Skip to main content

The association between skinfold thicknesses and estimated glomerular filtration rate in adolescents: a cross-sectional study



Obesity is one of the causes of glomerular hyperfiltration. Studies on the relationship between body fat content and glomerular hyperfiltration have been limited to special children. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between skinfold thickness, which represents body fat content, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).


The cross-sectional study included 6655 participants (3532 boys and 3123 girls; age: 12 − 17.99 years); data was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 2001–2010). The independent variables were subscapular skinfold thickness and triceps skinfold thickness. The dependent variable was eGFR. We used multivariate linear regression models to evaluate their associations and also performed subgroup analyses.


After adjusting for age, standing height, race, family income, blood urea nitrogen and uric acid variables, multivariate regression analysis identified that triceps skinfold thickness and subscapular skinfold thickness were positively correlated with eGFR and glomerular hyperfiltration in boys. In subgroup analyses stratified by age and body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness was also associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in boys. There was a linear relationship between triceps skinfold thickness and eGFR in boys (β = 0.389, P < 0.001) and girls (β = 0.159, P = 0.0003).


Triceps skinfold thickness and subscapular skinfold thickness are positively correlated with eGFR and glomerular hyperfiltration in US male adolescents. In all adolescents, there is a linear relationship between triceps skinfold thickness and eGFR.

Peer Review reports


Obesity is an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease [1], resulting in metabolic abnormalities as well as hemodynamic and renal structural changes. These decompensated mechanisms lead to obesity-related glomerular diseases. Histologically, obesity-related glomerular diseases are characterized by glomerular hypertrophy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [2]. One of the early signs of obesity-related glomerular diseases is the increase of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Studies have shown that obesity [3] is one of the causes of glomerular hyperfiltration in adults [4] and adolescents [5]. The pathologic process of glomerular hyperfiltration is not fully understood, but it is well known that glomerular hyperfiltration eventually leads to podocyte detachment, proteinuria, and the development of chronic kidney disease [1]. In addition, glomerular hyperfiltration was found to be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in healthy adults [6].

Although skinfold thickness is not the gold standard for the diagnosis of obesity, it is a more accurate measurement of body fat content than body mass index (BMI) [7]. Skinfold thickness has been shown to be associated with excess fat in obese and non-obese adolescents [7]. Although the measurement error is large, skinfold thickness is relatively easy to obtain [8], so it is widely used in the evaluation of obesity and fat content in children and adolescents [9]. This body measurement method can better identify excess fat in an adolescents body [10]. In addition, skinfold thickness has been shown to be closely related to other nutritional and biochemical indicators [7].

Current, research on glomerular hyperfiltration rates in adolescents is mostly limited to special children [11]. Consequently, there is no consensus on the definition of glomerular hyperfiltration in adolescents as there is for adults [3]. The range of glomerular hyperfiltration in adults is reportedly 130-140 mL/min/1.73m2 [12]. The relationship between excess body fat and GFR in normal adolescents remains to be studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether skinfold thickness is related to glomerular hyperfiltration in adolescents.


Study population

All data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), an ongoing duplicate cross-sectional study designed to assess the lifestyle, health, and nutritional status of the non-institutionalized civilian population of the United States. The survey consists of interviews conducted in participants’ homes and standardized physical examinations, including a blood sample, conducted in mobile examination centers. The data in this study were selected from five study intervals within NHANES that occurred between 2001 to 2010.

Data collection

TSFT, SSFT, standing height and body weight were measured by trained technicians using standard procedures recommended by NHANES [13]. The Holtain pleated caliper (Holtain Ltd, Crymych, UK) was used to measure the skinfold thickness at the triceps and subscapular region accurately to 0.1 mm.

The serum creatinine (Scr) concentration was determined by the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) standardized method starting in 2008 [14]. Before 2008, Scr concentration was measured using a modified Jaffe kinetic method that required no correction compared to IDMS [15]. eGFR was calculated using the Schwartz equation, derived from the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children study: eGFR(mL/min/1.73m2) = 0.413 × height(cm)/Scr(mg/dL) [16].

There is no clear definition of adolescent glomerular hyperfiltration [3]. Considering the definitions used in previous studies, we defined glomerular hyperfiltration [5] as eGFR greater than the 95th percentile for sex and age among all specimens; eGFR was converted to a dichotomous variable according to the glomerular hyperfiltration definition.

The ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics approved all NHANES protocols; and guardians of all participants gave written informed consent for the use of data for this research [17].

Statistical methods

Continuous variables such as age and all measurements obtained (including eGFR) were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The categorical variables were presented as percentage or frequency values. Student’s t-test was used to compare two means, whereas the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare multiple means. Pearson’s Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical variables.

A univariate linear regression model was used to assess the associations between clinical variables and eGFR. The relationship of both TSFT and SSFT with eGFR was estimated by calculating an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a multivariate regression model. The results from unadjusted, minimally adjusted, and fully adjusted analyses were shown simultaneously according to the recommendation of the The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [18]. Covariates were included as potential confounders in the models if they changed the estimates of skinfold thickness on eGFR by more than 10%. We constructed three models: (1) unadjusted; (2) minimally adjusted model (adjusted for age, standing height and race); and (3) fully adjusted model (adjusted for age, standing height, race, family income, blood urea nitrogen and uric acid variables). Hierarchical multivariate regression analysis was used for age and BMI subgroup analyses. We further analyzed the linear relationship between TSFT and eGFR using the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) and by fitting smoothing curves (penalty spline method).

All analyses were performed using the statistical software packages R (, The R Foundation) and EmpowerStats (, X&Y Solutions, Inc., Boston, MA). The level of significance of each test was set at P < 0.05.


The study sample initially included 8,498 adolescents aged from 12 to 17.99 years. Of these, we excluded 1843 participants—303 due to height data missing, 833 due to serum creatinine data missing, 302 due to missing triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT), 318 due to missing subscapular skinfold thickness (SSFT), 85 pregnant girls and one adolescent each with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) at maximum and minimum that may have been incorrect data. The final sample included 6655 adolescents (3532 boys and 3123 girls). There was no significant difference in BMI between the two groups. Descriptive data for participants according to whether or not glomerular hyperfiltration occurred, expressed as means and standard deviations, are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences in body weight, height and BMI between adolescents with and without glomerular hyperfiltration. The TSFT and SSFT of adolescents with glomerular hyperfiltration were significantly higher than those of adolescents without (P < 0.001; P = 0.008 respectively).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the total cohort and stratified according to glomerular hyperfiltration

The association between skinfold thickness and eGFR varied between sexes. Therefore, gender stratification analysis was performed. The univariate analysis (Table 2) indicated that age, weight, and BMI were negatively correlated with eGFR for both boys and girls (P < 0.001). In boys, TSFT was positively correlated with eGFR (P < 0.001), and waist circumference was negatively correlated with eGFR (P < 0.001), but not in girls.

Table 2 The results of univariate analysis of correlation between variables and eGFR

In minimally and fully adjusted models, multiple regression showed TSFT and SSFT were positively correlated with eGFR in boys. In girls, TSFT and SSFT were only positively correlated with eGFR in the fully adjusted model (Table 3). Based on multivariate regression analysis, we found that TSFT and SSFT were the only potential risk factors for glomerular hyperfiltration in boys (Table 4).

Table 3 Multivariate regression analysis of the correlations between the eGFR and skinfold by gender
Table 4 Multivariate regression analysis of the correlations between the glomerular hyperfiltration and skinfold by gender

The results of a subgroup analysis stratified by age and BMI in boys are shown in Table 5. TSFT and SSFT were positively associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in boys. SSFT and TSFT were not associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in girls (data not shown). Stratified by BMI, TSFT and SSFT were positively associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in boys.

Table 5 Correlations between the glomerular hyperfiltration and triceps skinfold, subscapular skinfold by different age and BMI in boys

To further investigate the linear relationship between skinfold thickness and eGFR in adolescents, we used a GAM and a fitted smoothing curve (Fig. 1). The results showed that there was a linear relationship between TSFT and eGFR in boys (β = 0.389, P < 0.001) and girls (β = 0.159, P = 0.0003): eGFR increased by 0.389 mL/min/1.73 m2 in boys and 0.159 mL/min/1.73 m2 in girls for each increase 1 mm of TSFT. The relationship between SSFT and eGFR was curvilinear.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Fitting smooth curve between skinfold and eGFR. a The association between TSFT and eGFR in adolescent. b The association between SSFT and eGFR in adolescent. Each point or circle represents a sample. Age, race/ethnicity, standing height, annual family income, blood urea nitrogen and uric acid were adjusted. Abbreviations: TSFT, triceps skinfold thickness; SSFT, subscapular skinfold thickness


Overweight and obesity are well-known risk factors for renal function loss. A BMI of more than 25 kg/m2 increases the long-term risk of end-stage renal disease by two to three times [19], but the relationship between obesity and glomerular filtration rate is unclear. Therefore, we examined the association of eGFR and glomerular hyperfiltration with TSFT and SSFT derived from the NHANES database in adolescents from 2001 to 2010.

We found that in both boys and girls, the younger the age and the lower the weight and BMI, the less likely eGFR was to increase (P < 0.05). Further threshold effect analysis showed that weight and BMI greater than 66.8 and 20.59, respectively, were positively correlated with eGFR (Supplementary Table 1).

The pathogenesis of glomerular hyperfiltration in obese patients is quite complex and has not been fully understood. In patients with diabetes and hypertension, high BMI has been shown to be one of the major factors for glomerular hyperfiltration [20]. An elevated BMI also contributed to the progression of chronic kidney disease in patients without high blood pressure or diabetes [21]. Interestingly, weight loss resulted in reduced hyperfiltration in severely obese patients [22]. Some studies have reported that glomerular hyperfiltration begins to occur when the body begins to accumulate excess fat [23]; this finding is consistent with the positive correlation noted between TSFT, SSFT and eGFR in adolescents in our study. Obesity-related kidney damage is thought to be caused by factors such as hyperlipidemia, increased oxidative stress, increased salt intake, and sympathetic nervous system activation [24]. Oxidative stress, secondary to increased obesity, is also thought to be a risk factor of hyperfiltration. Increased oxidation of low-density lipoproteins, observed in obese patients, stimulates angiotensin II synthesis, which in turn promotes glomerular fibrosis and chronic kidney disease caused by inflammatory cytokines [25]. Skinfold thickness reflects excess body fat content, and excess body fat may lead to increased glomerular filtration rate through previous pathways.

The observed association between TSFT, SSFT and eGFR in adolescent boys, but no significant association between TSFT, SSFT and glomerular hyperfiltration in adolescent girls, may the result of lower glomerular hyperfiltration occurrence in girls. A study assessing glomerular hyperfiltration in humanized sickle cell mice showed that increased age and male sex were risk factors for the development of glomerular hyperfiltration [26]; this is consistent with the finding of our study. We observed that TSFT, SSFT were positively correlated with eGFR and glomerular hyperfiltration in boys, and the increase of eGFR in boys was greater than that in girls when TSFT increased by 1 mm. The gender difference in the correlation between TSFT and glomerular hyperfiltration may be related to the protective effect of females without diabetic nephropathy [27], and the specific physiological mechanism may be related to the reduction of vascular responsiveness to renin angiotensin system activation by estrogen [28]. Studies in rat models have shown that estrogen attenuates angiotensin II-induced blood perfusion [29].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify TSFT and SSFT as an indicator of glomerular hyperfiltration in adolescents and to provide theoretical support for the association between the incidence of glomerular hyperfiltration and BMI. Moreover, it is simpler and more convenient to determine skinfold thickness than it is to determine the eGFR using the Schwartz equation.

Our study has some limitations. First, this study is a cross sectional analysis, so it provides only weak evidence of associations between independent variables and outcomes. As the study only included US adolescents, these results may not apply to other ethnic groups. Second, the measurement error of skinfold thickness is significant and unavoidable [30]. In NHANES, skinfold thickness was measured by highly trained medical personnel, so skinfold thickness can only be used as a preliminary indicator of the incidence of glomerular hyperfiltration in clinical practice. Third, although, eGFR obtained by the Schwartz equation has been used in previous studies on glomerular hyperfiltration, it does have the potential to overestimate eGFR. To avoid bias, we applied the new European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation [31] to further calculate eGFR, and the correlation between skinfold thickness and eGFR-EKFC was consistent with the results of this study (Supplementary Table 2).


TSFT and SSFT are positively correlated with eGFR and glomerular hyperfiltration in US male adolescents. Furthermore, in all adolescents, there is a linear relationship between TSFT and eGFR. This provides theoretical support for the association between skinfold thicknesses and the incidence of glomerular hyperfiltration.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be downloaded from the ‘NHANES’ database (



Body mass index


Blood urea nitrogen


Confidence interval


Estimated glomerular filtration rate


Odds ratio


Serum creatinine


Subscapular skinfold thickness


Triceps skinfold thickness


  1. D’Agati VD, Chagnac A, de Vries AP, Levi M, Porrini E, Herman-Edelstein M, Praga M. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: clinical and pathologic characteristics and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(8):453–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adelman RD, Restaino IG, Alon US, Blowey DL. Proteinuria and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in severely obese adolescents. J Pediatr. 2001;138(4):481–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helal I, Fick-Brosnahan GM, Reed-Gitomer B, Schrier RW. Glomerular hyperfiltration: definitions, mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8(5):293–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iduoriyekemwen NJ, Ibadin MO, Aikhionbare HA, Idogun SE, Abiodun MT. Glomerular hyperfiltration in excess weight adolescents. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(6):842–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Turer CB, Baum M, Dubourg L, Selistre LS, Skinner AC. Prevalence of hyperfiltration among US youth/young adults with overweight and obesity: A population-based association study. Obes Sci Pract. 2019;5(6):570–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park M, Yoon E, Lim YH, Kim H, Choi J, Yoon HJ. Renal hyperfiltration as a novel marker of all-cause mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(6):1426–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freedman DS, Wang J, Ogden CL, Thornton JC, Mei Z, Pierson RN, Dietz WH, Horlick M. The prediction of body fatness by BMI and skinfold thicknesses among children and adolescents. Ann Hum Biol. 2007;34(2):183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999;82(3):165–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goacher PJ, Lambert R, Moffatt PG. Can weight-related health risk be more accurately assessed by BMI, or by gender specific calculations of Percentage Body Fatness? Med Hypotheses. 2012;79(5):656–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Himes JH, Dietz WH. Guidelines for overweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. The Expert Committee on Clinical Guidelines for Overweight in Adolescent Preventive Services. Am J Clin Nutri. 1994;59(2):307–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bjornstad P, Cherney DZ. Renal Hyperfiltration in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes: Physiology, Sex Differences, and Implications for Diabetic Kidney Disease. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(5):22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cachat F, Combescure C, Cauderay M, Girardin E, Chehade H. A systematic review of glomerular hyperfiltration assessment and definition in the medical literature. Clin J Amer Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(3):382–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marks GC, Habicht JP, Mueller WH. Reliability, dependability, and precision of anthropometric measurements. The Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1976–1980. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130(3):578–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, Fleming J, Greenberg N, Greene T, Hostetter T, Levey AS, Panteghini M, Welch M, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem. 2006;52(1):5–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Selvin E, Manzi J, Stevens LA, Van Lente F, Lacher DA, Levey AS, Coresh J. Calibration of serum creatinine in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1988–1994, 1999–2004. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(6):918–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Staples A, LeBlond R, Watkins S, Wong C, Brandt J. Validation of the revised Schwartz estimating equation in a predominantly non-CKD population. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(11):2321–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zipf G, Chiappa M, Porter KS, Ostchega Y, Lewis BG, Dostal J. National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010. Vital Health Stat 1. 2013;(56):1–37.

  18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ejerblad E, Fored CM, Lindblad P, Fryzek J, McLaughlin JK, Nyrén O. Obesity and risk for chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(6):1695–702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wuerzner G, Pruijm M, Maillard M, Bovet P, Renaud C, Burnier M, Bochud M. Marked association between obesity and glomerular hyperfiltration: a cross-sectional study in an African population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(2):303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomaszewski M, Charchar FJ, Maric C, McClure J, Crawford L, Grzeszczak W, Sattar N, Zukowska-Szczechowska E, Dominiczak AF. Glomerular hyperfiltration: a new marker of metabolic risk. Kidney Int. 2007;71(8):816–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chagnac A, Weinstein T, Herman M, Hirsh J, Gafter U, Ori Y. The effects of weight loss on renal function in patients with severe obesity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(6):1480–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pacifico L, Bonci E, Andreoli GM, Di Martino M, Gallozzi A, De Luca E, Chiesa C. The Impact of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on Renal Function in Children with Overweight/Obesity. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(8):1218.

  24. Palatini P. Glomerular hyperfiltration: a marker of early renal damage in pre-diabetes and pre-hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(5):1708–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chalmers L, Kaskel FJ, Bamgbola O. The role of obesity and its bioclinical correlates in the progression of chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2006;13(4):352–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasztan M, Pollock DM. Impact of ET-1 and sex in glomerular hyperfiltration in humanized sickle cell mice. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133(13):1475–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cherney DZ, Sochett EB, Miller JA. Gender differences in renal responses to hyperglycemia and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetes. Kidney Int. 2005;68(4):1722–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chidambaram M, Duncan JA, Lai VS, Cattran DC, Floras JS, Scholey JW, Miller JA. Variation in the renin angiotensin system throughout the normal menstrual cycle. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(2):446–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brosnihan KB, Li P, Ganten D, Ferrario CM. Estrogen protects transgenic hypertensive rats by shifting the vasoconstrictor-vasodilator balance of RAS. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(6):R1908-1915.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Reliability of anthropometric measurements in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006;450:38–46.

  31. Pottel H, Bjork J, Courbebaisse M, Couzi L, Ebert N, Eriksen BO, Dalton RN, Dubourg L, Gaillard F, Garrouste C, et al. Development and Validation of a Modified Full Age Spectrum Creatinine-Based Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate : A Cross-sectional Analysis of Pooled Data. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(2):183–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We appreciate the time and effort given by participants during the data collection phase of the NHANES project.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



YW conceived and designed research; YY contributed to data collection, analysis and writing of the initial paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yubin Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

NHANES study protocols were approved by the research ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of participants younger than 18 years of age.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table 1.

Threshold effect analysis between the weight, BMI and eGFR.

Additional file2: Table 2.

Multivariate regression analysis of the correlations between the eGFR-EKFC and skinfold by gender.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Wu, Y. The association between skinfold thicknesses and estimated glomerular filtration rate in adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 23, 96 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Triceps skinfold thickness
  • Subscapular skinfold thickness
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate
  • Cross-sectional study