This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Prevalence of diminished kidney function in a representative sample of middle and older age adults in the Irish population
© Browne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 June 2012
Accepted: 28 October 2012
Published: 2 November 2012
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) using available estimating equations with the Republic of Ireland is unknown.
A randomly selected population based cross-sectional study of 1,098 adults aged 45 years and older was conducted using data from the 2007 Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition (SLÁN). Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated from a single IDMS aligned serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI and the MDRD equations, and albumin to creatinine ratio was based on a single random urine sample.
The sample clinical characteristics and demography was similar to middle and older age adults in the general Irish population, though with an underrepresentation of subjects >75 years and of males. All results are based on subjects with available blood and urine samples. Applying weighting to obtain survey based population estimates, using Irish population census data, the estimated weighted prevalence of CKD-EPI eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 was 11.6%, (95% confidence interval; 9.0, 14.2%), 12.0% ( 9.0, 14.2%) of men and 11.2% (7.3, 15.2%) of women. Unweighted prevalence estimates were similar at 11.8% (9.9, 13.8%). Albuminuria increased with lower CKD-EPI eGFR category. 10.1% of all subjects had albuminuria and an eGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 giving an overall weighted estimated prevalence of National Kidney Foundation (NKF) defined CKD 21.3% (18.0, 24.6%), with the unadjusted estimate of 21.9% (19.5, 24.4%). MDRD related estimates for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and NFK defined CKD were higher than CKD-EPI and differences were greater in younger and female subjects.
CKD is highly prevalent in middle and older aged adults within the Republic of Ireland. In this population, there is poor agreement between CKD-EPI and MDRD equations especially at higher GFRs. CKD is associated with lower educational status and poor self rated health.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common condition that irrespective of aetiology results in a wide range of complications including hypertension, hyperparathyroidism, anaemia, vascular calcification and accelerated cardiovascular disease [1, 2]. The symptoms associated with CKD are vague and are often attributed to age-related frailty; as a result CKD often remains undiagnosed until the condition is advanced.
The diagnosis of CKD is ideally established by measurement of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). As in other population based surveys, the measurement of 125 I-iothalamate  which is recognised as the gold standard method to determine GFR, is costly, invasive and impractical in larger studies. In addition, timed urine collections suffer from inaccuracy especially in community dwelling ambulatory subjects and isolated serum creatinine levels are difficult to interpret, due to the influence of body habitus and age related reduction in muscle mass. This has resulted in GFR estimating equations entering widespread clinical use. To date, the best validated and widely used estimation equation has been the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation [4–6]. Across laboratories in Ireland and in the UK, the MDRD equation is used routinely to estimate GFR. An alternative equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation , has been recently developed by a NIH consortium based on pooled data with a better representation of subjects with normal renal function. It is expected that this equation should improve the accuracy and validity of eGFR when used in population based screening relative to the MDRD equation. As with other causes of chronic disease, social and economic deprivation has been shown to influence the development and progression of CKD, in individual subjects and in residential communities [8–10].
To estimate the prevalence of diminished eGFR in middle and older aged adults in the Republic of Ireland and overall prevalence weighted for any underrepresented groups
To compare the effect of using the more appropriate derived CKD-EPI equation as compared to the established MDRD equation, which to date remains in widespread clinical use.
To explore the associations of CKD with self rated health, education, and socio-economic group and population based diabetes mellitus in Ireland.
A population-based cross-sectional analysis of renal function in adults aged 45 years or older was conducted using data from the 2007 Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition (SLÁN), which is the most recent of a series of nationally representative health surveys in the Republic of Ireland. Full details on survey methods have been presented elsewhere . A random sample of the Irish population was obtained using as its sampling frame ‘The Irish GeoDirectory’, listing all residential, non commercial addresses in the Republic of Ireland, compiled by the Irish Postal service. Non-institutionalized adults aged 18 years and older were recruited using multi-stage sampling with a known probability of selection for each dwelling. The primary sampling units were based on town land aggregates, with stratification by area characteristics and region, 400 such clusters were systematically selected using a random national starting point. Forty-six addresses were then systematically selected using a random starting point within each cluster. One adult was selected from each house as the subject with the nearest birthday on the study visit day. Overall, 10,364 participants (62% of those invited to participate) completed the extensive health and lifestyle questionnaire. A 25% random subgroup of the study participants who were 45 years or older were selected by inviting all such subjects within randomly selecting clusters to further undergo a comprehensive physical examination and basic laboratory testing. The surveys were confined to this age group, to allow comparison with earlier Irish based surveys (SLAN 1998, SLAN 2002), and as resources were not available to sample all age groups. The response rate to the physical examination was 66% with 179 subjects unable to participate and 613 subjects declining to participate. 47 subjects who participated in the physical examination component did not provide serum specimens, in addition 62 participating subjects were unable to provide an adequate urine specimen, resulting in a sample size for the albuminuria data of 1,098. In order to correctly interpret results based on eGFR and albuminuria only results based on 1098 subjects are presented.
For comparative purposes, an eGFR was calculated from a single, presumed stable, serum creatinine measurement using both the MDRD and the CKD-EPI regression equations as previously published [6, 7]. Both equations measure eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area (BSA). We categorised renal function based on the National Kidney Foundation - Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI) classification into G1 for GFR ≥90, G2 for 60–89, G3A for 45–59, G3B for 30–44, G4 for 15–29 and G5 for <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. This has been recommended in the recent literature to allow direct staging of eGFR, in addition to classification of CKD status [12, 13]. In accordance with the K/DOQI definition an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was diagnostic of CKD, while for an eGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, additional evidence of renal damage is necessary, for which we exclusively used the presence of an albumin to creatinine ratio of >30 mg/g [12, 13]. All specimens were collected in a non-fasting state. Serum creatinine was measured using the kinetic rate Jaffe method, and was IDMS aligned. Urine albumin was measured using bromcresol green method. Urinary creatinine concentration was measured on the same single void specimen and expressed as an albumin to creatinine ratio to adjust for differences in urinary concentration.
Household social class (SC) categories were derived from occupational status using the European socio-economic status (SES) classification system , and were divided into higher (professional and managerial) social classes (SC 1–2), non-manual and skilled manual categories (SC 3–4), and semi-skilled and unskilled occupational categories (SC 5–6) and unclassifiable on the basis of present or last occupation. Education is described as complete primary-level education only or with incomplete second-level education, complete second-level education, and some form of third-level education including Diplomas, College and post-graduate degrees. Smokers were identified as participants who reported smoking some days to every day, and former smokers reported smoking at least 100 cigarettes in the past and non smokers. Based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score [15, 16], participants’ activity levels were classified as light (<5,000 steps per day) and moderate to heavy (>5,000 steps per day). The presence of diabetes mellitus was assessed combining three methods, two questions relating to the diagnosis of diabetes, and / or the presence of diabetic medications including insulin and measurement of haemoglobin A1c >6.5% .
The distribution of CKD-EPI eGFR within the sample with available serum creatinine was calculated using the NKF-K/DOQI CKD categories as defined above. G4 and G5 were denoted as a combined stage G4-G5 due to small numbers. GFR was also dichotomized into ≥60 mL/min and <60 mL/min. To extrapolate from the SLAN sample, an estimated overall population prevalence of CKD in Ireland, weights were applied which were developed by the SLAN study consortium and the Economic and Social Research Institute, Ireland. The SLAN Physical Examination sample  was weighted to closely approximate the Irish population census 2006 figures for gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, household size and ethnicity. Missing blood samples occurred in 3.8% of the study participants and missed urine and blood samples occurred in 9%. Age, gender and SES were similar in the entire group (N=1207) to those with blood and urine samples (N=1098) which suggests the missing data occurred on a random basis. We present the overall population prevalence as the weighted estimates . The mean (95% CI) levels of agreement between the MDRD and CKD-EPI was calculated for overall study group and separately by severity of CKD, age and gender. Bland Altman plots graphically demonstrate differences and bias across the two methods in both males and females and age categories. Differences in average eGFR between methods were examined using independent sample t tests; significance level was defined as 0.05.
We examined associations between NKF-K/DOQI defined CKD with poor self-rated health, lower SES and lower educational state using a chi squared test. For the purposes of this analysis, primary school education only and incomplete second level education were merged as a single category. In addition, unclassified employment status was included with SES V. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between CKD and self rated health, SES and educational status adjusted for age and gender and presented as odds ratio (OR). All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA (Version 11.0).
Demography of the study population
Socio-demographic and physiological characteristics, Republic of Ireland, 2007 comparing study subjects with serum biochemical measurements and subjects with Albumin Creatinine ratio results (n=1,098) compared to SLAN 07 subjects of 45 years and older (N=5,147)
N=1098 N (%)
N=5147 SLAN07 (N%)
Age group (years)
Primary or less
Smoking status §
Self-rated health §
Physical Activity §
Blood Urea (mmol/l)*
Blood Creatinine (micromol/l)*
Urine Albumin/Creatinine (mg/g)*
The prevalence of diminished renal function in Irish middle and older aged adults
Prevalence (95% Confidence Interval) of GFR Stages by MDRD and CKD-EPI equations, based on subjects with available serum creatinine and urine (N=1,098) in a randomly selected representative sample of the middle and older Irish population
GFR Stage % (95% CI) Prevalence estimates N=1098
GFR Stage% (95% CI) Prevalence estimates N=1098
19.8% (17.4%, 22.1%)
34.4% (31.6%, 37.2%)
65.4% (62.6%, 68.2%)
53.8% (50.8%, 56.7%)
11.8% (9.9%, 13.7%)
9.2% (7.5%, 10.9%)
2.7% (1.8%, 3.7%)
2.3% (1.5%, 3.3%)
0.36% (0.07%, 0.7%)
0.36% (0.07%, 0.7%)
14.9% (12.8%, 17%)
11.8% (9.9, 13.8)
Population Estimate (Weighted) eGFR<60
15.7% (12.7%, 18.7%)
11.6% (9.0%, 14.2%)
POPULATION PREVALENCE ESTIMATES OF CKD
CKD Stage 1
2.7% (1.9%, 3.9%)
3.8% (2.8%, 5.1%)
CKD Stage 2
7.2% (5.7%, 8.9%)
6.3% (4.9%, 7.9%)
CKD Stage 3A
11.8% (9.9%, 13.8%)
9.2% (7.5%, 10.9%)
CKD Stage 3B
2.7% (1.8%, 3.7%)
2.3% (1.5%, 3.3%)
CKD Stage 4-5
0.36% (0.07%, 0.7%)
0.36% (0.07%, 0.7%)
24.8% (22.2%, 27.3%)
21.9% (19.5%, 24.4%)
Population Estimate CKD (Weighted)
25.1% (21.5%, 28.6%)
21.3% (18%, 24.6%)
The association of estimated GFR stages with albuminuria
Albuminuria was present in 13.2% (11.2, 15.2%) of the overall study sample. The proportion of subjects with albuminuria increased with GFR stage using the CKD-EPI equation, and more than doubled from 11.1% in G1 and 11.7% in G2 to 23.9% for G3. All subjects with G4-5 had at least microalbuminuria.
NKF diagnosis of chronic kidney disease in the Irish population
Overall 11.8% of subjects had an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 10.1% of all subjects had albuminuria and an eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2, meeting NKF diagnostic criterion of CKD, thereby giving an overall study prevalence of CKD of 21.9%, (19.5%, 24.4%), with an overall weighted estimated prevalence of National Kidney Foundation (NKF) defined CKD 21.3% (18.0%, 24.6%), Table 2. The prevalence of reduced eGFR increased sharply with age.
Comparison between eGFR methods
Mean (95% CI) difference between the CKD-EPI and MDRD equation estimates (defined as CKD-EPI – MDRD ), stratified by level of renal function using CKD–EPI equation as reference, age (<65 years compared to ≥65 years) and gender N (Males:%), in a randomly selected representative sample of middle and older aged Irish population
4.9 (4.5, 5.2) 1
6.4 (6.0, 6.8) 2
0.6 (−0.2, 1. 4) 3
3.43 (2.9, 3.9)
5.1 (4.6, 5.6)
-.0.3 (−1.4, 0.9)
6.03 (5.5, 6.6)
7.4 (6.8, 8.0)
1.7 (0.4, 2.7)
p value 4
CKD-EPI eGFR<60ml/min 1
1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 1
3.7 (3.3, 4.1) 2
0.3 (0.03,0.6) 3
0.2 (−0.2, 0.7)
3.3 (2.6, 4.0)
−0.4 (−0.8, -0.1)
1.7 (1.3, 2.1)
3.9 (3.4, 4.4)
1.2 (0.8, 1.5)
p value 4
Associations of CKD with self rated health, education, and socio-economic group and estimated prevalent diabetics in this population
Prevalence of CKD N % (CKD EPI <60 mls/min/1.73 m2 or Albuminuria>30 mg/g) by Self rated health Education Social Class and Diabetes Mellitus*, based on N=1098 (N=1095 for self rated health), OR (95% CI) adjusted for age and gender
OR (95% CI) Adjusted for age & gender
Age Categories in Years
1.3 (0.84, 2.0)
16.3 (9.4, 28.3)
Higher Level Education
Complete Secondary Level
1.2 (0.76, 1.9)
Complete Primary Education§
1.6 (1.1, 2.3)
Self Rated Health
Excellent to Good Health
Fair to Poor Health
1.6 (1.1, 2.2)
Social Class I &II
Social Class III & IV
1.3 (0.92, 1.94)
Social Class V & Unclassified
1.4 (0.94, 2.0)
This is the first population based study of the prevalence of CKD in Ireland, using a randomly selected, nationally representative sample of middle and older aged adults and applying the recently published and more robustly derived CKD-EPI estimating equation. We found that approximately 1 in 8 persons in the Republic of Ireland have at least a moderate decrement in renal function (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). As in previous studies, we find a marked age related increase in the estimated prevalence of renal dysfunction. The prevalence of eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 being 1.4% in those aged 45–50, all of whom had mild decrements in function and being over 25 fold higher (39.5%) in those aged over 70 years. As the age cut-off for entry into the SLAN physical examination study was age over 45 years, our population estimate only applies to this proportion of the population. However our age specific eGFR estimates are not dissimilar to NHANES 98–2006 estimates  reported using the CKD-EPI equation where for example 10.06% of subjects aged 60 to 69 had stage 3 CKD as had 35.33% of those aged over 70, the respective percentages for our study being 12.4% and 36.2%.
CKD-EPI equation was recently developed using pooled data to improve the accuracy of GFR estimates among individuals with normal or near normal renal function while remaining sensitive to the diagnosis of more serious renal impairment. As such it is more suitable for population-based studies. The MDRD equation reports lower levels of GFR in younger subjects, especially in females relative to the CKD EPI equation. The two methods were more concordant at lower eGFR and among older individuals. The CKD-EPI equation identified 33% of our study subjects as having normal renal function (G1), which is 50% more than that identified by the MDRD equation. Our results are broadly similar to that found in recent studies comparing MDRD and CKD-EPI estimates [22, 23].
The overall population estimates are presented as weighted estimates to enable a population based eGFR, as weighting facilitates an unbiased estimate of survey based population statistics.
Estimation of GFR using regression equations is now routinely performed as part of a general biochemical screen, in many parts of the world. Using these equations for screening purposes without specific renal related indications may have important implications to an individual. The identification of mild but previously undiagnosed renal dysfunction in community based subjects is important, as these subjects may benefit from specific interventions, both in relation to renal disease and in cardiovascular risk attenuation. However, the misclassification of an individual without any evidence of renal damage as having Stage 2 rather than Stage 1 GFR, although not diagnostic by itself of CKD, may still have important implications in terms of self-perceived health status and with regard to medical insurability. Moreover, a recent large meta-analysis of population based cohort studies detected increased cardiovascular and all cause mortality in subjects with lower eGFR compared to Stage 1, even in the absence of albuminuria . In current clinical practise in parts of Ireland, actual MDRD results for values up to 90 mL/min are reported, a policy also advocated by the 2007 revision of the Australasian Creatinine Consensus Working Group recommendations . In view of the implications and the potential for misclassification using the MDRD equation at a eGFR of greater than 60 mL/min our results suggests that either the more precise CKD-EPI equation should be used for routine population screening or if the MDRD equation is to be used, the results should be right censored at a cut-off of 60 mL/min, below which the two methods show reasonable agreement.
In addition to GFR, albuminuria is also an independent predictor of end stage kidney disease , as well as all cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. The detection and monitoring of albuminuria is thus also a potentially important screening test with broad implications. We detected albuminuria in 13.2% (95% CI 11.2, 15.2%), of the overall study sample, with 10.1% of those with eGFR≥60 mL/min having albuminuria thereby substantially increasing the proportion of subjects with eGFR≥60 mL/min who are defined as having CKD. The NHANES 99–2006 estimated albuminuria to be present in 7.3% of the non-institutionalized US population over 18 years of age with CKD-EPI eGFR ≥60 ml/min, while a recent study from Turkey , found 9.5% of such patients to be albuminuria. Some of these differences may related to secular trends of increased obesity in the Irish population, with the proportion of obese subjects (measured BMI >30 kg/m2) in Ireland increasing from 18% in 1999  to 23% in the most recent survey .
CKD was associated in this study with poor self rated health and lower educational status and this reflects similar findings in other populations [8–10]. Education may be a more sensitive indicator of SES in this population. Age is a strong confounder being associated with CKD and poorer educational status which reflects the demographics of this middle and older aged Irish population. Although smoking and physical exercise were associated with CKD, neither reached significance in a univariate or multivariate model and may be a consequence of the cross-sectional design of the study.
Our study is limited, as in many of the available population based prevalence studies, we only have an available serum creatinine measurement from a single time point, although the confirmation of CKD requires that abnormalities are present over at least a 3 month interval. However, as nearly all the sample were community dwelling subjects in their baseline state of health and given our reasonable sample size it is likely that the mean estimates are reasonable representative of the population values. Our prevalence estimates are generally higher than other overall population estimates which relates to the increasing burden of chronic kidney disease with age, however they are similar to estimates in this age bracket. The response rate of 66% is also similar to other National Health and Lifestyle surveys  and is good for an unsolicited, relatively detailed survey in an era of longer working days, controlled access to housing and ever-increasing concerns over personal safety and the confidentiality of health related data. In comparison to the 2006 Republic of Ireland National Census, participants in our study were slightly over representative of women and higher socio economic group, as this may represent a greater willingness to undertake a physical examination and specimen collection. Urinary Albumin to Creatinine levels are higher than in NHANES study as they are based on one sample only in this study which may result in over estimation, however the higher estimates may also reflect the middle and older aged demography of the sample. Finally we have no actual gold-standard measurement of GFR, thus while we can compare results from the two estimating equations, we cannot examine the precision or bias of either estimate when compared with a gold standard. However both these equations are established in clinical practice, making population estimates important. In this Irish population the level of bias between the estimating equations especially at eGFR higher than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 is similar to Stevens et al. in which the estimating equations were also compared to exogenous filtration markers .
In conclusion, in a representative sample of middle and older aged Irish adults, using the CKD-EPI equation, we found that 11.8% (95% CI 9.9-13.8%) of subjects had an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with a similar weighted estimate of 11.6% (9.0%, 14.2%), to obtain unbiased population based statistics. 21.9% (19.5-24.4%) had either an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or eGFR≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in conjunction with albuminuria, with a weighted estimate of 21.3% (18%, 24.6%). The MDRD estimation equation which is in widespread use within Ireland, classified more subjects as eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (14.9%, 12.8-17%), systematically underestimating eGFR at values below approximately 100 mL/min/1.73 m2 and overestimating it at higher values when compared to the CKD-EPI formula. The differences with the MDRD were most marked at eGFR greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for which specific values should not be reported.
We acknowledge the SLÁN 2007 Consortium members: Prof. Hannah McGee [Project Director – Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI)], Prof. Margaret Barry [PI – National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG)], Dr. Dorothy Watson [PI – Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)], Dr. Karen Morgan (Research Manager - RCSI), Dr. Emer Shelley (RCSI), Prof. Ronán Conroy (RCSI), Prof. Ruairí Brugha (RCSI), Mr. Mark Ward (RCSI), Ms. Nuala Tully (RCSI), Dr. Michal Molcho (NUIG), Mr. Eric Van Lente (NUIG) and Prof. Richard Layte (ESRI). We also acknowledge Dr N Loew (Biomnis) for assistance in biochemical analysis of the specimens. This work was supported by the HRB Centre for Health & Diet Research, Grant Ref.HRC/2007/13.
SLÁN 2007 was originally funded by the Department of Health and Children. Research relating to this study was funded by the Health Research Board, Ireland.
- Astor BC, et al: Association of kidney function with anemia: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994). Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162 (12): 1401-10.1001/archinte.162.12.1401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitts TO, Piraino BH, Mitro R, Chen TAIC, Segre GV, Greenberg A, et al: Hyperparathyroidism and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D deficiency in mild, moderate, and severe renal failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988, 67 (5): 876-10.1210/jcem-67-5-876.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perrone RD, Steinman TI, Beck GJ, Skibinski CI, Royal HD, Lawlor M, et al: Utility of radioisotopic filtration markers in chronic renal insufficiency: simultaneous comparison of sup 125 I-iothalamate, sup 169 Yb-DTPA, sup 99m Tc-DTPA, and inulin. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990, 16 (3): 224-235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levey AS, Greene T, Schluchter MD, Cleary PA, Teschan PE, Lorenz RA, et al: Glomerular filtration rate measurements in clinical trials. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group and the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993, 4 (5): 1159-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999, 130 (6): 461-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hallan S, Åsberg A, Lindberg M, Johnsen H: Validation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula for estimating GFR with special emphasis on calibration of the serum creatinine assay. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004, 44 (1): 84-93. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al: A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 150 (9): 604-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hossain MP, Goyder EC, Rigby JE, EI Nahas M: CKD and poverty: a growing global challenge. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009, 53 (1): 166-174. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.10.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plantinga LC, Johansen KL, Schillinger D, Powe NR: Lower socioeconomic status and disability among US adults with chronic kidney disease 1999–2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012, 9: E12-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shoham DA, Vupputuri S, Kaufman JS, Kshirsaqar AV, Diez Roux AV, Coresh J: Kidney disease and the cumulative burden of life course socioeconomic conditions: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Soc Sci Med. 2008, 67 (8): 1311-1320. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morgan K, McGee H, Watson D, Perry I, Barry M, Shelley E, Harrington J, Molcho M, Layte R, Tully N, van Lente E, Ward M, Lutomski J, Conroy R, Brugha R: SLÁN 2007: Surveyof Lifestyle, Attitudes & Nutrition in Ireland. Main Report. 2008, Dublin: Department of Health and ChildrenGoogle Scholar
- Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al: National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003, 139 (2): 137-147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, El Nahas M, Astor BC, Matsushita K, et al: The definition, classification and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference report. Kidney Int. 2011, 80 (1): 17-28. 10.1038/ki.2010.483.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrison E, Rose D: The European Socio-economic Classification User Guide. 2006, Colchester: ISER, University of Essex, Available online: http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/esec/user-guide Google Scholar
- Booth ML: Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2000, 71 (2): S114-S120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006, 9 (6): 755-762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Diabetic Association: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: S11-S61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heeringa SG, West BT, Berglund PA: Applied Survey Data Analysis. 2010, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall / CRC PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Central Statistics Office: The Republic of Ireland Census. 2006, Central Statistics Office, TCSO, http://www.cso.ie,Google Scholar
- Martin Bland J, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986, 327 (8476): 307-310. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, et al: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007, 298 (17): 2038-2047. 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Süleymanlar G, Uta C, Arinsoy T, Ate K, Altun B, Altiparmak MR, et al: A population-based survey of Chronic REnal Disease In Turkey—the CREDIT study. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2011, 26 (6): 1862-10.1093/ndt/gfq656.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carter J, Stevens P, Irving J, Lamb E: Estimating glomerular filtration rate: comparison of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations in a large UK cohort with particular emphasis on the effect of age. Q JM. 2011, 104 (10)): 839-847 d.Google Scholar
- Astor BC, Matsushita K, Gansevoort RT, van der Velde M, Woodward M, Levey AS, et al: Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with mortality and end-stage renal disease. A collaborative meta-analysis of kidney disease population cohorts. Kidney Int. 2011, 79 (12): 1331-1340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mathew TH, Johnson DW, Jones GRD, et al: Chronic Kidney Disease and Automatic Reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: revised recommendations. MJA. 2007, 187 (8): 459-463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hallan SI, Ritz E, Lydersen S, Romundstad S, Kvenild K, Orth SR: Combining GFR and albuminuria to classify CKD improves prediction of ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 20 (5): 1069-10.1681/ASN.2008070730.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- IUNA North/South Ireland Food Consumption Survey: Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance Summary Report,2001. Abbey court, Lower Abbey Street Dublin 1: Food Safety Promotion Board, Available online http://www.iuna.net
- Kelleher C, Nic Gabhainn S, Friel S, Corrigan H, Nolan G, Sixsmith J, Walsh O, Cooke M: The National Health and Lifestyles Surveys. Survey of Lifestyle,Attitudes and Nutrition (SLÁN) and the Irish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Survey 2002, Department of Health and Children. 2003, Dublin: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Froissart M, Hamm LL, Lewis JB, Mauer M, Navis GJ, Steffes MW, Eggers PW, Coresh J, Levey AS: Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010, 56 (3): 486-495. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.026.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/13/144/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.