Skip to main content
Download PDF

The causal relationship between COVID-19 and estimated glomerular filtration rate: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

BMC Nephrology volume 25, Article number: 21 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous Mendelian studies identified a causal relationship between renal function, as assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and severe infection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, much is still unknown because of the limited number of associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of COVID-19 and the lack of cystatin C testing. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to determine the genetic mechanisms responsible for the association between eGFR and COVID-19 in a European population.

Methods

We performed bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) data; log-eGFR was calculated from the serum levels of creatinine or cystatin C by applying the Chronic Kidney Disease Genetics (CKDGen) Meta-analysis Dataset combined with the UK Biobank (N = 1,004,040) and on COVID-19 phenotypes (122,616 COVID-19 cases and 2,475,240 controls) from COVID19-hg GWAS meta-analyses round 7. The inverse-variance weighted method was used as the main method for estimation.

Results

Analyses showed that the genetically instrumented reduced log-eGFR, as calculated from the serum levels of creatinine, was associated with a significantly higher risk of severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–5.41, P < 0.05) and significantly related to COVID-19 hospitalization (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.39–4.00, P < 0.05) or infection (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01–1.53, P < 0.05). The significance of these associations remained when using log-eGFR based on the serum levels of cystatin C as genetically instrumented. However, genetically instrumented COVID-19, regardless of phenotype, was not related to log-eGFR, as calculated by either the serum levels of creatinine or cystatin C.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that genetical predisposition to reduced kidney function may represent a risk factor for COVID-19. However, a consistent and significant effect of COVID-19 on kidney function was not identified in this study.

Peer Review reports

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) imposed a significant burden on public health. As of the 20th of November 2022, there had been 634 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 globally, including 6.6 million deaths. Almost three years after the pandemic started, some patients infected with COVID-19 were found to suffer from long-term symptoms, a condition that is referred to as “long COVID.” This discovery poses a number of new clinical challenges [1,2,3,4].

Although COVID-19 is predominantly a respiratory disease, previous studies have reported a broad spectrum of kidney impairment during long COVID-19 [5, 6]. However, whether this association is causal remains unknown. Conventional observational studies may be influenced by a range of confounding factors, including socioeconomic status and drug use; consequently, such analyses may not provide definitive answers. Using genetic variation as a tool to predict exposure, Mendelian randomization (MR) provides an efficient tool that can determine estimates that are not influenced by confounding factors without any intervention [7,8,9]. Furthermore, investigating the distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by performing MR analysis can help to identify specific risk factors for the development of COVID-19 infection [10, 11]. This form of analysis may help us to identify groups of patients that may be more susceptible to renal dysfunction.

In a recent MR study [12], Zhao et al. reported that genetic predisposition to reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as calculated from the serum levels of creatinine, was associated with increased susceptibility to severe COVID-19. Generally, the serum level of creatinine has become the most widely used parameter for evaluating kidney function in clinical practice [13]. However, since the serum levels of creatinine are influenced by muscle mass or diet, the calculation of eGFR from the serum levels of cystatin C presents certain advantages when assessing kidney function [14, 15]. Moreover, the additional trimming of SNPs is necessary to remove genetic variants that are likely to be related to creatinine metabolism instead of kidney function. Additionally, much is still unknown because of the limited number of associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of COVID-19 used in previous studies. It is necessary to determine the genetic association between eGFR and COVID-19 hospitalization or infection in a European population.

In the present study, we conducted an updated bidirectional MR analysis, including genome-wide summary statistics for log-eGFR, as calculated using the serum levels of creatinine or cystatin C, with a large sample size, the latest COVID-19 genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, and several sensitivity analyses, to investigate the assumptions generated by MR.

