Skip to main content

Advertisement

Coronary calcification as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease: a prospective long-term follow-up study

BMC Nephrology volume 20, Article number: 188 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) exhibit higher prevalence of coronary artery calcification (CaC) than general population. CaC has been proposed as a risk factor for mortality in end-stage CKD, but most studies in the field are based on short-term follow-up.

Methods

We conducted a cohort, 10-year prospective longitudinal study of consecutive cases referred to the renal unit. A non-enhanced multislice coronary computed tomography was performed at baseline. CaC was assessed by Agatston method. Patients were stratified according to their CaC score: severe calcification group (CaCs< 400 HU) and mild-moderate calcification group (CaCs≥400 HU). The overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, CV events, and factors potentially associated with CaC development were recorded.

Results

137 patients with advanced CKD were enrolled and provided consent. Overall mortality rate was 58%; 40% due to CV events. The rate of overall mortality in the severe calcification group was 75%, and 30% in the low calcification group, whereas the rate of CV mortality was 35% vs. 6%, respectively (p < 0.001). The severe calcification group was older, had higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, former cardiologic events, and lower albumin serum levels than the mild-moderate calcification group. In a multivariate Cox model, severe CaC was a significant predictor of CV mortality (HR 5.01; 95%CI 1.28 to 19.6, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Among advanced CKD, there was a significantly increase of CV mortality in patients with severe CaCs during a 10-year follow-up period. CaCs could be a useful prognostic tool to predict CV mortality risk in CKD patients.

Open Peer Review reports

Background

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is one of the leading causes of death and premature mortality among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients [1]. In addition to classic risk factors for CV morbimortality, different uraemia related conditions such as malnutrition, chronic inflammation, accelerated atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction have been considered to be involved in the genesis of CV damage [2, 3]. Additionally, bone and mineral derangements are well-recognized complications of CKD that might result in aberrances in bone turnover and calcification of vascular or other soft tissues [4, 5].

CV calcifications affect most of CKD patients (60–90%) and these calcifications develop early in the course of the disease [1, 6,7,8,9]. In haemodialysis, previous studies have suggested that coronary calcification (CaC) analysis could improve primary risk prediction of CV disease [1, 2, 10]. An elevated CaC score (CaCs> 400 HU) could be associated with higher overall and CV mortality [2, 10]. However, most of the studies have been performed after short follow-up, and scarce information is available concerning long-term prognosis [1]. Moreover, in advanced CKD and hemodialysis patients, the medial arterial wall calcification might predominate over atherosclerotic damage, and therefore it could be no underlying coronary obstructive atherosclerosis. Some studies have found poor correlation between CaCs measured by MSCT and coronary stenosis detected by coronary angiography [11,12,13,14]. Consequently, in these patients may predominate the non-atheromatous cardiovascular events [14]. Therefore, it is necessary to define the predictive role of CaCs for CV mortality in this population.

The primary aim of our study is to test, in long-term follow-up, the predictive value of CaCs detected by multi-layer spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for overall and CV mortality in advanced CKD patients, including those on hemodialysis. Secondary aims include assessing the prevalence of CaC and its effect on hospitalization due to CV events. As well as evaluating the potential clinical and biochemical factors involved in the development of severe CaC.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational and 10-year follow-up study. All patients evaluated at the Renal Unit of ‘Principe de Asturias’ University Hospital during a 2-year period were considered for inclusion. A total of 137 patients with advanced CKD were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age over 18 years, advance CKD disease (CKD stages 4-5) and patients on chronic haemodialysis (more than 6 months in the dialysis program). Exclusion criteria were as follows: acute kidney failure, pregnancy, a disease condition which could limit life expectancy to less than one year, and the inability to perform MSCT. Written informed consent was provided to all subjects. The Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital approved the study protocol.

