Skip to main content
Download PDF

The role of ultra-processed food consumption in protein-energy wasting and sarcopenia development in patients with chronic kidney diseases

BMC Nephrology volume 25, Article number: 4 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The effect of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) on chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been studied in some studies. The present study aimed to investigate the association between UPF consumption and the risk of protein-energy wasting (PEW) and sarcopenia in patients with CKD in the Iranian population.

Methods

The current cross-sectional study included 110 patients with CKD referred to two clinics in Shiraz, Iran. The International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) criteria and the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) guideline were considered for the diagnosis of PEW and sarcopenia, respectively. The valid semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to assess participants' dietary intake. The logistic regression was used to examine the association of UPFs with PEW and sarcopenia.

Results

We observed no significant association between sarcopenia and PEW with UPFs in the crude model. After adjusting for confounders, we observed a significantly higher odds of sarcopenia in the upper versus lower median of UPF intake (odds ratio (OR) = 3.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–12.62, P = 0.046).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest a positive relationship between UPF intake and sarcopenia among CKD patients. Therefore, reducing the intake of UPFs may decrease the odds of sarcopenia in patients suffering from CKD.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most important chronic non-communicable diseases whose prevalence and incidence are increasing [1]. The global burden of CKD increases mainly due to aging, diabetes, infections, hypertension, environmental toxins, and high body mass index (BMI) [2]. The prevalence of this disease is between 11.7% and 15.1% in the world [2].

One of the crucial complications of CKD is protein-energy wasting (PEW), a condition of metabolic and nutritional disorders in which the body's energy reserves and systemic protein are lost simultaneously [3]. PEW occurs due to anorexia, autoimmune conditions, systemic inflammation, and a hypercatabolic state due to uremia [4]. Sarcopenia is another common complication of CKD, with decreased muscle mass, performance, and muscle strength. This disease is associated with cardiovascular complications and increased patient mortality [5].

Diet plays an essential role in CKD. In CKD patients, phosphorus, sodium, and protein consumption is reduced to delay the onset of uremic toxicity, which may have toxic effects on the kidney, heart, and blood vessels [6]. The nutrition transition is happening rapidly in Iran [7]. This concept shows an increased tendency to consume hydrogenated fats, animal fats, sugar-containing products, packaged snacks, low-fiber foods, artificially sweetened beverages, and processed foods. In fact, the modern diet has replaced the traditional diet [8, 9]. Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are ready-to-heat or ready-to-eat foods [10]; many of these foods are considered nutritionally poor, containing high levels of free sugars, saturated fat, salt, phosphorus, energy, additives, and low levels of micronutrients, protein, and fiber [11,12,13].

Many epidemiological studies show that UPFs are harmful to human health [12, 14]. The effect of UPFs on CKD has been studied in some investigated [15, 16]. A cross-sectional study showed that more intake of UPFs was associated to a more prevalence ratio of CKD [17]. In a cohort study, the findings indicated that higher consumption of UPFs was associated with a higher risk of CKD [18]. The pathways by which UPF intake may lead to the onset of CKD are not fully understood. However, an animal study suggests that advanced glycation end products (AGEs) derived from processed foods are an important factor in the pathogenesis of CKD by activating the complement pathway and disrupting intestinal barrier permeability [19].

Although there are studies on the effect of UPFs on the risk of CKD, to our knowledge, no study has been conducted on the association of UPF consumption with two important complications of CKD (PEW and sarcopenia). Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the association between UPF consumption and the odds of PEW and sarcopenia in patients with CKD in the Iranian population.

Methods

Study population

Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the current cross-sectional study included 110 patients with CKD referred to Imam Reza and Motahari clinics in Shiraz (Fars province, Iran). Using statistical software and considering the sample size formula for estimating a proportion, α = 0.05, β = 20%, ratio (p) = 0.5, and 13% drop-out, 110 patients were determined as our final sample size. The present study was conducted between January and October 2022.

Our inclusion criteria were as follows: aged > 18 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/173m2 by a physician, no cognitive impairments, and willingness to participate in the study.

Also, our exclusion criteria were as follows: undergoing dialysis, suffering from heart failure and liver cirrhosis, presence of active infection, a daily energy intake of ≤ 800 or ≥ 4200 kcal, and remaining more than 40% of the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) unanswered (Fig. 1). This study was approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Code: 28190).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram

Full size image

Data collection

We used bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) (IN BODY-S10) to assess muscle mass and fat percentage and the Omron BF511 scale for weight assessment (with minimal clothes, without shoes, and accuracy of 100 gr). A non-stretchable tape (accuracy of 0.5 cm) was used to measure height and mid-arm circumference (MAC). BMI was calculated by dividing body weight by the square of height. We also collected 5 mL of fasting blood samples from all participants to evaluate creatinine, albumin, and other biochemical variables. Moreover, the physical activity level was assessed by a validated international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) [20].

Diagnosis of sarcopenia

The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) guideline, which considers low muscle mass, low muscle strength, and/or low muscle function as criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis, was used in our study. A dynamometer set measured handgrip strength (HGS) as an indicator of muscle strength. Also, to measure muscle and fat mass, a BIA was used and to assess muscle function, the 5-time chair standing test and the gait speed test were applied (walking speed for 6 m). We considered skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) less than 7 for men and less than 5.7 kg/m2 for women as the first criteria for sarcopenia. Secondly, muscle strength less than 28 and 18 for men and women, respectively, and/or weak physical performance (5-time chair standing test more than 12 s or gait speed less than 1 m/s) were considered to approve sarcopenia diagnosis [21].

Diagnosis of PEW

The International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) criteria were used for PEW diagnosis. The categories recommended by ISRNM for PEW diagnosis are as follows: low protein and energy intake (dietary protein intake (DPI) < 0.6 g/kg/day and dietary energy intake < 25 kcal/kg/day), low BMI (BMI < 23 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss: 5% over 3 months or 10% over 6 months, total body fat < 10%), biochemical indicators (serum albumin < 3.8 g/dL, serum pre-albumin < 30 mg/dL, and serum cholesterol < 100 mg/dL), and muscle mass wasting (decreased muscle mass 5% over 3 months or 10% over 6 months, decreased mid-arm muscle circumference area (a decrease of more than 10% compared to the 50th percentile of the reference population)), and creatinine appearance 24-h urine (lower quartile based on sex)). We excluded patients with less than 500 mL/day of urine to eliminate concerns about urine collection errors. At least three indicators were considered for diagnosing kidney disease-related PEW [22].

Food grouping and dietary assessment

The valid semi-quantitative FFQ (168 items) was used to assess participants' dietary intake [23]. We also offered participants the household measurement system (like plates, bowls, tablespoons, teaspoons, glasses, and cups) and a validated food album for better estimated the type and size of foods [24]. To measure the amount of food item intake, we converted the recorded values of each food item to grams and multiplied them by daily intake frequency.

The UPF index was calculated by selecting food items that the NOVA system defined as UPFs. UPFs include eight groups (1. non-dairy beverages, 2. cakes and cookies, 3. dairy beverages, 4. fast food and processed meats, 5. oil and sauce, 6. sweets, 7. bread, and 8. etc.) and the items of them are as bellows: processed meats, candies, biscuits, cakes, pastries and sweets, buns, packaged bread, salty snacks, ice cream, industrial fruit drinks, sweetened milk-based beverages, margarine, fries, soft drinks, sauces, dressing, and others. The calorie intake of each UPF item was used to calculate the total daily intake of each one. We divided the average daily calorie intake of each item of UPF groups by the total daily energy intake of UPFs, then multiplied by 100 to estimate the portion of each food group to the total UPF intake. Total UPF calories divided by total caloric intake and multiplied by 100 were used as exposure in our study [12, 25]. Nutritionist IV software for Iranians (version 7.0; N-Squared Computing, Salem, OR, USA) was used in the present study.

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS (version 26) for all the analyses in our study. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as level of significance. We reported study participants' baseline characteristics based on the median of UPFs as a percentage for categorical and mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range (IQR)) for continuous variables. The logistic regression in crude and adjusted models was used to examine the association between PEW and sarcopenia with UPFs. We adjusted age, sex, energy, and physical activity to eliminate their confounding roles in the final model.

Results

According to Table 1, there were significant differences between sex (P = 0.011), muscle mass (P = 0.033), fat percentage (P = 0.020), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = 0.029), ferritin (P = 0.046), parathyroid hormone (PTH) (P = 0.003), HCO3 (P = 0.019), and UPF intake (P < 0.001) between the lower and upper median of UPF intake. The baseline characteristics of the study participants are reported in Supplementary Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline features of the study population across the median of UPFs
Full size table

The intake of macronutrients and UPF subgroups across the median of UPF intake are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. As shown in Fig. 2, the intake of protein, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) did not significantly differ between UPF median (P > 0.05), but there was a significant difference in carbohydrate and saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake (P = 0.017 and P = 0.014, respectively). The contribution of macro- and micronutrient intake by the median of UPFs is shown in Supplementary Table 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The contribution of macronutrient intake based on UPF median

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Participants' food group intake across median of UPFs

Full size image

In multivariate analysis (Table 2), we observed no significant association between UPFs and sarcopenia and PEW in the crude model. After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and energy intake, we observed a significantly higher odds of sarcopenia in the upper versus lower median of UPF intake (odds ratio (OR )= 3.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–12.62, P = 0.046).

Table 2 Crude and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs across the median of energy percent of UPFs
Full size table

Discussion

Our results showed a direct association between the consumption of UPFs and sarcopenia in adults with CKD after adjusting confounders. According to our results, higher UPF intake leads to 3.59 times increased odds of sarcopenia. However, we did not find any association between the consumption of UPFs and PEW odds.

Evidence suggests that intake of UPFs may cause an increased risk of non-communicable diseases [26]. Based on our knowledge, the current study is the first to assess the association between UPF consumption and sarcopenia and PEW odds in CKD patients.

Some of the characteristics of UPFs, such as affordability, palatability, availability, convenience, and high supply in the market, lead to their overconsumption [27]. UPFs are dense in calories and poor in protein, fiber, vitamins, minerals, and other phytochemicals [28], which are essential nutrients for muscle health [29]. Our study results showed an association between higher consumption of UPFs and sarcopenia in CKD patients. Only one study has investigated the association between these two variables. This cross-sectional study showed that the elderly who consumed UPFs more than 1–2 times a week had a higher chance of developing sarcopenia. Also, their results indicated that the probability of sarcopenia in the elderly increases even with low exposure to UPFs [30].

Wasting of muscle mass, a common criterion of sarcopenia and PEW, is frequently found in CKD patients, especially in those with more advanced stages of the disease. On the other hand, decreased body fat is more common in PEW than in sarcopenia [31]. Etiological factors leading to sarcopenia and PEW associated with CKD that are exacerbated by consumption of UPFs include the following: developed insulin resistance, acidosis, vitamin D deficiency, and disruption of hormones like testosterone, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and growth hormone (GH) resistance [32, 33]. In addition, the change in the gut microbiome and dysfunction of the gut barrier aggregated by exposure to phthalates, which leaks into food through contact materials or food processing plastics, leads to the development of an inflammatory environment (increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines levels such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)) [34, 35] as a contributor to muscle wasting [36, 37]. One study has reported an association between phthalate exposure and lower grip strength, a marker of muscle health and sarcopenia [38]. Lower fiber intake also leads to the accumulation of protein fermentation metabolites, uremic toxicity [39], and finally, uremic muscle wasting [40].

We did not find a significant association between UPF intake and PEW in patients with CKD. To our knowledge, this is the first study that assessed this association. Mechanisms contributing to PEW are the same as sarcopenia etiology [31], but energy imbalance leading to fat loss could be a more important factor in PEW etiology. Even though, higher PEW was observed in the higher UPF intake group, no significant difference between protein and energy intake was found between the two UPF groups. Furthermore, UPFs contain a high amount of added sugars, trans and SFAs, and additives like emulsifiers, preservatives, stabilizers, and artificial flavors, which enhance lipogenesis (contrary to PEW criteria) and disrupt muscle protein synthesis and ultimately lead to a decline in muscle mass (in line with PEW criteria) [31], resultant of these two may be the reason why we did not observe a significant association between PEW and UPF intake.

We can mention some limitations of the present study. The investigation to the effect of UPF intake on inflammation as a determinant of CKD complications because of the lack of data on inflammatory factors such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), C-reactive protein, and IL-6 were impossible. However, the effects of some confounders were adjusted in the analysis; there may be other unknown confounding factors in this study.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings suggest a positive association between UPF intake and sarcopenia among CKD patients. Therefore, reducing the intake of UPFs may decrease the odds of sarcopenia in patients suffering from CKD. The importance of restricting access to UPFs should be addressed by public policy.

Availability of data and methods

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Abreu IS, Nascimento LC. Lima RAGd, Santos CBd: Children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease in haemodialysis: perception of professionals. Rev Bras Enferm. 2015;68:1020–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lv J-C, Zhang L-X. Prevalence and disease burden of chronic kidney disease. Renal fibrosis: mechanisms and therapies. 2019:3–15.

  3. Hanna RM, Ghobry L, Wassef O, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K. A practical approach to nutrition, protein-energy wasting, sarcopenia, and cachexia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Blood Purif. 2020;49(1–2):202–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Obi Y, Qader H, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Latest consensus and update on protein energy-wasting in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18(3):254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Souza VAd, Oliveira Dd, Mansur HN, Fernandes NMdS, Bastos MG. Sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease. Braz J Nephrol. 2015;37:98–105.

  6. Apetrii M, Timofte D, Voroneanu L, Covic A. Nutrition in chronic kidney disease—the role of proteins and specific diets. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):956.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghassemi H, Harrison G, Mohammad K. An accelerated nutrition transition in Iran. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(1a):149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Popkin BM. Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases–. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drewnowski A. Nutrition transition and global dietary trends. Nutrition. 2000;7(16):486–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lane KE, Davies IG, Darabi Z, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Khayyatzadeh SS, Mazidi M. The association between ultra-processed foods, quality of life and insomnia among adolescent girls in Northeastern Iran. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibney MJ. Ultra-processed foods: definitions and policy issues. Current Developments Nutrition. 2019;3(2):nzy077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, Moubarac J-C, Louzada ML, Rauber F, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Neri D, Martinez-Steele E. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(5):936–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Montero-Salazar H, Donat-Vargas C, Moreno-Franco B, Sandoval-Insausti H, Civeira F, Laclaustra M, Guallar-Castillón P. High consumption of ultra-processed food may double the risk of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Aragon Workers’ Health Study (AWHS). BMC Med. 2020;18:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker P, Friel S. Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia. Glob Health. 2016;12:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rey-García J, Donat-Vargas C, Sandoval-Insausti H, Bayan-Bravo A, Moreno-Franco B, Banegas JR, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillón P. Ultra-processed food consumption is associated with renal function decline in older adults: a prospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cai Q, Duan M-J, Dekker LH, Carrero JJ, Avesani CM, Bakker SJ, de Borst MH, Navis GJ. Ultraprocessed food consumption and kidney function decline in a population-based cohort in the Netherlands. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;116(1):263–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kityo A, Lee S-A. The intake of ultra-processed foods and prevalence of chronic kidney disease: the health examinees study. Nutrients. 2022;14(17):3548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gu Y, Li H, Ma H, Zhang S, Meng G, Zhang Q, et al. Consumption of ultraprocessed food and development of chronic kidney disease: the Tianjin Chronic Low-Grade Systemic Inflammation and Health and UK Biobank Cohort Studies. Am J Clin. 2023;117(2):373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Snelson M, Tan SM, Clarke RE, De Pasquale C, Thallas-Bonke V, Nguyen T-V, et al. Processed foods drive intestinal barrier permeability and microvascular diseases. Sci Adv. 2021;7(14):eabe4841.

  20. Moghaddam MB, Aghdam FB, Jafarabadi MA, Allahverdipour H, Nikookheslat SD, Safarpour S. The Iranian Version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Iran: content and construct validity, factor structure, internal consistency and stability. World Appl Sci J. 2012;18(8):1073–80.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen L-K, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T-W, Chou M-Y, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J American Medical Directors Assoc. 2020;21(3):300–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gracia-Iguacel C, González-Parra E, Mahillo I, Ortiz A. Criteria for classification of protein–energy wasting in dialysis patients: impact on prevalence. Br J Nutr. 2019;121(11):1271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, Kianfar H. The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of foods. Tehran Nashre Olume Keshavarzy. 1999;7(213):42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac J-C, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):5–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena M, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2021;125(3):308–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gibney MJ. Ultra-processed foods: definitions and policy issues. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3(2):nzy077.

  28. Martini D, Godos J, Bonaccio M, Vitaglione P, Grosso G. Ultra-processed foods and nutritional dietary profile: a meta-analysis of nationally representative samples. Nutrients. 2021;13(10):3390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. McGlory C, van Vliet S, Stokes T, Mittendorfer B, Phillips SM. The impact of exercise and nutrition on the regulation of skeletal muscle mass. J Physiol. 2019;597(5):1251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Almeida HC, da Silva Lage VK, de Paula FA. Freitas JdPC, Moreno LG, De Oliveira VC, de Carvalho Bastone A, Santos JNV, Lima LP, Fernandes AC: Association between ultra-processed foods frequency of intake and sarcopenia in older adults: a cross-sectional study. Research, Society and Development. 2022;11(11):e60111133129–e60111133129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sabatino A, Cuppari L, Stenvinkel P, Lindholm B, Avesani CM. Sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease: what have we learned so far? J Nephrol. 2021;34(4):1347–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Avesani CM, Cuppari L, Nerbass FB, Lindholm B, Stenvinkel P. Ultraprocessed food and chronic kidney disease - double trouble. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16(11):1723–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Menezes CA, Magalhães LB, da Silva JT, da Silva Lago RMR, Gomes AN, Ladeia AMT, Vianna NA, Oliveira RR. Ultra-processed food consumption is related to higher trans fatty acids, sugar intake, and micronutrient-impaired Status in schoolchildren of Bahia, Brazil. Nutrients. 2023;15(2):381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cuevas-Sierra A, Milagro FI, Aranaz P, Martínez JA, Riezu-Boj JI. Gut microbiota differences according to ultra-processed food consumption in a Spanish population. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramezani A, Raj DS. The gut microbiome, kidney disease, and targeted interventions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(4):657–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dalle S, Koppo K. Is inflammatory signaling involved in disease-related muscle wasting? Evidence from osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type II diabetes. Exp Gerontol. 2020;137:110964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schaap LA, Pluijm SM, Deeg DJ, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, Colbert LH, Pahor M, Rubin SM, Tylavsky FA. Higher inflammatory marker levels in older persons: associations with 5-year change in muscle mass and muscle strength. J Gerontology Series A: Biomed Scie Medical Scie. 2009;64(11):1183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun L, Fan J, Song G, Cai S, Fan C, Zhong Y, Li Y. Exposure to phthalates is associated with grip strength in US adults. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;209:111787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sabatino A, Regolisti G, Brusasco I, Cabassi A, Morabito S, Fiaccadori E. Alterations of intestinal barrier and microbiota in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;30(6):924–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nishi H, Takemura K, Higashihara T, Inagi R. Uremic Sarcopenia: Clinical Evidence and Basic Experimental Approach. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1814.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zainab Shateri and Sevda Eskandarzadeh equally contributed to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

    Zainab Shateri

  2. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Sevda Eskandarzadeh

  3. Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Mehran Nouri

  4. Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Mehran Nouri

  5. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Mehran Nouri

  6. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Shahrokh Ezzatzadegan Jahromi

  7. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Fatemeh Mansouri & Siavash Babajafari

  8. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Siavash Babajafari

Authors
  1. Zainab Shateri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sevda Eskandarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehran Nouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shahrokh Ezzatzadegan Jahromi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fatemeh Mansouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Siavash Babajafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.S, S.E, S.E.J and M.N; Contributed to writing the first draft. M.N; Contributed to all data, statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. F.M and S.B; Contributed to the research concept, supervised the work, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fatemeh Mansouri or Siavash Babajafari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the medical research and ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and the informed consents were completed by all participants. Also, we confirmed all the methods included in this study are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Baseline features of the study population. Table S2. Macro- and micronutrient intake by the median of UPFs.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shateri, Z., Eskandarzadeh, S., Nouri, M. et al. The role of ultra-processed food consumption in protein-energy wasting and sarcopenia development in patients with chronic kidney diseases. BMC Nephrol 25, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03409-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03409-6

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us