Methods

GWAS meta-analysis of COVID-19

In the present study (Fig. 1), we used the latest release of COVID-19 GWAS data as exposure. SNPs in the genome-wide data that were significant (P < 5 × 10–8), uncorrelated (r2 < 0.01), and at least 1 Mbp apart, were considered as genetic variants from European samples in our bidirectional MR analysis. Confounding data were excluded due to the presence of associations (P < 5 × 10–8) with the risk of eGFR based on creatinine levels, including smoking status, arm fat and fat-free mass, and systolic and diastolic pressure (Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overall design of the MR analysis in the present study

Full size image

Data relating to severe COVID-19 (13,769 cases and 1,072,442 controls) were derived from several large studies, including the UK Biobank, GENCOVID, GenOMICC, and BRACOVID. We also investigated COVID-19 hospitalization (32,519 cases and 2,062,805 controls) and all COVID-19 cases (122,616 cases and 2,475,240 controls) using the largest publicly available COVID-19 GWAS, mostly including individuals of European ancestry (details of the participating studies are given at https://www.covid19hg.org/results/r7/). Severe COVID-19 was defined as death or respiratory support following hospitalization due to COVID-19 as the primary reason for admission. COVID-19 hospitalization was defined as hospitalization due to coronavirus-related symptoms with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. All COVID-19 cases were defined as (1) laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (based on RNA and/or serology), (2) COVID-19 diagnosed by a physician, or (3) self-reported COVID-19. Participants in these cohorts who were not infected with COVID-19 were considered as controls. GWAS data were adjusted for age, age square, sex, the interaction between age and sex, and principal component [16].

For COVID-19 infection phenotype [17,18,19,20], we included 14,134 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 1,284,876 controls. For hospitalized COVID-19 phenotype, we included 6,406 hospitalized COVID-19 cases with 902,088 controls as well as 1776 hospitalized cases with 6,443 non-hospitalized controls [23]. For severe COVID-19 phenotype, we included 4,792 confirmed cases of very severe respiratory infections with 1,054,664 population controls, 1,610 confirmed severe COVID-19 cases with respiratory failure and 2,180 population controls, and 182 confirmed critical illness cases with 910 population controls.

GWAS meta-analysis of kidney function

A recent GWAS meta-analysis incorporating CKDGen and UK Biobank data with a genome-wide significant association featuring log-transformed eGFR data calculated from serum creatinine levels (eGFRcrea), and eGFR calculated from serum cystatin C levels (eGFRcys) in > 450,000 individuals was used to identify alternative biomarkers [21]. The increased sample size had an impact not only on GWAS findings for eGFR when calculated using serum creatinine levels (eGFRcrea) but also led to a substantial improvement in fine-mapping and alternative biomarker support.

A total of 548 SNPs were included in the MR analysis based on published genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10− 8), and uncorrelated (r2 < 0.01) genetic variants, which were at least 1 Mbp apart. This analysis was used to predict eGFRcrea values for European samples when utilizing log-transformed eGFRcrea levels as an exposure. Additional trimming was required for these 548 SNPs. Thus, we removed the genetic variants of 144 SNPs that were likely to be related to creatinine metabolism instead of kidney function and showed different directions of regressed betas. We also removed SNPs that did not show a significant (P < 0.05) association with cystatin C-based eGFR values. Nine SNPs, including smoking status and educational level, were excluded because of significant associations (P < 1 × 10–5) with an increased risk of COVID-19. Finally, 395 SNPs with a genome-wide significant association with log-transformed eGFRcrea values were used as an exposure (Supplementary Tables 2 and Table 4).

In this study, we performed GWAS meta-analysis of log-transformed eGFR values based on serum levels of cystatin C from individuals of European ancestry (N = 460,826) [21]. Trimming was performed, as described above, to ensure that we only included SNPs that were consistently associated with biomarkers related to kidney function. Consequently, 344 SNPs were validated to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with eGFR, when calculated using the serum levels of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), with a consistent direction and were not associated with confounding. Next, we performed secondary analysis using information from these 344 SNPs and the statistics relating to their association with eGFRcys as genetic instruments (Supplementary Table 4). We also used other markers related to kidney function, including urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), microalbuminuria, BUN, and uric acid, from GWAS summary data (http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank) [22].

