Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinicopathological spectrum of biopsy-proven renal diseases of patients at a single center in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional retrospective review

BMC Nephrology volume 24, Article number: 181 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The clinical presentation of renal diseases can vary widely. The lack of a comprehensive national registry for Sri Lanka makes it difficult to provide a detailed record of the various clinical presentations and histopathology of renal disorders in the nation. Therefore, this study aims to provide a record of the spectrum of renal diseases in Sri Lanka.

Methods

Renal biopsies performed at the nephrology unit in Colombo South Teaching Hospital (CSTH), Sri Lanka from March 2018 to October 2019 was retrospectively studied. Indications for renal biopsy were nephrotic range proteinuria, sub nephrotic range proteinuria, acute kidney injury without obvious etiology, chronic renal disease without obvious etiology and haematuria.

Results

A total of 140 native kidney biopsies were analyzed in which majority were females (55.7%). The mean age of the population was 46 ± 15.3 years. The most common indications for renal biopsy were nephrotic range proteinuria (54.3%), followed by sub-nephrotic range proteinuria (14.3%), nephrotic range proteinuria with haematuria (14.3%), sub-nephrotic range proteinuria with haematuria (9.3%), AKI without known cause (4.3%), and CKD without known cause (3.6%). The leading histopathological diagnoses were FSGS (22.1%), lupus nephritis (20%), PSGN (17.1%), DN (12.1%), HTN (9.3%), MCD (6.4%), IgA nephropathy (5.7%), IN (4.3%), vasculitis (2.1%), and MGN (0.7%).

Conclusions

The most common indication for renal biopsy was nephrotic range proteinuria in our population. FSGS was the most prevalent histopathological diagnosis and the least frequent diagnosis reported was MGN. The spectrum of renal diseases could differ according to the study location and it changes over time. Therefore, a renal biopsy registry is needed for documenting the changing disease pattern in Sri Lanka.

Peer Review reports

Background

End-stage renal disease has become a growing burden especially in the developing nations and recent studies indicate that the number of patients starting kidney replacement therapy due to glomerular diseases is on the rise [1]. Renal biopsy has become a standard tool for diagnosis of renal parenchymal diseases and has a high accuracy in prognosis and treatment. The first publication on renal biopsy was in 1951 by Iversen and Brun which paved for understanding of the pathogenesis and diagnosis of kidney disease [2]. Over the years with the development of immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy, renal biopsy technique improved its diagnostic potential providing more information on the histopathology and classification of kidney diseases [3, 4].

Renal disorders are of many subtypes, glomerulonephritis (GN) is the most frequent type of renal disorder and its epidemiology is mainly determined by the biopsy rate [4, 5]. Epidemiology of biopsy proven renal diseases is important to understand the geographical prevalence and variability of renal diseases. Previous studies show that immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) was the most common cause of GN in Japan [6], China [7, 8], Australia [9], Hungary [10], Italy [11, 12], Spain [13] and France [14]. Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was reported as the most frequent cause of GN in India [15,16,17,18], Pakistan [19] Brazil [20], Colombia [21] and USA [22]. These varying reports from different parts of the world could be influenced by many confounding factors including socioeconomic status, geography, ethnicity, time period, nutritional status and age [4, 6].

There is limited data regarding the patterns of renal diseases in Sri Lanka, and a centralised national registry is unavailable for renal diseases in Sri Lanka. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive record of the clinicopathological spectrum of renal diseases according to clinical presentation and histopathological diagnoses and emphasize the importance of maintaining a central national database/registry for renal diseases in Sri Lanka.

Methods

Study design

Clinical and pathological records of adult patients (≥18 years) who had a native kidney biopsy performed at the nephrology unit in Colombo South Teaching Hospital (CSTH), Sri Lanka during the period of March 2018 to October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Colombo South Teaching Hospital is one of the leading tertiary care centers in Sri Lanka and patients with renal diseases are referred to the nephrology team lead by the consultant nephrologist. If indications are sufficient, the consultant nephrologists would direct the patients for renal biopsy which are being performed under real time ultra sound scan guidance. Renal biopsy was not performed on patients who had diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy unless there was a compelling indication.

Indications for renal biopsy

Indications for biopsy were defined as follows:

  • Acute kidney injury without obvious etiology (AKI) – Increase in serum creatinine by >0.3mg/dl (>26.5 mmol/l) within 48 hours; or increase in serum creatinine >1.5 times of baseline, which is known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days; or urine volume <0.5ml/kg/h for 6 hours without a known etiology [23].