As part of the initial evaluation in the renal unit, within one month prior to performing MSCT, in all cases a blood basal sample was collected for routine biochemistry analysis. All subjects underwent a synchronized MSCT to assess the basal CaC. A 16-detector MSCT Lightspeed Plus GE Medical System was used. Image processing was carried out in an Advantage Workstation 4.0 console. CaCs was calculated by adding the calcium score in the left main coronary artery, the left anterior descending, circumflex and right coronary artery. The CaCs described by Agatston [15] was calculated. It establishes a threshold of 130 Hounsfield Units (HU) to determine whether the lesions are calcified. The “Agatston score” incorporates the density of calcification, multiplying the calcification area by a weighted density coefficient. According to previously published information, patients may be classified into four groups according to baseline CaCs: no calcification (CaCs 0 HU); mild calcification (CaCs 1–100 HU); moderate calcification (CaCs 101–400 HU) and severe calcification (CaCs≥400 HU) [16,17,18]. Our patients were stratified into two groups in order to analyse the proposed outcomes: severe calcification group (CaCs≥400 HU) and mild-moderate calcification group (CaCs< 400 HU) [16].

Baseline clinical data were recorded from medical reports and are detailed in Table 1. The biochemical parameters included those related to renal function, bone mineral metabolism and classic cardiovascular risk variables. During the follow-up period, any new CV event that caused hospital admissions (heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, ischemic heart disease) was recorded. For analysis purpose, we use a strategy of introducing a variable to the first event in time [17].

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics and laboratory values
Full size table

The overall mortality was defined as time from the recruitment moment to death from any cause, in-hospital or outpatient. CV mortality was considered as death due to myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death, peripheral vascular disease, or stroke.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables with normal distribution or as a median + interquartile range (IQR) in all other cases, in accordance with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distribution test. Categorical variables are indicated as percentages related to the size of the sample. Subjects were split into two groups based on CaCs derived from baseline CT, CaCs ≥400 HU and CaCs< 400 HU. To compare both calcification groups, we used chi square test for binominal variables and Student t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test for quantitative variables, as suitable.

The influence of each variable on overall and CV mortality was assessed by means of a Cox proportional hazard models. The first stage consisted of a univariate analysis selecting those with a p-value < 0.1 as statistically significant. Then, a multivariate Cox approach was carried out, using a backward strategy (p-value < 0.05). The multivariate Cox regression model was used, assuming there is a maximum of one variable per each 10 events. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for high values of CaCs. Overall and CV mortality was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and Mantel-Cox (log-rank test) to compare survival curves. The omnibus method was used to adjust the chi-square output. We also took into consideration the strategy reported by Detrano et al. [18] to study how a doubling of the CaCs influenced on overall and CV mortality of our series. To transform CaCs into a continuous variable, the base-2 logarithm of the sum of the CaCs plus 1 (log2 [CaCs + 1]) was used. Each unit difference in the log-transformed CaCs represents a doubling of the score. Data were analysed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Software, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The population-based sample was composed of 137 patients, 85 subjects (62%) undergoing maintenance haemodialysis and 52 patients (38%) with advanced CKD. Subjects were 74 males and 63 females, with a median age of 66 years (IQR 52 to 71). Haemodialysis vintage was 25 months (IQR 10–53). The median follow-up period was 87.5 months (29.5–111). Regarding renal replacement therapy, at baseline, two out five of patients in HD were dialyzed with a membrane of high dialytic efficacy and in four out five it was used a standard dialysis bath. The main baseline subject characteristics are outlined in Table 1.

Variables associated with high CaCs

The prevalence of CaC was 87% (range: 0 to 8798 HU). The median of CaCs was 600 HU (IQR 70–1794). Those patients with severe CaC (CaCs ≥400 HU) were older, had a longer haemodialysis vintage, showed higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes, previous cardiologic events, and exhibited higher triglyceride serum concentration and lower serum albumin levels than mild-moderate CaC subjects (CaCs< 400 HU) (Table 2.)

Table 2 Comparison between demographic, clinical and laboratory variables at study enrolment in patients with a high and a low coronary calcium score
Full size table

Variables that showed a significant association with severe CaCs (≥400 HU) were: age (OR 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.08), haemodialysis (OR 2.85; 95%CI 1.40–5.83), type 2 diabetes (OR 4.92; 95%CI 1.89–12.8), previous cardiologic events (OR 7.59; 95%CI 2.49–23.2) and low serum albumin values (OR 2.92; 95%CI 1.31–6.50). On the multivariate regression analysis, age (OR 1.07; 95%CI 1.03–1.11), haemodialysis (OR 5.22; 95% CI 1.88–14.5) and type 2 diabetes (OR 6.21; 95%CI 1.81–21.3) kept a statistically significant association with severe CaCs.

Mortality

During the follow-up period, 58% of subjects died and 40% of deaths were related to CV events. Considering overall mortality, 75% of patients (n = 60) were receiving haemodialysis and 25% (n = 20) had advanced CKD. In terms of CV mortality, 78% (n = 25) of subjects were on maintenance dialysis. Median overall survival, estimated by the inverted KM curve, was 44.6 ± 3.7 months (95% CI 37.4–51.8), while median CV survival was 39.1 ± 5.6 months (95% CI 28.1 to 50.1).

Overall mortality rate according to baseline CaCs was 17% (n = 3) in patients without CaC, 22% (n = 4) in patients with mild CaC, 53% (n = 9) in patients with moderate CaC and 75% (n = 64) in patients with severe CaC. Most of overall mortality events happened in group 4 (80%). By KM analysis, patients with CaCs ≥400 HU had a significantly higher mortality compared to those with CaCs< 400 HU (X2 18.92, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1a). There were no CV deaths in groups without or with mild CaC. Most of CV deaths belonged to the severe calcification group (91%, n = 29). By KM analysis, patients with CaCs ≥400 HU showed a significantly higher CV mortality compared to those with CaCs< 400 HU (X2 14.92, p < 0.001) too (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Unadjusted Kaplan Meier cumulative-curves for overall mortality (a) and cardiovascular mortality (b) according to coronary arterial calcification score in Hounsfield Units (CaCs HU): Group with severe coronary calcification (CaCs≥400 HU) and group with mild-moderate coronary calcification (CaCs< 400 HU) are shown p < 0.001

Full size image

A total of 292 CV events were observed during the follow-up period; 149 of them required admission to hospital. These CV events included: 82 heart failures, 17 atrial fibrillations, 29 ischemic heart diseases and 21 strokes. Figure 2 shows the unadjusted KM cumulative-curve for CV events incidence according to CaCs. The differences among these curves were statistically significant (X2 10.88, p = 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure2

Unadjusted Kaplan Meier cumulative curve for non-fatal cardiovascular events caused by coronary arterial calcium score in Hounsfield Units (CaCs HU); group with severe coronary calcification (CaCs ≥400 HU) and group with mild-moderate coronary calcification (CaCs< 400 HU) are shown. Non-fatal cardiovascular events include heart failure, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and stroke. p = 0.001

Full size image

Coronary calcification as a predictor of total and cardiovascular mortality

On univariate Cox analysis of the sample (Table 3), the predictive variables associated with overall mortality were: CaCs≥400 HU, age and previous cardiologic events. On multivariate Cox analysis, both age and previous cardiologic events still kept a statistically significant association with total mortality-according to omnibus test (X2 10.18, p = 0.006)- while, only in haemodialysis patients, severe CaCs seemed to have tendency on overall mortality (HR 1.55; 95%CI 0.84–2.87), although not reaching a statistical significance (Additional file 1).

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis of the factors associated with overall and cardiovascular mortality
Full size table

The same strategy was carried out to assess the role of the CaCs as a predictor of CV mortality. On the univariate Cox analysis, those variables associated with CV mortality were: CaCs ≥400 HU, previous stroke and serum calcium. On multivariate Cox analysis, CaCs≥400 HU and serum calcium -according to omnibus test (X2 14.47, p = 0.002)- still appeared to have an influence on CV mortality (Table 3).

Finally, in a separate analysis that considered CaCs as a continuous variable, we found that a doubling of the calcium score increased the estimated probability of both overall (HR 1.19; 95%CI 1.1–1. 29) and CV (HR 1.43; 95%CI 1.19–1.72) mortality by 19 and 43% respectively, during a median follow-up period of 87.5 (29.5–111) months.

Discussion

In recent years, mortality of patients in haemodialysis has decreased due to improvements in technique. According to the United States Renal Data System, life expectancy of patients once they start haemodialysis ranges between 8 and 4.5 years. Increasing length of time on dialysis is a related to higher mortality rates [19].

In the present study, we explore the predictive value of CaCs for total and CV mortality in advanced CKD and haemodialysis population. Our results point out that CaCs≥400 HU could be a predictor of higher CV mortality in this population, on a long-term basis. Unfortunately, we were not able to identify a clear relationship between CaCs and overall mortality in the whole sample. A possible limitation of the study might be the use of a relatively small sample size; therefore, further studies should be designed to explore this hypothesis.

In addition, we found that a doubling of the CaC score increased the estimated probability of CV mortality by approximately 43% in a 10-year period. In the Detrano study, subjects aged 45 to 84 years with no clinical cardiovascular disease before enrolment were followed for a median of 3.8 years; authors found that a doubling of calcium score resulted in a 20% increase in the risk of a major coronary event (myocardial infarction or death from coronary heart disease) [18]. Our findings support previous studies that examined the relationship between CaC measured by MSCT and mortality in advanced CKD patients. These studies were performed mostly in advanced CKD patients and haemodialysis patients separately [10, 20,21,22], whereas we have preferred to include both types of patients together in our analysis. Moreover, to our knowledge, present data include the longest follow-up period in these patients until now.

In CKD patients, Watanabi et al. investigated a heterogeneous sample of 117 non dialyzed patients with CKD stages 2 to 5. After a follow-up period of 24 months, they found that the presence of CaCs ≥400 HU was associated with a shorter cardiovascular and hospitalization event-free time and a lower survival rate [20]. Recently, Chen et al. have addressed, in larger CKD cohort with a long follow-up, the association between CaC measured by MSCT and the risk of CV disease and mortality [23]. They found that CaCs is related to risk of CV diseases and improves risk predicted models. However, there are some notably differences with our current research: Chen et al. included only 20% of cases with an estimated glomerular filtration < 30 ml/min, specifically excluded haemodialysis patients, and only considered overall mortality. Although their main conclusions are completely valid, their results did not provide information about the prognostic value of CaC concerning CV mortality in advanced CKD, and it is in this aspect in which our results stress the value of this measurement in improving prognostic predictions.

Shantouf et al. found that haemodialysis patients with CaCs 0 HU had a higher rate of 6-year event-free survival (89%) compared to those with a CaCs> 400 HU (58%). After adjustment for standard CV risk factors and bone-mineral metabolism parameters, they reported a higher total mortality in CaCs> 400 HU group [2].

Some authors have suggested that CaCs could be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in haemodialysis. After adjusting for other CV risk factors, Matsuoka et al. found that the 5-year cumulative survival rate was significantly different between patients with low CaCs (84%) compared to those with high CaCs (68%), although with an adjusted relative risk of death of 1.001 [10]. Block et al. (2007) described that baseline CaCs> 400 HU was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 4.5, 95%CI 1.33–15.14) in 127 incident haemodialysis patients during a 4-year follow-up period [22].

In a 7-year follow-up study, reported by Shimoyama [6], which was carried out in 200 haemodialysis patients, 51% of deaths were related to CV events. Much lower CV mortality was found in the lowest CaCs and similar results were reported in all-cause mortality. In a prospective study of a similar sample size, Noce et al. also found a significant difference in CV mortality in patients with CaCs≤400, using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, compared to those in the group of CaCs>400HU; 49.7% died due to a major CV event during the follow-up period of 7 years [24].

In our study, we did not include CV disease subtypes in Cox analysis. However, it would have been interesting to analyse the subtypes of CV mortality in the haemodialysis group according to their CaCs, since non-atheromatous CV events could predominate in these patients [14]. Matsushita et al. just assessed CV disease subtype. The prediction model with CaC was superior to intima media thickness and ankle-brachial index, only for coronary heart disease and heart failure prediction, regardless of CKD status [25].

As reported by other authors, we found a high prevalence of CaC, ranging 0–8798 HU. This asymmetric distribution is consistent with other similar studies [6, 16, 26]. Moreover, patients with high CaCs had worse renal function than those with low CaCs. Also, there were more haemodialysis patients in the group of severe calcifications. This finding supports the inverse relationship between glomerular filtration rate and CaC [1, 7]. As reported in previous studies, we found that patients with high CaCs were older, with higher prevalence of previous cardiologic events and type 2 diabetes [2, 8, 10, 27]. It is well known that diabetes is a risk factor for developing atherosclerosis and vascular calcification [28, 29].

Our data showed that patients with high CaCs had lower albumin levels than patients with mild or moderate CaC. Malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome is a common phenomenon in dialysis patients, and is related to increased morbidity and mortality. In dialysis patients, there seems to be an association between malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome and vascular calcification [30, 31]. Therefore, lower albumin level, as a marker of malnutrition and inflammation, could be a risk marker of CaC. This finding, however, needs to be validated conducting larger sample prospective studies.

We did not find a significant association between CaC and any biochemical parameter related to mineral metabolism or other traditional CV risk parameters. This lack of association could be explained by the small sample size, the study design or the clinical characteristics of our cohort. It should be mentioned that biochemical parameters were measured only once at baseline, and a single baseline laboratory value may not reflect the time-averaged exposure.

Traditionally, hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism have been associated with vascular calcification in patients with CKD. However, it has been described that excessive suppression of PTH, or relative hypoparathyroidism, leads to a decrease in bone remodelling or adynamic bone. It is also related to a greater progression of vascular and coronary calcification. Therefore, calcium and PTH levels do not always are correlated with net calcium balance and vascular calcification severity [32].

Therapeutic changes were not recorded, so might be they have had some influence on endpoints. In relation to this point, it is known that CKD and dialysis patients treated with non-calcium-based phosphate binders have a reduction in all-cause mortality compared with those that use calcium-based phosphate binders [33, 34]. Besides, it has been reported that a low dialysate calcium level could reduce progression rate of CaC in haemodialysis patients [35]. Besides, the treatment provided to patients was aimed to control disturbances of mineral metabolism adequately, and this pharmacological intervention could have conditioned the results obtained. Another potential bias might be related to the design of the enrolment if it considered that those patients of incident haemodialysis and severe CaC might experience a premature death (< 6 months). Though, we set a minimum period of 6 months of permanence in the hemodialysis program to minimize this theoretical bias. Thus, those cases incident in hemodialysis, whose death in a period inferior to 6 months, were excluded. All enrolled cases were previously followed up in the Nephrologist outpatient office. And, in fact, the ANSWER study reports that the most potent predictor of early mortality was inadequate pre-dialysis treatment [36].

Moreover, CaC in our cohort was only measured just once, at baseline conditions. Therefore, we couldn’t report number of patients with CaCs < 400 HU who have change to CaCs > 400 HU during the follow up.

Conclusions

We conclude that, within the limits of our relatively small sample size, CaC is highly prevalent in advanced CKD patients. Age, diabetes and haemodialysis therapy may be associated with CaC severity. CaCs seems to be a good long-term predictor of CV mortality in patients with advanced CKD, but larger prospective studies are needed to confirm the clinical utility of performing routine MSCT in this population in order to assess CV risk.

Abbreviations

CaC:

Coronary calcification

CaCs:

Coronary calcification score

CI:

Confidence interval

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CV:

Cardiovascular

HD:

Haemodialysis

HR:

Hazard ratio

HU:

Hounsfield Units

IQR:

Interquartile range

KM:

Kaplan-Meier

MSCT:

Multi-layer spiral computed tomography

OR:

Odds ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. 1.

    Bashir A, Moody WE, Edwards NC, Ferro CJ, Townend JN, Steeds RP. Coronary artery calcium assessment in CKD: utility in cardiovascular disease risk assessment and treatment? Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(6):937–48.

  2. 2.

    Shantouf RS, Budoff MJ, Ahmadi N, et al. Total and individual coronary artery calcium scores as independent predictors of mortality in haemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2010;31(5):419–25.

  3. 3.

    Turkmen K, Kayikcioglu H, Ozbek O, Solak Y, Kayrak M, Samur C, et al. The relationship between Epicardial adipose tissue and malnutrition, inflammation, atherosclerosis/calcification syndrome in ESRD patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1920–5.

  4. 4.

    London GM. Mechanisms of arterial calcifications and consequences for cardiovascular function. Kidney Int; Suppl (2011). 2013;3(5):442–5.

  5. 5.

    Demer LL, Tintut Y. Vascular calcification: pathobiology of a multifaceted disease. Circulation. 2008;117(22):2938–48.

  6. 6.

    Shimoyama Y, Tsuruta Y, Niwa T. Coronary artery calcification score is associated with mortality in Japanese haemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2012;22(1):139–42.

  7. 7.

    Budoff MJ, Rader DJ, Reilly MP, Mohler ER 3rd, Lash J, Yang W, et al. Relationship of estimated GFR and coronary artery calcification in the CRIC (chronic renal insufficiency cohort) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(4):519–26.

  8. 8.

    Russo D, Palmiero G, De Balsio AP, Balleta MM, Andreucci VE. Coronary artery calcification in patients with CRF not undergoing Dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44(6):1024–30.

  9. 9.

    Tomiyama C, Higa A, Dalboni MA, Cendoroglo M, Draibe SA, Cuppari L. The impact of traditional and non-traditional risk factors on coronary calcification in pre-dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(9):2464–71.

  10. 10.

    Matsuoka M, Iseki K, Tamashiro M, et al. Impact of high coronary artery calcification score (CACS) on survival in patients on chronic haemodialysis. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2004;8(1):54–8.

  11. 11.

    Sharples EJ, Pereira D, Summers S, et al. Coronary artery calcification measured with electron-beam computerized tomography correlates poorly with coronary artery angiography in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(2):313–9.

  12. 12.

    Haydar AA, Hujairi NM, Covic AA, Pereira D, Rubens M, Goldsmith DJ. Coronary artery calcification is related to coronary atherosclerosis in chronic renal disease patients: a study comparing EBCT-generated coronary artery calcium scores and coronary angiography. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(9):2307–12.

  13. 13.

    Tong LL, Mehrotra R, Shavelle DM, Budoff M, Adler S. Poor correlation between coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease in an end-stage renal disease patient. Hemodial Int. 2008;12(1):16–22.

  14. 14.

    Bover J, Ureña-Torres P, Górriz JL, Lloret MJ, da Silva I, Ruiz-García C, et al. Cardiovascular calcifications in chronic kidney disease: potential therapeutic implications. Nefrol. 2016;36(6):597–608.

  15. 15.

    Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.

  16. 16.

    Raggi P, Boulay A, Chasan-Taber S, Amin A, Dillon M, Burke SK, et al. Cardiac calcification in adult Haemodialysis patients. A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(4):695–701.

  17. 17.

    Rauch G, Kieser M, Binder H, Bayes-Genis A, Jahn-Eimermacher A. Time-to-first-event versus recurrent-event analysis: points to consider for selecting a meaningful analysis strategy in clinical trials with composite endpoints. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(5):437–43.

  18. 18.

    Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1336–45.

  19. 19.

    Collins AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C, Chavers BM, Gillbertson D, Ishani A, et al. Excerpts from the US renal data system 2009 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(1 Suppl 1):S1–S420 A6-7.

  20. 20.

    Watanabe R, Lemos MM, Manfredi SR, Draibe SA, Canziani ME. Impact of cardiovascular calcification in non-dialyzed patients after 24 months of follow-up. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(2):189–94.

  21. 21.

    Wilkieson TJ, Rahman M, MO GAS, Voss M, Ingram AJ, Ranganath N, et al. Coronary artery calcification, cardiovascular events, and death: a prospective cohort study of incident patients on hemodialysis. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2015;2:29.

  22. 22.

    Block GA, Raggi P, Bellasi A, Kooienga L, Spiegel DM. Mortality effect of coronary calcification and phosphate binder choice in incident haemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2007;71:438–41.

  23. 23.

    Chen J, Budoff MJ, Reilly MP, Yang W, Rosas SE, Rahman M, et al. Coronary artery calcification and risk of cardiovascular disease and death among patients with chronic kidney disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):635–43.

  24. 24.

    Noce A, Canale MP, Capria A, Rovella V, Tesauro M, Splendiani G, et al. Coronary artery calcifications predict long term cardiovascular events in non-diabetic Caucasian haemodialysis patients. Aging (Albany NY). 2015;7(4):269–79.

  25. 25.

    Matsushita K, Sang Y, Ballew SH, Shlipak M, Katz R, Rosas SE, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis measures for cardiovascular prediction in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(2):439–47.

  26. 26.

    Goodman WG, Goldin J, Kuizon BD, Yoon C, Gales B, Sider D, et al. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl Med. 2000;342(20):1478–83.

  27. 27.

    Fensterseifer DM, Karohl C, Schvartzman P, Costa CA, Veronese FJ. Coronary calcification andits association with mortality in haemodialysis patient. Nephrology (Carlton). 2009;14(2):164–70.

  28. 28.

    Wu M, Rementer C, Giachelli CM. Vascular calcification: an update on mechanisms and challenges in treatment. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93(4):365–73.

  29. 29.

    Snell-Bergeon JK, Budof fMJ, Hokanson JE. Vascular calcification in diabetes. Mechanisms and implications. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13:391.

  30. 30.

    Ikee R, Honda K, Oka M, Maesato K, Mano T, Moriya H, Ohtake T, et al. Association of Heart Valve Calcification with malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome, b2-microglobulin, and carotid intima media thickness in patients on Haemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial. 2008;12(6):464–8.

  31. 31.

    Zhang K, Gao J, Chen J, Liu X, Cai Q, Liu P, Huang H. MICS, an easily ignored contributor to arterial calcification in CKD patients. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;311(4):663–70.

  32. 32.

    Bover J, Ureña P, Brandenburg V, Goldsmith D, Ruiz C, DaSilva I, et al. Adynamic bone disease: from bone to vessels in chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol. 2014 Nov;34(6):626–40.

  33. 33.

    Jamal SA, Vandermeer B, Raggi P, Mendelssohn DC, Chatterley T, Dorgan M, et al. Effect of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;12(382):1268–77.

  34. 34.

    Di Iorio B, Bellasi A, Russo D. On behalf of the independent study investigators. Mortality in kidney disease patients treated with phosphate binders: a randomized study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:487–93.

  35. 35.

    Ok E, Asci G, Bayraktaroglu S, Toz H, Ozkahya M, Yilmaz M, et al. Reduction of dialysate calcium level reduces progression of coronary artery calcification and improves low bone turnover in patients on hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(8):2475–86.

  36. 36.

    Pérez-García R, Martín-Malo A, Fort J, et al. Baseline characteristics of an incident hemodialysis population in Spain: results from ANSWER – a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:578–88.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The present study has not provided by any grant, funding or financial support from any party.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting the results reported in the present manuscript, according to the country legislation. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. ‘Principe de Asturias’ University Hospital, Ctra Alcalá-Meco s/n. Alcalá de Henares, 28805, Madrid, Spain
    • Marta Cano-Megías
    • , Hanane Bouarich
    •  & Concepción Álvarez-Sanz
  2. European University, Internal Medicine, Ruber Juan Bravo Hospital, Juan Bravo St 39-49, ZP 28006, Madrid, Spain
    • Pablo Guisado-Vasco
  3. Guadalajara University Hospital, Donante de Sangre St s/n, ZP 19002, Guadalajara, Castilla La Mancha, Spain
    • Gabriel de Arriba-de la Fuente
  4. ‘Infanta Leonor’ University Hospital, Gran vía del Este, 80, 28031, Madrid, Spain
    • Patricia de Sequera-Ortiz
  5. Research Foundation of ‘Principe de Asturias’ University Hospital, Ctra Alcalá-Meco s/n, Alcalá de Henares, 28805, Madrid, Spain
    • Diego Rodríguez-Puyol
Authors
  1. Search for Marta Cano-Megías in:
  2. Search for Pablo Guisado-Vasco in:
  3. Search for Hanane Bouarich in:
  4. Search for Gabriel de Arriba-de la Fuente in:
  5. Search for Patricia de Sequera-Ortiz in:
  6. Search for Concepción Álvarez-Sanz in:
  7. Search for Diego Rodríguez-Puyol in:

Contributions

MCM and PGV acquired, analysis, interpreted the collected data, and drafting of the manuscript. CAS assessed the scores obtained in the images studies and interpreted them. DRP and HB contributes to the design, drafting and promote equally to the direction of the research. PSO and GAF contributes to conception of the research and data acquisition. All authors critically review the article for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the article are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Cano-Megías.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research has been approved by the local ethics committee, from the ‘Príncipe de Asturias’ University Hospital (date 12/1/2004). All participants have signed a consent form specifically design for current study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Tables S1 and S2. Description of cardiovascular events and mortality. Multivariate proportional Cox analysis in the haemodialysis group. (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cano-Megías, M., Guisado-Vasco, P., Bouarich, H. et al. Coronary calcification as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease: a prospective long-term follow-up study. BMC Nephrol 20, 188 (2019) doi:10.1186/s12882-019-1367-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Coronary artery calcification
  • Haemodialysis
  • Cardiovascular mortality
  • Coronary calcification score

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us