Bidirectional MR based on summary-level data

Bidirectional MR was first performed using summary-level data from individuals of European ancestry; this allowed us to identify causal estimates between COVID and eGFR. In the summary-level MR, we disregarded SNPs that did not overlap between summary statistics or were palindromic with intermediate allele frequencies. The main method applied in the MR was the fixed-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. Sensitivity analyses were performed with established MR sensitivity analysis methods. First, MR-Egger regression, which yields pleiotropy-robust causal estimates, was performed with bootstrapped standard errors. Second, we applied the panelized weighted median mode method, which yields valid causal estimates even in conditions when invalid instruments are present. Finally, MR-PRESSO was performed; this method detects and corrects the effects of outliers, yielding causal estimates that are robust to heterogeneity. However, the weighted median method is known to be sensitive to the addition or removal of genetic variants. Furthermore, the MR-Egger test is less efficient than the IVW method while the MR-PRESSO has a high false-positive rate with several invalid instrumental variables. We assess the biological functions in the gene set enrichment analysis of eGFR and COVID-19 obtained from Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets. The MR analysis was performed using the TwoSampleMR package in the R environment (version 4.3.1, the R foundation).

Results

Causal estimates of the effect of reduced eGFR, as predicted by genetic analysis, on COVID‑19

Initially, 395 SNPs were identified to be associated with eGFRcrea. After excluding SNPs that were likely to be related to the metabolism of creatinine rather than kidney function, and the risk factors for COVID-19 identified by the GWAS meta-analysis of a European population, three SNPs did not overlap with the summary statistics, two SNPs were significantly associated with exposure (P < 5E − 5), and nine SNPs were removed because they were palindromic with intermediate allele frequencies. The reduced log-eGFRcrea, as predicted by genetic analysis and the 381 SNPs was significantly associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR]-IVW = 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38–5.41; P = 0.004) (Fig. 2; Table 1). Furthermore, causal estimates remained significant for the MR-PRESSO test and the with regards to the panelized weighted median (P < 0.05). Without reducing the number of SNPs in the genetic instrument (Table 1), the genetic predisposition for reduced log-eGFRcrea remained significantly associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19. Notably, the genetically predicted reduced log-eGFRcrea was significantly associated with a higher risk of hospitalized COVID (OR-IVW = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.39–4.00, P< 0.05) and all COVID cases (OR-IVW = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01–1.53, P< 0.05) (Fig. 2). Other implementations of MR methods are presented in the supplementary material. The genetically predicted reduced log-eGFRcys exhibited the same relationship with COVID-19 (Fig. 2). Causal estimates between eGFRcrea and different phenotypes of COVID-19 infection are shown in Supplementary Table 5. The top 10 significant GO pathways (biological process, cellular component and molecular function) are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

IVW estimates for per 1 unit of log transformed eGFR lower on COVID-19

Full size image
Table 1 Causal estimates from the summary-level data-based MR from the GWAS summary statistics
Full size table

Causal estimates of the effect of genetically predicted COVID‑19 on eGFR and CKD

MR analysis did not reveal any association between genetically predicted COVID-19 and eGFRcrea (all COVID-19 cases vs. population controls; OR-IVW = 0.997; 95% CI, 0.993–1.002; P = 0.211), COVID-19 hospitalization (COVID-19 hospitalization vs. population controls; OR-IVW = 0.999; 95% CI, 0.996–1.001; P = 0.193), or severe COVID-19 (severe COVID-19 vs. population controls; OR-IVW = 1.000; 95% CI, 0.999–1.001; P = 0.733) (Supplementary Table 6). Effect estimates for the association between COVID-19 and kidney function indicators, including uACR, microalbuminuria, BUN, cystatin C, and uric acid, are shown in Fig. 3. Only hospitalized COVID-19 was associated with a causal increase in the level of uACR (OR-IVW = 1.07, P = 0.01). We did not detect a causal relationship between different phenotypes of COVID-19 infection and eGFRcrea/CKD, as shown in Table 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

IVW estimates of the effect of COVID-19 on kidney function

Full size image
Table 2 Causal estimates of genetically predicted COVID‑19 on eGFR and CKD from the summary-level data-based MR from the GWAS summary statistics
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, MR analysis demonstrated that genetically instrumented kidney dysfunction (based on eGFRcrea and eGFRcys) was related to a higher risk of severe COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, and all COVID-19 cases. Our findings further support the fact that improving kidney function is likely to exert a beneficial effect on lowering the risk of COVID-19, regardless of phenotype, with significant implications for healthcare and drug repositioning. Furthermore, we revealed that COVID-19 has a complex effect on various indicators of renal function indicators, meaning that the influence of COVID-19 on renal function might be complex.

The kidneys perform a range of functions and are associated with immune responses, inflammation, coagulation, and endothelial function [23,24,25]. The failure of renal function may result in impaired protein catabolism and the accumulation of metabolic waste products; these effects may contribute to increased inflammation and immunosuppression [26]. Chronic kidney disease may contribute to the infection and development of COVID-19 via both direct and indirect mechanisms. Known predisposing factors include immune response dysfunction in the pre-uremic or uremic state and the loss of antibody and complement caused by glomerular damage, systemic inflammation, and immunosuppressants [27]. In a previous study, Mehta et al. reported that the most critical feature of severe COVID-19 is cytokine storm syndrome and immunosuppression. In addition, hypercoagulation and venous thrombosis usually coexist with kidney failure [24, 25, 28]. A previous study reported thrombin production in patients on dialysis and that this effect increased the risk of thrombosis and COVID-19 [29]. Another study found that reduced renal function was associated with endothelial dysfunction [23] and that this effect may also contribute to the development of severe COVID-19. However, these pathways have not been confirmed by experimental studies and cannot be evaluated by MR studies because relevant GWAS data are unavailable.

In a recent MR study [12], Zhao et al. reported that genetic predisposition to eGFRcrea was associated with increased susceptibility to COVID-19. However, as the serum levels of creatinine are known to be influenced by muscle mass and diet, the eGFR value based on cystatin C level has certain advantages when assessing kidney function [14, 15]. Our current findings are preliminary and need to be interpreted cautiously. The protective association of kidney function with severe COVID-19 might reflect an association that is specific to severe COVID-19, an incidental finding, or a lack of power for other COVID-19 outcomes. A previous GWAS meta-analysis of eGFRcrea data that was conducted by the CKDGen Consortium explained almost 20% of the genetic heritability of eGFRcrea [30]. A substantial fraction of missing heritability is expected to be attributed to low-frequency and rare variants, which require even larger GWAS sample sizes. While eGFRcrea is a useful biomarker for kidney function in clinical practice, serum creatinine is a key metabolite of muscle metabolism and, thus, might reflect functions that are not specific to the kidney. It is very difficult for eGFRcrea GWAS to identify mechanisms of biomarker metabolism from modulators of kidney function. The estimation of GFR by serum cystatin C may represent a better marker of GFR. However, eGFRcys can also be influenced by factors other than GFR, such as inflammation, obesity and diabetes. Moreover, eGFRcys has a limited role in the GWAS of kidney function due to high costs and small datasets [14, 15, 31]. Therefore, in the present study it was necessary to perform additional trimming of SNPs to remove genetic variants that were likely to be related to the metabolism of creatinine instead of kidney function.

In the present study, we conducted updated bidirectional MR analysis, including genome-wide summary statistics for log-eGFRcrea or eGFRcys with a large sample size and utilizing the very latest GWAS data relating to COVID-19. In the present study, we found that genetically instrumented better kidney function (based on lower eGFRcrea and eGFRcys values) was significantly related to a higher risk of severe COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, and all COVID-19 cases. We defined severe COVID-19 as death and respiratory support following hospitalization due to COVID-19, in which hospitalization involved supplemental oxygen (not including simple supplementary oxygen), non-invasive mechanical ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation. The genetic associations with severe COVID-19 were derived from summary statistics; it was not possible to provide a breakdown by the mode of respiratory support. In addition, we investigated the impact of eGFR on severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure and critical COVID-19. However, due to the limited number of cases in the fourth round and the absence of phenotypic data in the seventh round of GWAS summary data for COVID-19, we were unable to acquire meaningful results. However, we found that a reduced eGFR was causally associated with an increase in the risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization. Therefore, our findings indicate that COVID-19 and kidney function are closely linked; this is a major problem since COVID-19 remains a persistent threat to public health across the world. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic demands a concerted effort to develop new therapeutic strategies to prevent new infections and reduce the severity of infection in patients.

In this study, we investigated the association between COVID-19 and multiple indices of kidney function. However, we obtained inconsistent conclusions, potentially due to the influence of different metabolic pathways on the selected indices or the complex effects of COVID-19 that might lead to renal hyperfiltration or renal dysfunction. Several cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that renal hyperfiltration is associated with various medical conditions, including diabetes, hypertension, obesity, prehypertension, and prediabetes, as well as lifestyle factors, such as smoking, the lack of physical activity, and low levels of aerobic physical activity [32,33,34]. We identified a causal association between hospitalization for COVID-19 and an increase in uACR; however, these results need to be interpreted with caution. Further analysis of specific individuals is now necessary to fully determine the effect of COVID-19 on renal function. A previous observation study reported that kidney dysfunction is common in patients with COVID-19 and may result in a progressive decline in kidney function and the onset of CKD [35]. Thus, patients with COVID-19 and kidney impairment should be managed in an active manner to protect kidney function and minimize potential long-term effects.

Limitations

There were several limitations to this study that need to be considered. First, because the COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing and COVID19-hg GWAS meta-analyses round 7 including UK Biobank, it is inevitable that our analysis may have featured a certain overlap in samples that may have caused bias in the two-sample MR. However, our analysis included many SNP sites and our MR analysis was performed in a rigorous manner. Second, although we demonstrated the causal effect of eGFR on COVID-19, dedicated clinical trials are required to fully determine whether the risk of COVID-19 can be actually reduced via the management of kidney dysfunction. Furthermore, it is important that future studies investigate non-genetic influences and other potential confounders that were not accounted for in the present study. Third, it is possible that a non-linear causal relationship may exist between COVID-19 and the changes of eGFR; to address this, it is necessary to perform non-linear MR analysis for individual patients. Finally, our MR analysis only involved a population of patients of European ancestry; consequently, our current findings now need to be verified in populations of patients from other ancestries.

Conclusion

Our MR analysis demonstrated that kidney function plays a stronger role in COVID-19 than the serum levels of cystatin C or creatinine. Regardless of the severity of COVID-19, kidney function appears to be one of the key targets of COVID-19. Investigation of the underlying pathways and the use of available medications that improve kidney function, such as antihypertensives, might be beneficial for the treatment of COVID-19 treatment, with relevance to drug repositioning and healthcare. Moreover, we found that COVID-19 exerts a complex effect on various renal function indices, necessitating further research to investigate the specific mechanisms and pathways that underlie these effects.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GWAS summary statistics (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/) and COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (https://www.covid19hg.org/).

References

  1. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet (London England). 2020;395(10224):e37–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gong Y, Liu X, Zheng Y, Mei H, Que J, Yuan K, Yan W, Shi L, Meng S, Bao Y, et al. COVID-19 Induced Economic Slowdown and Mental Health issues. Front Psychol. 2022;13:777350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Global prevalence and burden of depressive. And anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet (London England). 2021;398(10312):1700–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fung KW, Baye F, Baik SH, Zheng Z, McDonald CJ. Prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in elderly patients: an observational cohort study of over 2 million adults in the US. PLoS Med. 2023;20(4):e1004194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, Kang L, Guo L, Liu M, Zhou X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet (London England). 2021;397(10270):220–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowe B, Xie Y, Xu E, Al-Aly Z. Kidney outcomes in long COVID. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2021;32(11):2851–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sekula P, Del Greco MF, Pattaro C, Köttgen A. Mendelian randomization as an Approach to assess causality using Observational Data. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2016;27(11):3253–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowden J, Holmes MV. Meta-analysis and mendelian randomization: a review. Res Synthesis Methods. 2019;10(4):486–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JA, Timpson N, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med. 2008;27(8):1133–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun Y, Zhou J, Ye K. Extensive mendelian randomization study identifies potential causal risk factors for severe COVID-19. Commun Med. 2021;1:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ying K, Zhai R, Pyrkov TV, Shindyapina AV, Mariotti M, Fedichev PO, Shen X, Gladyshev VN. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of the causal relationship between aging and COVID-19. Commun Med. 2021;1:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao JV, Schooling CM. Using genetics to understand the role of kidney function in COVID-19: a mendelian randomization study. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Levey AS, Perrone RD, Madias NE. Serum creatinine and renal function. Annu Rev Med. 1988;39:465–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Diseases: Official J Natl Kidney Foundation. 2002;40(2):221–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lees JS, Welsh CE, Celis-Morales CA, Mackay D, Lewsey J, Gray SR, Lyall DM, Cleland JG, Gill JMR, Jhund PS, et al. Glomerular filtration rate by differing measures, albuminuria and prediction of Cardiovascular Disease, mortality and end-stage Kidney Disease. Nat Med. 2019;25(11):1753–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lawlor DA, Benfield L, Logue J, Tilling K, Howe LD, Fraser A, Cherry L, Watt P, Ness AR, Davey Smith G, et al. Association between general and central adiposity in childhood, and change in these, with cardiovascular risk factors in adolescence: prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical Research ed). 2010;341:c6224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, VanderWeele TJ, Higgins JPT, Timpson NJ, Dimou N, et al. Strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology using mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR Statement. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1614–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. The COVID-19. Host Genetics Initiative, a global initiative to elucidate the role of host genetic factors in susceptibility and severity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic. Eur J Hum Genetics: EJHG. 2020;28(6):715–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, Bujanda L, Buti M, Albillos A, Invernizzi P, Fernández J, Prati D, Baselli G, Asselta R, et al. Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(16):1522–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pairo-Castineira E, Clohisey S, Klaric L, Bretherick AD, Rawlik K, Pasko D, Walker S, Parkinson N, Fourman MH, Russell CD, et al. Genetic mechanisms of critical Illness in COVID-19. Nature. 2021;591(7848):92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanzick KJ, Li Y, Schlosser P, Gorski M, Wuttke M, Thomas LF, Rasheed H, Rowan BX, Graham SE, Vanderweff BR, et al. Discovery and prioritization of variants and genes for kidney function in > 1.2 million individuals. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Köttgen A, Albrecht E, Teumer A, Vitart V, Krumsiek J, Hundertmark C, Pistis G, Ruggiero D, O’Seaghdha CM, Haller T, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 18 new loci associated with serum urate concentrations. Nat Genet. 2013;45(2):145–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Amann K, Wanner C, Ritz E. Cross-talk between the kidney and the cardiovascular system. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2006;17(8):2112–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ocak G, Lijfering WM, Verduijn M, Dekker FW, Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, Vossen CY. Risk of venous Thrombosis in patients with chronic Kidney Disease: identification of high-risk groups. J Thromb Haemostasis: JTH. 2013;11(4):627–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sagripanti A, Cozza V, Baicchi U, Camici M, Cupisti A, Barsotti G. Increased thrombin generation in patients with chronic Renal Failure. Int J Clin Lab Res. 1997;27(1):72–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurts C, Panzer U, Anders HJ, Rees AJ. The immune system and Kidney Disease: basic concepts and clinical implications. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(10):738–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schiffl H, Lang SM. Long-term interplay between COVID-19 and chronic Kidney Disease. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;55(8):1977–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID-19: consider cytokine Storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet (London England). 2020;395(10229):1033–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burton JO, Hamali HA, Singh R, Abbasian N, Parsons R, Patel AK, Goodall AH, Brunskill NJ. Elevated levels of procoagulant plasma microvesicles in dialysis patients. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e72663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wuttke M, Li Y, Li M, Sieber KB, Feitosa MF, Gorski M, Tin A, Wang L, Chu AY, Hoppmann A, et al. A catalog of genetic loci associated with kidney function from analyses of a million individuals. Nat Genet. 2019;51(6):957–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jeon YK, Kim MR, Huh JE, Mok JY, Song SH, Kim SS, Kim BH, Lee SH, Kim YK, Kim IJ. Cystatin C as an early biomarker of Nephropathy in patients with type 2 Diabetes. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26(2):258–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mogensen CE, Christensen CK. Predicting diabetic Nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(2):89–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmieder RE, Messerli FH, Garavaglia G, Nunez B. Glomerular hyperfiltration indicates early target organ damage in Essential Hypertension. JAMA. 1990;264(21):2775–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dupuis ME, Nadeau-Fredette AC, Madore F, Agharazii M, Goupil R. Association of Glomerular Hyperfiltration and Cardiovascular Risk in Middle-aged healthy individuals. JAMA Netw open. 2020;3(4):e202377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yende S, Parikh CR. Long COVID and Kidney Disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(12):792–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge many of the participating groups in COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative for providing the summary statistics.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Blood Purification Center, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, 528403, China

    Qiuling Li

  2. Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Mengjiao Lin & Yinghui Deng

  3. Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Haozhang Huang

  4. Department of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Haozhang Huang

  5. The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China

    Haozhang Huang

Authors
  1. Qiuling Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengjiao Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yinghui Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haozhang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HZH conceived the study, analyzed the data, and drafted the paper, HZH and QLL designed the study. QLL helped with the interpretation and improved the manuscript. MJL and YHD collated the data-set and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and the corresponding authors attest that all listed authors meet authorship criteria.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yinghui Deng or Haozhang Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This analysis of publicly available data does not require ethical approval.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12882_2023_3443_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Supplementary Material 1. Supplementary Table  1 Index SNPs significantly associated with potential confounders of COVID-19 in summary-level data-based MR when Genetically predicted eGFR-cr used as exposure. Supplementary Table  2 Genetic instruments for log-transformed eGFR based on creatinine levels. Supplementary Table 3 Index SNPs significantly associated with potential confounders of eGFR-cr in summary-level data-based MR when Genetically predicted COVID-19 used as exposure. Supplementary Table 4. Genetic instruments for log-transformed eGFR based on cystatin C levels. Supplementary Table 5. Causal estimates between eGFRcrea and different COVID-19 infection phenotype from the summary-level data-based MR from the GWAS summary statistics. Supplementary Table 6. Causal estimates between COVID-19 and eGFRcrea from the summary-level data-based MR from the GWAS summary statistics

12882_2023_3443_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 2. Supplementary Fig. 1 Sensitivity analysis of causal association between eGFR and severe COVID-19. Supplementary Fig. 2 Sensitivity analysis of causal association between eGFR and COVID-19 hospitalization. Supplementary Fig. 3 Sensitivity analysis of causal association between eGFR and COVID-19. Supplementary Fig. 4 Top 10 significant GO pathways of eGFR and COVID-19.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Lin, M., Deng, Y. et al. The causal relationship between COVID-19 and estimated glomerular filtration rate: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. BMC Nephrol 25, 21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03443-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03443-4

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us