Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 for the prediction of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery

BMC NephrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:177

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0592-8

Received: 27 February 2017

Accepted: 17 May 2017

Published: 30 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery is common and associated with poor patient outcomes. Early risk assessment for development of AKI remains a challenge. The combination of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) has been shown to be an excellent predictor of AKI following cardiac surgery, but reported studies are for predominately non-Asian populations.

Methods

Adult patients were prospectively enrolled at Zhongshan hospital in Shanghai, China. The primary analysis was prediction of AKI and stage 2–3 AKI by [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] measured 4 h after postoperative ICU admission assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Kinetics of [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] following ICU admission were also examined.

Results

We prospectively enrolled 57 cardiac surgery patients, of which 20 (35%) developed AKI and 6 (11%) developed stage 2–3 AKI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] at 4 h after ICU admission was 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.91) for development of AKI and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.69–0.96) for development of stage 2–3 AKI. Urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] values at 4 h after ICU admission were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in patients who developed AKI than in patients who did not develop AKI (mean (standard error) of 1.08 (0.34) (ng/mL)2/1000 and 0.29 (0.05) (ng/mL)2/1000, respectively). The time-profile of [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] suggests the markers started to elevate by the time of ICU admission in patients who developed AKI and either decreased or remained flat in patients without AKI.

Conclusion

The combination of urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 4 h after postoperative ICU admission identifies patients at risk for developing AKI, not just stage 2–3 AKI following cardiac surgery.

Keywords

Acute kidney injury TIMP-2 IGFBP7 Cardiac surgery Biomarker

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a global health concern associated with increased morbidity and mortality [13]. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery, especially with cardiopulmonary bypass, are at high risk for AKI. A recent meta-analysis estimated the global incidence of AKI following cardiac surgery to be approximately 22% [4]. Development of AKI following cardiac surgery increases hospital and ICU length of stage, short and long term mortality, and risk of long-term renal dysfunction [46].

Despite the adverse consequences associated with AKI, missed or delayed diagnosis of AKI is common [7, 8]. Early diagnosis of AKI requires close monitoring of changes in serum creatinine and urine output, which may not be practical for all patients. Additionally, changes in these markers of renal function often lag injury [9]. Risk assessment for AKI is recommended by clinical practice guidelines to facilitate early detection of AKI and potentially prevent AKI in some cases [10]. Yet, few tools for early risk assessment are available beyond clinical evaluation.

Recently, a biomarker-based test for AKI risk assessment has become available for clinical use in Europe and the United States [11]. The test measures two urinary proteins involved in cell-cycle arrest: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7). These urinary cell cycle arrest markers are believed to be indicators of renal tubule cell stress involved in the earliest phases of acute kidney injury [12]. The combination of these biomarkers ([TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]) has been shown to be predictive of AKI in large diverse cohorts of critically ill patients in the Sapphire, Opal and Topaz studies [1214].

Studies in Germany have investigated the performance of urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] in cardiac surgery patients [1518]. Post-operative urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] was predictive of AKI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve as high as 0.9. Moreover, urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] outperformed serum creatinine and urinary NGAL. In a subgroup analysis of the Sapphire and Topaz studies (conducted in Europe and the United States), urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] predicted AKI with an AUC of 0.84 in patients who had cardiac surgery [19]. However, to our knowledge, urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] has not been investigated in hospitals in Asia. In our study, we investigated the use of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] for prediction of AKI in a cohort of adults undergoing cardiac surgery in China.

Methods

Study design and participants

We conducted a prospective observational study after obtaining approval from the institutional review board of the ethics committee of Zhongshan Hospital. Adult patients were screened for enrollment prior to cardiac surgery at Zhongshan Hospital in Shanghai, China, between May 01, 2016 to May 31, 2016. All enrolled patients provided written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, chronic dialysis, and prior renal transplantation. Urine samples for measurement of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] were collected prior to surgery, in 2-h intervals from 0 h to 12 h after ICU admission, and 24 h after ICU admission to characterize the time-profile of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]. Clinical data for the study were abstracted from hospital records and included patient demographics, medical history, surgical procedure, and serum creatinine and urine output data for AKI assessment.

Endpoints

The primary endpoints were AKI and moderate-to-severe AKI within 7 days following surgery. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria [10]. Moderate-to-severe AKI was defined as KDIGO stage 2 or 3 AKI. As in prior studies of cardiac surgery patients [15, 17, 18], both urine output and serum creatinine were used to determine AKI stages. Serum creatinine results from blood samples collected at hospital admission were used as the baseline values for AKI staging.

Urine sample analysis

Urine samples were analyzed for TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 within 1 h of collection using the NephroCheck Test and Astute140 Meter (Astute Medical, San Diego, CA). The Astute140 Meter reports the product of the two protein concentrations ([TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]) in units of (ng/mL)2/1000.

Statistical analysis

To assess the predictive ability of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] for the primary endpoints, empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the AUC and operating characteristics were determined using bootstrap sampling and the Clopper-Pearson method, respectively. To investigate the [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] time course, mean and standard error of the [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] values at each urine sample collection time were determined for endpoint positive and endpoint negative patients. Categorical variables were compared between groups using Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Two-sided P -values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

A clinical risk model for prediction of AKI was constructed starting from all clinical variables significantly (P < 0.05) associated with AKI (Table 1). Goodness of fit was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Category free net reclassification improvement (cfNRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and AUC difference were used to assess the improvement in predictive ability with the addition of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] to the model.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics for All patients and by AKI Status

 

All

AKI

No AKI

p value

Subjects

57

20

37

 

Male

41 (71.9%)

19 (95.0%)

22 (59.5%)

0.005

Age (Years)

60 (49–65)

64 (58–69)

53 (46–63)

0.01

Comorbidities

 Hypertension

22 (38.6%)

13 (65.0%)

9 (24.3%)

0.004

 Diabetes mellitus

8 (14.0%)

3 (15.0%)

5 (13.5%)

>0.99

 Cerebral infarction

3 (5.3%)

2 (10.0%)

1 (2.7%)

0.28

 Hyperlipidemia

3 (5.3%)

3 (15.0%)

0(0%)

0.04

 Chronic renal insufficiency

2 (3.5%)

2 (10.0%)

0(0%)

0.12

 COPD/Emphysema

2 (3.5%)

1 (5.0%)

1 (2.7%)

>0.99

NYHA Class

   

0.26

 I

5 (8.8%)

1 (5.0%)

4 (10.8%)

 

 II

24 (42.1%)

6 (30.0%)

18 (48.6%)

 

 III

27 (47.4%)

13 (65.0%)

14 (37.8%)

 

 IV

1 (1.8%)

0(0%)

1 (2.7%)

 

EuroSCORE

3 (2–4)

4 (2–5)

3 (2–3)

0.09

Pre-operative serum creatinine (μmol/L)

78 (68–87)

85 (77–88)

75 (64–84)

0.02

Prior exposure to nephrotoxic drugs

5 (8.8%)

3 (15.0%)

2 (5.4%)

0.33

Prior exposure to radiocontrast agents

35 (61.4%)

15 (75.0%)

20 (54.1%)

0.16

Time from radiocontrast to surgery (d)

2 (1–5)

2 (1–3)

4 (2–6)

0.03

Procedures

 Mitral valve replacement

17 (29.8%)

5 (25.0%)

12 (32.4%)

0.76

 Aortic valve replacement

17 (29.8%)

12 (60.0%)

5 (13.5%)

<0.001

 Coronary artery bypass graft

12 (21.1%)

3 (15.0%)

9 (24.3%)

0.51

 Valvuloplasty

17 (29.8%)

8 (40.0%)

9 (24.3%)

0.24

Cardiopulmonary bypass

42 (73.7%)

18 (90.0%)

24 (64.9%)

0.06

CPB time (minutes)

72 (63–108)

87 (66–139)

71 (58–93)

0.15

Aortic cross clamp time (minutes)

47 (35–66)

53 (30–92)

47 (35–63)

0.50

ICU Length of Stay (h)

23 (20–66)

34 (21–92)

22 (20–45)

0.14

Hospital Length of Stay (d)

12 (10–14)

12 (9–14)

12 (10–14)

0.51

AKI acute kidney injury, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NYHA the New York Heart Association, CPB cardiopulmonary bypass

Qualitative variables are shown as N (%), quantitative variables as median with first and third quartiles (interquartile range)

Results

Patient characteristics

We enrolled 57 cardiac surgery patients. Twenty (35.1%) patients developed AKI within 7 days of surgery, and 6 (10.5%) patients developed stage 2–3 AKI. Two patients with stage 3 AKI received renal replacement therapy. Compared with patients who did not develop AKI, AKI patients were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia (Table 1). AKI patients had higher preoperative serum creatinine levels, more recent exposure to radiocontrast agents, and were more likely to have undergone aortic valve replacement than non-AKI patients. Though not statistically significant (P = 0.06), cardiopulmonary bypass was more common among AKI patients than non-AKI patients.

Biomarker performance

The AUC (95% CI) of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] four hours after ICU admission was 0.80 (0.68–0.91) for prediction of any AKI stage and 0.83 (0.69–0.96) for prediction of stage 2–3 AKI (Fig. 1). Table 2 showed operating characteristics for different [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] cutoffs, including the previously validated high sensitivity [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] cutoff of 0.3 and the high specificity cutoff of 2.0. The sensitivity was 75% for any AKI and 100% for stage 2–3 AKI at the 0.3 cutoff, and the specificity was 100% for any AKI and 96% for stage 2–3 AKI at the 2.0 cutoff. The NPV was 84% for any AKI and 100% for stage 2–3 AKI at the 0.3 cutoff, and the PPV was 100% for any AKI and 50% for stage 2–3 AKI at the 2.0 cutoff.
Fig. 1

ROC curves for prediction of AKI using [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] results from urine samples collected 4 h after ICU admission. a prediction for all AKI, AUC = 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.91, b prediction for stage 2–3 AKI, AUC = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96). AKI acute kidney injury, AUC the area under the ROC curve

Table 2

[TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] operating characteristics at 4 h after ICU admission for prediction of AKI

A. Endpoint is any AKI

[TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] Cutoff

Sensitivity

Specificity

NPV

PPV

 0.3

0.75 (0.51–0.91)

0.70 (0.53–0.84)

0.84 (0.66–0.95)

0.58 (0.37–0.77)

 0.5

0.50 (0.27–0.73)

0.84 (0.68–0.94)

0.76 (0.60–0.88)

0.63 (0.35–0.85)

 1.0

0.20 (0.06–0.44)

0.95 (0.82–0.99)

0.69 (0.54–0.81)

0.67 (0.22–0.96)

 2.0

0.20 (0.06–0.44)

1.00 (0.91–1.00)

0.70 (0.56–0.82)

1.00 (0.40–1.00)

B. Endpoint is stage 2–3 AKI

 0.3

1.00 (0.54–1.00)

0.61 (0.46–0.74)

1.00 (0.89–1.00)

0.23 (0.09–0.44)

 0.5

0.67 (0.22–0.96)

0.76 (0.63–0.87)

0.95 (0.83–0.99)

0.25 (0.07–0.52)

 1.0

0.33 (0.04–0.78)

0.92 (0.81–0.98)

0.92 (0.81–0.98)

0.33 (0.04–0.78)

 2.0

0.33 (0.04–0.78)

0.96 (0.87–1.00)

0.92 (0.82–0.98)

