Skip to main content

The association of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and increased risk for AV-fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. A retrospective analysis



Patients in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) need a patent vascular access for optimal treatment. The recommended first choice is a native arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Complications of AVF are frequent and include thrombosis, stenosis and infections leading to worsening of dialysis efficacy. Some known risk factors are age, gender and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The aim was to investigate if further risk variables are associated with dysfunctional AVF.


This retrospective observational study included 153 chronic HD patients (Cases) referred to a total of 473 radiological investigations due to clinically suspected complications of their native AVF. Another group of chronic HD patients (n = 52) who had a native AVF but were without history of previous complications for at least 2 years were controls. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, logistic regression, parametric and non-parametric methods such as Student’s T-test and Mann-Whitney test.


Among Cases, at least one significant stenosis (> 50% of the lumen) was detected in 348 occasions. Subsequent PTA was performed in 248 (71%). Median erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) weekly doses were higher in Cases than in Controls (8000 vs 5000 IU, p < 0.001). Cases received higher doses of intravenous iron/week than the Controls before the investigation (median 50 mg vs 25 mg, p = 0.004) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, p = 0.028). Compared to Controls, Cases had a lower level of parathyroid hormone (median 25 vs 20 ρmol/L, p = 0.009). In patients with diabetes mellitus, HbA1c was higher among Cases than Controls (50 vs 38 mmol/mol, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed significant associations between Cases and female gender, prescription of doxazocin, and doses of ESA and LMWH.

There was no difference between the groups regarding hemoglobin, CRP or ferritin.


In conclusion, the present study indicated that the factors associated with AVF problems were high doses of ESA, iron administration, and tendency of thromboembolism (indicated by high LMWH doses); the use of doxazocin prescription, however, requires further investigation.

Peer Review reports


A native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred access for patients in chronic hemodialysis [1], while AV graft (AVG) and central dialysis catheters (CDC) are less preferred options [2]. Non-maturation of an AVF varies between 20% and 60% [3,4,5,6].

Although thrombosis, stenosis and infections appear as complications, the patency of AVF is superior to AVG and CDC [7,8,9,10]. The one-year patency of AVF is 50–70% [3, 11,12,13].

AVF dysfunction can be caused by too low bloodflow and/or clotting that develops predominantly upon stenosis due to neointimal proliferation [4]. The risk factors vary depending on the location of AVF dysfunction; for instance, AVF problems within the feeding artery are considered to be related to factors such as age, diabetes mellitus, hypertensive diseases, uraemia, tobacco use and inflammation [4, 6, 14]. Anastomosis related problems are considered mainly to be due to surgical measures [6]. Post-anastomosis related problems such as stenosis and thrombosis are noted especially in elderly patients (≥65 years), those with coagulation abnormalities, those with hypotension, and in smokers [6, 15, 16]. Other risk factors are prolonged clamping in conjunction with compression, repeated needle punctures and local hematoma [4, 6, 13, 17, 18].

Individual circumstances focus on the presence of diabetes mellitus, older age, and female gender, all of which are associated with a worse prognosis [14, 19,20,21]. Other factors that are considered to hamper AVF function are high levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1, factor VII [22], daily dialysis [23], hypotension [24], smoking [25], disturbed calcium and phosphate balance and increased parathyroid hormone levels [26,27,28,29]. Previous studies from our center indicated that patients with AVF problems had received increased doses of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) [30, 31]; this was also noticed in other studies [32,33,34]. However, further validation is needed to substantiate this.

Aside from individual suffering, the cost due to AVF complications are substantial [9, 35]. A patent AVF improves life expectancy [36]. Therefore, it is important to identify further variables that may be intervened to prevent AVF problems. In addition, if a CDC is necessary, this increases the risk for infections [9].

The aim of this study was to investigate if there are further risk variables that are associated with dysfunctional AVFs.


Patient characteristics

Since guidelines recommend lower arm AVF [37], the present study focused on risk factors for only these type of patients, thereby excluding those with AVG and upper arm placement of AVF, respectively. All patients were over 18 years of age. Data were collected between 2006 and 2015 from one university hospital and one county hospital. Specified data concerning non-maturation of AVF in the course of immediate surgical creation was not the intention of the present study since preoperative individual, surgical and technical evaluations differ. The intention was to clarify reasons for a failure after the AVF function had been established. Hemodialysis vintage (duration of time attending for dialysis), dialysis efficacy and present drug administration such as antihypertensives and anticoagulants are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population at baseline presented as proportion, mean (SD) or median (quartiles)

Study design

The study was an explorative retrospective observational study of 205 patients in chronic hemodialysis (HD) that had a native lower arm AVF for HD use. Of these, 153 patients were defined as ‘Cases’ since they had clinical assessed AVF dysfunction that resulted in referral for radiologic investigation at the local department of Radiology. The Cases performed a total of 473 radiologic examinations of AVFs. Each of these examinations was defined as an independent episode of access problems and as such was used for analysis. In addition to each radiological investigation (that could include/end up in intervention: radiological or surgical, Table 3), each episode included the closest regular laboratory samples within 1 month before and 1 month after (as cross-sectional data). Some patients underwent several episodes of interventions, so for these repeated laboratory data were obtained.

