Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Nephrology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Association between 24-hour blood pressure variability and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional analysis of African Americans participating in the Jackson heart study

  • Rikki M. Tanner1,
  • Daichi Shimbo2,
  • Albert W. Dreisbach3,
  • April P. Carson1,
  • Ervin R. Fox3 and
  • Paul Muntner1Email author
BMC Nephrology201516:84

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0085-6

Received: 19 February 2015

Accepted: 4 June 2015

Published: 18 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Studies suggest 24-h blood pressure (BP) variability has prognostic value for cardiovascular disease. Several factors associated with high 24-h BP variability are also common among individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We hypothesized 24-h BP variability would be higher for individuals with versus without CKD.

Methods

We analyzed 1,022 Jackson Heart Study participants who underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Twenty-four hour BP variability was defined by two metrics: day-night standard deviation (SDdn) and average real variability (ARV). CKD was defined as ACR ≥30 mg/g or eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results

The mean SDdn of systolic BP (SBP) was 10.2 ± 0.2 and 9.1 ± 0.1 mmHg and the mean ARV of SBP was 9.2 ± 0.2 and 8.6 ± 0.1 mmHg for those with and without CKD, respectively (each p ≤ 0.001). After adjustment for age and sex, SDdn and ARV were 0.98 mmHg (95 % CI 0.59, 1.38) and 0.52 mmHg (95 % CI 0.18, 0.86), respectively, higher among participants with versus without CKD. These differences were not statistically significant after further multivariable adjustment including 24-h mean SBP. Older age, and higher total cholesterol and 24-h mean SBP were associated with higher SDdn and ARV of SBP among participants with CKD. Mean SDdn and ARV of diastolic BP (DBP) were higher for participants with versus without CKD but these associations were not present after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusion

Data from the current study suggest that CKD is associated with higher 24-h BP variability, but the association is primarily explained by higher mean BP among those with CKD.

Keywords

Kidney diseaseBlood pressureVariabilityABPMHealth disparities

Background

Over 26 million American adults have chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1], evidenced by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥ 30 mg/g. CKD is a substantial public health challenge given its high prevalence and association with adverse outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and all-cause mortality [2, 3]. Identifying factors that explain this increased risk may provide guidance on the development of interventions to reduce it.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is useful for the identification of phenotypes that cannot be ascertained by blood pressure (BP) measurements in the clinic setting. This includes the identification of white coat hypertension, masked hypertension, circadian BP patterns, and 24-h BP variability. Recent data have suggested that 24-h BP variability has prognostic value for CVD and mortality independent of mean BP [46]. For example, Hansen, et al. reported an association between higher 24-h BP variability and increased risk for cardiovascular mortality and stroke in a pooled analysis of 11 studies [4]. Autonomic dysfunction has been proposed as a key factor underlying higher 24-h BP variability [7]. Many individuals with CKD have autonomic dysfunction and other factors associated with high 24-h BP variability including older age, higher mean systolic BP (SBP), and higher levels of inflammation are common among individuals with CKD [810]. Therefore, we hypothesized that individuals with CKD would have higher 24-h BP variability compared to their counterparts without CKD. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an analysis of African-American adults participating in the Jackson Heart Study.

Methods

Study participants

The Jackson Heart Study is a community-based observational study designed to identify risk factors for CVD in African Americans. Details of the study design and recruitment have been published previously [1113]. In brief, 5,301 African Americans ≥ 21 years of age were recruited from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) site in Jackson, Mississippi, and a representative sample of urban and rural Jackson tri-county (Hinds, Madison, and Rankin) residents, study volunteers, randomly contacted individuals, and secondary family members. Baseline data collection occurred between September 2000 and March 2004. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards governing research in human subjects at the participating centers and all participants provided written consent.

Data collection

Data used for the current analysis were collected through an in-home interview; a study examination after an overnight fast; and, for a subset of participants (n = 1,148), 24-h ABPM. Information on age, sex, education, income, cigarette smoking, and a history of diabetes, stroke, or myocardial infarction were collected during the study interview. During the clinic visit, a standardized protocol was followed to obtain two BP measurements, waist circumference was measured, and blood and urine samples were collected. Information was recorded on all medications, vitamins, mineral supplements, and herbal or home remedies used within the 2 weeks prior to the participant’s interview [12].

Using the blood and urine samples collected during the clinic visit, total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were assayed by the cholesterol oxidase method supplied by Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics on a Roche COBAS Fara analyzer (Indianapolis, IN). Serum c-reactive protein was measured with a high-sensitivity immunoturbidimetric CRP-Latex assay (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Washington) and levels > 3 mg/L were defined as elevated. Urinary albumin was measured with the Dade Behring BN II nephelometer (Newark, Delaware). Serum and urine creatinine were measured using a multi-point enzymatic spectrophotometric assay on a Vitros 950 Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics analyzer (Raritan, New Jersey). Creatinine values were biochemically calibrated to Cleveland Clinic-equivalent Minnesota Beckman CX3 assay for analysis purposes [14]. eGFR was calculated via the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [1], and CKD was defined as ACR ≥ 30 mg/g or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

During the clinic visit, BP was measured after a 5-min rest with a Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer equipped with one of four cuff sizes selected following measurement of each participant’s arm circumference (Hawksley and Sons Ltd). The average of the 2 measures taken 1 min apart was used to define clinic BP. Upon completion of the study visit, participants were asked to complete an ABPM over the next 24 h. ABPM measurements were obtained with a portable, noninvasive oscillometric device (Spacelabs 90207; Medifacts International Ltd, Rockville, MD) with a cuff fitted to the participant’s non-dominant arm. Trained technicians instructed participants in the proper use of the ABPM device. With the participant in the seated position, 3–5 simultaneous ABPM and office sphygmomanometer BP readings were taken to calibrate the ABPM device. The device was programmed to measure BP every 20 min for 24 h, and participants were instructed to proceed with their normal daily activities but keep their arm still and extended at their side during each BP reading. Participants returned to the clinic after 24 h for the removal of the device. The monitor was connected to a computer and the BP readings were downloaded with commercially available software (Medicom, version 3.41; Medifacts Ltd). Quality control was assured by technician recertification, procedural checklists, and data review [12, 1517].

Assessment of 24-h BP variability

All BP readings were reviewed to eliminate out-of-range readings and errors due to motion artifacts or equipment problems, relying on predetermined acceptable ranges of SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) [17]. Twenty-four hour BP variability was defined by two metrics: day-night standard deviation (SDdn) and average real variability (ARV). SDdn was calculated as a weighted average of the daytime and nighttime standard deviation of SBP and DBP, separately, during the ABPM period. The ARV was calculated for SBP and DBP, separately, as the mean of the absolute difference of consecutive BP measurements during the ABPM period.

Statistical analysis

The current analysis was restricted to participants with valid ABPM data based on the International Database of Ambulatory Blood Pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDACO) criteria, which requires 10 daytime (defined as 10a-8p) and 5 nighttime (defined as 12p-6a) SBP and DBP measurements (N = 1,046). Participants missing clinic SBP (n = 5), with end-stage renal disease at baseline (n = 9), and without a serum creatinine measurement at baseline (n = 10) were excluded. We used multiple imputation (n = 10 data sets) and chained equations to impute ACR and other variables with missing data. Additional file 1: Table S1 summarizes the percentage of participants with missing data prior to imputation. We included 1,022 Jackson Heart Study participants in the current analysis.

Participant characteristics and SDdn and ARV of SBP and DBP were calculated for those with and without CKD, separately. The statistical significance of differences across groups were calculated using t-tests and chi-square tests, as appropriate. Next, using linear regression, we calculated the adjusted differences in SDdn and ARV of SBP and DBP for participants with, versus without, CKD. Three levels of adjustment were performed, using variables selected a priori. Initial models included adjustment for age and sex. A second model included age, sex, education, income, smoking status, waist circumference, diabetes, history of stroke, history of myocardial infarction, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, c-reactive protein, statin use, and antihypertensive medication use. The full multivariable adjusted model included the variables in the second model and mean 24-h SBP in analyses of SDdn and ARV of SBP, and mean 24-h DBP in analyses of SDdn and ARV of DBP. Analyses were repeated comparing SDdn and ARV of SBP and DBP between participants with eGFR less than versus greater than or equal to 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and ACR greater than or equal to versus less than 30 mg/g. Finally, for individuals with CKD, we calculated differences in SDdn and ARV of SBP and DBP associated with each study covariate included in full multivariable adjusted models. All analyses were conducted using Stata Version 13 (Stata Corp. College Station, TX).

Results

Participant characteristics

On average, compared to their counterparts without CKD, participants with CKD were older, had a larger waist circumference, a higher mean clinic and 24-h SBP and DBP, and were more likely to be taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker (Table 1). Also, participants with CKD had lower HDL-cholesterol compared to those without CKD. Those with CKD were more likely to have less than a high school education, diabetes, and a history of stroke.
Table 1

Characteristics of Jackson Heart Study participants with and without chronic kidney disease

 

No CKD

CKD

p-value

(n = 849)

(n = 173)

Age, years

58.9 (0.4)

60.8 (0.9)

0.041

Female gender, %

68.3

65.1

0.452

Less than high school education, %

18.1

26.7

0.022

Low income, %

10.8

15.6

0.142

Diabetes, %

21.2

40.6

<0.001

History of stroke, %

2.9

8.8

0.002

History of myocardial infarction, %

4.1

7.5

0.074

Current smoking, %

5.3

7.4

0.329

Waist circumference, cm

99.1 (0.5)

104.5 (1.3)

<0.001

Total cholesterol, mg/dL

200.7 (1.4)

205.0 (3.5)

0.242

HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL

54.1 (0.5)

51.5 (1.0)

0.043

C-reactive protein > 3 mg/L, %

46.7

52.1

0.213

Mean clinic SBP, mmHg

126.0 (0.6)

132.9 (1.6)

<0.001

Mean clinic DBP, mmHg

77.3 (0.4)

77.1 (0.9)

0.781

Mean 24-h SBP, mmHg

125.0 (0.4)

132.7 (1.4)

<0.001

Mean 24-h DBP, mmHg

73.8 (0.3)

76.2 (0.9)

0.004

eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2

94.4 (0.6)

77.7 (2.4)

<0.001

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio, mg/g

5.5 (3.7, 9.4)

55.3 (22.9, 125.5)

<0.001

Antihypertensive medication use, %

   

Aldosterone antagonist

1.6

4.9

0.073

Alpha blocker

11.6

16.9

0.152

ACE inhibitor

35.8

47.0

0.035

Angiotensin II receptor blocker

12.2

13.3

0.753

Beta blocker

24.1

18.6

0.234

Calcium channel blocker

32.6

47.2

0.008

Diuretic

65.6

65.4

0.971

Renin inhibitor

NA

NA

---

Vasodilator

0.8

1.0

0.839

CKD chronic kidney disease, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or an albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g; HDL high-density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ACE angiotensin converting enzyme

Numbers in table are presented as mean (standard error) or percent except albumin-to-creatinine ratio, which is presented as median (interquartile range)

CKD and SDdn and ARV of SBP

SDdn of SBP was higher among participants with versus without CKD (Table 2, top panel). After age and sex-adjustment and further adjustment for education, income, smoking status, waist circumference, diabetes, history of stroke, history of myocardial infarction, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, c-reactive protein, statin use, and antihypertensive medication use, SDdn of SBP was higher for participants with versus without CKD. The difference in SDdn of SBP for those with, versus without, CKD was attenuated and not statistically significant after further adjustment for mean 24-h SBP. ARV of SBP was higher for those with versus without CKD after age and sex adjustment, but this difference was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after further multivariable adjustment.
Table 2

Association of chronic kidney disease status, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate with measures of systolic blood pressure variability

Chronic kidney disease status

Blood pressure variability measure

No CKD

CKD

p-value

(n = 849)

(n = 173)

Day-night standard deviation, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

9.1 ± 0.1

10.2 ± 0.2

<0.001

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.98 (0.59, 1.38)

<0.001

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.64 (0.19, 1.09)

0.005

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.31 (−0.12, 0.74)

0.162

Average real variability, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

8.6 ± 0.1

9.2 ± 0.2

0.001

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.52 (0.18, 0.86)

0.003

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.32 (−0.09, 0.72)

0.125

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.08 (−0.31, 0.46)

0.695

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio, mg/g

Blood pressure variability measure

ACR < 30

ACR ≥ 30

p-value

(n = 885)

(n = 137)

Day-night standard deviation, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

9.2 ± 0.1

10.2 ± 0.3

<0.001

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

1.09 (0.65, 1.53)

<0.001

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.85 (0.33, 1.37)

0.001

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.35 (−0.16, 0.85)

0.179

Average real variability, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

8.7 ± 0.1

9.2 ± 0.2

0.01

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.57 (0.18, 0.95)

0.004

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.41 (−0.06, 0.89)

0.085

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.05 (−0.41, 0.50)

0.844

Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min/1.73 m 2

Blood pressure variability measure

eGFR ≥ 60

eGFR < 60

p-value

(n = 960)

(n = 62)

Day-night standard deviation, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

9.3 ± 0.1

10.4 ± 0.4

<0.001

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.58 (−0.04, 1.20)

0.066

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.24 (−0.39, 0.86)

0.455

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.17 (−0.42, 0.77)

0.565

Average real variability, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

8.7 ± 0.1

9.5 ± 0.2

0.004

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.27 (−0.24, 0.78)

0.296

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

−0.01 (−0.54, 0.52)

0.981

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

−0.05 (−0.56, 0.46)

0.842

CKD chronic kidney disease, ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

aAdjusted for age, sex, education, income, smoking status, waist circumference, diabetes, history of stroke, history of myocardial infarction, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, c-reactive protein, statin use, and antihypertensive medication use

bAdjusted for above model 1 plus mean 24-h systolic blood pressure

SDdn and ARV of SBP were higher among participants with ACR ≥ 30 mg/g versus their counterparts with ACR < 30 mg/g (Table 2, middle panel). These associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment including mean 24-h SBP. SDdn and ARV of SBP were higher for participants with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to their counterparts with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Table 2, bottom panel). These differences were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment for age and sex or further multivariable adjustment.

Among participants with CKD, older age, total cholesterol, and higher 24-h SBP were associated with higher SDdn and ARV of SBP (Additional file 2: Table S2). Female gender and alpha blocker use were associated with higher SDdn of SBP but not ARV of SBP. Higher HDL-cholesterol was associated with lower ARV of SBP among those with CKD.

CKD and SDdn and ARV of DBP

SDdn and ARV of DBP were higher for participants with versus without CKD (Table 3, top panel). SDdn of DBP was higher for participants with versus without CKD after age, sex-adjustment and after further adjustment for education, income, smoking status, waist circumference, diabetes, history of stroke, history of myocardial infarction, total and HDL-cholesterol, c-reactive protein, statin use, and antihypertensive medication use. However, this association was attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment for mean 24-h DBP. The age and sex-adjusted mean difference in ARV of DBP was higher for individuals with CKD compared to those without CKD, but this association was no longer statistically significant after further multivariable adjustment. Compared to those with ACR < 30 mg/g, participants with ACR ≥ 30 mg/g had higher SDdn of DBP and ARV of DBP (Table 3, middle panel). This association was no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment including mean 24-h DBP. Differences in SDdn of DBP and ARV of DBP between participants with eGFR < and ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were not statistically significant before or after multivariable adjustment (Table 3, bottom panel).
Table 3

Association of chronic kidney disease status, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate with measures of diastolic blood pressure variability

Chronic kidney disease status

Blood pressure variability measure

No CKD

CKD

p-value

(n = 849)

(n = 173)

Day-night standard deviation, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

8.0 ± 0.1

8.5 ± 0.2

0.004

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.54 (0.17, 0.90)

0.004

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.43 (0.00, 0.85)

0.049

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.25 (−0.16, 0.66)

0.231

Average real variability, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

7.5 ± 0.1

7.9 ± 0.2

0.043

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.37 (0.01, 0.72)

0.041

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.32 (−0.09, 0.72)

0.128

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.19 (−0.21, 0.59)

0.351

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio, mg/g

Blood pressure variability measure

ACR < 30

ACR ≥ 30

p-value

(n = 885)

(n = 137)

Day-night standard deviation, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

8.0 ± 0.1

8.6 ± 0.2

0.002

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.64 (0.23, 1.06)

0.002

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.63 (0.13, 1.13)

0.013

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.39 (−0.10, 0.87)

0.122

Average real variability, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

7.5 ± 0.1

8.1 ± 0.2

0.011

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.53 (0.13, 0.93)

0.010

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.57 (0.09, 1.05)

0.021

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.39 (−0.09, 0.87)

0.108

Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min/1.73 m 2

Blood pressure variability measure

eGFR ≥ 60

eGFR < 60

p-value

(n = 960)

(n = 62)

Day-night standard deviation, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

8.1 ± 0.1

8.2 ± 0.3

0.572

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

0.17 (−0.39, 0.72)

0.551

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

0.07 (−0.50, 0.64)

0.805

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

0.01 (−0.55, 0.56)

0.977

Average real variability, mmHg

   

Mean ± standard error

7.6 ± 0.1

7.5 ± 0.2

0.655

Age, sex adjusted

0 (ref)

−0.13 (−0.66, 0.41)

0.641

Multivariable adjusted 1a

0 (ref)

−0.19 (−0.75, 0.36)

0.487

Multivariable adjusted 2b

0 (ref)

−0.24 (−0.78, 0.30)

0.384

CKD chronic kidney disease, ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

aAdjusted for age, sex, education, income, smoking status, waist circumference, diabetes, history of stroke, history of myocardial infarction, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, c-reactive protein, statin use, and antihypertensive medication use

bAdjusted for above model 1 plus mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure

Among participants with CKD, older age, larger waist circumference and higher mean 24-h DBP were associated with higher SDdn and ARV of DBP (Additional file 3: Table S3). Female gender was associated with lower ARV of DBP but not SDdn of DBP among those with CKD.

Discussion

This population-based study of African American adults suggests an association between CKD and higher SDdn of BP and ARV of DBP. However, these associations were explained by the higher mean 24-h BP among participants with CKD. Older age, larger waist circumference, and higher mean 24-h SBP were associated with higher 24-h SBP variability. Female gender, larger waist circumference, and higher mean 24-h DBP were associated with higher 24-h DBP variability.

Twenty-four hour BP variability has been associated with adverse outcomes and may represent a novel CVD risk factor. In a pooled analysis of 11 studies, Hansen, et al. reported that ARV of BP was associated with total and cardiovascular mortality (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for ARV of SBP: 1.11 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.18) and 1.17 (95 % CI: 1.07–1.28), respectively; multivariable adjusted HR for ARV of DBP: 1.13 (95 % CI: 1.07–1.19) and 1.21 (95 % CI: 1.12–1.31), respectively) [4]. Additionally, Eguchi, et al. reported SD of nighttime SBP to be an independent risk factor for the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death (HR: 2.21; 95 % CI 1.08–4.53) [18].

Long-term BP variability (i.e. “visit-to-visit” variability) has been associated with adverse outcomes among individuals with CKD in several studies [1922]. For example, in an analysis of 374 elderly patients with CKD, DiIorio, et al. reported that each 1 % increase in visit-to-visit BP variability was associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR: 1.05 (95 % CI: 1.02–1.09) [19]. In an analysis of the African American Study of Kidney Disease (AASK) trial, McMullan, et al. found an association between visit-to-visit BP variability with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (HR comparing highest with lowest tertile of visit-to-visit BP variability: 2.82 (95 % CI: 1.14–6.95) and 4.91 (95 % CI: 1.12–21.50), respectively) [20]. Although not extensively studied, 24-h BP variability has been associated with target organ damage among individuals with CKD in at least one study. Ryu, et al. reported that ARV of SBP was associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio: 1.05 (95 % CI: 1.02–1.09)), but not kidney injury (defined as eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria) in a large sample of hypertensive CKD patients in Korea [23].

In the current analysis, CKD was associated with higher 24-h BP variability, but this association was no longer present after adjustment for mean 24-h BP. The direction of the association between mean BP and BP variability is unclear. For example, higher mean BP and its associated sequelae (e.g., arterial stiffness) could lead to higher BP variability. Alternatively, higher BP variability could cause vascular injury, making BP harder to control. Given the cross-sectional nature of our analysis, future studies with longitudinal ABPM assessments could prove helpful for characterizing this association. Autonomic imbalance is a characteristic of BP variability which has also been associated with CKD progression [24] and may suggest a potential physiologic mechanism for the association between 24-h variability and CKD. Sympathetic nerve terminals innervate the kidneys directly, potentially affecting tubular function by enhancing solute and fluid resorption and modifying renal microvascular function by enhancing the effects of angiotensin [2426]. Additionally, several CVD risk factors which adversely affect the glomerulus (e.g. endothelial dysfunction, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and oxidative stress) are also associated with high sympathetic and low parasympathetic tone, suggesting a potential mechanism involving the nervous system’s role in regulating hemodynamics, vascular tone, metabolism, and inflammation [24].

Strengths and limitations

Our study maintains several strengths, including the large sample size of African American adults with available ABPM data and the availability of comprehensive data which allowed us to adjust for potential confounders. However, the current findings should be considered in the context of certain limitations. The current analysis employed a cross-sectional study design. Also, eGFR and albuminuria were only assessed at a single time point and therefore, misclassification of CKD status may be present. We were not able to assess the effect of plasma metanephrines, a marker of adrenergic activation, on 24-h BP variability. Finally, the applicability of our results to race/ethnic groups beyond African Americans needs to be assessed in other studies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, data from the current study suggest that CKD may be associated with higher SDdn of SBP and DBP and ARV of DBP over 24-h. However, these associations were no longer present after adjustment for 24-h mean BP. Further studies with repeated measurements of 24-h BP variability and mean BP are needed to determine the direction of the association. Such data may be useful in identifying new therapeutic targets in an effort to improve health outcomes for individuals with CKD.

Abbreviations

ABPM: 

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

ACR: 

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio

ARV: 

Average real variability

BP: 

Blood pressure

CI: 

Confidence interval

CKD: 

Chronic kidney disease

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

DBP: 

Diastolic blood pressure

eGFR: 

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

HR: 

Hazard ratio

SBP: 

Systolic blood pressure

SDdn

Day-night standard deviation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The Jackson Heart Study is supported by contracts HHSN268201300046C, HHSN268201300047C, HHSN268201300048C, HHSN268201300049C, and HHSN268201300050C from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD). Support was also partially provided through P01-HL047540 (Dr. Shimbo) from NHLBI. Dr. Muntner received an institutional grant from Amgen Inc. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
(2)
Columbia University Medical Center
(3)
Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center

References

  1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Keith DS, Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Brown JB, Smith DH. Longitudinal follow-up and outcomes among a population with chronic kidney disease in a large managed care organization. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(6):659–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen TW, Thijs L, Li Y, et al. Prognostic value of reading-to-reading blood pressure variability over 24 hours in 8938 subjects from 11 populations. Hypertension. 2010;55(4):1049–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pringle E, Phillips C, Thijs L, et al. Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population. J Hypertens. 2003;21(12):2251–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wizner B, Dechering DG, Thijs L, et al. Short-term and long-term repeatability of the morning blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens. 2008;26(7):1328–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Safar ME. Blood pressure variability in relation to autonomic nervous system dysregulation: the X-CELLENT study. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(4):399–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coresh J, Wei GL, McQuillan G, et al. Prevalence of high blood pressure and elevated serum creatinine level in the United States: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994). Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(9):1207–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, Reynolds K, Arnett DK, Oparil S. The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension. 2011;57(2):160–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johns EJ. Autonomic regulation of kidney function. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;117:203–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sempos CT, Bild DE, Manolio TA. Overview of the Jackson Heart Study: a study of cardiovascular diseases in African American men and women. Am J Med Sci. 1999;317(3):142–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor Jr HA, Wilson JG, Jones DW, et al. Toward resolution of cardiovascular health disparities in African Americans: design and methods of the Jackson Heart Study. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4 Suppl 6):S6–4–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuqua SR, Wyatt SB, Andrew ME, et al. Recruiting African-American research participation in the Jackson Heart Study: methods, response rates, and sample description. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4 Suppl 6):S6–18–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox ER, Benjamin EJ, Sarpong DF, et al. The relation of C-reactive protein to chronic kidney disease in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. BMC Nephrol. 2010;11:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Wyatt SB, Akylbekova EL, Wofford MR, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the Jackson Heart Study. Hypertension. 2008;51(3):650–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogedegbe G, Spruill TM, Sarpong DF, et al. Correlates of isolated nocturnal hypertension and target organ damage in a population-based cohort of African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26(8):1011–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hickson DA, Diez Roux AV, Wyatt SB, et al. Socioeconomic position is positively associated with blood pressure dipping among African-American adults: the Jackson Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24(9):1015–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Eguchi K, Hoshide S, Schwartz JE, Shimada K, Kario K. Visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability as predictors of incident cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25(9):962–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Iorio B, Pota A, Sirico ML, et al. Blood pressure variability and outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(12):4404–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McMullan CJ, Bakris GL, Phillips RA, Forman JP. Association of BP Variability with Mortality among African Americans with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(5):731–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Mallamaci F, Minutolo R, Leonardis D, et al. Long-term visit-to-visit office blood pressure variability increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;84(2):381–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yokota K, Fukuda M, Matsui Y, Hoshide S, Shimada K, Kario K. Impact of visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure on deterioration of renal function in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Hypertens Res. 2013;36(2):151–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryu J, Cha RH, Kim DK, et al. The clinical association of the blood pressure variability with the target organ damage in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(7):957–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Brotman DJ, Bash LD, Qayyum R, et al. Heart rate variability predicts ESRD and CKD-related hospitalization. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(9):1560–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. DiBona GF. Neural control of the kidney: past, present, and future. Hypertension. 2003;41(3 Pt 2):621–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kassab S, Kato T, Wilkins FC, Chen R, Hall JE, Granger JP. Renal denervation attenuates the sodium retention and hypertension associated with obesity. Hypertension. 1995;25(4 Pt 2):893–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tanner et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement