Skip to main content

Acute kidney injury in Turkey: epidemiological characteristics, etiology, clinical course, and prognosis

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the etiologies, comorbidities, and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in Turkey and determine any potential differences among different geographical parts of the country.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted by the Acute Kidney Injury Working Group of the Turkish Society of Nephrology. Demographical and clinical data of patients with AKI at the time of diagnosis and at the 1st week and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of diagnosis were evaluated to determine patient and renal survival and factors associated with patient prognosis.

Results

A total of 776 patients were included (54.7% male, median age: 67 years). Prerenal etiologies, including dehydration, heart failure, and sepsis, were more frequent than other etiologies. 58.9% of the patients had at least one renal etiology, with nephrotoxic agent exposure as the most common etiology. The etiologic factors were mostly similar throughout the country. 33.6% of the patients needed kidney replacement therapy. At the 6th month of diagnosis, 29.5% of the patients had complete recovery; 34.1% had partial recovery; 9.5% developed end-stage kidney disease; and 24.1% died. The mortality rate was higher in the patients from the Eastern Anatolian region; those admitted to the intensive care unit; those with prerenal, renal, and postrenal etiologies together, stage 3 AKI, sepsis, cirrhosis, heart failure, and malignancy; those who need kidney replacement therapy; and those without chronic kidney disease than in the other patients.

Conclusion

Physicians managing patients with AKI should be alert against dehydration, heart failure, sepsis, and nephrotoxic agent exposure. Understanding the characteristics and outcomes of patients with AKI in their countries would help prevent AKI and improve treatment strategies.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important part of nephrology practice in both inpatient and outpatient clinics as well as emergency departments. Different criteria have been suggested for the diagnosis of AKI during the last decade. AKI has been most recently described by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) in 2012 [1].

The incidence of AKI has been reported to vary among different studies, possibly in part owing to the changing criteria for the diagnosis and diversity of the study populations. AKI is a multifactorial condition; many clinical conditions and medications contribute to its development. However, more importantly, AKI has been found to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates and worst outcomes, regardless of the etiology [2]. Both the etiology and prognosis of AKI may differ among regions with different socioeconomic statuses. The presence of AKI is associated not only with short-term prognosis but also with long-term mortality. Lafrance et al. [2] retrospectively analyzed 82711 hospitalized US veteran patients with AKI. Approximately 17.4% of patients who survived at least 90 days after AKI onset were reported to die during follow-up, and the mortality rate was higher in those with more severe AKI than in their counterparts. Besides patient mortality, AKI was found to be associated with worse renal survival and may lead to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Iram et al. [3] reported that 4.35% of their patients with AKI died, and 28.69% developed CKD. Similar reports can be found in the literature [4,5,6].

This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the etiologies, clinical courses, treatment options, and outcomes of AKI in Turkey and determine any potential differences among different geographical regions of the country.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted by the Acute Kidney Injury Working Group of the Turkish Society of Nephrology. It was announced online to all members of the Turkish Society of Nephrology, and only the respondents were recorded as the investigators. The investigators were asked to evaluate their patients with AKI at inpatient and emergency clinics as well as intensive care units (ICUs) according to the criteria proposed by the KDIGO: sudden decline in kidney function (increase in the serum creatinine level of > 0.3 mg/dL within 48 h, or > 50% within 7 days, or decreased urine output of < 0.5 mL/kg/h for more than 6 h) [1]. All parameters of the patients with AKI who provided informed consent were recorded into a web-based database. The study was conducted between April 2018 and 2019.

The demographical parameters, including age, sex, date and place of AKI diagnosis, the clinic where the patient was diagnosed to have AKI, status of hospitalization, duration between initial hospitalization and AKI diagnosis, and basal creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were recorded for each patient. The serum creatinine level assessed before 48 h was considered the basal creatinine level during hospital follow-up, while and in patients with AKI at the time of admission the creatinine level at the previous week, when available, was considered the basal level. The stage of AKI as defined by the KDIGO was recorded.

The etiology of AKI was recorded and classified into three major subgroups: prerenal, renal, and postrenal. Prerenal etiologies included dehydration, gastrointestinal losses, heart failure, burns, sepsis, liver cirrhosis, and ascites. Renal factors included ischemic events, nephrotoxin exposure, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, tubulointerstitial nephritis, and diabetic nephropathy. Nephrotoxic agents included aminoglycosides, radiocontrast material, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAS) blockers, colistin, amphotericin, chemotherapeutic agents, and other drugs. Postrenal factors included stone and malignancies of the urinary tract, prostatic disease, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and vesicoureteral reflux. The clinicians were free to select more than one option.

The clinicians were asked to select one or more causes of hospitalization, including respiratory, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, hematological, gastroenterological, hepatological, and genitourinary diseases; infections; immunosuppressive status; cardiovascular surgery; and major or minor non-cardiac surgery. Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, ischemic cardiovascular disease, CKD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, liver cirrhosis, and malignancies; they were described on the basis of the medical history of the patients.

The clinicians were asked to fill data regarding sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). SIRS was diagnosed on the basis of the following findings: body temperature over 38 °C or below 36 °C, heart rate over 90 beats/min, respiratory rate over 20 breaths/min, PaCO2 level above 32 mmHg, white blood cell count more than 12000/mm3 or below 4000/mm3, or ratio of band forms over 10%. Sepsis was diagnosed when there was additional evidence of infection and organ dysfunction [7, 8].

Besides the initial evaluation, follow-up visits were performed at the 1st week and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of the diagnosis of AKI. The clinicians recorded the outcome as complete recovery, partial recovery, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) development, and mortality, as well as data related to kidney replacement therapy (KRT) at each visit, when needed. Complete recovery was defined as creatinine levels falling to the basal level, while partial recovery was defined as a > 50% decrease in the creatinine levels that did not reach the basal level. The types of KRT, including intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), and peritoneal dialysis (PD), were recorded. More than one option could be selected when used during follow-up. The demographical and clinical parameters associated with the prognosis of AKI were evaluated using a Cox regression analysis.

Statistical analysis

The descriptive parameters were expressed as numbers and percentages for the categorical variables and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for the numerical variables. The numerical variables of two independent groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test, as they were unevenly distributed. Meanwhile, the categorical variables were compared using the chi square test. The risk factors of mortality and ESKD in the patients with AKI were analyzed using a Cox regression analysis. The statistical alpha significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 776 patients were analyzed after excluding those with missing data. Of them, 420 (54.1%) were men, and all were Caucasian, except for one black patient. The median patient age was 67 (IQR: 56–77) years. The centers providing data were classified according to the region of the country: Marmara-1, Marmara-2, and Central, Southern, and Eastern Anatolian regions. The names of the regions and centers and number of patients included according to region are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The names of the regions and centers and number of patients included according to region

AKI was diagnosed in 357 (47.9%) inpatients, 126 (16.9%) ICU patients, and 262 (35.2%) emergency clinic patients. The median duration between hospitalization and AKI diagnosis was 0 (IQR: 0–1) days. The median basal creatinine level and eGFR of the patients, excluding 153 patients with no data, were 1.20 (IQR: 0.89–1.80) mg/dL and 47 (IQR: 25–80) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively.

The etiology of AKI is presented in Table 2. Prerenal etiologies were more frequent, with dehydration being the most prevalent, followed by heart failure and sepsis. 58.9% of the patients had at least one renal etiology, among which exposure to a nephrotoxic agent was the most frequent. NSAIDs, RAS blockers, and radiocontrast agents were the three most common nephrotoxic agents. Postrenal etiologies were recorded in 13.5% of the patients. A total of 275 (35.4%) patients had both prerenal and renal factors; 56 (7.2%), both prerenal and postrenal factors; 35 (4.5%), both renal and postrenal factors; and 25 (3.2%), all three factors.

Table 2 The etiology of AKI in regions

The prerenal factors were more prevalent in the Marmara-2 and Southern Anatolian regions. Dehydration and heart failure were more frequent in the Marmara-2 region, while sepsis was more prevalent in the Southern Anatolian region. The renal factors were also more frequent in the Marmara-2 and Southern Anatolian regions. The ischemic factors were more frequently reported in the Marmara-2 region, while exposure to nephrotoxic agents, mostly radiocontrast material and RAS blockers, was more prevalent in the Southern Anatolian region than in the other regions. The prevalence of the postrenal factors was similar in all regions.

The causes of hospitalization and comorbidities are presented in Table 3. The most frequent cause of hospitalization was genitourinary diseases, followed by infections and cardiovascular diseases. The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension and DM. 33.6% of the patients were found to have CKD.