0.50 (0.07–0.93)

TIMP-2 urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2, IGFBP7 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7, ICU intensive care units, AKI acute kidney injury, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive, predictive value

Biomarker time course

Mean (SE) [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] pre-surgery values were nearly the same in patients who did and did not develop AKI (0.70 (0.11) compared with 0.65(0.20), respectively). Following surgery, mean (SE) [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] values from patients who developed AKI increased to a peak of 1.49 (0.87) at 6 h after ICU admission; while mean (SE) [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] values from non-AKI patients decreased to a nadir of 0.19 (0.02) at 24 h after ICU admission (Fig. 2). At 4 h after ICU admission, mean (SE) [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] values were 1.08 (0.34) and 0.29 (0.05), respectively, for AKI and non-AKI patients. The difference in post-surgical [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] values between AKI and non-AKI patients was statistically significant at 4 h and 12 h after ICU admission.
Fig. 2

Mean [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] values in patients who developed AKI and those who did not. Times post-surgery are relative to ICU admission. Error bars show standard error. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001

Clinical model

A clinical risk model for the prediction of AKI was constructed using backward selection. The selected variables were sex, hypertension and preoperative serum creatinine (Table 3). The AUC (95% CI) of the model increased from 0.83 (0.73–0.91) to 0.94 (0.83–0.98) with the addition of urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] to the model (P = 0.03). The adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for log10-transformed [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] was 115 (4–2156), P = 0.01. Reclassification analysis also showed an improvement in model performance with addition of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] (cfNRI = 1.22 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.58), P < 0.001, and IDI = 0.19 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.31), P = 0.001).
Table 3

Adjusted odds ratios and AUC for prediction of AKI

 

Clinical Model Alone

Clinical Model with [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]

Adjusted Odds Ratio

Value (95% CI)

P

Value (95% CI)

P

Sex (Male/Female)

11.5 (1.6–107.4)

0.04

9.5 (2.6–83.6)

0.03

Hypertension

5.7 (1.7–18.0)

0.03

6.4 (3.2–35.7)

0.04

Preoperative creatinine >78 μmol/L

3.8(1.2–12.3)

0.01

4.0 (0.9–21.5)

0.04

[TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]a

--

--

115 (4–2156)

0.01

Model AUCb

0.83(0.73–0.91)

<0.001

0.94 (0.83–0.98)

<0.001

AUC areas under the curves, AKI acute kidney injury, TIMP-2 urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2, IGFBP7 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7

aValues were log10 transformed

bAUC for clinical model with [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] was significantly greater than the AUC for the clinical model alone, p = 0.03

Discussion

Our study is the first known investigation of the performance of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] in a Chinese population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The cell cycle arrest biomarkers TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 are released in the earliest stages of injury by renal tubule cells that have become stressed from kidney exposures that can lead to AKI [12, 20]. Elevated urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] levels thus indicate renal tubule cell stress that precedes AKI, and this is believed to be the reason that [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] levels correspond to risk for AKI [12, 14, 20, 21]. Major surgery including cardiac surgery, complications such as hypotension or infection following surgery, and nephrotoxic drugs commonly prescribed in surgical patients are potential kidney exposures that can stress renal tubule cells and thus cause AKI [10], making cardiac surgery patients an appropriate at-risk population for risk stratification with the [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] test.

We chose to evaluate the [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] test 4 h after ICU admission for several reasons. First, this time is similar to that evaluated in prior studies of non-Asian cardiac surgery patients [15, 18]. Second, patients should be starting to stabilize at this time, and it is therefore a good time to evaluate which patients may be experiencing increased renal tubule cell stress, putting them at risk for developing a serious post-operative AKI complication. Such patients are good candidates to receive preventive measures that have been outlined in the KDIGO guideline [10] and elsewhere [20] for high-risk patients.

In our study, [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] measured in urine collected 4 h after ICU admission was predictive of both any stage of AKI and stage 2–3 AKI. The sensitivity at the previously validated 0.3 cutoff was 75% for any AKI and 100% for stage 2–3 AKI, and the specificity at the previously validated 2.0 cutoff was 100% for any AKI and 96% for stage 2–3 AKI.

Multiple studies in Germany have investigated urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] for prediction of AKI following cardiac surgery in adults [15, 17, 18]. These studies either specifically enrolled patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or enrolled cardiac surgery patients deemed to be high risk for AKI as defined by a Cleveland Clinic Foundation Score [22] ≥ 6. Unlike in these studies, we did not restrict our enrolled cohort by type of cardiac surgery or pre-surgery risk. Yet, our results are strikingly similar to those of these other studies. In the CABG study, for which the endpoint was stage 2–3 AKI, the AUC (95% CI) of urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] at 4 h after surgery was 0.86 (0.72–1.00) as compared to 0.83 (0.69–0.96) at 4 h after ICU admission for the same endpoint in our study.

Addition of urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] to a clinical risk model significantly improved model performance, demonstrating that [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] provides critical information about AKI risk that is not obtainable from clinical risk factors alone. Our study also found that preoperative serum creatinine was significantly higher in AKI group and it is a risk factor for the prediction of AKI after cardiac surgery similar to previous studies in which subjects with higher serum creatinine developed acute or chronic kidney dysfunction after surgery [22, 23]. Of course the combination of creatinine and biomarkers is the future of AKI prediction. It is important to note that clinical risk prediction models derived from small data sets such as ours are “over-trained” and their performance thus overestimated. Therefore, although the AUCs for our clinical models (0.83 for clinical variables alone and 0.94 for clinical variables plus [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]) are high, clinicians should not rely on our clinical model for risk assessment. Nevertheless, the results are important because they show that [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] provides valuable information about AKI risk even when clinical risk factors are considered.

In our study, average urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] levels appeared to be on the rise at the time of ICU admission and reached maximum levels 2–6 h after ICU admission in patients who developed AKI. In contrast, in patients who did not develop AKI, average urinary [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] levels appeared to slowly decrease after ICU admission. Most prior studies of cardiac surgery patients [15, 17, 18] have shown significant elevations of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] 4 h after the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients who developed AKI, similar to the measurement time in our study. However, two prior studies [17, 24] have shown maximum predictive ability the morning after surgery. Although it is usually assumed that the earliest injury in cardiac surgery associated AKI occurs during the surgery, it is possible in some patients that significant post-operative kidney exposures such as episodes of hypotension, developing infections or nephrotoxic drugs cause kidney stress and AKI to start developing during the post-operative period. This may explain why the maximum predictive ability of [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] occurred early after surgery in some studies (including ours) and later in other studies. This hypothesis requires additional investigation, but suggests that repeated testing might be appropriate in cases in which significant post-operative exposures might exist. Indeed, one study [15] found that use of three measurements (4, 12 and 24 h after CPB) had greater predictive value (AUC = 0.90) than a single measurement 4 h after CBP (AUC = 0.81).

Although all patients experiencing significant kidney exposures are at increased risk of AKI, only a small fraction (about 10% in our study) will develop the severest forms of AKI (stage 2–3). The [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] test provides a quantitative indication of risk (renal tubule cell stress) for each particular patient, with higher test values indicating higher stress and thus higher risk. Two well-established cutoffs, one at 0.3 that is highly sensitive and one at 2.0 that is highly specific provide risk stratification that allows the physician to apply preventative measures such as enhanced hemodynamic monitoring and modified drug dosing commensurate with the risk level [20]. Our study for the first time verifies these cutoffs in a Chinese population. Therefore, we can expect that protocols developed in other countries for using the test to help manage patients at risk for AKI will be relevant to patients undergoing cardiac surgery in China.

