Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Complement C3 and incident hospitalization due to chronic kidney disease: a population-based cohort study

  • 1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 2
BMC Nephrology201920:61

  • Received: 25 May 2018
  • Accepted: 6 February 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Circulating C3 has been associated with diabetes and hypertension, which are the leading causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD). C3 activation is considered to contribute to several renal diseases. Here we examined whether elevated C3 concentration is associated with hospitalization due to CKD in the general population, and whether this relationship is mediated by factors such as diabetes and hypertension.


Baseline plasma C3 was quantified in 4552 participants, without previous hospital admission due to CKD, from the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort study. Incidence of first hospitalization due to CKD (main diagnosis) was investigated in relation to C3 levels using Cox proportional hazards regression models after a mean follow-up of 19.2 ± 4.16 years. Traditional risk factors of CKD including diabetes, blood pressure, C-reactive protein and baseline renal function were considered in adjustments and sensitivity analyses.


During the follow-up period, 94 subjects were admitted to hospital due to CKD. After multivariate adjustment, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for hospitalization from CKD across quartiles of C3 were 1.00 (reference), 1.68 (0.69, 4.13), 2.71 (1.15, 6.39), and 3.16 (1.36, 7.34) (p for trend = 0.003). Results were generally consistent across different sensitivity analyses.


These findings indicate that C3 is associated with incidence of first hospitalization due to CKD in the general population. The observed relationship cannot be entirely attributed to hyperglycemia and hypertension.


  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Complement C3
  • Diabetes
  • Hypertension


Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a heterogeneous group of disorders affecting kidney structure and function [1]. Currently, around 8–16% of people worldwide are suffering from it [2]. Many factors contribute to the development and progression of CKD, among which diabetes and hypertension are the foremost attributable causes in all developed and various developing countries [2]. Regardless of cause, CKD is associated with a substantially higher risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalization and mortality, and the association increases with the severity of CKD [25].

The complement system plays a crucial role in both innate and adaptive immune responses. While its deficiency leads to susceptibility to infection [6], its aberrant activation can cause or exacerbate various diseases [7]. Complement C3 is a central hub in the activation of the complement cascade [8]. Besides its role in complement cascade and inflammation, several observational studies have indicated that elevated C3 in plasma is associated with the development of diabetes and hypertension [911], i.e., two major causes of CKD [2]. C3 can be produced in the kidney [12, 13] and contributes to the circulating pool of C3 [14]. Sufficient evidence has accumulated in clinical settings to support the involvement of complement activation in renal damage [15]. In many kidney diseases, altered circulating C3 levels, renal C3 deposits, and genetic mutations in C3 can be observed [15]. It is thus possible that something in the renal structure or function could make kidney vulnerable to complement-mediated injury, and may directly contribute to the link between C3 and CKD.

Therefore, we examined the relationship between C3 and incidence of first hospitalization due to CKD in the general adult population. We also sought to explore whether the observed relation between C3 and CKD hospitalization was mediated by factors like diabetes and hypertension.



The Malmö Diet and Cancer study (MDCS) is a large prospective cohort study including both male and female residents from Malmö, a southern city of Sweden [16]. During 1991–1994, 6103 participants were randomly selected from the MDCS to study the epidemiology of carotid artery atherosclerosis [17]. They comprised the Malmö Diet and Cancer Cardiovascular (MDC-CV) cohort study. Among them, 4559 participants had complete information on C3 and confounders. We further excluded 1 participant with extremely high C3 value (20.6 g/L) and 6 participants with previous admission for CKD (Fig. 1). Therefore, the final population in the cohort analysis consisted of 4552 participants, with mean age of 57.6 ± 5.93 years, 39.8% of which were men. Written informed consent was obtained from all included participants. The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethical committee at Lund University, Lund, Sweden (LU 51/90).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