Fifty-two chronic HD patients who had not suffered any AVF complication (without need of radiology investigation) during at least 2 years (complication free period) served as Controls. Regular laboratory samples were collected within 2 months after the first and subsequent year respectively (complication free years). This study did not include any specific data of hyper- or hypotensive episodes during dialysis.

Radiologic investigations and access flow measurements

For the Cases, the radiological investigations were based on clinical suspicion of insufficient AVF function. Referrals for radiological investigation were based on a combination of clinical findings, monitoring and surveillance measurements according to the KDOQI clinical practice guidelines [1]. The routines include a prospective trend analysis verifying a progressive impaired AVF access flow over time, especially if below 500 ml/min, as well as a repeated increase of static mean venous pressure by more than 50%, increasing recirculation, and/or insufficient cannulation possibilities. Often an ultrasound examination was also performed before radiological investigation to help guide stenosis diagnostics (Table 2). Results from radiological interventions and other measures were collected from medical records and from radiology archives (Table 3).

Table 2 The main reasons for radiological investigation (n = 473) of the AVF – usually confirmed by measured blood flow problems. The referrals included several surveillance and monitoring findings to discriminate possible expected clinical findings. “Others“ are a blend of worsened dialysis, pain, artery suction and others. Doppler Ultrasound was used as a preemptive examination in 307 of the investigations
Table 3 The most common findings of radiological investigations (n = 473) and measures taken of Cases

Dialysis regimen

Access blood flow and recirculation (% of return of exit blood flow from the extracorporeal dialyzed circuit to the inlet blood flow) was measured using a Transonic® device. The total weekly administered doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, U/week), the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA, U/week), and intravenously administered iron during the end of the HD (mg/week) were calculated. The values used were those within 1 month before and 1 month after the radiological investigation for Case and the one-year event free date for Controls. Dialysis efficacy was estimated by calculating the weekly stKt/V based on calculations of urea removal. The time spent in dialysis (hours/week) as well as body mass index (BMI) were also registered.

Laboratory data

The laboratory values included were hemoglobin (reference 100–120 g/L), platelets (165–387 × 109/L), serum values of albumin (g/L), calcium (2.10–2.50 mmol/L), phosphate (0.60–1.5 mmol/L), ferritin (7–120 μg/L), parathyroid hormone (1.5–7.6 ρmol/L), C-reactive protein (CRP,  < 5 mg/L, data < 5 mg/L are given as 4.99 mg/L), HbA1c (mmol/mol-IFCC), plasma fibrinogen (g/L), and cholesterol (3.9–7.8 mmol/L). Since we lacked information about weight in a number of patients, a rough estimate of ESA responsiveness/resistance (ESA/Hb) was calculated using the ESA doses (U/week) divided by the hemoglobin value (g/L). This was a modified estimate of ESA resistance based on the Erythropoietin Resistance Index by Santos et al. [38]. Similarly, the iron administration in mg/week was related to the hemoglobin level (Iron/Hb).

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were expressed as means with (SD = standard deviation) or as medians with (range). Analysis of categorical data was done with Chi 2 test, and group comparisons with respect to continuous variables were performed with Student t-test, ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test depending on data distribution. Paired statistics were performed with the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank test. When correlation analysis was performed the result was given as correlation coefficient ‘r’ for parametric (Pearson) and ‘rho’ for non-parametric (Spearman) analyses.

Statistical analysis was performed of the first episode and included in next step each new episode and new Control (one stenosis-free year later) as independent episodes. Baseline data in Table 1 are given for the first investigation of Cases and Controls.

The variables that differed between the two groups based on univariate comparisons (Table 4) were included in a multiple logistic regression. A stepwise logistic regression model was performed with group (Cases vs Controls) as the outcome including the variables gender, prescription of ESA, PTH, standard Kt/V (stKt/V), iron administration/week, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and alfa receptor-blockers. Several variables for HD-conditions were significant in univariate analyses, but due to strong correlations with each other we chose to include only stKt/v in the multiple model. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) together with R2 (coefficient of determination by Cox & Snell) are presented to quantify associations between the explanatory variables and the group as the outcome variable. A two-tailed significance level of p < 0.05 was used, if not otherwise mentioned. Statistical analyses were done with statistical package SPSS v25.

Table 4 Comparison (mean and SD) for Controls and for Cases. Data collected before vs after intervention (Cases) and for Controls (after 1 year free of AVF problems) and repeated within 8 weeks later for both groups. Also included are parametric and non-parametric comparisons between Controls first data and Cases before intervention


A radio-cephalic (RC) fistula was present in 90% of the Cases, with a dominance for end-to-side anastomosis. The remaining 10% had a mid-arm placement. All Cases had been investigated by either percutaneous transluminal angiography (PTA) (mostly) or by phlebography due to impaired fistula function (Table 3). At least one significant stenosis (> 50%) was detected in 348 investigations, and a subsequent PTA was performed in 248 of these. Thrombolysis was performed in another 14 Cases (total n = 262). In 211 of the examinations, no radiological intervention was performed. In 40 of these examinations, there was no abnormality and the remainder underwent surgical adjustment or were referred for another more suitable radiological investigation/intervention (Table 3).

All Controls had a radio-cephalic (RC) fistula, with a dominance for end-to-side anastomosis. The 52 Control patients were considered for up to 124 measurements.

Table 1 shows that there were no differences between the groups in age, or between the prevalence of various diagnoses considered responsible for kidney failure. The Controls had a history of a longer vintage and more tobacco users. The Cases had a higher prevalence of administered alfa-receptor blockers (Table 1).

Table 4 shows that regarding baseline laboratory values the Cases had a higher dose of weekly iron administered and a lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) level than the Controls. However, the calcium-phosphate product did not differ between groups. For the patients suffering from diabetes nephropathy, the Cases had a higher HbA1c. This difference was not present after intervention. When comparing the first data for the Controls (n = 117) and the data before intervention in the Cases (n = 397), the median values of CRP did not differ (Controls 6 mg/L, quartiles 5–14 vs Cases 6 mg/L, quartiles 5–14).

Fibrinogen values were analyzed to estimate bleeding risk for 158 occasions before intervention in the Cases. The mean value was 4.5 g/L (SD ±1.3) and 70% had a value above the upper reference value.

The prescriptions differed insofar that the Cases received a higher dose of weekly ESA compared to the Controls (Table 4), iron and LMWH both before and after intervention.

The ESA doses did not differ between genders. The Cases with glomerulonephritis or nephrosclerosis received higher doses of ESA than those with other diagnoses (p-value< 0.01). In the Controls, the ESA doses were lower for all diagnoses compared to the Cases.

At follow-up the Controls with diabetes mellitus had an increase in HbA1c while other values remained unchanged. In the Cases, hemoglobin was lowered after intervention, most probably due to bleeding during the intervention. Indirect measures of the more effective AVF flow after intervention can be the increased blood pump speed, stKt/V and HD hours/week, and the decreased recirculation.

Among the Cases, the ESA/Hb correlated with fibrinogen (r = 0.292, p = 0.002), Iron/Hb (r = 0.215, p = 0.001), CRP (r = 0.163, p = 0.003), and dialysis time hours/week (r = 0.18, p = 0.001), but did not correlate with the other factors.

After initial analyses of the variables mentioned in the Statistical analyses section, proceeding univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses are shown in Table 5. The results of the final model revealed that besides female gender (OR = 2.26, p-value = 0.012, R2 = 2%), a higher prescription of ESA (OR = 1.15, p-value< 0.001, R2 = 7%), the use of the alfa-receptor blockers doxazocin (OR = 3.99, p-value = 0.004, R2 = 4%, registered as a dichotomous variable), and higher doses of LMWH (OR = 1.06, p-value = 0.013, R2 = 2%) remained as statistically significant factors for the performance of AVF investigation.

Table 5 Logistic regression model with group (Case = 1 and Control = 0) as the outcome variable (Odds ratio -OR- and 95% confidence interval- CI). Variables associated with group are investigated by univariate and multivariate models

Iron administration dropped out from the final model eventually depending on correlation to ESA and/or LMWH (iron vs ESA r = 0.252, p < 0.001; iron vs LMWH r = 0.139, p < 0.05). In patients with diabetes mellitus, there was an inverse correlation between the HbA1c level and extent of dialysis, measured as stKt/V (rho = − 0.242, p = 0.017, n = 97). Doxazocin was not prescribed as the sole antihypertensive medication in any patient but was prescribed together with two to five other antihypertensives in 93% of the patients. In those with doxazocin, stKt/V was lower than for patients without such prescription (p < 0.001), but did not differ between Cases and Controls. In patients without doxazocin, stKt/V was lower in Cases before radiological investigation than in Controls (p = 0.028).


The complexity of AVF dysfunction is due to multiple reasons [14, 18]. It appears different on various levels of the AVF such as the arterial branch, the area of the anastomosis, and the area of cannulation. In the present study, with the Case and Control design, several new plausible risk factors were found. After multiple regression analyses, the remaining risk factors for AVF dysfunction, besides female gender, were the prescriptions of higher doses of ESA and LMWH and the use of alfa-receptor blockers. Univariate analyses showed several significant findings but with limited r-square values, which highlights the complexity of numerous different reasons that contribute to AVF morbidity. One reason might be the relation to the prescription of higher doses of iron for the Cases. Although there was no difference in CRP, ferritin and albumin during the first and the second episode (after investigation), there was a small and significant correlation between ESA/Hb and CRP. An inflammatory association between AVF problems and CRP was also shown by others [39]. However, we cannot rule out that the CRP may be a primary reason caused, for example, by the poorer general condition of these patients, but in contrast may also be a consequence of AVF dysfunction. Elevated ESA doses in the Cases with AVF dysfunction were also shown in a few previous studies [30, 31, 40, 41].

The other deviate findings in the Cases are reasonably explained by the impaired blood flow in the AVF before intervention such as the use of a lower blood pump speed, higher recirculation, less effective dialysis (shown by a lower stKt/V), and the shortened/interrupted HD sessions. All these variables improved after intervention. Within the frame of the study, other expected risk factors such as tobacco use and calcium, phosphate and PTH levels were similar or even worse in the Controls.

Insulin resistance due to tissue insensitivity is pronounced in uremic patients [42]. In the present study, an inverse correlation between HbA1c and stKt/V in patients with diabetes mellitus indicate that less dialysis is associated with a worse metabolic control. Such metabolic disturbance may impair the vascular endothelium [11, 43]. This is also in line with the present study where the Cases with diabetic nephropathy had higher HbA1c values before intervention, which thereafter improved and became similar to Controls.

However, the shorter vintage when AVF problems appear in the Cases compared to the Controls may be due to the maturation process, although this period is mainly considered to be within 8 weeks after surgery [1]. Therefore, these results indicate that the Cases mainly have a more general problem that affects their AVF already early on, but also later after placement.

Several Cases in the present study might suffer from hypo-responsiveness to ESA since hemoglobin levels were similar to Controls. Johnson et al. noted that such hypo-responsiveness is present in 5–10% of chronic kidney disease patients [44]. A few studies have suggested a link between ESA responsiveness and higher morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease patients [45, 46], often together with more signs of inflammation [47,48,49]. Regarding AVF in the present study, there is no indication that the Cases had a higher degree of inflammation than the Controls. In that ESA increases blood pressure [50], higher ESA doses could explain the addition of antihypertensive drugs such as alfa-receptor blockers.

The activation of coagulation during HD is initiated by the blood membrane contact [51]. This will result in high concentrations of activators in the blood that return to the AVF, which may favor clotting in this AVF area. Besides a local activation, a more general effect seems present since most AVF stenoses and thromboses are present/develop closer to the AVF anastomosis as well as the site where the needle for the inlet to the dialysis circuit is located [14]. Other studies have shown that a higher ESA dose was related to a higher extent of thromboembolic complications in AVF [52] as well as of cardiovascular diseases in general [34, 52,53,54].

The present study shows a relation between ESA/Hb and plasma fibrinogen that indicates an association with increased thromboembolic risk. Such data also fit with previous studies that noted in general that treatment with ESA was associated with increased thromboembolic events [32,33,34]. Inflammation may induce increased fibrinogen levels. However, in the present study, the CRP values, as a marker for inflammation, did not differ extensively between the Cases and Controls, and in general were not very high.

The increased LMWH doses in Cases versus Controls may well indicate that LMWH is a confounding factor for an increased tendency for clotting that is visible in the dialyzer and/or in the venous air traps. The increasing number of extracorporeal circuit thromboses oblige the dialysis staff to increase the dose of LMWH. Such thromboembolic tendency in these patients may increase the risk also for thromboses associated to the AVF.

Another possible consequence of increased LMWH doses may be increased blood loss after decannulation at the site of the AVF after termination of the HD. The blood loss would explain that higher doses of ESA and intravenous iron were used in these patients. The blood loss would also lower iron stores, increase the need for iron supplementation and explain that ferritin levels were similar to those of the Controls. However, the repeated infusions of iron could have toxic effects on local AVF conditions and lead to negative effects on all-cause mortality [55, 56]. Also, ferritin levels above 400 μg/L have recently raised concern to be associated with higher inflammatory effects on the vascular endothelium with iron-induced oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction [57, 58]. In the present study, ferritin was above 400 μg/L among half of the patients. However, this level was recommended by KDIGO in 2012 [59], which indicates that lower values may be considered in the future. Maintaining a regular hemoglobin level can be achieved by using regular ESA doses combined with intravenous iron doses adapted to S-ferritin (SF) and transferrin saturation (TSAT) thresholds that are lower than those used in routine practice; this contributes to a reduced risk of iron overload [60].

Studies have indicated increased morbidity and shortened life expectancy for HD patients that receive ESA above 8100  U/week [61], and iron doses above 800 mg within 6 months [62]. The administration of intravenous ESA might enhance erythropoietin receptors in the stenotic fistulae, thus inducing cell proliferation in response to local TGF-β1 expression, and result in intimal thickening of the vessel wall [63]. This should entail more careful attention when reaching doses beyond 8000 U/week and subsequent attention to other methods to treat the anemic state of the HD patient.

The lower stKt/V, as an estimate of the extent of HD, was still significantly lower for the Cases (compared to the Controls) after intervention of the stenosis, although it was well within the limit of recommendation. Therefore, the present study cannot rule out that extended HD could reduce the need of ESA, which would be in line with other studies [64, 65].

The significant finding of a higher frequency of doxazocin prescription together with other antihypertensive drugs may imply that these patients suffered from a more resistant hypertension. Such hypertension is not evidently related to interdialytic weight gain [66]. This could be related to higher doses of ESA that may increase blood pressure [50]. On the one hand, doxazocin dilates vessels and may counteract, for example, platelet aggregation, thereby having beneficial profibrinolytic effects [67, 68] and counteracting coronary constriction [69]. On the other hand, doxazocin may stimulate collagen synthesis [70] and induce edema [71], which would be a disadvantage for the AVF. We recommend further studies to clarify if advantages or disadvantages by doxazocin and AVF function exists.

The strength of the present study was the consecutive inclusion of the numerous episodes of the Cases and the Controls who had a lower arm AVF observed up to a 9-year period.


Repeated use of Cases and Controls may be a limitation. The controls had a wash-out period of 1 year and were considered as new controls for the next episode the following year. In some Cases, repeated measurements were performed several times and we considered each episode as independent. Within both groups paired statistics were used with each patient as his/her control in the analysis (before vs after for each episode). Therefore, results on both the group and individual level are presented. Variables such as gender and diagnosis were stable over time. Age alterations were considered similar in both groups (see Table 1).

Information about overhydration between dialysis and ultrafiltration was not included in the analyses. This is a known factor for hyper- and hypotension and AVF access [72]. In some of the patients, the phlebography or angiography could not reveal a stenosis, although the AVF access was not considered optimal from a clinical point of view. This could have been due to vasoconstriction or problems to achieve adequate locations of the needles at the insertion sites. On some occasions, it was later found that a patient had more central stenoses such as in the feeding artery or in veins of the upper arm or at the exit of the subclavian vein. Some patients suffered from elongated ‘non-significant’ stenoses that caused an impaired flow [14]. We cannot rule out that hypotensive episodes appeared in patients that were prescribed the antihypertensive drug doxazocin. However, hypotension is probably less frequent in those patients prescribed numerous antihypertensives due to therapy resistance than in those without hypertension.

The importance of the results is that the presence of hypo-responsiveness to ESA and iron doses should bring into question whether it might be reasonable to keep a lower dose and thereby a hemoglobin level in the lower range. In patients with previous clotting problems, complicated surgical procedures and higher fibrinogen levels favor thromboembolic events, and therefore may be considered for a prolonged period of LMWH as prophylaxis for thrombosis after AVF surgery, as is also suggested by others [73]. In the present study, the relation between ESA/Hb and plasma fibrinogen indicates an association and supports an increased thromboembolic risk. Such data also fit with previous studies showing that treatment with ESA was associated with increased thromboembolic events [32,33,34].

Future research should clarify if a more extensive bleeding after decannulation, caused by higher LMWH doses contributes to anemia and increased doses of ESA.

Diabetes patients may benefit from an improved metabolic control to counteract insulin resistance. Combining high doses of ESA and intravenous iron among diabetics treated with HD may contribute to AVF related complications as is shown by other researchers [58]. The present study does not rule out that a similar approach may also be helpful for other groups of patients who suffer from AVF problems.

In conclusion, the present study indicated that the factors associated with AVF problems were high doses of ESA, iron administration, and tendency of thromboembolism (indicated by high LMWH doses); the use of doxazocin prescription, however, requires further investigation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Kdoqi N. Kidney F: KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for Anemia in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(5 Suppl 3):S11–145.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson BM, Akizawa T, Jager KJ, Kerr PG, Saran R, Pisoni RL. Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):294–306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bylsma LC, Gage SM, Reichert H, Dahl SLM, Lawson JH. Arteriovenous fistulae for Haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(4):513–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brahmbhatt A, Remuzzi A, Franzoni M, Misra S. The molecular mechanisms of hemodialysis vascular access failure. Kidney Int. 2016;89(2):303–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rooijens PP, Tordoir JH, Stijnen T, Burgmans JP. Smet de AA, Yo TI: Radiocephalic wrist arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: meta-analysis indicates a high primary failure rate. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28(6):583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gameiro J, Ibeas J. Factors affecting arteriovenous fistula dysfunction: a narrative review. J Vasc Access. 2020;21(2):134–47.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, Kosa SD, Quinn RR, Moist LM. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(3):464–78.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bashar K, Zafar A, Elsheikh S, Healy DA, Clarke-Moloney M, Casserly L, Burke PE, Kavanagh EG, Walsh SR. Predictive parameters of arteriovenous fistula functional maturation in a population of patients with end-stage renal disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119958.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lok CE, Foley R. Vascular access morbidity and mortality: trends of the last decade. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(7):1213–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Field M, MacNamara K, Bailey G, Jaipersad A, Morgan RH, Pherwani AD. Primary patency rates of AV fistulas and the effect of patient variables. J Vasc Access. 2008;9(1):45–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erkut B, Unlu Y, Ceviz M, Becit N, Ates A, Colak A, Kocak H. Primary arteriovenous fistulas in the forearm for hemodialysis: effect of miscellaneous factors in fistula patency. Ren Fail. 2006;28(4):275–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee T, Mokrzycki M, Moist L, Maya I, Vazquez M, Lok CE. North American vascular access C: standardized definitions for hemodialysis vascular access. Semin Dial. 2011;24(5):515–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazemzadeh GHMM, Ravari H, Daliri M, Hoseini L, Nateghi M. Primary patency rate of native AV fistula: long term follow up. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2012;5(1):173–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hadimeri U, Warme A, Nasic S, Fransson SG, Wigelius A, Stegmayr B. Angiography and phlebography in a hemodialysis population: a retrospective analysis of interventional results. Int J Artif Organs. 2019;42(12):675–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Misskey J, Faulds J, Sidhu R, Baxter K, Gagnon J, Hsiang Y. An age-based comparison of fistula location, patency, and maturation for elderly renal failure patients. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(5):1491–500.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SM, Ko HK, Noh M, Ko GY, Kim MJ, Kwon TW, Kim HJ, Cho YP. Factors affecting patency following successful percutaneous intervention for dysfunctional hemodialysis vascular access. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;47:54–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwab SJ, Raymond JR, Saeed M, Newman GE, Dennis PA, Bollinger RR. Prevention of hemodialysis fistula thrombosis. Early detection of venous stenoses. Kidney Int. 1989;36(4):707–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stegmayr B, Willems C, Groth T, Martins A, Neves NM, Mottaghy K, Remuzzi A, Walpoth B. Arteriovenous access in hemodialysis: a multidisciplinary perspective for future solutions. Int J Artif Organs. 2020:391398820922231.

  19. Patibandla BK, Narra A, Desilva R, Chawla V, Vin Y, Brown RS, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS. Disparities in arteriovenous fistula placement in older hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2014;18(1):118–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcus RJ, Marcus DA, Sureshkumar KK, Hussain SM, McGill RL. Gender differences in vascular access in hemodialysis patients in the United States: developing strategies for improving access outcome. Gend Med. 2007;4(3):193–204.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hod T, Desilva RN, Patibandla BK, Vin Y, Brown RS, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS. Factors predicting failure of AV "fistula first" policy in the elderly. Hemodial Int. 2014;18(2):507–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Marchi S, Falleti E, Giacomello R, Stel G, Cecchin E, Sepiacci G, Bortolotti N, Zanello F, Gonano F, Bartoli E. Risk factors for vascular disease and arteriovenous fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7(8):1169–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shurraw S, Zimmerman D. Vascular access complications in daily dialysis: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2005;57(3):151–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Irvinn J, Oldman N, Sedgwick P, Chemla E. Do blood pressure levels and other patient characteristics influence native fistula patency? Semin Dial. 2014;27(3):E27–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith GE, Gohil R, Chetter IC. Factors affecting the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(3):849–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishizawa Y, Shoji T, Kawagishi T, Morii H. Atherosclerosis in uremia: possible roles of hyperparathyroidism and intermediate density lipoprotein accumulation. Kidney Int Suppl. 1997;62:S90–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Olsson LF, Odselius R, Ribbe E, Hegbrant J. Evidence of calcium phosphate depositions in stenotic arteriovenous fistulas. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(2):377–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida T, Yamashita M, Horimai C, Hayashi M. High glucose concentration does not modulate the formation of arterial medial calcification in experimental uremic rats. J Vasc Res. 2013;50(6):512–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lanzer P, Boehm M, Sorribas V, Thiriet M, Janzen J, Zeller T, St Hilaire C, Shanahan C. Medial vascular calcification revisited: review and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(23):1515–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Warme A, Hadimeri U, Hadimeri H, Nasic S, Stegmayr B. High doses of erythropoietin stimulating agents may be a risk factor for AV-fistula stenosis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018.

  31. Wärme A, Hadimeri U, Json Wigelius A, Stegmayr B. A retrospective analysis of dialysis data in patients with native AV-fistula in a Swedish county hospital 2013-14. In: Nordic Society of Nephrology. Stavanger: Nordic Society of Nephrology. p. 2015.

  32. Corwin HL. Erythropoietin use in critically ill patients: forest and trees. CMAJ. 2007;177(7):747–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nishio A, Chhatkuli BP, Ma JZ, Kalantari K. Higher doses of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and hyporesponsiveness to their effects are associated with increased mortality among prevalent hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif. 2013;36(1):29–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pfeffer MA, Burdmann EA, Chen CY, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Eckardt KU, Ivanovich P, Kewalramani R, Levey AS, Lewis EF, et al. Baseline characteristics in the trial to reduce cardiovascular events with Aranesp therapy (TREAT). Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54(1):59–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leermakers JJ, Bode AS, Vaidya A, van der Sande FM, Evers SM, Tordoir JH. Cost-effectiveness of vascular access for haemodialysis: arteriovenous fistulas versus arteriovenous grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(1):84–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Olsha O, Hijazi J, Goldin I, Shemesh D. Vascular access in hemodialysis patients older than 80 years. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):177–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, de Donato G, Gallieni M, Gibbons CP, Haage P, Hamilton G, Hedin U, Kamper L et al: Editor's choice - vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018, 55(6):757–818.

  38. Santos EJF, Hortegal EV, Serra HO, Lages JS, Salgado-Filho N, Dos Santos AM. Epoetin alfa resistance in hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease: a longitudinal study. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;51(7):e7288.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rattanasompattikul M, Molnar MZ, Zaritsky JJ, Hatamizadeh P, Jing J, Norris KC, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Association of malnutrition-inflammation complex and responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in long-term hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(7):1936–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jeong HY, Ko EJ, Kim SH, Lee MJ, Cho HJ, Yang DH, Lee SY. Administration of a High-Dose Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agent in hemodialysis patients is associated with late Arteriovenous fistula failure. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(4):793–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wärme A, Hadimeri H, Nasic S, Stegmayr B. The association of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and increased risk for AV-fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. A retrospective analysis. (abstract). International. Journal of Artificial Organs. 2020;43(8):542.

    Google Scholar 

  42. DeFronzo RA. The effect of insulin on renal sodium metabolism. A review with clinical implications. Diabetologia. 1981;21(3):165–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Akin D, Ozmen S, Kaya R. A novel factor for primary arteriovenous fistula failure: hyperinsulinism. Ren Fail. 2016;38(8):1206–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Johnson DW, Pollock CA, Macdougall IC. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness. Nephrology (Carlton). 2007;12(4):321–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kilpatrick RD, Critchlow CW, Fishbane S, Besarab A, Stehman-Breen C, Krishnan M, Bradbury BD. Greater epoetin alfa responsiveness is associated with improved survival in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(4):1077–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fukuma S, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto S, Nakai S, Iseki K, Tsubakihara Y, Fukuhara S. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent responsiveness and mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from a cohort study from the dialysis registry in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(1):108–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Barany P, Divino Filho JC, Bergstrom J. High C-reactive protein is a strong predictor of resistance to erythropoietin in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;29(4):565–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gunnell J, Yeun JY, Depner TA, Kaysen GA. Acute-phase response predicts erythropoietin resistance in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33(1):63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. de Lurdes Agostinho Cabrita A, Pinho A, Malho A, Morgado E, Faisca M, Carrasqueira H, Silva AP, Neves PL. Risk factors for high erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance index in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients, stages 4 and 5. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(3):835–40.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Stegmayr BG, Plum Wirell M. Intravenously administered erythropoietin may cause a direct increase in blood pressure in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int. 2001;21(3):316–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Svensson M, Friberger P, Lundstrom O, Stegmayr B. Activation of FXII during haemodialysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1996;56(7):649–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, Reddan D, Investigators C. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(20):2085–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gao S, Ma JJ. Lu C: venous thromboembolism risk and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(1):603–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gao D, Ning N, Niu X, Dang Y, Dong X, Wei J, Zhu C. Erythropoietin treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2012;164(5):715–27 e711.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Streja E, Kovesdy CP, Greenland S, Kopple JD, McAllister CJ, Nissenson AR, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Erythropoietin, iron depletion, and relative thrombocytosis: a possible explanation for hemoglobin-survival paradox in hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(4):727–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Szczech LA, Barnhart HX, Inrig JK, Reddan DN, Sapp S, Califf RM, Patel UD, Singh AK. Secondary analysis of the CHOIR trial epoetin-alpha dose and achieved hemoglobin outcomes. Kidney Int. 2008;74(6):791–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kuo KL, Hung SC, Lee TS, Tarng DC. Iron sucrose accelerates early atherogenesis by increasing superoxide production and upregulating adhesion molecules in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(11):2596–606.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rostoker G, Vaziri ND. Iatrogenic iron overload and its potential consequences in patients on hemodialysis. Presse Med. 2017;46(12 Pt 2):e312–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. KDIGO. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Anemia work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for Anemia in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International. 2012;(Supplement 2):279–335.

  60. Peters NO, Jay N, Cridlig J, Rostoker G, Frimat L. Targets for adapting intravenous iron dose in hemodialysis: a proof of concept study. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Perez-Garcia R, Varas J, Cives A, Martin-Malo A, Aljama P, Ramos R, Pascual J, Stuard S, Canaud B, Merello JI, et al. Increased mortality in haemodialysis patients administered high doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a propensity score-matched analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33(4):690–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kuo KL, Hung SC, Lin YP, Tang CF, Lee TS, Lin CP, Tarng DC. Intravenous ferric chloride hexahydrate supplementation induced endothelial dysfunction and increased cardiovascular risk among hemodialysis patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50295.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ikegaya N, Yamamoto T, Takeshita A, Watanabe T, Yonemura K, Miyaji T, Ohishi K, Furuhashi M, Maruyama Y, Hishida A. Elevated erythropoietin receptor and transforming growth factor-beta1 expression in stenotic arteriovenous fistulae used for hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(5):928–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dai WD, Zhang DL, Cui WY, Liu WH. Effect of long intermittent hemodialysis on improving dialysis adequacy of maintenance hemodialysis patients. Chin Med J. 2013;126(24):4655–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ok E, Duman S, Asci G, Tumuklu M, Onen Sertoz O, Kayikcioglu M, Toz H, Adam SM, Yilmaz M, Tonbul HZ, et al. Comparison of 4- and 8-h dialysis sessions in thrice-weekly in-Centre haemodialysis: a prospective, case-controlled study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(4):1287–96.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Holmberg B, Stegmayr BG. Cardiovascular conditions in hemodialysis patients may be worsened by extensive interdialytic weight gain. Hemodial Int. 2009;13(1):27–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ekholm M, Jekell A, Wallen NH, Gigante B, Kahan T. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and alpha 1-adrenergic receptor blockade on inflammation and hemostasis in human hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018;71(4):240–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hernandez RH, Pajuelo JRG, Carvajal AR, Padilla MCA, Dehernandez MJA, Barragan O, Boada JJB. Evidence of an antiplatelet aggregation action of Doxazosin in patients with hypertension - an Exvivo study. Am Heart J. 1991;121(1):395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lee TM, Su SF, Suo WY, Lee CY, Chen MF, Lee YT, Tsai CH. Distension of urinary bladder induces exaggerated coronary constriction in smokers with early atherosclerosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279(6):H2838–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Qian X, Li M, Wagner MB, Chen G, Song X. Doxazosin stimulates Galectin-3 expression and collagen synthesis in HL-1 Cardiomyocytes independent of protein kinase C pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:495.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Chapman N, Chang CL, Dahlof B, Sever PS, Wedel H, Poulter NR, Investigators A. Effect of doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system as third-line antihypertensive therapy on blood pressure and lipids in the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial. Circulation. 2008;118(1):42–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Asano M, Oguchi K, Saito A, Onishi Y, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S, Akiba T, Akizawa T. Intradialytic ultrafiltration volume and vascular access outcomes: a Japan Dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study subanalysis. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(6):489–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Salmela B, Hartman J, Peltonen S, Alback A, Lassila R. Thrombophilia and arteriovenous fistula survival in ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(6):962–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Ursula Hadimeri, MD, PhD, for valuable comments on the interventional examinations. Anna Lena Emanuelsson-Loft for valuable comments regarding text configuration. Malin Skagerlind, RN, PhD, Dept of Public health and Clinical Medicine Umea, for gathering laboratory and intervention results. Albert Crenshaw, L-A Write Now, for professional and effective language editing.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


An Abstract of part of this material was sent to the Congress of the European Society of Artificial Organs to be held in London 2020. The Abstract is published in the International Journal of Artificial Organs [41].


The Department of Research and Development at Skaraborg Hospital and Norrlands Njurföreningar supported the study. The funding parties had no role in the design of the study, collection of data, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript. Open Access funding was provided by Gothenburg University Library.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AW, BS and SN analysed and interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. AW, BS and HH were responsible for the study concept, design and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors discussed the results, contributed to the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Wärme.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics committee in Gothenburg, Sweden, EPN, DNR, 402–14, 2014-08-22, T-037-15, 2015-01-09. The Ethics committee approved that the informed consent was waived since the study subjects were de-identified and no intervention was induced by the study (retrospective data only).

Consent for publication

Ethics committee approved that the study could be published. All authors consent to publish. There are no clinical details of participants or publication of identifying images or other personal that compromise anonymity.

Competing interests

The manuscript is not under consideration for publication by any other journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wärme, A., Hadimeri, H., Nasic, S. et al. The association of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and increased risk for AV-fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients. A retrospective analysis. BMC Nephrol 22, 30 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Arterio-venous fistula
  • Stenosis
  • Erythropoietin
  • Hemodialysis