M, Andreozzi F, Nicolucci A, Pugliese G, Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE) Study Group: Diverging association of reduced glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with coronary and noncoronary events in patients with type 2 diabetes: the renal insufficiency and cardiovascular events (RIACE) Italian multicenter study. Diabetes Care. 2012, 35: 143-149. 10.2337/dc11-1380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. McCullough PA, Jurkovitz CT, Pergola PE, McGill JB, Brown WW, Collins AJ, Chen SC, Li S, Singh A, Norris KC, Klag MJ, Bakris GL, KEEP Investigators: Independent components of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state: results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167: 1122-1129. 10.1001/archinte.167.11.1122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Foster MC, Hwang SJ, Larson MG, Parikh NI, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, Wang TJ, Levy D, Fox CS: Cross-classification of microalbuminuria and reduced glomerular filtration rate: associations between cardiovascular disease risk factors and clinical outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167: 1386-1392. 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/15/150/prepub

Copyright

© Rodriguez-Poncelas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement