Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence of reflux nephropathy in Iranian children with solitary kidney: results of a multi-center study

BMC Nephrology volume 23, Article number: 70 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Given the importance of the function of the remnant kidney in children with unilateral renal agenesis and the significance of timely diagnosis and treatment of reflux nephropathy to prevent further damage to the remaining kidney, we aimed to determine the prevalence of reflux nephropathy in this subgroup of pediatric patients.

Methods

In general, 274 children referred to pediatric nephrologists in different parts of Iran were evaluated, of whom 199 had solitary kidney and were included in this cross-sectional study. The reasons for referral included urinary tract infection (UTI), abnormal renal ultrasonography, being symptomatic, and incidental screening. Demographic characteristics, including age and gender were recorded. History of UTI and presence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were evaluated.

Results

Of the 274 children evaluated in this study with the mean age (SD) of 4.71 (4.24) years, 199 (72.6%) had solitary kidney. Among these, 118 (59.3%) were male and 81 (60.7%) were female, 21.1% had a history of UTI, and VUR was present in 23.1%. The most common cause of referral was abnormal renal ultrasonography (40.2%), followed by incidental screening (21.1%), being symptomatic (14.1%), and UTI (5.5%). In 116 children (58.3%), the right kidneys and in 83 (41.7%) the left kidneys were absent. Besides, 14.6% of the participants had consanguineous parents and 3% had a family history of solitary kidney. Upon DMSA scan, the single kidney was scarred in 13.1%, of which only 7.5% were associated with VUR. In addition, proteinuria and hematuria were observed in 6.5% and 1.5% of children, respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of reflux nephropathy was 7.5% in children with solitary kidney with a male predominance. Given the relatively high prevalence of reflux nephropathy in these children, screening for VUR in the remnant kidney appears to be essential in this population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Most solitary kidneys in children are of congenital origin, with renal agenesis accounting for one in every 1000–2000 births [1]. In general, congenital solitary kidney is more common in boys [2, 3].

On the other hand, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urological abnormality in children, mostly diagnosed following a urinary tract infection (UTI) episode. Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) is the gold standard for diagnosing VUR, previously routinely performed on every child with a UTI. Nevertheless, VCUG is currently saved for patients at high risk of VUR as recommended by guidelines [4,5,6].

The renal scarring correlated with VUR is called reflux nephropathy. Reflux nephropathy can be congenital, resulting from the anomalous development of the kidneys causing focal dysplasia in the absence of UTI, or acquired, resulting from renal damage associated with pyelonephritis, with the congenital type more common in males and the acquired type more frequently occurring in females. Dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy (99mTc-DMSA) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing renal scars; however, it cannot differentiate between the scars caused by pyelonephritis in the absence of VUR and congenital or acquired reflux nephropathy [7]. Congenital reflux nephropathy has been reported in 30–60% of children with VUR, mostly diagnosed following the identification of hydronephrosis after birth [8].

No epidemiological studies have been conducted on the prevalence of reflux nephropathy in children with unilateral renal agenesis. Given the importance of the function of the remnant kidney in these children and the significance of timely diagnosis and treatment of reflux nephropathy to prevent further damage, we decided to determine the prevalence of reflux nephropathy in this subgroup of pediatric patients.

Methods

Participants

This cross-sectional study included children referred to pediatric nephrologists in different parts of Iran. The inclusion criteria were having DMSA scans and VCUG (standard or isotope). Patients with multicystic dysplastic kidney disease, acquired single kidney due to nephrectomy, and non-functioning remaining kidney were excluded from the study.

Study design

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Iran University of Medical Sciences (ethics code: IR.IUMS.REC.1399.673) and it complies with the statements of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of the participants. A table consisting of the study variables was sent to the members of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. Fourteen centers cooperated and filled out the tables. The reasons for referral included urinary tract infection (UTI), abnormal renal ultrasonography (kidney size, renal outlet obstruction, collecting system dilatation, and parenchymal lesions), being symptomatic, and incidental screening. Demographic characteristics, including age and gender were recorded. History of UTI and presence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) were evaluated. Proteinuria was defined as urinary protein excretion at levels higher than 150 mg/m2/day. Hematuria was defined as the presence of more than 5 red blood cells (RBCs) per high power field collected in an uncentrifuged mid-stream urine sample. Signs and symptoms of UTI included frequency, dysuria, and urgency in school-aged children, and fever, strong-smelling urine, hematuria, abdominal or flank pain, and new-onset urinary incontinence in infants and younger children. Of note, reflux nephropathy was defined as the presence of renal scarring associated with VUR [9].

Data analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 25.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., USA) was used for data analysis. Mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range (IQR), frequency, and percentages were used to describe the results. Based on the results of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, the independent t-test and the Mann–Whitney test were used to compare quantitative variables between patients with and without reflux nephropathy (among those with VUR). Also, the Fisher’s exact test and the chi-squared test were used to compare qualitative variables between these two groups of patients. P-values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Of the 274 children included in this study with the mean age of 4.71 ± 4.24 years, 199 (72.6%) had unilateral renal agenesis. General characteristics of the study population based on availability of data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 General characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Among children with unilateral renal agenesis, 118 (59.3%) were male and 81 (40.7%) were female. In 116 children (58.3%), the right kidney and in 83 (41.7%) the left kidney was absent. In general, the most common cause of referral was abnormal renal ultrasonography (40.2%), followed by incidental screening (21.1%), being symptomatic (14.1%), and UTI (5.5%). Besides, 21.1% of these children had a history of UTI and 23.1% were diagnosed with VUR (Table 2). Moreover, 14.6% of the participants had consanguineous parents and 3% had a family history of solitary kidney. Upon DMSA scan, scarring of the single kidney was observed in 26/199 patients (13.1%), of which only 15 (7.5%) were associated with VUR and correspond to the definition of reflux nephropathy. In addition, proteinuria and hematuria were observed in 6.5% and 1.5% of children, respectively.

Table 2 Comparison of gender, cause of referral, history of UTI, and VUR between children with right-sided and left-sided absent kidney
Full size table

In children with VUR (n = 46), the presence of reflux nephropathy was not correlated with age, gender, birth weight and height, current weight and height, eGFR, history of UTI, VUR grade, having consanguineous parents, or family history of solitary kidney (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation of reflux nephropathy with different factors in patients with VUR (n = 46)
Full size table

Discussion

The reduction in renal mass due to unilateral renal agenesis can lead to compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral kidney [10, 11]. With regard to the function of the remnant kidney, it is crucial to determine whether this hypertrophy is associated with an increased number of nephrons or enlargement of the existing nephrons. It has been demonstrated in animal studies that compensatory nephrogenesis in the contralateral kidney, leading to an increase in the number of nephrons, is responsible for its enlargement [10, 12]. However, no human studies have reported similar results, yet better long-term glomerular filtration rates have been observed in children with congenital solitary kidney compared to those with acquired solitary kidney [11].

To the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of reflux nephropathy in children with solitary kidney has not been investigated in previous studies and this is the first report in this regard. VUR was present in 23.1% of children with solitary kidney in this study. The significance of VUR relies on its association with renal scarring and chronic kidney disease (CKD) because it predisposes children to recurrent UTIs and the subsequent ascending infection, leading to destruction and scarring of the renal parenchyma [13]. VCUG is the “gold standard” for the detection of VUR and not only does it detect VUR but also it allows grading of its severity. However, due to exposure to radiation, invasiveness of the procedure, and the expenses, VCUG is only indicated when medical reasons necessitate the performance of the test [14]. This is even more crucial when it comes to children with solitary kidney; however, it does not negate the need for such evaluation in these patients. On the other hand, congenital renal anomalies, rather than UTIs, are the primary causes of renal injury in solitary kidneys, since VUR is associated with renal damage to solitary kidneys due to the genetic-related dysplasia regardless of UTIs [15,16,17,18]. Nevertheless, Marzuillo and Polito have argued against the performance of VCUG in all children with solitary kidney, as the detection of VUR by VCUG only presented useful prognostic information in 0.9% of their patients [19].

The cause of referral for further evaluations was abnormal RUS findings in 40.2% of the participants in the current study. Yamamoto et al. showed that the only risk factor for abnormal VCUG was abnormal RUS findings [20]; nonetheless, their study included children with unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney. The majority of congenital kidney and urinary tract anomalies can be detected by RUS; however, 2/3 cases of VUR are not detected by RUS even when significant VUR is present [21], which confirms the need for VCUG in the detection of VUR. Therefore, abnormal RUS findings cannot be the only reason for further investigation in children with solitary kidney.

CKD is currently a significant health issue globally. It is considered a risk factor for all-cause mortality as well as progression to end-stage renal disease [22]. In a large cohort of Korean adults, solitary kidney was an independent risk factor for CKD, yet this association was stronger in patients with acquired solitary kidney compared to those with congenital solitary kidney [23]. In our study, proteinuria and hematuria were observed in 6.5% and 1.5% of children with unilateral renal agenesis, respectively which can be indicators of kidney damage leading to CKD. In order to determine the true burden of VUR in children with solitary kidney, the patients of the current study are required to be followed for long periods of time. Moreover, in the study by La Scola et al. children with congenital solitary kidney were at increased risk of hypertension compared to those with two kidneys [24] implicating the necessity of screening for hypertension in this population.

The major strength of the current study was the evaluation of patients using DMSA scans, which enabled us to differentiate between VUR and reflux nephropathy. Another strength was the multi-centric design of the study. Also, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the prevalence of reflux nephropathy in children with solitary kidney. Nonetheless, our study was not without limitations. One limitation was that due to the multi-centric design of the study, imaging and laboratory evaluations had been made at different centers, with potential differences in the accuracy of measurements and interpretations. Another limitation was our relatively small sample size, which prompts cautious generalization of the findings.

Conclusions

The prevalence of reflux nephropathy was 7.5% in children with solitary kidney with a male predominance. Given the relatively high prevalence of reflux nephropathy in these children, screening for VUR in the remnant kidney appears to be essential in this population. Early diagnosis of VUR in children with unilateral kidney agenesis can prevent the development of permanent damage to the remaining kidney.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DMSA:

Dimercaptosuccinic acid

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

VCUG:

Voiding cystourethrogram

VUR:

Vesicoureteral reflux

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

References

  1. Cochat P, Febvey O, Bacchetta J, Bérard E, Cabrera N, Dubourg L. Towards adulthood with a solitary kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(11):2311–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wühl E, van Stralen KJ, Verrina E, Bjerre A, Wanner C, Heaf JG, et al. Timing and outcome of renal replacement therapy in patients with congenital malformations of the kidney and urinary tract. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(1):67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flögelová H, Langer J, Šmakal O, Michálková K, Bakaj-Zbrožková L, Zapletalová J. Renal parenchymal thickness in children with solitary functioning kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(2):241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection SCoQI, Management. Urinary tract infection: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Am Acad Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):595–610.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mattoo TK, Chesney RW, Greenfield SP, Hoberman A, Keren R, Mathews R, et al. Renal scarring in the randomized intervention for children with vesicoureteral reflux (RIVUR) trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(1):54–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mori R, Lakhanpaul M, Verrier-Jones K. Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in children: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2007;335(7616):395–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mattoo TK, Moxey-Mims M. Reflux Nephropathy. Chronic Renal Disease: Elsevier; 2020. p. 1255–64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ismaili K, Hall M, Piepsz A, Wissing KM, Collier F, Schulman C, et al. Primary vesicoureteral reflux detected in neonates with a history of fetal renal pelvis dilatation: a prospective clinical and imaging study. J Pediatr. 2006;148(2):222–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mattoo TK. Vesicoureteral reflux and reflux nephropathy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2011;18(5):348–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lankadeva YR, Singh RR, Tare M, Moritz KM, Denton KM. Loss of a kidney during fetal life: long-term consequences and lessons learned. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2014;306(8):F791–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abou Jaoudé P, Dubourg L, Bacchetta J, Berthiller J, Ranchin B, Cochat P. Congenital versus acquired solitary kidney: is the difference relevant? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(7):2188–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Vuuren SH, Sol CM, Broekhuizen R, Lilien MR, Oosterveld MJS, Nguyen TQ, et al. Compensatory growth of congenital solitary kidneys in pigs reflects increased nephron numbers rather than hypertrophy. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewitt I, Montini G. Vesicoureteral reflux is it important to find? Pediatr Nephrol. 2021;36(4):1011-7.

  14. La Scola C, De Mutiis C, Hewitt IK, Puccio G, Toffolo A, Zucchetta P, et al. Different guidelines for imaging after first UTI in febrile infants: yield, cost, and radiation. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):e665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marzuillo P, Guarino S, Grandone A, Di Somma A, Della Vecchia N, Esposito T, et al. Outcomes of a cohort of prenatally diagnosed and early enrolled patients with congenital solitary functioning kidney. J Urol. 2017;198(5):1153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. La Scola C, Ammenti A, Puccio G, Lega MV, De Mutiis C, Guiducci C, et al. Congenital solitary kidney in children: size matters. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1250–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Westland R, Kurvers RAJ, van Wijk JAE, Schreuder MF. Risk factors for renal injury in children with a solitary functioning kidney. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):e478–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Westland R, Verbitsky M, Vukojevic K, Perry BJ, Fasel DA, Zwijnenburg PJG, et al. Copy number variation analysis identifies novel CAKUT candidate genes in children with a solitary functioning kidney. Kidney Int. 2015;88(6):1402–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marzuillo P, Polito C. The dilemma of micturating cystourethrogram for congenital solitary kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(7):1359–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto K, Kamei K, Sato M, Ogura M, Suzuki M, Hasegawa Y, et al. Necessity of performing voiding cystourethrography for children with unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(2):295–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Preda I, Jodal U, Sixt R, Stokland E, Hansson S. Value of ultrasound in evaluation of infants with first urinary tract infection. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1984–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. The Lancet. 2013;382(9888):260–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim S, Chang Y, Lee YR, Jung H-S, Hyun YY, Lee K-B, et al. Solitary kidney and risk of chronic kidney disease. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(9):879–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. La Scola C, Marra G, Ammenti A, Pasini A, Taroni F, Bertulli C, Morello W, Ceccoli M, Mencarelli F, Guarino S, Puccio G. Born with a solitary kidney: at risk of hypertension. Pediatric Nephrology. 2020;35(8):1483-90.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely appreciate the dedicated efforts of the investigators and the volunteer patients and their parents.

Code availability

N/A

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Clinical Research Development Center of Children’s Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

    Maryam Esteghamati

  2. Non-Communicable Pediatric Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Hadi Sorkhi

  3. Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research Center, Communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Hamid Mohammadjafari

  4. Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Ali Derakhshan

  5. Genetics of Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

    Simin Sadeghi-Bojd

  6. Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Besat Hospital, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Hossein Emad Momtaz

  7. Pediatric Nephrology Research Center, Research Institute for Children’s Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Masoumeh Mohkam

  8. Taleghani Pediatric Hospital, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

    Baranak Safaeian

  9. Aliasghar Clinical Research Development Center, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Nakysa Hooman

  10. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

    Afshin Safaeiasl

  11. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

    Mohsen Akhavan Sepahi

  12. Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran

    Khadijeh Ghasemi

  13. Clinical Research Development Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Valiasr Hospital,School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Zahra Bazargani

  14. Department of Pediatrics, Hajar Shaherkord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

    Elham Emami

Authors
  1. Maryam Esteghamati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hadi Sorkhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamid Mohammadjafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Derakhshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Simin Sadeghi-Bojd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hossein Emad Momtaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masoumeh Mohkam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Baranak Safaeian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nakysa Hooman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Afshin Safaeiasl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mohsen Akhavan Sepahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Khadijeh Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Zahra Bazargani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Elham Emami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NH designed the study. ME wrote the manuscript. The following authors evaluated patients from different parts of Iran: HS evaluated patients from Babol and provided the associated data for these patients, HM from Mazandaran, AD from Shiraz, SSB from Zahedan, HEM from Hamadan, MM and NH from Tehran, BS from Gorgan, AS from Guilan, MAS from Qom, KG from Bushehr, ZB from Fasa, ME from Bandar Abbas, and EE from Shahrekord. All authors evaluated the number of patients who had been referred to them and the final analysis was performed on the information provided by all the others. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Esteghamati.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences, ethics code: IR.IUMS.REC.1399.673 and it complies with the statements of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of the participants.

Consent for publication

N/A

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esteghamati, M., Sorkhi, H., Mohammadjafari, H. et al. Prevalence of reflux nephropathy in Iranian children with solitary kidney: results of a multi-center study. BMC Nephrol 23, 70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02703-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02703-z

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us