Conclusions

The prediction performance of urine [TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7] in a Chinese cardiac surgery population is good for all of the AKI patients, not just stage 2–3 AKI. It is even better than that reported previously in non-Asian populations.

Abbreviations

AKI: 

Acute kidney injury

AUC: 

The area under the ROC curve

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass graft

cfNRI: 

Category free net reclassification improvement

CI: 

Confidence intervals

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CPB: 

Cardiopulmonary bypass

ICU: 

Intensive care units

IDI: 

Integrated discrimination improvement

IGFBP7: 

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein

KDIGO: 

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes

NPV: 

Negative predictive value

NYHA: 

The New York Heart Association

PPV: 

Positive predictive value

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic curve

TIMP-2: 

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (No.81430015 and No.81270779).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JJ, YZ, LL and ZZ performed the sample collection and testing, BS, WJ collected the data. YW and JX participated in the statistical analysis. YW drafted the manuscript. XD, JT, CW, and ZL participated in study design, manuscript writing and revision of the manuscript. All authors assisted in editing the manuscript and approved the final version to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the ethics committee of Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University. All of the enrolled patients provided written informed consent.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
(2)
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
(3)
Department of critical care medicine, Fudan University

References

  1. Lameire NH, Bagga A, Cruz D, et al. Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern. Lancet. 2013;382:170–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang Y, Fang Y, Teng J, et al. Acute kidney injury epidemiology: from recognition to intervention. Contrib Nephrol. 2016;187:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1411–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu J, Chen R, Liu S, et al. Global incidence and outcomes of adult patients with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:82–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Xu JR, Zhu JM, Jiang J, et al. Risk factors for long-term mortality and progressive chronic kidney disease associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e2025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rydén L, Sartipy U, Evans M, et al. Acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term risk of end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 2014;130:2005–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stewart J, Findlay G, Smith N, et al. Adding insult to injury: a review of the care of patients who died in hospital with a primary diagnosis of acute kidney injury (acute renal failure). A report by the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2009). http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2009aki.html.
  8. Yang L, Xing G, Wang L, et al. Acute kidney injury in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2015;386:1465–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Waikar SS, Bonventre JV. Creatinine kinetics and the definition of acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(3):672–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2012;Suppl 2:1–138.Google Scholar
  11. Vijayan A, Faubel S, Askenazi DJ, et al. Clinical use of the urine biomarker [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] for acute kidney injury risk assessment. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:19–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kashani K, Al-Khafaji A, Ardiles T, et al. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013;17:R25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoste EA, McCullough PA, Kashani K, et al. Derivation and validation of cutoffs for clinical use of cell cycle arrest biomarkers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:2054–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bihorac A, Chawla LS, Shaw AD, et al. Validation of cell-cycle arrest biomarkers for acute kidney injury using clinical adjudication. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:932–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al. Urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 as early biomarkers of acute kidney injury and renal recovery following cardiac surgery. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93460.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al. Validation of cell-cycle arrest biomarkers for acute kidney injury after pediatric cardiac surgery. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110865.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Pilarczyk K, Edayadiyil-Dudasova M, Wendt D, et al. Urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] for early prediction of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:2133–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunnerson KJ, Shaw AD, Chawla LS, et al. TIMP2•IGFBP7 biomarker panel accurately predicts acute kidney injury in high-risk surgical patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:243–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kellum JA, Chawla LS. Cell-cycle arrest and acute kidney injury: the light and the dark sides. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:16–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz N, Ronco C. Acute kidney stress--a useful term based on evolution in the understanding of acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2016;20:23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Thakar CV, Arrigain S, Worley S, et al. A clinical score to predict acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:162–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Esposito C, De Mauri A, Vitulo P, et al. Risk factors for chronic renal dysfunction lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2007;84:1701–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wetz AJ, Richardt EM, Wand S, et al. Quantification of urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP-7: an adequate diagnostic test to predict acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery? Crit Care. 2015;19:3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement