Skip to main content
Download PDF

Existing creatinine-based equations overestimate glomerular filtration rate in Indians

BMC Nephrology volume 19, Article number: 22 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important for diagnosis and risk stratification in chronic kidney disease and for selection of living donors. Ethnic differences have required correction factors in the originally developed creatinine-based GFR estimation equations for populations around the world. Existing equations have not been validated in the vegetarian Indian population. We examined the performance of creatinine and cystatin-based GFR estimating equations in Indians.

Methods

GFR was measured by urinary clearance of inulin. Serum creatinine was measured using IDMS-traceable Jaffe’s and enzymatic assays, and cystatin C by colloidal gold immunoassay. Dietary protein intake was calculated by measuring urinary nitrogen appearance. Bias, precision and accuracy were calculated for the eGFR equations.

Results

A total of 130 participants (63 healthy kidney donors and 67 with CKD) were studied. About 50% were vegetarians, and the remainder ate meat 3.8 times every month. The average creatinine excretion were 14.7 mg/kg/day (95% CI: 13.5 to 15.9 mg/kg/day) and 12.4 mg/kg/day (95% CI: 11.2 to 13.6 mg/kg/day) in males and females, respectively. The average daily protein intake was 46.1 g/day (95% CI: 43.2 to 48.8 g/day). The mean mGFR in the study population was 51.66 ± 31.68 ml/min/1.73m2. All creatinine-based eGFR equations overestimated GFR (p < 0.01 for each creatinine based eGFR equation). However, eGFR by CKD-EPICys was not significantly different from mGFR (p = 0.38). The CKD-EPICys exhibited lowest bias [mean bias: −3.53 ± 14.70 ml/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: -0.608 to −0.98)] and highest accuracy (P30: 74.6%). The GFR in the healthy population was 79.44 ± 20.19 (range: 41.90–134.50) ml/min/1.73m2.

Conclusion

Existing creatinine-based GFR estimating equations overestimate GFR in Indians. An appropriately powered study is needed to develop either a correction factor or a new equation for accurate assessment of kidney function in the Indian population.

Peer Review reports

Background

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important determinant for identifying and classifying chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1]. Since measuring GFR is impractical, equations that rely upon the serum concentration of filtration markers (i.e., molecules generated in the body at a fixed rate and eliminated almost exclusively by glomerular filtration) have been developed for estimating GFR (eGFR). Creatinine is the best known of these markers, and was the basis for the development of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) GFR estimating equation [2]. Recognizing that serum creatinine concentration was dependent upon muscle mass, demographic parameters that acted as surrogates for muscle mass, i.e. age, gender and ethnicity, are included in the equation. The MDRD equation was found to be biased and imprecise for values above 60 ml/min, and has been superseded by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, developed in more diverse populations [3]. The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend the use of this equation for diagnosis and follow up of CKD, as well as for screening of populations with unknown kidney function, unless equations developed in local populations are available [1].

Based on the concern that the ethnicity coefficient did not address nonwhite, non-African-American groups, investigations in Chinese and Japanese populations led to development of correction factors of 1.23 and 0.81, respectively [4, 5]. This meant that the same value of serum creatinine represented a 23% higher and 19% lower GFR compared to the white population, respectively. Correction factors or new equations have also been developed in Thai, Korean and Pakistani populations [6,7,8]. Since the largest differences are seen at higher GFR values, suggestions have been made to develop and validate ethnicity coefficients in populations where screening for CKD might occur.

Since muscle mass and dietary protein intake, in particular that of meat, are important determinants of serum creatinine concentration, it can be hypothesized that a correction factor, or a new eGFR equation may be necessary to accurately identify and classify individuals with CKD in the predominantly vegetarian Indian population, so that preventive and therapeutic strategies can be targeted appropriately. More recently, equations based on cystatin C (Cys), another filtration marker that is not dependent upon muscle mass and may be less susceptible to ethnic variations, have been developed [9]. Horio et al. showed that the CKD-EPI Cys (CKD-EPICys) eGFR equation developed in white population performed equally well in the Japanese [10].

In this pilot study, we evaluated the performance of the existing eGFR equations for assessment of GFR in Indians to determine the need for a larger study to develop an ethnicity coefficient for GFR estimation in Indians.

Methods

Study population

The study was done at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. We studied participants of either sex over the age of 18 with normal kidney function (prospective living renal donors) as well as those with stable CKD. Organ transplant recipients, those on dialysis, edematous subjects, those with heart failure, current or past malignancy, history or current symptoms of voiding dysfunction, pregnancy, allergy to inulin, history of amputation in any limb, current use of glucocorticoids and current use of methyldopa were excluded. The study protocol adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee at PGIMER, Chandigarh. All participants provided written informed consent.

Urinary clearance of inulin

GFR was measured by urinary clearance of inulin (Cin). Enrolled participants reported for measurement of Cin after an overnight fast on the morning of completion of 24-h urine collection. Baseline anthropometric, demographic and clinical data were recorded. Participants were orally hydrated with 500 ml of water. Prior to start of continuous inulin infusion, the participants were instructed to void completely, and baseline blood and urine samples were collected. Inulin (Inulead®, Fuji Yakuhin Co Ltd., Saitama, Japan) was reconstituted in normal saline to 10 mg/ml as per manufacturer instructions, and infused at 300 ml/h. The infusion rate was decreased to 100 ml/h after 30 min. Participants voided completely after 30, 60 and 90 min of starting infusion. Blood samples were collected from the contralateral upper limb at 45 and 75 min. Participants were orally hydrated with 60 ml of water at 30 and 60 min. Infusion was stopped after the final complete voiding. The entire process was carried out under direct supervision. Serum and urine specimens were immediately stored at -80 °C until analysis. Inulin concentrations in serum and urine samples were measured by an enzymatic method using a kit (Diacolor Inulin, Toyobo Co, Osaka, Japan) as described before [5, 11, 12]. Cin was calculated as average of two timed collection periods and reported as measured GFR (mGFR). Cin measurement by two timed collection periods has been previously shown to be acceptable [13].

Serum creatinine and cystatin C

Serum creatinine levels were measured by means of an isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) traceable assays both at PGI (modified Jaffe’s method using Cobas C111 auto-analyzer, Roche Diagnostics Limited) and in a central lab in Japan (enzymatic creatinine assay [5] using Hitachi creatinine auto-analyzer, model 7170, Hitachi). Serum Cys levels were measured in a central lab by colloidal gold immunoassay (Alfresa Pharma, http://www.alfresa-pharma.co.jp) which has been standardized for measurement of cystatin C traceable to ERM-DA471/IFCC [10].

eGFR measurements

eGFR were calculated using serum creatinine values from enzymatic assay in following equations: serum creatinine based CKD-EPICr, Japanese coefficient-modified CKD-EPI [CKD-EPI (JAP)], MDRD and CKD-EPI Pakistan equation [CKD-EPI (PK)] and serum Cys based CKD-EPICys (Additional file 1: Table S1) [3, 6, 9, 14, 15].

Other measurements

Dietary habits were recorded as vegetarian or non-vegetarian (participants who consumed meat in any form). Dietary protein intake was estimated by 24-h urea nitrogen appearance calculated as sum of urine urea nitrogen (in grams/day) and non-urea nitrogen (calculated as weight in kg X 0.031 g kg/day) [16, 17]. Daily protein intake was calculated as urea nitrogen appearance multiplied by 6.25.

Statistical analyses

Continuous data were presented as mean ± standard deviation with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Categorical data were presented as frequencies or proportions. Bias was expressed as mean difference between mGFR and eGFR (mGFR-eGFR), and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. 95% limits of agreement were calculated as mean bias ±1.96 x standard deviation. Precision was expressed as 95% confidence interval of the difference between mGFR and eGFR. Accuracy was expressed as root mean square error (RMSE) of difference between mGFR and eGFR, and percentage of participants with eGFR within ±30% of mGFR (P30). We performed sensitivity analyses using Jaffe creatinine values.

Continuous data were tested for normality and compared using independent sample t test if the data were normal. Mann Whitney U test was used if the data were not normally distributed. Correlation between serum creatinine levels done at PGIMER and in Japan was tested by Pearson’s correlation. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software for Macintosh, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

A total of 200 participants with stable CKD and 85 prospective renal donors were screened between January 2014 and December 2015. 150 participants were excluded (on dialysis: 63; organ transplant recipient: 15; edema: 22; heart failure: 11; voiding dysfunction: 8, use of glucocorticoids: 12; refused consent: 19). Finally, 135 participants were studied. Data collection were incomplete in 5 participants and hence, 130 participants were included for final analyses. These included 63 apparently healthy prospective living renal donors and 67 patients with CKD. The causes of CKD in these 67 individuals are shown in Table 1. The demographic, biochemical characteristics and GFR in study population are shown in Table 2. Majority were males and 50% were strict vegetarian. Among meat-eaters, the average frequency of meat intake was 3.8 times every month. The average weight and 24-h urine volume in study participants were 63.2 kg (95% CI: 61.0 to 65.3 kg) and 2321 ml (95% CI: 2135 to 2508 ml), respectively. The average daily urine creatinine and urea nitrogen excretion were 0.87 g (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.93 g) and 5.4 g (95% CI: 5.0 to 5.8 g), respectively. The creatinine excretion were 14.7 mg/kg/day (95% CI: 13.5 to 15.9 mg/kg/day) and 12.4 mg/kg/day (95% CI: 11.2 to 13.6 mg/kg/day) in males and females, respectively. The average daily protein intake based on 24-h urea nitrogen excretion was 46.1 g/day (95% CI: 43.2 to 48.8 g/day), respectively.

Table 1 Causes of CKD in study population with CKD (n = 67)
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics and measurements in study population (n = 130)
Full size table

The mean mGFR in the study population was 51.66 ± 31.68 ml/min/1.73m2. A total of 54 participants had mGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2 whereas 76 had mGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2. Amongst apparently healthy participants (prospective renal donors), the mean mGFR was 79.44 ± 20.19 ml/min/1.73m2 (range: 41.90–134.50 ml/min/1.73m2). All five eGFR equations overestimated GFR (Table 3, Fig. 1), with CKD-EPICr being the poorest. The CKD-EPICys exhibited the lowest bias. The results did not change after stratification by gender (data not shown) or mGFR categories (Additional file 1: Tables S2 and S3) or age (Additional file 1: Tables S4 and S5). eGFR by any of the creatinine based estimating equations was significantly different from mGFR. Overall, the accuracy was best for CKD-EPICys equation [Table 3, Fig. 1]. When stratified by mGFR groups, the proportion of participants with eGFR by CKD-EPICys within ±30% of mGFR were 81.5% and 69.7% for those with mGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2 and <60 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively.

Table 3 Performance of GFR estimating equations as compared to measured GFR by urinary inulin clearance
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure1

Accuracy of eGFR equations against mGFR. Comparison between mGFR and eGFR by CKD-EPICr (a), CKD-EPI (PK) (c), CKD-EPI (JAP) (e) and CKD-EPICys (g); the diagonal lines represent the values within 30% of mGFR Mean bias represented by solid line, and 95% limits of agreement (mean bias ±1.96 SD) represented by dashed lines for eGFR by CKD-EPICr (b), CKD-EPI (PK) (d), CKD-EPI (JAP) (f) and CKD-EPICys (h)

Full size image

Serum creatinine values measured by the modified Jaffe method at PGIMER, India strongly correlated with those done at the Central Laboratory in Japan (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.965, p < 0.001, Additional file 2: Figure S1). The mean difference between the two methods was −0.037 ± 0.243 mg/dL (p = 0.096) with 95% limit of agreement as 0.439 to −0.513, and no potential proportional bias (linear regression analysis: unstandardized B = −0.023, p = 0.336). Sensitivity analysis using eGFR calculated using the Jaffe creatinine showed similar performance (Additional file 1: Table S6).

Discussion

This pilot study shows that the existing creatinine based eGFR equations significantly overestimate GFR in the predominantly vegetarian Indian population. Better performance of CKD-EPIcys equation and lower creatinine excretion suggest that this overestimation is likely linked to the lower muscle mass. These findings support the need of an appropriately powered study to develop either a correction factor or a new equation for accurate assessment of kidney function in the Indian population.

In stable individuals, age, sex and race are important non-GFR determinants that affect creatinine generation and have been factored in creatinine based eGFR equations [18]. Most Indians are vegetarian because of cultural and religious beliefs. Even those who count themselves as non-vegetarians eat meat only infrequently. Also, the body habitus of individuals of Indian ethnicity is different from other Western and Asian populations. Indian individuals are comparatively short, have less muscle mass, and exhibit truncal obesity [19,20,21,22]. The measured daily creatinine excretion rates of 14.7 and 12.4 mg/kg/day in Indian males and females are lower than what has been reported for Japanese participants (20.2 and 16.7 mg/kg/day respectively) [5]. These important physiologic non-GFR determinants of serum creatinine have not been factored in the available serum creatinine based eGFR equations [18], and could account for poor performance of these equations in our study population, as shown by low P30 values.

This hypothesis was also supported by the better performance of cystatin-based equation. Notably, the eGFR by CKD-EPICys and mGFR did not differ significantly in overall study population and GFR subgroups. Cys is produced by all nucleated cells and is less affected by age and sex [23,24,25]. Its generation is not dependent on muscle mass and dietary protein intake. In a study of 170 healthy individuals, serum creatinine and 24-h urinary creatinine excretion significantly correlated with lean body mass whereas serum Cys levels did not, even after adjustment for dietary protein/meat intake and level of physical activity [26]. This observation is important, as use of equations that use both serum creatinine and cystatin has been recommended to offset errors by equations that rely on individual parameters [27]. Similar finding has been reported amongst the Japanese, where the CKD-EPICys accurately predicted mGFR, but addition of creatinine to the formula worsened the bias [10].

Another important finding was the relatively low mGFR in apparently healthy participants who were being worked up as kidney donors. This finding is consistent with earlier reports from India. In a selected population of 122 apparently healthy prospective renal donors, GFR measured by plasma clearance of technetium 99 m diethyltriaminepentaacetic acid was 83.42 ± 13.4 (range 61–130) ml/min/1.73m2 [28]. In another study of 101 healthy Indian adults, mGFR was 82.4 ± 12.7 ml/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 80.0 to 84.8 ml/min/1.73m2) [29]. In a multiethnic study of 103 healthy volunteers from Singapore, participants with Indian ethnicity had lower measured GFR compared with other Asian populations (Chinese, Malay and others) [30]. This is comparable to mean mGFR of 79.44 ± 20.19 ml/min/1.73m2 seen in apparently healthy prospective renal donors in our population. The mGFR was <60 ml/min/1.73m2 in 9 participants. According to the 2012 KDIGO classification scheme, people with GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 would be deemed to have stage 3 CKD [1]. Low protein intake on account of largely vegetarian diet could be one of the reasons for comparatively low GFR in Indian population. Previous studies, however, have shown an acute rise in GFR with protein loading, indicating preserved renal functional reserve [29, 31]. An important question that needs to be answered is whether this low GFR in otherwise healthy individuals has long term adverse health consequences. Several meta-analyses have shown the adverse impact of low GFR on mortality and ESRD risk [32]. These meta-analyses, however, have not included any cohorts from India. The KDIGO classification [1] emphasizes that individuals should be labelled as having CKD only when the abnormality has implications for health. It remains unknown, however, whether having a low GFR in apparently healthy individuals in this population is physiological or carries an adverse prognosis as described in individuals with comparable eGFR levels elsewhere. Therefore, longitudinal studies that measure GFR and carefully and accurately define prognosis in this population are needed to inform the definition and staging of CKD. The Indian government has launched a scheme for a population wide non-communicable disease survey that includes assessment for CKD (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Soon-door-to-door-screening-of-diseases/articleshow/53471865.cms). In the absence of an accurate equation, misclassification of healthy individuals as CKD could overwhelm the implementation of preventive and therapeutic strategies, and impair the credibility of the discipline [33]. This information is also important for selecting living kidney donors. Currently, only a minority of centers in India measure GFR, relying upon eGFR for donor selection. Reliance on equations that overestimate GFR could lead to inappropriate selection of donors with low true GFR, or inappropriate exclusion of healthy individuals who may not have any consequence from donation despite having a low GFR. This study is the first attempt at robust assessment of accuracy of currently recommended eGFR equations in Indian population. We have measured GFR by the gold standard method - urinary inulin clearance.

Our study has some limitations, including small sample size, limited regional representation (mainly North Indian population) and no formal measurement of muscle mass.

Our findings support the need for developing either a correction factor or a new equation for the Indian population. Such a study should be adequately powered, and should include participants from all geographies so that an equation that performs well across full spectrum of clinical characteristics in the population could be developed. Longitudinal studies are also needed for accurately estimating future risk of kidney failure, cardiovascular disease or mortality in populations who have had a baseline GFR measurement to validate the existing eGFR based diagnosis and classification system.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study shows that the existing creatinine-based GFR estimating equations significantly overestimate mGFR in the Indian population, which could be linked to the low muscle mass and vegetarian diet.

Abbreviations

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CKD-EPI:

Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration

Cys:

Cystatin C

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ESRD:

End stage renal disease

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

IDMS:

Isotope dilution mass spectrometry

KDIGO:

Kidney disease improving global outcomes

MDRD:

Modification of diet in renal disease

mGFR:

Measured glomerular filtration rate

RMSE:

Root mean square error

SPSS:

Statistical package for the social sciences

References

  1. 1.

    Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Definition and classification of CKD. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2013;3(1):19–62.

  2. 2.

    Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461–70.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, Luo Q, Yu XQ, Li Y, Xu JS, Huang SM, Wang LN, Huang W, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(10):2937–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(6):982–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jessani S, Levey AS, Bux R, Inker LA, Islam M, Chaturvedi N, Mariat C, Schmid CH, Jafar TH. Estimation of GFR in south Asians: a study from the general population in Pakistan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(1):49–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee CS, Cha RH, Lim YH, Kim H, Song KH, Gu N, Yu KS, Lim CS, Han JS, Kim S, et al. Ethnic coefficients for glomerular filtration rate estimation by the modification of diet in renal disease study equations in the Korean population. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(11):1616–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Praditpornsilpa K, Townamchai N, Chaiwatanarat T, Tiranathanagul K, Katawatin P, Susantitaphong P, Trakarnvanich T, Kanjanabuch T, Avihingsanon Y, Tungsanga K, et al. The need for robust validation for MDRD-based glomerular filtration rate estimation in various CKD populations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(9):2780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):20–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR: GFR estimation using standardized serum cystatin C in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(2):197–203.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Imai E, Horio M, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Iseki K, Hara S, Ura N, Kiyohara Y, Hirakata H, Watanabe T, et al. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the MDRD study equation modified for Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2007;11(1):41–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Orita Y, Gejyo F, Sakatsume M, Shiigai T, Maeda Y, Imai E, Fujii T, Endoh M, Jinde K, Haneda M, et al. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate by inulin clearance: comparison with creatinine clearance. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2005;47(7):804–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Horio M, Yasuda Y, Takahara S, Imai E, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Comparison of a simple and a standard method for inulin renal clearance. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2010;14(5):427–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Modification of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for Japanese: accuracy and use for population estimates. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(1):32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Marsh J, Stevens LA, Kusek JW, Van Lente F. Chronic kidney disease epidemiology C: expressing the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem. 2007;53(4):766–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Maroni BJ, Steinman TI, Mitch WE. A method for estimating nitrogen intake of patients with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1985;27(1):58–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Masud T, Manatunga A, Cotsonis G, Mitch WE. The precision of estimating protein intake of patients with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 2002;62(5):1750–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stevens LA, Levey AS. Measured GFR as a confirmatory test for estimated GFR. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(11):2305–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Misra A, Khurana L. Obesity-related non-communicable diseases: south Asians vs white Caucasians. Int J Obes. 2011;35(2):167–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pandit K, Goswami S, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay P, Chowdhury S. Metabolic syndrome in south Asians. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(1):44–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rush E, Plank L, Chandu V, Laulu M, Simmons D, Swinburn B, Yajnik C. Body size, body composition, and fat distribution: a comparison of young New Zealand men of European, Pacific Island, and Asian Indian ethnicities. N Z Med J. 2004;117(1207):U1203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rush EC, Freitas I, Plank LD. Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(4):632–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ferguson TW, Komenda P, Tangri N. Cystatin C as a biomarker for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2015;24(3):295–300.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Levey AS, Inker LA, Coresh J. GFR estimation: from physiology to public health. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(5):820–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu X, Foster MC, Tighiouart H, Anderson AH, Beck GJ, Contreras G, Coresh J, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, et al. Non-GFR determinants of low-molecular-weight serum protein filtration markers in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):892–900.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Baxmann AC, Ahmed MS, Marques NC, Menon VB, Pereira AB, Kirsztajn GM, Heilberg IP. Influence of muscle mass and physical activity on serum and urinary creatinine and serum cystatin C. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(2):348–54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shlipak MG, Matsushita K, Arnlov J, Inker LA, Katz R, Polkinghorne KR, Rothenbacher D, Sarnak MJ, Astor BC, Coresh J, et al. Cystatin C versus creatinine in determining risk based on kidney function. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(10):932–43.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mahajan S, Mukhiya GK, Singh R, Tiwari SC, Kalra V, Bhowmik DM, Gupta S, Agarwal SK, Dash SC. Assessing glomerular filtration rate in healthy Indian adults: a comparison of various prediction equations. J Nephrol. 2005;18(3):257–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Barai S, Gambhir S, Prasad N, Sharma RK, Ora M, Kumar A, Gupta A, Parasar DS, Suneetha B. Levels of GFR and protein-induced hyperfiltration in kidney donors: a single-center experience in India. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(3):407–14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Teo BW, Xu H, Koh YY, Li J, Subramanian S, Sinha AK, Shuter B, Toh QC, Sethi S, Lee EJ. Glomerular filtration rates in healthy Asians without kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton). 2014;19(2):72–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bosch JP, Saccaggi A, Lauer A, Ronco C, Belledonne M, Glabman S. Renal functional reserve in humans. Am J Med. 1983;75(6):943–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Astor BC, Matsushita K, Gansevoort RT, van der Velde M, Woodward M, Levey AS, Jong PE, Coresh J, Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis C, Astor BC, et al. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with mortality and end-stage renal disease. A collaborative meta-analysis of kidney disease population cohorts. Kidney Int. 2011;79(12):1331–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    McDonald HI, Shaw C, Thomas SL, Mansfield KE, Tomlinson LA, Nitsch D. Methodological challenges when carrying out research on CKD and AKI using routine electronic health records. Kidney Int. 2016;90(5):943–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was supported in part by grants from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt of India to VJ, International Society of Nephrology Clinical Research Program to VK, and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan to MH. The funding agencies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All the data used and/or analysed for the current study is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Vivek Kumar, Ashok Kumar Yadav, Vinod Kumar, Krishan L. Gupta, Harbir Singh Kohli & Vivekanand Jha

  2. Department of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

    Yoshinari Yasuda & Seiichi Matsuo

  3. Department of CKD Initiatives, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

    Yoshinari Yasuda

  4. Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

    Masaru Horio

  5. Department of Dietitics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Nancy Sahni

  6. George Institute for Global Health, 311-312, Elegance Tower, Plot No. 8, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Vivekanand Jha

  7. University of Oxford, London, UK

    Vivekanand Jha

Authors
  1. Vivek Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashok Kumar Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshinari Yasuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masaru Horio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vinod Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nancy Sahni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Krishan L. Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seiichi Matsuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Harbir Singh Kohli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Vivekanand Jha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Research idea and study design: VJ, YY, MH, SM, VK1; data acquisition: VK1, AKY, VK2, NS; data analysis/interpretation: AKY, VK1, VK2; statistical analysis: YY, VK1, AKY; supervision or mentorship: HSK, KLG, SM. Writing: VK1, AKY, YY, VJ. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivekanand Jha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institute Ethics Committee Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Estimating GFR equations. Table S2. Characteristics and measurements in study population (stratified by mGFR groups). Table S3. Performance of GFR estimating equations as compared to measured GFR by urinary inulin clearance (stratified by mGFR groups). Table S4. GFR measurements in study population (stratified by age). Table S5. Performance of GFR estimating equations as compared to measured GFR by urinary inulin clearance (stratified by age). Table S6. Performance of GFR estimating equations (eGFR calculated using serum creatinine values by modified Jaffe method) as compared to measured GFR by urinary inulin clearance. (DOCX 76 kb)

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

A. Correlation between serum creatinine (mg/dL) measured by modified Jaffe’s method and enzymatic method (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.965, p < 0.0001); B. Bland Altman analysis of difference between serum creatinine values (in mg/dL) measured by enzymatic and modified Jaffe’s methods (X-axis represents difference between two values and Y-axis represents mean of two values, red line represents mean difference and green line represents 95% limits of agreement. (DOCX 1387 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Yadav, A.K., Yasuda, Y. et al. Existing creatinine-based equations overestimate glomerular filtration rate in Indians. BMC Nephrol 19, 22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-018-0813-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Glomerular filtration rate
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Creatinine
  • Cystatin C
  • Inulin clearance

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us