docx Study population flow chart

Baseline measurements and definitions

After an overnight fast, blood samples were drawn from the cubital vein and immediately stored at − 80 °C prior to testing. Fasting concentration of C3 (g/L), C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L), creatinine (μmol/L) and cystatin C (mg/L) were all quantified from plasma samples. C3 was measured by an immunoturbidimetric method using Cobas c-systems and reagents from Roche Diagnostics, Germany. The assay shows a lower detection limit of 0.04 g/L and an upper limit of 5 g/L. Inter- and intra-coefficients of variation were 2.0 and 1.3%, respectively. LDL was calculated using Friedewald’s formula [18]. CRP was measured using the Tina-quant® CRP latex assay (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Creatinine was analyzed in frozen plasma samples in 2009 with the Jaffé method, and traceable to the International Standardization with isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Cystatin C was measured using a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (N Latex Cystatin; Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL) in 2009. Since measures were conducted before 2010 when the world calibrator was introduced, cystatin C values were not standardized (reference value: 0.53–0.95 mg/L) [19]. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated based on the previously reported CKD- Epidemiology Collaboration 2012 equation [20] which takes both creatinine and cystatin C into consideration.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP) were measured in the left arm using a mercury-column sphygmomanometer after 10 min of rest in supine position. Waist circumference was measured midway between the lowest rib margin and iliac crest. Fasting blood glucose was measured according to standard procedures at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Malmö. Diabetes was defined as self-reported physician diagnosis of diabetes, use of anti-diabetic drugs or fasting whole blood glucose ≥6.1 mmol/L (corresponding to plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L). A coronary event was defined based on the International Classification of Diseases 9th (ICD-9) codes 410A-410X and ICD-10 code I21 or death attributable to ischemic heart disease (ICD-9 codes: 410–414; ICD-10 codes: I20-I25). Stroke was defined as ICD-9 codes 430, 431,434 or 436, or ICD-10 codes I60, I61 or I63–64. Information regarding smoking habits, alcohol consumption and medication was collected in a questionnaire survey. Participants were categorized into current smokers, former smokers and never smokers. High alcohol consumption was defined as consuming an average of > 40 g pure alcohol per day for males, and > 30 g per day for females. Participants also reported whether they had been treated for inflammatory diseases, i.e., asthma/chronic bronchitis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease.

Ascertainment for incidence hospitalization due to CKD

In the present study, information on hospitalization due to CKD was obtained from the Swedish patient register. This register covers all hospitalizations in south of Sweden since 1970 and has nation-wide coverage since 1987. From 2001 onwards, all out-patient hospital visits are also included in the register. The register has been previously described and validated for outcome classification [21]. In addition, the Swedish renal registry was searched for any additional cases of CKD [22]. CKD was defined as codes 585–586 according to ICD-9, and N18 and N19 according to ICD-10. Hospitalization due to CKD was defined as first admission to hospital for having CKD as the main diagnosis. In a sensitivity analysis, we also examined the relationship between C3 and incidence of hospitalization due to CKD, with CKD listed as the main or contributing diagnosis (one of the first three positions). In 100 randomly selected patients from MDCS, the CKD diagnoses were evaluated by two experienced specialists in nephrology using patient records and laboratory data. A CKD diagnosis requires two measuring points at least 3 months apart to meet the criteria (KDIGO, CKD Work Group 2012 [23]). The diagnoses were divided into 4 groups based on the degree of reliability: grade 0, incorrect diagnosis; grade 1, low probability of correct diagnosis, or insufficient information (e.g. GFR 58 ml/min at one time only and no indication of albuminuria); grade 2, reasonable high probability of correct diagnosis (e.g. 2.5 months between creatinine analyzes instead of 3 months); grade 3, correct diagnosis. Grades 0–1 was considered incorrect. Grades 2–3 were considered to be correct. The final result showed 94 correct diagnoses, 5 incorrect diagnoses, and 1 case that cannot be classified as correct due to doubtful or insufficient data. Thus, the validation showed that 94% of the patients had a correct diagnosis of CKD.

All participants without any previous hospitalization admission due to CKD at baseline were followed from the date of the baseline examinations until the occurrence of a hospital diagnosis of CKD, emigration from Sweden, death or December 31st, 2013, whichever came first.

Statistical analyses

For skewed variables, log-transformed values were used to obtain a normal distribution before analyses. Multiple linear regression (adjusted for age and sex) was used for continuous variables to compare differences in baseline characteristics between individuals with and without hospitalization due to CKD during follow-up, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used for categorical variables. Participants were then divided into quartiles based on C3 levels. The association between C3 quartiles and incidence of hospitalization due to CKD was estimated with Cox proportional hazard regression and expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Timescale was time to follow-up until incident CKD hospitalization, emigration, death or end of follow-up. Potential confounders including age, sex, waist circumference, smoking and drinking habits, LDL cholesterol, diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), use of anti-hypertensive drug medications, and baseline eGFR were all included in the final model.

Potential interactions between C3 and covariates were tested by adding interaction terms in the final model. In sensitivity analyses, the final model was repeated with baseline creatinine, cystatin C, hsCRP, and inflammatory diseases (i.e., asthma/chronic bronchitis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease) additionally taken into consideration. In addition, Fine and Grey models [24, 25] were used to determine the subdistribution HR for hospitalization due to CKD, and death was accounted for as a competing event. We also conducted various subgroup analyses using C3 as a continuous variable (Fig. 1), in which we respectively excluded participants with 1) baseline diabetes; 2) previous or concomitant diabetes before incident hospitalization for CKD; 3) baseline diabetes or incident diabetes during follow-up; 4) baseline diabetes or impaired fasting glucose (IFG, fasting glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L); 5) baseline hypertension; 6) baseline CVD; 7) history of smoking; 8) high alcohol consumption; 9) impaired renal function at baseline (eGFR< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2).

The restricted cubic spline function was applied to detect possible non-linearity, with knots placed at the 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th percentiles of C3 concentration. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System version 9.3 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).


Baseline characteristics

Age- and sex-adjusted baseline characteristics of participants with and without CKD hospitalization during follow-up are presented in Table 1. Participants who were hospitalized due to CKD during follow-up had significantly higher C3 levels at baseline. They also had lower eGFR, and higher fasting glucose, systolic BP, diastolic BP, waist circumference, and usage of anti-hypertensive medication.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics by status of incident hospitalization due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) during follow-up


Incidence hospitalization due to CKD

p a

No (n = 4458)

Yes (n = 94)

Age (years)

57.3 (57.1, 1.93) b

59.1 (57.8, 3.14)


Sex (male, %)




Complement C3 (g/L)

1.51 (1.50, 1.52)

1.71 (1.64, 1.78)


Fasting glucose (mmol/L)

5.06 (5.04, 5.09)

5.71 (5.51, 5.92)


Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

140.2 (139.6, 8.64)

146.4 (142.8, 9.65)


Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

86.6 (86.3, 13.6)

89.5 (87.6, 15.5)


Waist circumference (cm)

83.9 (83.6, 7.58)

90.1 (88.0, 10.2)


Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)

4.04 (4.01, 10.7)

4.10 (3.91, 7.46)


eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)

88.8 (88.4, 8.27)

73.0 (70.9, 8.13)


Cystatin C (mg/L)

0.76 (0.76, 5.07)

0.93 (0.90, 8.36)


Creatinine (μmol/L)

84.3 (84.0, 14.3)

95.5 (92.6, 4.53)


High alcohol consumption (%)




Smokers (%)




Anti-hypertensive medication (%)




Diabetes (%)




Cardiovascular disease (%)




eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the 2012 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation

aMultiple linear or logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex

bGeometric mean (95% confidence interval) (all such values)

The distribution of risk factors across C3 quartiles is shown in Table 2. Compared to participants in the lowest quartile of C3, those in the higher C3 quartile had significantly lower baseline eGFR. Meanwhile, they were more likely to be older, to be male or non-smokers, and to have higher fasting glucose, systolic BP, diastolic BP, waist circumference, LDL, cystatin C, and usage of anti-hypertensive medication, and to suffer from diabetes or CVD.
Table 2

Age and sex-adjusted characteristics of individuals across complement C3 quartiles (Q1-Q4)


C3 quartiles

P for trend a





No. of subjects





Age (years)

56.2 (55.9, 56.6) b

57.3 (56.9, 57.6)

57.9 (57.5, 58.2)

57.7 (57.4, 58.1)


Sex (male, %)






Fasting glucose (mmol/L)

4.85 (4.80, 4.90)

4.95 (4.90, 5.00)

5.12 (5.07, 5.17)

5.38 (5.33, 5.44)


Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

136.6 (135.6, 137.6)

138.6 (137.7, 139.6)

142.4 (141.4, 143.5)

143.4 (142.4, 144.4)


Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

84.3 (83.8, 84.8)

85.9 (85.4, 86.4)

87.4 (86.9, 87.9)

88.8 (88.3, 89.3)


Waist circumference (cm)

78.6 (78.0, 79.1)

82.2 (81.7, 82.7)

85.5 (84.9, 86.0)

90.1 (89.5, 90.7)


Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)

3.77 (3.72, 3.82)

4.00 (3.95, 4.06)

4.13 (4.07, 4.19)

4.24 (4.18, 4.30)


eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)

89.0 (88.2, 89.8)

88.1 (87.4, 88.9)

88.8 (88.1, 89.6)

87.6 (86.9, 88.4)


Cystatin C (mg/L)

0.75 (0.75, 0.76)

0.77 (0.76, 0.77)

0.77 (0.76, 0.77)

0.78 (0.77, 0.79)


Creatinine (μmol/L)

84.9 (84.1, 85.7)

85 (84.2, 85.7)

84.1 (83.3, 84.8)

84.4 (83.6, 85.2)


High alcohol consumption (%)






Smokers (%)






Anti-hypertensive medication (%)






Diabetes (%)






Cardiovascular disease (%)






eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the 2012 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation

aMultiple linear or logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex

bGeometric mean (95% confidence interval) (all such values)

Incidence of hospitalization due to CKD in relation to C3

During a mean follow-up of 19.2 ± 4.16 years, 94 participants (2.07%, 53 men and 41 women) were hospitalized due to CKD (main diagnosis). Incident hospitalization due to CKD was 1.08 per 1000 person-years. Fifty-four cases developed CKD stage 4 or more, and 21 cases progressed to end stage renal disease (ESRD) before end of follow-up.

As shown in Table 3, an increase in baseline C3 was associated with a substantially increased risk of CKD hospitalization. In the crude model, the HR and 95% CI (highest vs. lowest quartiles of C3) for CKD hospitalization was 6.46 (2.91–14.3; p for trend< 0.001). When adjusted for age and sex, this value changed marginally (HR, 5.82; 95% CI: 2.62–12.9; p for trend< 0.001). Further adjustment for other covariates attenuated the HR to 3.16 (95% CI: 1.36–7.34; p for trend = 0.003). If fasting glucose was adjusted for instead of diabetes, the risk increase was rather similar (HR for the highest vs. lowest quartiles, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.28–6.86; p for trend = 0.004; data not shown). In 4443 participants with available data on hsCRP, we additionally adjusted for CRP, but the risk persisted (2.60, 1.09–6.20; p for trend = 0.022; data not shown). Furthermore, of the 4527 participants with information available, 518 reported that they had inflammatory diseases (asthma/chronic bronchitis, rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease). Results were substantially unchanged when this confounder was additionally adjusted for in multivariate analyses (HR for the highest vs. lowest quartiles, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.36–7.38; p for trend = 0.003; data not shown). No significant interaction was observed between C3 and other covariates. The restricted cubic spline analysis did not show any evidence for non-linearity (p non-linearity = 0.26). The age- and sex-adjusted HR (Q4 vs Q1) for those who developed CKD stage 4 or more before end of follow-up was 1.49 (95% CI, 1.15–1.94; p for trend = 0.003). The age- and sex-adjusted HR was not significant for the 21 cases that developed ESRD (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.75–1.66; p for trend = 0.59).
Table 3

Incidence of hospitalization due to chronic kidney disease in relation to complement C3 quartiles (Q1-Q4)


Quartile 1

Quartile 2

Quartile 3

Quartile 4

P for trend a

C3 range (g/L)






No. of subjects





Incidence (main diagnosis) b





Incidence (per 1000 person-years)





Model 1 d


2.09 (0.86, 5.07) c

3.63 (1.58, 8.36)

6.46 (2.91, 14.3)


Model 2 e


1.86 (0.77, 4.53)

3.14 (1.36, 7.24)

5.82 (2.62, 12.9)


Model 3 f


1.68 (0.69, 4.13)

2.71 (1.15, 6.39)

3.16 (1.36, 7.34)


Incidence (main or contributing diagnosis) g





Incidence (per 1000 person-years)





Model 1 d


1.74 (1.01, 2.98)

2.50 (1.49, 4.19)

3.89 (2.38, 6.37)


Model 2 e


1.50 (0.87, 2.58)

2.07 (1.23, 3.48)

3.46 (2.12, 5.66)


Model 3 f


1.39 (0.81, 2.40)

1.50 (0.88, 2.55)

1.73 (1.02, 2.92)


aAnalysis by Cox proportional hazards model

bIncidence of hospitalization due to chronic kidney disease (defined as 585–586 according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9, and N18 and N19 according to ICD10; main diagnosis refer to cases at the first position; main or contributing diagnosis refer to cases at one of the first three positions)

cAdjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) (all such values)

dCrude model

eAdjusted for age and sex

fAdjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, smoking and drinking habits, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, anti-hypertensive drug medication, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate

During the follow-up period, 480 participants died without CKD hospitalization. Using death as a competing event, the overall findings were relatively unchanged. The subdistribution HR (95% CI) for CKD hospitalization was 3.14 (1.36–7.23; p for trend = 0.001) in the highest vs lowest quartile of C3 and was 1.33 (1.14–1.55; p < 0.001) per 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in C3.

When C3 was used as a continuous variable, the multivariate-adjusted HR of CKD hospitalization increased by 28% for each 1 SD increment in C3 concentration. In subgroup analyses, the association between C3 and CKD hospitalization remained significant in participants without baseline diabetes (1.35, 1.10–1.66, p = 0.004), without previous or concomitant diabetes before incident hospitalization for CKD (1.39, 1.11–1.73, p = 0.004), without baseline diabetes or incident diabetes during follow-up (1.46, 1.17–1.82, p = 0.001) and in those with normal fasting glucose at baseline (1.43, 1.13–1.81, p = 0.003). Similarly, as shown in Table 4, the association was significant in participants without hypertension and in other subgroups.
Table 4

Adjusted HR (95% CI) for incident CKD hospitalization per 1 SD increase in complement C3 a


Mean ± SD of C3

No. of subjects


HR (95%CI)


Whole study population

1.548 ± 0.353



1.28 (1.08, 1.53)


Model 1 b

1.529 ± 0.341



1.35 (1.10, 1.66)


Model 2 c

1.528 ± 0.341



1.39 (1.11, 1.73)


Model 3 d

1.511 ± 0.330



1.46 (1.17, 1.82)


Model 4 e

1.515 ± 0.332



1.43 (1.13, 1.81)


Model 5 f

1.475 ± 0.343



1.65 (1.16, 2.35)


Model 6 g

1.544 ± 0.351



1.27 (1.06, 1.52)


Model 7 h

1.548 ± 0.350



1.57 (1.18, 2.09)


Model 8 i

1.548 ± 0.354



1.26 (1.06, 1.51)


Model 9 j

1.546 ± 0.352



1.25 (1.04, 1.50)


aHR hazard ratios, CI confidence interval, CKD chronic kidney disease, SD standard deviation; adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, smoking and drinking habits, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, anti-hypertensive drug medication, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (specific covariate was not adjusted when being investigated in a specific model)

bExcluding participants with baseline diabetes

cExcluding participants with previous or concomitant diabetes before incident chronic kidney disease

dExcluding participants with baseline diabetes or incident diabetes during follow-up

eExcluding participants with baseline diabetes or impair fasting glucose (fasting glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L)

fExcluding participants with baseline hypertension

gExcluding participants with baseline cardiovascular disease

hExcluding current, occasional or former smokers

iExcluding participants with high alcohol consumption

jExcluding participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2

A total of 186 individuals were hospitalized due to CKD as the main or contributing diagnosis (one of the first three positions). We also explored the relationships between C3 and CKD hospitalization using this endpoint definition. After adjustments in the final model, the HR for hospitalization due to CKD was 1.73 (1.02, 2.92; p for trend = 0.047) comparing the 4th vs 1st quartile (Table 3).


The present population-based cohort study showed that elevated plasma C3 was associated with increased incidence of first hospitalization due to CKD among middle-aged adults. This relationship was independent of traditional risk factors including diabetes, blood pressure, baseline renal function and CRP.

C3 is an acute phase protein and a protein crucial to all complement activation pathways [8]. Hence, raised C3 levels could be a result of systemic low-grade inflammation, while low levels are observed in conditions characterized by excessive complement activation [15]. C3 is richly expressed in abdominal adipose tissue as well as kidneys [13, 14, 26]. Plasma lipids have been reported to be associated with the development of CKD [27], and the coexistence of hypertriglyceridemia and high C3 levels showed a strong association with proteinuria [28]. In addition, both obesity and elevated C3 levels were related to higher risk of insulin resistance and diabetes [9, 29], a primary cause of CKD [2]. These findings indicate that dysregulation of the lipid and glucose metabolism could be a common link between raised C3 and CKD. In accordance with this view, we found that C3 was positively associated with LDL, waist circumference, fasting glucose and diabetes at baseline. However, the longitudinal relationship between C3 and CKD hospitalization remained significant after extensive exclusions of those with diabetes or impaired fasting glucose. Similarly, whereas hypertension may potentially confound our primary finding [10, 30], the relationship between C3 and CKD hospitalization remained significant in non-hypertensive subjects. Thus, it is unlikely that the relation between C3 and CKD hospitalization was entirely mediated by diabetes or hypertension. In addition, adjusting for baseline eGFR or excluding participants with eGFR< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 only marginally influenced the impact of C3 on risk for CKD hospitalization. Other sensitivity analyses, adjustments and tests of interaction consistently supported an independent predictive value of C3 for incident hospitalization for CKD. This conclusion was further confirmed by results obtained from analyses accounting for the competing risk of death.

Inflammation has been shown to be involved in the development of kidney disease in both experimental and epidemiological studies [31, 32]. However, the results changed only marginally when inflammatory diseases were taken into consideration in multivariate adjustments. In addition, the association of C3 with hospitalization due to CKD decreased but remain significant even after adjusting for CRP, another common inflammatory marker. This is in line with previous observations suggesting that there was no significant association between CRP levels and incident CKD hospitalization [31], and that C3 may be preferable to CRP as an inflammatory marker of cardiometabolic traits [11, 33, 34].

Noteworthily, the kidney itself is an important source of extrahepatic C3 [12, 13], and contributes significantly to circulating C3 [14]. C3 gene expression has been widely detected in normal human renal tissue and can be substantially increased by multiple stimuli [13]. In podocytes, which are critical for the integrity of the glomerular filtration barrier, the C3 synthesis is up-regulated in response to injury or cellular stress [12]. Local C3 production correlates closely with the severity of kidney tissue injury, probably via enhanced T- and B-cell function, recruitment of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cytokines, disposal of immune complexes and apoptotic cells, etc [13]. Plasma C3, as partially originated from the kidney, could be a marker of ongoing injury of kidney cells, which ultimately results in CKD. Whereas no previous study has explored the association between circulating C3 and CKD in the general population, higher serum C3 levels have been found to be associated with higher levels of urine protein in patients with non-nephrotic CKD [28], and with renal arteriolosclerosis in patients with non-diabetic CKD [35]. Decreased blood C3 levels have been observed in some less common renal diseases (e.g. atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, dense deposit diseases, and C3 glomerulonephritis [15, 36, 37]), perhaps due to aberrant complement activation or impaired glomerular filtration barrier and proteinuria [38]. However, these nephropathies constitute a minor proportion of all CKD cases. In contrast, the present study was conducted in the general population, and we demonstrated that elevated C3 levels were associated with decreased eGFR at baseline and CKD hospitalization during follow-up. Since the kidney generally contributes to human circulating C3 concentration in a significant and sustained manner [14], it is speculated that high plasma C3 in apparently healthy individuals could reflect a mild and subclinical complement activation that ultimately results in increased risk of CKD hospitalization.

Strengths and limitation

This study had a prospective study design with long follow-up duration. The endpoint was retrieved from hospital registers with national coverage. The CKD diagnosis in this study was validated with a correct rate of 94%. Moreover, a variety of sensitivity analyses were conducted, and the results remained significant. However, due to the descriptive nature of the observational design, our findings provide limited insight into the underlying mechanism. Many patients were treated in primary care and it was obvious that some individuals with less severe renal dysfunction were missed. The CKD cases in this study constituted of cases who were treated in hospital, which assumingly were the most severe cases. The use of ICD codes to identify the cause of hospital admission might be sub-optimal to CKD based on eGFR measurements. Our study is also limited by a low incidence of CKD hospitalization, which may reduce the statistical power. Due to the observational design of the study, findings are descriptive in nature. Moreover, the cohort only included participants being residents of Malmö, Sweden, further studies are needed to generalize the results to other populations.


Our results revealed that C3 is associated with incidence of CKD hospitalizations in the general population, independent of traditional risk factors including diabetes, blood pressure, CRP and baseline renal function.



blood pressure


confidence interval


Chronic kidney disease


C-reactive protein


cardiovascular disease


estimated glomerular filtration rate


hazard ratio


International Classification of Disease


impaired fasting glucose


low-density lipoprotein cholesterol


Malmö Diet and Cancer Cardiovascular


Malmö Diet and Cancer study


standard deviation



The authors gratefully acknowledge the participants of the study and all medical and nursing staff of University Hospital. The Swedish Patient Registry and the Swedish Renal Registry are acknowledged for providing information about renal outcomes.


The study was funded by the Medical Research Council of Sweden (Grant numbers K2011-65X-20752-04-6, 2014–2265), the Swedish Heart–Lung Foundation (Grant numbers 2013–0249, 2016–0315), and the China Scholarship Council (Grant number 201706940044). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Lund University, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Lund University.

Authors’ contributions

XB and GE conceived the study. XB and GE participated in data analysis and drafted the manuscript. YB and IFM contributed to the study design and statistical analysis. AC and MP participated in data collection and revised the manuscript. CAS and MOM contributed to the study design and interpretation of data and literature search. KN contributed to the interpretation and revision of the manuscript. All the authors contributed towards critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in this study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee at Lund University Lund, Sweden (LU 51/90) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standard. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Nutritional Epidemiology Institute and School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, CRC 60:13, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, S-20502 Malmö, Sweden


  1. James MT, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M. Early recognition and prevention of chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2010;375:1296–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013;382:260–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Herzog CA, Asinger RW, Berger AK, Charytan DM, Diez J, Hart RG, et al. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. A clinical update from kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2011;80:572–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Angelantonio E, Chowdhury R, Sarwar N, Aspelund T, Danesh J, Gudnason V. Chronic kidney disease and risk of major cardiovascular disease and non-vascular mortality: prospective population based cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunkelberger JR, Song WC. Complement and its role in innate and adaptive immune responses. Cell Res. 2010;20:34–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. McGeer PL, Lee M, McGeer EG. A review of human diseases caused or exacerbated by aberrant complement activation. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;52:12–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sahu A, Lambris JD. Structure and biology of complement protein C3, a connecting link between innate and acquired immunity. Immunol Rev. 2001;180:35–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wlazlo N, van Greevenbroek MM, Ferreira I, Feskens EJ, van der Kallen CJ, Schalkwijk CG, et al. Complement factor 3 is associated with insulin resistance and with incident type 2 diabetes over a 7-year follow-up period: the CODAM study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1900–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Engström G, Hedblad B, Berglund G, Janzon L, Lindgarde F. Plasma levels of complement C3 is associated with development of hypertension: a longitudinal cohort study. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:276–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Borne Y, Muhammad IF, Lores-Motta L, Hedblad B, Nilsson PM, Melander O, et al. Complement C3 associates with incidence of diabetes, but no evidence of a causal relationship. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:4477–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Ding F, Zhang X, Li B, Ding J. The expression profile of complement components in podocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou W, Marsh JE, Sacks SH. Intrarenal synthesis of complement. Kidney Int. 2001;59:1227–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tang S, Zhou W, Sheerin NS, Vaughan RW, Sacks SH. Contribution of renal secreted complement C3 to the circulating pool in humans. J Immunol. 1999;162:4336–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thurman JM. Complement in kidney disease: core curriculum 2015. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65:156–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Berglund G, Elmstahl S, Janzon L, Larsson SA. The Malmo diet and Cancer study. Design and feasibility J Intern Med. 1993;233:45–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hedblad B, Nilsson P, Janzon L, Berglund G. Relation between insulin resistance and carotid intima-media thickness and stenosis in non-diabetic subjects. Results from a cross-sectional study in Malmo, Sweden. Diabet Med. 2000;17:299–307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schulz CA, Persson M, Christensson A, Hindy G, Almgren P, Nilsson PM, et al. Soluble Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and impaired kidney function in the population-based Malmo diet and Cancer study. Kidney Int Rep. 2017;2:239–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Qureshi AR, Evans M, Stendahl M, Prutz KG, Elinder CG. The increase in renal replacement therapy (RRT) incidence has come to an end in Sweden-analysis of variations by region over the period 1991-2010. Clin Kidney J. 2013;6:352–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kidney Disease. Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2013;3:1–150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohl M, Plischke M, Leffondre K, Heinze G. PSHREG: a SAS macro for proportional and nonproportional subdistribution hazards regression. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2015;118:218–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gabrielsson BG, Johansson JM, Lonn M, Jernas M, Olbers T, Peltonen M, et al. High expression of complement components in omental adipose tissue in obese men. Obes Res. 2003;11:699–708.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Muntner P, Coresh J, Smith JC, Eckfeldt J, Klag MJ. Plasma lipids and risk of developing renal dysfunction: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Kidney Int. 2000;58:293–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohagura K, Kochi M, Miyagi T, Kinjyo T, Maehara Y, Kinjyo K, et al. Hypertriglyceridemia accompanied by increased serum complement component 3 and proteinuria in non-nephrotic chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2014;18:453–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsai S, Clemente-Casares X, Revelo XS, Winer S, Winer DA. Are obesity-related insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes autoimmune diseases? Diabetes. 2015;64:1886–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the eighth joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Shankar A, Sun L, Klein BE, Lee KE, Muntner P, Nieto FJ, et al. Markers of inflammation predict the long-term risk of developing chronic kidney disease: a population-based cohort study. Kidney Int. 2011;80:1231–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Remuzzi G, Bertani T. Pathophysiology of progressive nephropathies. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1448–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Muscari A, Antonelli S, Bianchi G, Cavrini G, Dapporto S, Ligabue A, et al. Serum C3 is a stronger inflammatory marker of insulin resistance than C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate: comparison study in an elderly population. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2362–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ajjan R, Grant PJ, Futers TS, Brown JM, Cymbalista CM, Boothby M, et al. Complement C3 and C-reactive protein levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:1048–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kojima C, Takei T, Ogawa T, Nitta K. Serum complement C3 predicts renal arteriolosclerosis in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2012;19:854–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1676–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Pickering MC, D'Agati VD, Nester CM, Smith RJ, Haas M, Appel GB, et al. C3 glomerulopathy: consensus report. Kidney Int. 2013;84:1079–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang R, Li H, Han Q, Guo R, et al. Implication of decreased serum complement 3 in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55:31–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019