Table 3 Causes of hospitalization and comorbidities

The number of patients with stage 1, 2, and 3 AKI according to the KDIGO classification was 185 (23.9), 259 (33.4%), and 331 (42.7%), respectively. The mean creatinine levels of the patients with stage 1, 2, and 3 AKI were 2.46 ± 1.26, 3.17 ± 1.40, and 5.89 ± 3.60 mg/dL, respectively. The corresponding eGFRs were 74.0 ± 55.4, 48.3 ± 34.8, and 47.8 ± 41.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Regarding the diagnostic criteria for SIRS, a body temperature more than 38 °C or less than 36 °C was recorded in 135 (17.4%) patients; heart rate above 90 beats/min in 190 (24.5%) patients; respiratory rate exceeding 20 breaths/min or PaCO2 level above 32 mmHg in 133 (17.1%) patients; and white blood cell count above 12000/mm3 or below 4000/mm3 or ratio of band forms more than 10% in 214 (27.6%) patients. A total of 491 (63.3%) patients showed no diagnostic criteria for SIRS; meanwhile, 87 (11.2%) patients showed one criterion; 63 (8.1%), two criteria; 81 (10.4%), three criteria; and 54, (7.0%), four criteria. Sepsis was recorded in 179 (23.1%) patients.

During follow-up, 254 (33.6%) patients needed KRT. Specifically, 229 patients needed IHD; 8 patients, IHD and CKRT; 3 patients, IHD and PD; and 1 patient, PD. The frequency of use of KRT significantly differed among the regions (p < 0.001) (Table 4). KRT was most commonly needed among the patients from the Central Anatolia region and least needed among those from the Marmara-2 region.

Table 4 The frequencies of use of kidney replacement therapies in the regions

At the first follow-up visit of the 776 patients included, 174 recovered completely; 409 partially recovered; 80 received KRT; and 67 died. At the 6th month of diagnosis, 229 (29.5%) recovered completely; 265 (34.1%) partially recovered; 74 (9.5%) developed ESKD; and 187 (24.1%) died. Mortality was related and unrelated to AKI in 124 (66.3%) and 63 (33.7%) patients, respectively. The outcome data could not be reached for 21 patients. The outcomes of the patients at the first and last visits are presented schematically in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Outcome of patients during first and last controls

The comparison of the patients grouped according to the outcome at the last visit is presented in Table 5. The male and female patients had similar outcomes. In the comparison of the different geographical groups, the prevalence of complete recovery, partial recovery, and ESKD was the highest in the Southern Anatolian (54.9%), Marmara-2 (35.6%), and Central Anatolian regions (17.1%), respectively. The recovery rate was lower, and the mortality rate was higher in the patients who were admitted to the ICU than in the other patients. The proportion of patients who died or became dialysis-dependent was higher in the patients with stage 3 AKI than in the patients with stage 1 or 2 AKI. The recovery rate decreased, and the risk of mortality and ESKD increased, as the number of the diagnostic criteria for SIRS increased. The outcome was worse in the patients with sepsis, hypertension, CKD, heart failure, and malignancy than in the other patients.

Table 5 The comparison of the patients grouped according to the outcome at the last visit

The risk of ESKD was higher in the patients from the Central Anatolian region, those with stage 3 AKI, and those with underlying CKD (Table 6) than in the other patients. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for of ESKD (Fig. 2). Being in the Marmara-1 (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.213–2.684; p = 0.004) and Central Anatolian regions (HR: 1.785; 95% CI: 1.070–2.979; p = 0.027), having an elevated basal creatinine level (HR: 1.216; 95% CI: 1.130–1.309; p < 0.001), having heart failure (HR: 1.590; 95% CI: 1.013–2.495; p = 0.044), having glomerulonephritis (HR: 1.956; 95% CI: 1.041–3.675; p = 0.037), having stage 2 AKI (HR: 2.968; 95% CI: 1.560–5.649; p = 0.001), and having CKD (HR: 1.776; 95% CI: 1.190–2.650; p = 0.005) were found to increase the risk of ESKD; meanwhile, being in the Marmara-2 (HR: 0.390; 95% CI: 0.170–0.891; p = 0.025) and Southern Anatolian regions (HR: 0.587; 95% CI: 0.359–0.959; p = 0.034), having dehydration (HR: 0.649; 95% CI: 0.428–0.985; p = 0.042) or postrenal factors (HR: 0.361; 95% CI: 0.158–0.825; p = 0.016) as the etiology of AKI, and having stage 1 AKI were associated with a decreased risk of ESKD.

Table 6 Factors associated with the risk of end stage kidney disease
Fig. 2
figure 2

Factors for the risk of ESKD and death determined by Cox regression analysis

The comparison of the subgroups according to the mortality rate is presented in Table 7. The mortality rate was higher in the patients from the Eastern Anatolian region; those admitted to the ICU; those with prerenal, renal, and postrenal factors together; those with stage 3 AKI, sepsis, increased number of met diagnostic criteria for SIRS, liver cirrhosis, heart failure, and malignancy; and those without CKD than in the other patients. The mortality analysis was repeated within the group with prerenal etiologies. The patients with AKI due to hypovolemia were compared with those with heart failure and liver cirrhosis. The 6-month survival rates were not significantly different (77.7% and 73.0%, respectively; p = 0.316). The Cox regression analysis (Fig. 2) revealed that advanced age (HR: 1.027; 95% CI: 1.017–1.037; p < 0.001), number of days between hospitalization and AKI diagnosis (HR: 1.023; 95% CI: 1.013–1.032; p < 0.001), admission to the ICU (HR: 1.554; 95% CI: 1.035–2.333; p = 0.034), diagnosis at the emergency clinic (HR: 6.285; 95% CI: 4.174–9.463; p < 0.001), stage 3 AKI (HR: 1.563; 95% CI: 1.037–2.355; p = 0.033), body temperature above 38 °C or below 36 °C (HR: 2.528; 95% CI: 1.889–3.382; p < 0.001), heart rate above 90 beats/min (HR: 2.742; 95% CI: 2.028–3.707; p < 0.001), tachypnea (HR: 1.875; 95% CI: 1.399–2.513; p < 0.001), leukocytosis or leukopenia (HR: 1.365; 95% CI: 1.247–1.494; p < 0.001), diagnostic criteria for SIRS (HR: 3.142; 95% CI: 2.353–4.195; p < 0.001), sepsis (HR: 3.142; 95% CI: 2.353–4.195; p < 0.001), respiratory disorders (HR: 1.986; 95% CI: 1.470–2.683; p < 0.001), cerebrovascular events (HR: 1.976; 95% CI: 1.145–3.409; p = 0.014), hepatological diseases (HR: 2.360; 95% CI: 1.108–5.028; p = 0.016), infectious diseases (HR: 1.470; 95% CI: 1.093–1.976; p = 0.011), cardiovascular surgery (HR: 2.190; 95% CI: 1.120–4.281; p = 0.022) as the cause of hospitalization, presence of liver cirrhosis (HR: 2.338; 95% CI: 1.195–4.574; p = 0.013), malignancy (HR: 1.811; 95% CI: 1.317–2.490; p < 0.001), and heart failure (HR: 1.791; 95% CI: 1.282–2.500; p = 0.001) increased the risk of mortality. Meanwhile, glomerulonephritis (HR: 0.307; 95% CI: 0.114–0.827; p = 0.02) or genitourinary diseases as the etiology of AKI (HR: 0.583; 95% CI: 0.432–0.785; p < 0.001) and underlying CKD (HR: 0.698; 95% CI: 0.507–0.963; p = 0.028) were found to decrease the risk of mortality. The multivariate analysis was performed including parameters related to the mortality rate in the univariate analysis as well as the demographical parameters. Advanced age (HR: 1.025; 95% CI: 1.013–1.038; p < 0.001), increased interval between the admission and diagnosis of AKI (HR: 1.017; 95% CI: 1.006–1.029; p = 0.002), heart failure (HR: 1.773; 95% CI: 1.226–2.565; p = 0.002), liver cirrhosis (HR: 2.504; 95% CI: 1.235–5.077; p = 0.011), sepsis (HR: 2.537; 95% CI: 1.664–3.868; p < 0.001), and malignancy (HR: 1.982; 95% CI: 1.376–2.856; p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Being in the Central Anatolian region (HR: 0.476; 95% CI: 0.239–0.947; p = 0.035), having gastrointestinal losses as the etiology of AKI (HR: 0.511; 95% CI: 0.292–0.895; p = 0.019), having genitourinary diseases as the cause of hospitalization (HR: 0.644; 95% CI: 0.450–0.922; p = 0.016), and having CKD as the comorbidity (HR: 0.636; 95% CI: 0.434–0.931; p = 0.020) were associated with better survival. The effect of the stage of CKD was analyzed among subgroups including patients with stage 1–2, 3, 4, and 5 CKD. The 6-month survival rates of these subgroups were 70.2%, 70.4%, 81.4%, and 81.1%, respectively. The mortality rate was higher in the patients with stage 1–2 CKD than in those with stage 4 (p = 0.022) and 5 CKD (p = 0.006). Further, the mortality rate was higher in the patients with stage 3 CKD than in those with stage 5 CKD (p = 0.038).

Table 7 The comparison of the subgroups according to the mortality rate

The mortality analysis results of the patients who needed KRT and those who did not are presented in Fig. 3. The 6-month cumulative survival rate was higher in the patients who did not need KRT than in those who needed IHD (79.3% vs. 68.8%; p < 0.001), CKRT (79.3% vs. 31.3%; p < 0.001), and IHD plus CKRT (79.3% vs. 39.9%; p < 0.001). The 6-month survival rates of the patients with stage 1, 2, and 3 AKI were 43.7%, 63.7%, and 55.7%, respectively (Fig. 4). The difference between the patients with stage 1 and 2 AKI was significant (p = 0.030).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mortality analysis of patients who needed KRT and those who did not

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mortality analysis of patients with different stages of acute kidney injury

Discussion

AKI is defined as a clinical situation with heterogeneous etiology, clinical presentation, and both renal and patient survival. Its incidence is highly dependent on the study population. For example, Srisawat et al. [9] studied critically ill patients admitted to the ICU and reported that 32% of the study population (n = 15132) developed AKI. Another study reported an incidence of 12.7% [10]. In our study, we decided to evaluate the data of patients with AKI diagnosed by nephrology specialists at emergency clinics, inpatient wards, or ICUs.

Compared with Europe and Asia, Turkey is a crowded country with a population of 81623817 in its 814578 km2 surface area according to the records of the Turkish Statistical Institute [11]. It is divided into seven different geographical areas, each with different characteristics related to climate, flora, and residents. The majority of the population resides in the Western regions, followed by the Mediterranean region, an eastern part of Turkey. There are enough nationwide technical opportunities/personnel for the care of patients with AKI, such as nephrologists, educated nurses and technicians, modern hospitals and ICUs, and dialysis facilities, including those for all types of KRT. Moreover, the social security system covers renal care of patients both in university and government hospitals nationwide. Thus, there is no obstacle in caring for patients with AKI regarding coverage by the social security system.

A sufficiently large number of cases with AKI (n = 776) were included in our study to evaluate the etiologic factors, geographical differences, and outcomes. Unfortunately, we could not conclude on the incidence of AKI, since we did not have data on the number of patients admitted to the related centers during the study period. Further, not all hospitals and nephrologists provided data to the study. Therefore, we could not evaluate the proportion of patients with AKI within the outpatient and inpatient populations. Nevertheless, we were able to evaluate the clinical courses, treatment options, and differences between the geographical regions.

Many disease conditions are known to contribute to the development of AKI. The incidence of AKI may differ according to the features of the studied population and approach of the physician. The nephrological approach in patients at high risks can be lifesaving in this field. Training physicians on how to recognize and evaluate patients at high risks to protect them from developing AKI is important. To clarify the different features among countries, the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) designed the Snapshot Study [12], which was a multinational study including 3664 patients from different countries with varying degrees of income. Hypotension or shock was the most common etiological factor in high-income countries; meanwhile, dehydration was the most common factor in lower-income countries, wherein sepsis and AKI related to pregnancy were more frequent [12]. In a study conducted in Malawi, community-acquired AKI was detected in 12.7% of admissions within a pre-specified period of 3 months. A significant number of patients (43.8%) were seropositive for HIV. The most frequent causes of AKI were reported to be HIV-related sepsis and hypovolemia mostly due to gastroenteritis. Toxins, urinary obstruction, and primary renal parenchymal diseases were less prevalent [10]. Investigators from Karachi studied hospital-acquired AKI and found that the most common causes of AKI were sepsis, gastroenteritis, and surgical and obstetric complications [3]. Another study conducted in Singapore analyzed 422 cases of AKI. The most common etiological factors were prerenal etiologies, followed by sepsis and ischemic acute tubular necrosis [13]. Lombardy et al. [14] studied the causes of AKI in 2864 patients. They reported that AKI was more prevalent during winter (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05–1.29; p = 0.003), and a higher AKI risk was found to be associated with lower air temperature and higher humidity [14]. In our study, the most frequent etiology of prerenal AKI was dehydration, heart failure, and sepsis. This prompts the necessity of early evaluation and supportive care of patients with symptoms that may cause dehydration. With advances in the treatment options for ischemic heart disease, survival is prolonged, and an increasing number of cardiorenal syndrome cases are observed. There is a need for education among both primary care physicians and patients regarding the use of diuretics, especially their correct indication and dose, to prevent both hypervolemia and dehydration.

Since the primary function of the kidneys is concentration and excretion of toxic metabolites and drugs, the kidneys are the main organ affected by drug toxicity. It has been reported that nephrotoxicity accounts for 8–60% of all AKI cases depending on the population and definition of AKI [15]. Interestingly, the use of nephrotoxic agents was the most prominent etiology of renal AKI in our population (72.1%). This result was found to be true for all parts of the country. Thus, it is important to alert all physicians regarding nephrotoxicity of medications, especially those practicing in ICUs.

Infectious diseases are commonly associated with AKI. Krairoun et al. [16] studied 1716 patients admitted to emergency clinics with suspected infectious disease. Of these patients, 10.8% had AKI, and 12.4% died; 4.2% of those who died had no AKI [16].

Sepsis is also commonly associated and/or confounded with AKI [17]. Deleterious inflammatory events, hypovolemia, and exposure to nephrotoxic agents are some of the many potential causes of AKI seen in patients with sepsis. Infections were among the frequent etiologies of AKI in our study, as in many previous studies, and the proportion of patients with sepsis was quite high. Timely and adequate treatment of infections may prevent the development of AKI.

One of the known major risk factors for AKI is the presence of CKD. Approximately one-third of the patients included in our study had CKD. This necessitates careful evaluation of these patients.

There was some regional variation in the etiology of AKI regarding prerenal and renal factors. Dehydration and heart failure were more frequent in the Marmara-2 region, while sepsis and dehydration were more prevalent in the Southern Anatolia region. This cannot be explained simply by the several possible related factors, such as the change in the population characteristics, including age and sex, climate differences, and predominant population of patients cared for in clinical settings, such as cardiovascular hospitals or cancer centers. Another factor may be related to the physicians. The characteristics of the patients may change if the physician is responsible for inpatient, outpatient, or emergency clinic consultation. This factor also applies to the differences between the causes of hospitalization and comorbidities of patients according to region.

We concluded that the diversity of the type of KRT among the geographical regions in our study may be related to the individual characteristics of the patients and technical facilities or the differences in the practice of the clinicians providing data to the study.

Data on renal and patient survival vary in the literature. Again, the study population, risk factors, and socioeconomic factors may play a role. In one study, the overall mortality rate of patients with AKI admitted to the ICU was reported to be 27%, which was correlated with the severity of AKI [9]. The mortality rate was higher in lower-income countries than in higher-income countries in the ISN Global Snapshot Study [12]. In this study, 22% of patients needed dialysis, and among them, the mortality rate was higher. Age, concomitant organ dysfunction, sepsis, and oliguria were other factors related to increased mortality rates, while the presence of CKD was associated with decreased mortality rates. The mortality rate of patients with prerenal AKI due to hypovolemia was similar to that of patients with prerenal AKI secondary to heart failure or liver cirrhosis. However, in the study by Evans et al. [10], the mortality rate increased with advancing stage of AKI. Age above 40 years, stage of AKI, and history of nephrotoxin exposure were found to increase the risk of mortality related to AKI.

In a study conducted in Singapore, KRT was needed in 27% of patients, and the in-hospital and 6-month mortality rates were reported to be 20.3% and 9.4%, respectively. Stage 3 AKI was associated with higher mortality rates [13]. Another study from India reported that 220 of 1150 patients admitted to a general ward in a year had AKI. The in-hospital mortality rate of patients with and without AKI was reported to be 19.09% and 1.8%, respectively. Hematological malignancies, the need for inotropic agents, and the serum creatinine level at the time of admission were independent predictors of mortality. Underlying CKD and hospital-acquired AKI were not related to mortality [18]. In our study, the mortality rates at the 1st week and 6th month of diagnosis were 8.6% and 24.1%, respectively. This is an alarming finding, necessitating all clinicians to follow up patients in the long term. An increasing stage of AKI was associated with both patient and renal survival, which is common in most reports in the literature. Using the staging system proposed by the KDIGO may help clinicians determine patients at the highest risk.

Besides mortality, AKI is also associated with worse renal outcomes. In a recent study involving 5548 patients receiving anesthesia for the first time, all stages of AKI had been found to be related to progression to CKD [19]. In our study, ESKD developed in 74 (9.5%) patients. Being in the Marmara-1 and Central Anatolian regions and having elevated basal creatinine levels, heart failure, glomerulonephritis, stage 2 AKI, and CKD were found to increase the risk of ESKD; conversely, being in the Marmara-2 and Southern Anatolian regions and having dehydration or postrenal factors as the etiology of AKI were associated with a decreased risk of ESKD.

Regional variations may be related to the different risk factors, etiologies, and clinical practices. Dehydration and postrenal factors seem to cause a potentially reversible AKI. CKD is a well-known risk factor for AKI, as shown in our study. Advanced age, admission to the ICU, diagnosis at the emergency clinic, history of cardiovascular surgery, and presence of stage 3 AKI, the diagnostic criteria of SIRS, sepsis, respiratory diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, hepatological diseases, infectious diseases, cirrhosis, malignancy, and heart failure were related to increased mortality rates in our study. Most of these factors are similar to those in the current literature. In a study from Lithuanian University, 575 cases of severe AKI requiring KRT were analyzed [19]. The lowest mortality rate was noted in patients with postrenal AKI and the highest mortality rate in those with renal causes. Older age, systolic blood pressure below 120 mmHg, multiple organ dysfunction, pH level of < 7.3, oliguria, hepatorenal syndrome, cardiac surgery, and sepsis were associated with very high mortality rates. The AKI risk and mortality rate have been reported to be substantially high in patients with liver cirrhosis [20]. This finding is consistent with our results. Glomerulonephritis as the etiology and underlying CKD were associated with decreased mortality rates. The first association may be attributed to the potential reversibility of the disorder with treatment of glomerulonephritis. The mortality rate was lower in the patients with CKD than in those without and was found to decrease with advancing stage of preexisting CKD, when present. The positive effect of preexisting CKD is an interesting finding that may be speculated to be attributed to the less clinical implication of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD. Moreover, there might be an effect of the population included in the study. As we could not include all patients with AKI admitted to the involved centers, bias might have occurred during evaluation. There might have been patients with advanced CKD and multiple comorbidities with worse prognosis.

Herein, the mortality rate was higher in the patients who needed CKRT than in those who did not. This is an expected finding considering the indications for CKRT, instead of conventional hemodialysis, with the most common one being hemodynamic instability.

Conclusion

The most common etiology of AKI in our study was dehydration. 58.9% of the patients had at least one renal etiology, among which nephrotoxin exposure was the most frequent. At the 6th month of diagnosis, 33.6% of the patients needed KRT; 29.5% completely recovered; 34.1% partially recovered; 9.5% developed ESKD; and 24.1% died. The difference in the etiology and outcome among the geographical regions may be related to the individual characteristics of the patients included or the differences in the practice patterns of physicians providing data to the study. Taken together, physicians managing patients with AKI should be aware of the patient characteristics and outcomes in their country and region to prevent AKI progression and provide more efficient treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

CI:

Confidence interval

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CKRT:

Continuous kidney replacement therapies

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

ESKD:

End stage kidney disease

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IHD:

Intermittent hemodialysis

IQR:

Interquartile range

ISN:

International Society of Nephrology

KDIGO:

Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes

KRT:

Kidney replacement therapy

NSAID:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PD:

Peritoneal dialysis

RAS:

Renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

References

  1. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int. 2012;2(Suppl 1):19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lafrance JP, Miller DR. Acute kidney injury associates with increased long-term mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(2):345–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iram H, Ali M, Kumar V, Ejaz A, Solangi SA, Junejo AM, Solangi SA, Un NN. Frequency of Risk Factors and Outcome of Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury. Cureus. 2020;12(12):e12001.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Talabani B, Zouwail S, Pyart RD, Meran S, Riley SG, Phillips AO. Epidemiology and outcome of community-acquired acute kidney injury. Nephrology (Carlton). 2014;19(5):282–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rathore AS, Chopra T, Ma JZ, Xin W, Abdel-Rahman EM. Long-Term Outcomes and Associated Risk Factors of Post-Hospitalization Dialysis-Dependent Acute Kidney Injury Patients. Nephron. 2017;137(2):105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gameiro J, Marques F, Lopes JA. Long-term consequences of acute kidney injury: a narrative review. Clin Kidney J. 2020;14(3):789–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bone RC. Toward an epidemiology and natural history of SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). JAMA. 1992;268(24):3452–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R, Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srisawat N, Sileanu FE, Murugan R, Bellomod R, Calzavacca P, Cartin-Ceba R, Cruz D, Finn J, Hoste EE, Kashani K, Ronco C, Webb S, Kellum JA, Acute Kidney Injury-6 Study Group. Variation in risk and mortality of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a multicenter study. Am J Nephrol. 2015;41(1):81–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans RD, Hemmilä U, Craik A, Mtekateka M, Hamilton F, Kawale Z, Kirwan CJ, Dobbie H, Dreyer G. Incidence, aetiology and outcome of community-acquired acute kidney injury in medical admissions in Malawi. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The results of population analysis based on province of residence. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2019-33705

  12. Mehta RL, Burdmann EA, Cerdá J, Feehally J, Finkelstein F, García-García G, Godin M, Jha V, Lameire NH, Levin NW, Lewington A, Lombardi R, Macedo E, Rocco M, Aronoff-Spencer E, Tonelli M, Zhang J, Remuzzi G. Recognition and management of acute kidney injury in the International Society of Nephrology 0by25 Global Snapshot: a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;387(10032):2017–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30240-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teo SH, Lee KG, Koniman R, Tng ARK, Liew ZH, Naing TT, Li H, Tan RY, Tan HK, Choong HL, Foo WYM, Kaushik M. A prospective study of clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute kidney injury in a tertiary care Centre. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lombardi G, Gambaro G, Pertica N, Naticchia A, Bargagli M, Ferraro PM. Seasonality of acute kidney injury in a tertiary hospital academic center: an observational cohort study. Environ Health. 2021;20(1):8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khairoun M, Uffen JW, Ocak G, Koopsen R, Haitjema S, Oosterheert JJ, Kaasjager K. The incidence, mortality and renal outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients with suspected infection at the emergency department. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0260942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Poston JT, Koyner JL. Sepsis associated acute kidney injury. BMJ. 2019;9(364):k4891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chandiraseharan VK, Kalimuthu M, Prakash TV, George T, Rajenesh A, Jayaseelan V, Sudarsanam TD. Acute kidney injury is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in a general medical ward: A retrospective study from a tertiary care centre in south India. Indian J Med Res. 2020;152(4):386–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Privratsky JR, Krishnamoorthy V, Raghunathan K, Ohnuma T, Rasouli MR, Long TE, Sigurdsson MI. Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Is Associated With Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease Independent of Severity. Anesth Analg. 2022;134(1):49–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paškevičius Ž, Skarupskienė I, Balčiuvienė V, Dalinkevičienė E, Kušleikaitė-Pere N, Petrulienė K, Žiginskienė E. Mortality Prediction in Patients with Severe Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(10):1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pena Polanco NA, Martin P, Carrion AF. Advances in the Management of Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2021;17(5):211–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would thank the Turkish Society of Nephrology for technical support.

Funding

No funding was gained for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MG, IY, BD, MRI designed the study. MG and IY gatered information from the centers, made the analysis and wrote the paper, IY supervised the study. ST, BD, SGB, SB, SP, SD, UD, AD, MS, IK, EA, ABH, MRA, ZT helped planning of the study, followed up the participants, provided data of patients. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meltem Gursu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee at which the studies were conducted (Ethical approval was gained from ‘The Ethics Committe of Kocaeli University’, No: 2017/92IRB) with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gursu, M., Yegenaga, I., Tuglular, S. et al. Acute kidney injury in Turkey: epidemiological characteristics, etiology, clinical course, and prognosis. BMC Nephrol 23, 326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02933-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02933-1

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Etiology
  • Kidney replacement therapy
  • Survival