  • Chronic renal disease without obvious etiology (CKD) – Abnormality of kidney functions or structure present for 3 months without obvious etiology with normal kidney sizes were not contraindications for biopsy [24].

  • Nephrotic range proteinuria- Defined by 24-hr urine protein > 3 g/day/1.73 m2, UPCR > 300mmol/l with or without edema [25].

  • Sub nephrotic range proteinuria-Defined by 24-hr urine protein between 1-3 g/day/1.73 m2, Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) between 100-300mmol/l.

  • Haematuria – Microscopic presence of red cells in urine full report together with the presence of proteinuria (Hematuria alone was not an indication for renal biopsy).

Diagnosis criteria for hypertensive nephropathy (HTN).

The criteria for the diagnosis of hypertensive nephropathy were as follows: i) >5 year history of primary hypertension that is typically accompanied by left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary heart disease, heart failure, cerebral arteriosclerosis and/or history of cerebral vascular accident; ii) relatively normal urine sediment; iii) retinal arteriosclerosis or arteriosclerotic changes in the retina; iv) slowly progressive renal insufficiency with gradually increasing proteinuria that is usually non-nephrotic; v) hypertension precedes the development of either proteinuria or renal insufficiency and there is no other obvious cause of renal disease [26].

Pathologic diagnosis

Two cores of kidney tissues were obtained in each case. One sample was sent for light microscopic study which was performed by the histopathologist at CSTH and second sample was sent to Medical Research Institute (MRI), Colombo, Sri Lanka for immunofluorescence. Then the first sample was fixed with 10% neutral buffered formal saline, routinely processed and embedded in paraffin wax, stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain, Masson’s Trichrome, periodic acid–Schiff and Silver stains. Congo red stains was performed if required. The second sample was frozen sectioned for immunofluorescence examination of IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q and fibrinogen. In CSTH Electron Microscope (EM) was not available, therefore the final most likely diagnosis was formulated based on clinicopathologic correlations of each patient.

Data collection and analysis

The information was retrieved from the histopathology requisition forms accompanying renal biopsy and clinic data. We included histopathology requisition forms of patients who had undergone renal biopsies during the study period and who had sufficient samples for histopathological diagnosis. We excluded records with insufficient samples and hence had no histopathological diagnosis. The relevant clinical and laboratory variables such as socio-demographic data, indication for renal biopsy, histopathological diagnosis and clinical investigations were documented. The data was entered in Microsoft Office Excel spread sheet and statistical analysis was done using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.4.

Results

During the study period a total of 140 native kidney biopsies were performed at the center. There were 78 (55.7%) females and 62 (44.3%) males. The mean age of the sample was 46 ±15.3 years. The indication for renal biopsy and histopathological diagnoses are presented in Table 1. In both genders, the most common indications for renal biopsy were nephrotic range proteinuria amounting to 54.3%, followed by sub-nephrotic range proteinuria (14.3%), nephrotic range proteinuria with haematuria (14.3%), sub-nephrotic range proteinuria with haematuria (9.3%), AKI without known cause (4.3%), and CKD without known cause (3.6%). The leading histopathological diagnoses were FSGS (22.1%), lupus nephritis (20%), PSGN (17.1%), DN (12.1%), HTN (9.3%), MCD (6.4%), IgA nephropathy (5.7%), IN (4.3%), vasculitis (2.1%), and MGN (0.7%). The most common diagnoses in the nephrotic range proteinuria were FSGS accounting for 27.6% followed by DN (17.1%), lupus nephritis (14.5%), MCD (11.8%), IgA nephropathy (9.2%) and HTN (7.8%).

Table 1 Indication for renal biopsy and histopathological diagnoses
Full size table

Renal biopsy indications for different age groups are shown in Table 2. Nephrotic range proteinuria was the most common indication for renal biopsy in all age groups. The mean age of the patients with nephrotic range proteinuria was 46.8 ±15.1 years. Majority of the patients who underwent biopsy were above 40 years. However, most patients presented with sub-nephrotic range proteinuria with haematuria were young adults under 40 years (69.2%).

Table 2 Renal biopsy indication in different age groups
Full size table

Table 3 presents the disease pattern across different age groups. The most common diagnoses in the 16-30 years age category were lupus and PSGN whereas FSGS and HTN nephropathy were the most common diseases among the elderly (≥ 60 years). Majority of the diagnoses were found to be distributed in the age groups of above 40 years. Diabetes nephropathy was common in 50-60 years age group. IgA nephropathy was commonest in 16-30 years age group whereas MCD was almost similarly common in 16-30 years and 40-50 years age groups.

Table 3 Disease pattern in different age groups
Full size table

Descriptive characteristics of indications for renal biopsy are presented in Table 4. Clinical details revealed 56 (40%) patients to have hypertension and 36 (25.7%) with diabetes mellitus without diabetic retinopathy. In all cases the bilateral kidney size was equal or more than 10 cm. Ultrasound scan had features of chronic renal parenchymal disease in 40 (28.6%) patients. Urinalysis indicated majority of the patients with protein 3+ (57.1%) and red cell casts in 4 (2.9%), granular casts in 32 (22.9%) and 16 (11.4%) patients had dysmorphic red blood cells ≥10%. Patients with nephrotic range proteinuria had the highest mean urine protein creatine ratio (UPCR) of 672.8 ± 363.7 mmol/l, whereas sub nephrotic range proteinuria had the lowest mean UPCR of 166.6 ± 65.8 mmol/l. The mean serum creatinine was highest among those with AKI of unknown cause (562.8 ± 377 mmol/l) and was followed by patients with CKD of unknown cause (450 ± 431.6 mmol/l). Those biopsied for nephrotic range proteinuria reported to have the lowest mean serum creatinine value (88.6 ± 61.7mmol/l).

Table 4 Descriptive characteristics of indications for renal biopsy
Full size table

Among the patients diagnosed with FSGS, 9 patients were known to have DM, 12 had HTN, 27 patients had 3+ and 4+ proteinuria and no one had red cell cast in urine (Table 5). In patients diagnosed with lupus, 4 patients had DM, 4 had HTN and 24 patients had 2+ and 3+ proteinuria. Out of the 24 patients diagnosed with PSGN only 2 patients had DM, 3 had HTN and 19 patients had 2+ and 3+ proteinuria. Among the 17 diabetic nephropathy patients, all had been previously diagnosed with DM and 15 also had HTN and 12 had 3+ proteinuria. From the 13 HTN nephropathy patients, all had been previously diagnosed with hypertension and 3 patients also diagnosed with diabetes, 9 patients had 3+ proteinuria.

Table 5 Descriptive characteristics of renal diseases
Full size table

Discussion

The present study was conducted to determine the epidemiology and the relationship between indication and histopathology outcomes of renal biopsies at a single center in Sri Lanka, which thereby would improve the existing clinical knowledge of possible cause of renal disorders in the nation. Majority of the patients in our cohort were females (55.7%) and the mean age was 46 ±15.3 years. The most common indication for biopsy was nephrotic range proteinuria (54.3%), followed by sub-nephrotic range proteinuria (14.3%), nephrotic range proteinuria with hematuria (14.3%), sub-nephrotic range proteinuria with hematuria (9.3%), AKI without known cause (4.3%) and CKD without known cause (3.6%) (Table 1). Nephrotic range proteinuria was the most common indication in all age groups and in both genders (Table 2).

The epidemiology of primary and secondary glomerular diseases may differ within the nation due to different socio-economic and ethnic backgrounds in different parts of the country. Similar to our findings, single center studies conducted in Sri Lanka showed nephrotic range proteinuria as the most common indication for renal biopsy [27, 28]. Comparably studies done in other parts of the world including Bangladesh [29], Africa [30], India [15], Poland [31], China [32] and Romania [33, 34] showed nephrotic range proteinuria as the most prevalent indication for renal biopsy.

The most frequent histopathological diagnosis in our study was FSGS (22.1%) followed by lupus nephritis (20%), PSGN (17.1%), DN (12.1%), HTN (9.3%), MCD (6.4%), IgA nephropathy (5.7%), IN (4.3%), Vasculitis (2.1%), and MGN (0.7%). Interestingly, primary GN was the most common finding and IgA nephropathy being the most frequent diagnosis in the study performed at Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital, Sri Lanka between 2012 and 2019 [27]. However, this does not correspond with our data, which showed FSGS to be the leading cause. The second common histology in that study was FSGS followed by primary chronic TIN. Whereas in the secondary forms of GN, lupus was the most common followed by DN and amyloidosis [27]. Another retrospective study done at Kandy teaching hospital Sri Lanka with a total of 2680 biopsies during the period of 2010 to 2019 showed that among primary GN, FSGS as the most common diagnosis observed in 11.41% biopsies [28]. Among secondary GN, lupus nephritis was the most common diagnosis observed among 15.45%, followed by diabetic nephropathy in 7.27%, post infectious GN in 7.1%, renal vasculitis in 4.25% and hypertensive nephropathy in 1.52%. Among females, lupus was the most frequent pathology in that study and it corresponds to our findings [28]. However, another study done on the same settings in the period of 2015- 2018 found that MCD was the most common histopathological diagnosis (86/345) followed by lupus (20%), FSGS (14%), IgAN (12%), DN (10%) and MGN (9%) [27]. Therefore, these conflicting results in Sri Lanka should be further investigated to achieve unity.

Our findings were similar to the reports from other South Asian countries, America, Egypt, Spain and Iran, where the most common diagnosis was FSGS [13, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, 35,36,37,38], Other studies from Europe, East Asia and Australia showed conflicting findings where they reported IgAN to be the most prevalent histopathological diagnosis [6,7,8,9,10,11,12, 14, 39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Nevertheless, some studies in South Asia had different results as well, where they reported MCD [46, 47] and DPGN [29] as the most frequent diagnosis. Studies done in Thailand [48], Oman [49], Saudi Arabia [50], South Africa [51] and Serbia [30] showed lupus as the most common diagnosis (Table 6). Differences in the prevalence of histopathological diagnoses across nations could be due to the difference in socio demographic factors, environmental factors and difference in the healthcare systems across different countries.

Table 6 Epidemiology of renal biopsy from national registries and studies
Full size table

In the present study the leading indication for biopsy was nephrotic range proteinuria and its most common pathologic diagnosis was FSGS (27.6%) followed by DN (17.1%), lupus nephritis (14.4%), MCD (11.8%), IgAN (9.2%) and HTN (7.8%). The most frequent diagnosis for nephrotic range proteinuria with hematuria was PSGN (30%) followed by FSGS (25%) and lupus nephritis (25%). Lupus nephritis was the most common diagnosis (40%) for sub nephrotic range proteinuria followed by HTN (20%), interstitial nephritis (15%), PSGN (10%) and DN (10%). The most common diagnosis in the sub nephrotic proteinuria with hematuria group was PSGN (69.2%) followed by lupus nephritis (23.1%) and FSGS (7.7%) (Table 1).

There were 36 (25.7%) diabetes patients in the sample and 19 patients had no morphologic signs of diabetic kidney disease in the renal biopsy. The most common pathologic diagnoses among patients with diabetes were DN (42.2%), FSGS (25%) and lupus (11.1%). Among the group without diabetes, the most common pathologies were lupus (23%) FSGS (21.1%), PSGN (21.1%), HTN (9.6%) and MCD (8.6%) (Table 5). However due to the relatively small sample size and absence of the comorbid duration, we did not divide the comorbid details into age categories and therefore we cannot comment on the above relationship between the age categories. Nevertheless, in our sample there were 77 patients below 50 years and 41 patients below the age of 40 years. This might be a partial explanation for these findings which needs future multicentric and a larger sample size to further investigate among the elderly and younger groups. Interestingly, a study done in Poland with 352 patients aged ≥65 years compared with a control group of 2214 individuals aged 18-64 years showed a prevalence of 18.2% diabetes patients among elderly individuals, and as much as 75% of them had no morphologic signs of diabetic kidney disease in the renal biopsy [31].

Though there were numerous papers published regarding frequency of indication and histopathological diagnosis of biopsy-proven kidney diseases, due to several factors our findings cannot be compared for conclusive interpretations. Firstly, time period of the studies conducted (the present study was from 2018-2019). Secondly, the age of the study participants (in our study the average age of the patient was 46 ±15.3 years and ranged from 18 - 76 years. Some studies evaluated cases of all ages, while some included only children, adults or the elderly. Moreover, the classification of age groups was not similar in different studies. Thirdly, the categorization of indications and type of biopsies varied in different studies. We studied all types of renal disorders as a whole, while some studies included only GN cases, whereas some included only native kidneys. In addition, some studies had categorization of primary GN, secondary GN, vascular disorders, hereditary and metabolic disorders. Fourthly, the lack of ability to generalize the data to the whole country since most studies were done in one or several centers in the country and only few countries had the capability of using a national registry [11, 21, 58]. Lastly, the different socioeconomic status of different countries.

It is evident from this study that similar indications are present with different renal abnormalities, thereby signifying renal biopsy as the most important diagnostic modality in renal disease, and majority of the cases are potentially treatable if diagnosed early. Therefore, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining a nationwide renal registry. This could help to identify the prevalence of various renal pathologies in different age groups, gender, geographies, socioeconomic classes that encounter in clinical practice in a developing nation like Sri Lanka. This may also help healthcare providers and nephrologists for early detection and improve treatment of renal pathologies. Nevertheless, despite the valuable insights provided by the study on the epidemiology of biopsy proven renal diseases in Sri Lanka, it is noteworthy that the sample size was small and the study period was relatively short (19 months). Hence, the results of this study cannot be considered definitive or conclusive. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of conducting multi-centric studies with longer study periods to gain a deeper understanding of the patterns of renal disease in Sri Lanka in the future.

Our study has several limitations. We used the most probable diagnoses and, in the sample, we did not have overlapping diagnoses. However, the lack of EM facility at the center was a limiting factor in determining co-existing diseases such as IGAN or FSGS. Relatively short duration of study resulting in a smaller sample size of only 140 patients is another key limitation which may not reflect the disease pattern. Due to the small sample size, we did not categorize the diagnoses such as primary and secondary GN. Though we have divided age groups within indication and diagnoses, we did not compare the association of indication to histopathological diagnoses within age groups as a result of the smaller sample size. In addition, our patient group is above 18 years and we cannot comment on the clinicopathological spectrum of renal diseases of children. Although this study was performed in a tertiary care hospital in an urban city of Sri Lanka, a significant proportion of patients come to the specialist clinics from outside the city. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the findings we obtained applies only to the local city population. Furthermore, since Sri Lanka is a multicultural, multilinguistic and multireligious country with varying education levels, our cohort may also not be fully representative of the spectrum of renal disease in Sri Lanka as a whole.

Conclusions

In our study of 140 patients, nephrotic syndrome was the indication for renal biopsy in more than 50% of patients. The most common histological diagnosis was FSGS whereas the least frequent diagnosis reported was MGN. It is evident from this study that similar indications are present with different renal abnormalities, thereby signifying that there is no alternative to renal biopsy. Our data show the pattern of renal biopsy from a single center in Sri Lanka, which is an initial step in the understanding of the epidemiology of renal diseases in the nation. Our findings were different from previous reports in Sri Lanka and other countries, which can be possibly explained by the difference in geography, socioeconomic status, genetic and environmental factors. However due to the relative short time period it may not sufficiently reflect the disease pattern for definite conclusions. Therefore, further large-scale, multicentric studies should be carried out for a longer period to evaluate the survival rates of patients, and a national registry for renal biopsies should be established. Present data represent an important contribution to the epidemiology of renal diseases in Sri Lanka and providing a valuable comparison with other renal biopsy registries worldwide, as a basis for nephrologists and health care providers to stimulate new analyses and improve treatment of renal diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset is available with the Primary Investigator, Dr. Arjuna Marasinghe and can be provided upon request.

Abbreviations

CINAC:

Chronic interstitial nephritis in agricultural communities

CresGN:

Crescentic glomerulonephritis

DN:

Diabetic nephropathy

DPGN:

Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis

FNGN:

Pauci-immune focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis,

FSGS:

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

GN:

Glomerulonephritis

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HSP:

Henoch–Schönlein purpura

HTN:

Hypertensive nephropathy

IgAN:

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy

IgMN:

Immunoglobulin M nephropathy

IN:

Interstitial nephritis

MCD:

Minimal change disease

MCGN:

Mesangiocapillary GN

MesGN:

Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis

MGN:

Membranous glomerulonephritis

MPGN:

Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis

MN:

Membranous nephropathy

PGN:

Primary glomerulonephritis

PIGN:

Post-infectious glomerulonephritis

SGN:

Secondary glomerulonephritis

TIN:

Tubulointerstitial nephritis

TMA:

Thrombotic Microangiopathy

References

  1. Thurlow JS, Joshi M, Yan G, Norris KC, Agodoa LY, Yuan CM, et al. Global Epidemiology of End-Stage Kidney Disease and Disparities in Kidney Replacement Therapy. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(2):98–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iversen P, Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med. 1951;11(3):324–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luciano RL, Moeckel GW. Update on the Native Kidney Biopsy: Core Curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(3):404–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fiorentino M, Bolignano D, Tesar V, Pisano A, Biesen W, D’’Arrigo G, et al. Renal Biopsy in 2015 - From Epidemiology to Evidence-Based Indications. Am J Nephrol. 2016;43(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazi AM, Hashmi MF. Glomerulonephritis. StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [Cited 2022 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560644/.

  6. Sugiyama H, Yokoyama H, Sato H, Saito T, Kohda Y, Nishi S, et al. Japan Renal Biopsy Registry and Japan Kidney Disease Registry: Committee Report for 2009 and 2010. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2013;17(2):155–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan X, Xu J, Ren H, Zhang W, Xu Y, Shen P, et al. Changing spectrum of biopsy-proven primary glomerular diseases over the past 15 years: a single-center study in China. Contrib Nephrol. 2013;181:22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li LS, Liu ZH. Epidemiologic data of renal diseases from a single unit in China: analysis based on 13,519 renal biopsies. Kidney Int. 2004;66(3):920–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jegatheesan D, Nath K, Reyaldeen R, Sivasuthan G, John GT, Francis L, et al. Epidemiology of biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in Queensland adults. Nephrol Carlton Vic. 2016;21(1):28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Molnár A, Thomas MJ, Fintha A, Kardos M, Dobi D, Tislér A, et al. Kidney biopsy-based epidemiologic analysis shows growing biopsy rate among the elderly. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schena FP. Survey of the Italian Registry of Renal Biopsies. Frequency of the renal diseases for 7 consecutive years. The Italian Group of Renal Immunopathology. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12(3):418–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zaza G, Bernich P, Lupo A, ‘Triveneto’ Register of Renal Biopsies (TVRRB). Incidence of primary glomerulonephritis in a large North-Eastern Italian area: a 13-year renal biopsy study. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2013;28(2):367–72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rivera F, López-Gómez JM, Pérez-García R, Spanish Registry of Glomerulonephritis. Clinicopathologic correlations of renal pathology in Spain. Kidney Int. 2004;66(3):898–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon P, Ramee MP, Boulahrouz R, Stanescu C, Charasse C, Ang KS, et al. Epidemiologic data of primary glomerular diseases in western France. Kidney Int. 2004;66(3):905–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishna A, Vardhan H, Singh PP, Kumar O. Analysis of native kidney biopsy: Data from a single center from Bihar, India. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2018;29(5):1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balakrishnan N, John GT, Korula A, Visalakshi J, Talaulikar GS, Thomas PP, et al. Spectrum of biopsy proven renal disease and changing trends at a tropical tertiary care centre 1990–2001. Indian J Nephrol. 2003;13(1):29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rathi M, Bhagat RL, Mukhopadhyay P, Kohli HS, Jha V, Gupta KL, et al. Changing histologic spectrum of adult nephrotic syndrome over five decades in north India: A single center experience. Indian J Nephrol. 2014;24(2):86–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Golay V, Trivedi M, Kurien AA, Sarkar D, Roychowdhary A, Pandey R. Spectrum of nephrotic syndrome in adults: clinicopathological study from a single center in India. Ren Fail. 2013;35(4):487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mubarak M, Kazi JI, Naqvi R, Ahmed E, Akhter F, Naqvi SAA, et al. Pattern of renal diseases observed in native renal biopsies in adults in a single centre in Pakistan. Nephrol Carlton Vic. 2011;16(1):87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polito MG, de Moura LAR, Kirsztajn GM. An overview on frequency of renal biopsy diagnosis in Brazil: clinical and pathological patterns based on 9617 native kidney biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(2):490–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arias LF, Henao J, Giraldo RD, Carvajal N, Rodelo J, Arbeláez M. Glomerular diseases in a Hispanic population: review of a regional renal biopsy database. Sao Paulo Med J Rev Paul Med. 2009;127(3):140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nair R, Walker PD. Is IgA nephropathy the commonest primary glomerulopathy among young adults in the USA? Kidney Int. 2006;69(8):1455–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. AKI definition. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):19–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2011.32.

  24. Definition and classification of CKD. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):19–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2012.64.

  25. Hull RP, Goldsmith DJA. Nephrotic syndrome in adults. BMJ. 2008;336(7654):1185–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang XC, Liu CH, Chen YJ, Wu Y, Yang LS, Liu HM, Liao HL. Clinical and pathological analysis of the kidney in patients with hypertensive nephropathy. Exp Ther Med. 2013;6(5):1243–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pilapitiya D, Wadduwage N, Aberathna C, Galahitiyawa C, Herath C, Rodrigo S. P0141 Kidney biopsy indications and outcomes: seven years experience of a single centre in Sri Lanka. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(Supplement_3):gfaa142.P0141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Basnayake B, Wazil A, Nanayakkara N, Shafras M, Priyadarshana P, Mahanama R. Analysis of a Histopathological Pattern of Renal Biopsy Specimens in Sri Lanka: A Single-Centre Study. 2019.

  29. Islam SMJ, Haque WS, Akhter S, Alam SM. Histomorphological pattern of renal biopsy in Dhaka: A single center study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2018;29(5):1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Okpechi IG, Ameh OI, Bello AK, Ronco P, Swanepoel CR, Kengne AP. Epidemiology of Histologically Proven Glomerulonephritis in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS One. 2016;11(3):e0152203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Perkowska-Ptasinska A, Deborska-Materkowska D, Bartczak A, Stompor T, Liberek T, Bullo-Piontecka B, et al. Kidney disease in the elderly: biopsy based data from 14 renal centers in Poland. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17(1):194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang YT, Zhou CY, Zhu TC, Yang J, Zhang Y, Xu QY, et al. Analysis of Kidney Biopsy Data From a Single Center in the Midland Rural Area of China, 1996–2010. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2013;74:22–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Covic A, Schiller A, Volovat C, Gluhovschi G, Gusbeth-Tatomir P, Petrica L, et al. Epidemiology of renal disease in Romania: a 10 year review of two regional renal biopsy databases. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2006;21(2):419–24.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Volovăt C, Cãruntu I, Costin C, Stefan A, Popa R, Volovăt S, et al. Changes in the histological spectrum of glomerular diseases in the past 16 years in the North-Eastern region of Romania. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14(1):148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mittal P, Agarwal SK, Singh G, Bhowmik D, Mahajan S, Dinda A, et al. Spectrum of biopsy-proven renal disease in northern India: A single-centre study. Nephrol Carlton Vic. 2020;25(1):55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Monfared A, Khosravi M, Lebadi M, Mosavian Roshan Zamir SA, Hoda S, Habibzadeh SM, et al. Distribution of renal histopathology in Guilan: a single-center report. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2012;6(3):173–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohammadhoseiniakbari H, Rezaei N, Rezaei A, Roshan SK, Honarbakhsh Y. Pattern of glomerulonephritis in Iran: a preliminary study and brief review. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2009;15(9):PH109-114.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Barsoum RS, Francis MR. Spectrum of Glomerulonephritis in Egypt. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2000;11(3):421.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bae HJ, Moon KR, Kim YJ, Choi DE, Na KR, Lee KW, et al. Clinical and Histopathological Analysis of the Kidney Biopsies of 2,450 Patients seen over 30 Years at Chungnam National University Hospital. Korean J Med. 2013;84(3):379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Horvatic I, Tisljar M, Bulimbasic S, Bozic B, Galesic Ljubanovic D, Galesic K. Epidemiologic data of adult native biopsy-proven renal diseases in Croatia. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45(6):1577–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Maixnerova D, Jancova E, Skibova J, Rysava R, Rychlik I, Viklicky O, et al. Nationwide biopsy survey of renal diseases in the Czech Republic during the years 1994–2011. J Nephrol. 2015;28(1):39–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hanko JB, Mullan RN, O’Rourke DM, McNamee PT, Maxwell AP, Courtney AE. The changing pattern of adult primary glomerular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(10):3050–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brazdziute E, Miglinas M, Gruodyte E, Priluckiene J, Tamosaitis A, Bumblyte IA, et al. Nationwide renal biopsy data in Lithuania 1994–2012. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(4):655–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Carvalho E, do Sameiro Faria M, Nunes JPL, Sampaio S, Valbuena C. Renal diseases: a 27-year renal biopsy study. J Nephrol. 2006;19(4):500–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McQuarrie EP, Mackinnon B, Young B, Yeoman L, Stewart G, Fleming S, et al. Centre variation in incidence, indication and diagnosis of adult native renal biopsy in Scotland. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2009;24(5):1524–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Basnayake D, Mahanama B, Thangarajah B, Wazil M, Nanayakkara N, Ratnatunga N. MON-016 A Retrospective Study On Clinicopathological Diagnosis Of Nephrotic Syndrome – A Single Centre Experience In Sri Lanka. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;4(7):S309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Das U, Dakshinamurty KV, Prayaga A. Pattern of biopsy-proven renal disease in a single center of south India: 19 years experience. Indian J Nephrol. 2011;21(4):250–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Parichatikanond P, Chawanasuntorapoj R, Shayakul C, Choensuchon B, Vasuvattakul S, Vareesangthip K, et al. An analysis of 3,555 cases of renal biopsy in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2006;89(Suppl 2):S106-111.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Al Riyami D. The Spectrum of Glomerular Diseases on Renal Biopsy: Data From A Single Tertiary Center In Oman. Oman Med J. 2013;28(3):213–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huraib S, Al Khader A, Shaheen FA, Abu Aisha H, Souqiyyeh MZ, Al Mohana F, et al. The spectrum of glomerulonephritis in saudi arabia: the results of the saudi registry. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant Off Publ Saudi Cent Organ Transplant Saudi Arab. 2000;11(3):434–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Okpechi I, Swanepoel C, Duffield M, Mahala B, Wearne N, Alagbe S, et al. Patterns of renal disease in Cape Town South Africa: a 10-year review of a single-centre renal biopsy database. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2011;26(6):1853–61.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ossareh S, Asgari M, Abdi E, Nejad-Gashti H, Ataipour Y, Aris S, et al. Renal biopsy findings in Iran: case series report from a referral kidney center. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42(4):1031–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Naini AE, Harandi AA, Ossareh S, Ghods A, Bastani B. Prevalence and clinical findings of biopsy-proven glomerulonephritidis in Iran. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2007;18(4):556–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Mardanpour K, Rahbar M. Histopathologic patterns of adult renal disease in Kermanshah, Iran: A 6-year review of two referral centers. Casp J Intern Med. 2013;4(3):717–21.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rahbar M. Kidney biopsy in west of Iran: Complications and histopathological findings. Indian J Nephrol. 2009;19(2):68–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Jafari M, Monsef A, Soleimani B. Age and gender distribution of primary and secondary glomerulonephritis obtained by renal biopsy: a study from Hamadan, a great province in Western Iran. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant Off Publ Saudi Cent Organ Transplant Saudi Arab. 2015;26(2):375–7.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Karnib HH, Gharavi AG, Aftimos G, Mahfoud Z, Saad R, Gemayel E, et al. A 5-year survey of biopsy proven kidney diseases in Lebanon: significant variation in prevalence of primary glomerular diseases by age, population structure and consanguinity. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2010;25(12):3962–9.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Heaf J, Løkkegaard H, Larsen S. The epidemiology and prognosis of glomerulonephritis in Denmark 1985–1997. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 1999;14(8):1889–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Naumovic R, Pavlovic S, Stojkovic D, Basta-Jovanovic G, Nesic V. Renal biopsy registry from a single centre in Serbia: 20 years of experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc - Eur Ren Assoc. 2009;24(3):877–85.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hur E, Taskin H, Bozkurt D, Sarsik B, Sen S, Ertilav M, et al. Adult native renal biopsy experience of Ege University for 12 consecutive years. BANTAO J. 2010;8:22–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Goh KL, Abeyaratne A, Ullah S, Rissel C, Priyadarshana K. Histopathology pattern and survival analysis of patients with kidney biopsy in the top end of Northern Australia from 2007 to 2020. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the clinical and administrative support received from the histopathology lab of Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka.

Funding

Self-funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nephrology and dialysis unit, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Kalubowila, Sri Lanka

    Chanaka Muthukuda, Maithili Laxman & Arjuna Marasinghe

  2. Ministry of Health and Indigenous Medical Services, Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Vindika Suriyakumara

  3. Histopathology unit, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Kalubowila, Sri Lanka

    Cherine Sosai

  4. Diabetes Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Thilina Samarathunga

Authors
  1. Chanaka Muthukuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vindika Suriyakumara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cherine Sosai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thilina Samarathunga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maithili Laxman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Arjuna Marasinghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.M. and V.S designed the study and A.M supervised the project. C.M. and M.L. conducted the retrospective analysis and designed the database. C.M. analyzed and interpreted the data. C.S. performed the histopathological analysis. C.M, V.S and T.S. wrote the manuscript. C.S. and T.S. edited the final manuscript. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanaka Muthukuda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Ethical Review Committee of Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka (PL/MO/2019). The informed written consent forms had been given to patients where they signed reading to all the conditions of the procedure. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muthukuda, C., Suriyakumara, V., Sosai, C. et al. Clinicopathological spectrum of biopsy-proven renal diseases of patients at a single center in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional retrospective review. BMC Nephrol 24, 181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03217-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03217-y

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us