Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 9,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 9 and
BMC Nephrology201213:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-2

©  Okada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

  • Received: 30 June 2011
  • Accepted: 9 January 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the associations between common potential functional promoter polymorphisms in pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokine genes and kidney function/chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence in a large Japanese population.

Methods

A total of 3,323 subjects aged 35-69 were genotyped for all 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter regions of candidate genes with minor allele frequencies of > 0.100 in Japanese populations. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CKD prevalence (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) of the subjects were compared among the genotypes.

Results

A higher eGFR and lower prevalence of CKD were observed for the homozygous variants of IL4 -33CC (high IL-4 [anti-inflammatory cytokine]-producing genotype) and IL6 -572GG (low IL-6 [pro-inflammatory cytokine]-producing genotype). Subjects with IL4 CC + IL6 GG showed the highest mean eGFR (79.1 ml/min/1.73 m2) and lowest CKD prevalence (0.0%), while subjects carrying IL4 TT + IL6 CC showed the lowest mean eGFR (73.4 ml/min/1.73 m2) and highest CKD prevalence (17.9%).

Conclusions

The functional promoter polymorphisms IL4 T-33C (rs2070874) and IL6 C-572G (rs1800796), which are the only SNPs that affect the IL-4 and IL-6 levels in Japanese subjects, were associated with kidney function and CKD prevalence in a large Japanese population.

Keywords

  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Genotype Carrier
  • Complete Linkage Disequilibrium
  • Cytokine Polymorphism
  • Good Kidney Function

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common and continues to increase. It is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is also a strong risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and mortality. A combined effect of environment and genotype determines the risk of CKD [1–3], and cytokine polymorphisms play important roles [3–5].

Cytokines are known to influence atherosclerosis, which causes CKD and subsequent ESRD [6, 7]. The balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines determines the inflammatory response and may mediate the progression of CKD [6]. Among the cytokines, pro-inflammatory (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13) cytokines play pivotal roles [6]. IL-2 and IL-8 are also well-known pro-inflammatory cytokines that may affect CKD or ESRD progression [7, 8]. Functional SNPs within the promoter area of these cytokine genes have been identified in that they influence the gene promoter activities and gene product levels [9, 10]. Such polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be associated with susceptibility to a number of atherosclerotic diseases in CKD [3–5], but the issue of whether these cytokine polymorphisms are risk factors for CKD itself has not been fully clarified. Some studies have failed to show such associations, possibly owing to the small sample sizes, and their conclusions are controversial [11].

This study aimed to explore the associations between common potential functional promoter polymorphisms of pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokines and kidney function/CKD prevalence in a large Japanese population.

Methods

Study subjects

The study subjects were participants in the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) Study, a large cohort study to confirm and detect gene-environment interactions in lifestyle-related diseases, in which voluntarily enrolled participants aged 35-69 from 10 areas of Japan provided blood and lifestyle data based on questionnaires. The details of the J-MICC Study have been described elsewhere [12]. The participants in this cross-sectional study were 4,519 subjects enrolled in the 10 study areas throughout Japan between 2004 and 2008 [13]. Serum creatinine (SCr) data were available in eight study areas. Of the 3,435 participants in these areas, 3,323 (97%) subjects were included in the analyses. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of Nagoya University School of Medicine and the participating institutions.

Selection and genotyping of polymorphisms

We selected pro-inflammatory (IL1, IL2, IL6, IL8, and TNFA) and anti-inflammatory (IL4, IL10, and IL13) cytokine genes as candidate genes based on the published literature [6–8]. In addition, CD14, which encodes a lipopolysaccharide receptor that initiates the inflammatory response, was selected based on our previous report [14]. Subsequently, to the best of our knowledge, we selected all the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter regions that had minor allele frequencies in Japanese populations of > 0.100, based on the database SNP (dbSNP) and the HapMap database, and that had potential functional effects according to the published literature. The selected SNPs were IL4 T-33C (rs2070874, which is in complete linkage disequilibrium with T-589C [rs2243250]) [9, 15], IL6 C-572(-634)G (rs1800796) [10, 11], IL1B T-31C (rs1143627, linked to C-511T [rs16944]), IL2 T-330G (rs2069762), IL13 C-1111T (rs1800925) [16], and CD14 A-260(-159)G (rs2569190) [14], which were proven to be functional, and IL8 T-251A (rs4073), IL10 T-819C (rs1800871, linked to A-592C [rs1800872]), TNFA C-857T (rs1799724), and TNFA T-1031C (rs1799964, linked to C-863A [rs1800630]), which were reported to be probable or presumed functional SNPs [16, 17]. IL6 T-6331C (rs10499563), A-597G (rs1800797), C-174G (rs1800795), and IL10 A-1082G (rs1800896) were excluded because their minor allele frequencies were < 0.100.

DNA was extracted from buffy coat fractions using a BioRobot M48 Workstation (Qiagen Group, Tokyo, Japan), or from whole blood using an automatic nucleic acid isolation system (NA-3000; KURABO, Osaka, Japan). The SNPs were genotyped using a Multiplex PCR-based Invader Assay (Third Wave Technologies, Madison, WI) [18] at the Laboratory for Genotyping Development, Center for Genomic Medicine, RIKEN. The genotype call rates were 99.40% to 99.98%.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and definitions of CKD and comorbid diseases

SCr was measured in all participants using an enzymatic method. The eGFR of each participant was calculated from the SCr, age, and sex using the following Japanese eGFR equation recently determined by the Japanese Society of Nephrology [19]:
eGFR  ( ml ∕ min ∕ 1 . 73 m 2 ) =  194 ×  SCr  mg ∕ dl - 1 . 0 94 ×  ag e - 0 . 287 ( × 0 . 739 if female ) .

The prevalence of CKD was determined for CKD stages 3-5 (defined as eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) [20].

Hypertension was defined as resting blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg or being under treatment for hypertension. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or serum HbA1c ≥ 6.5% or being under treatment for diabetes mellitus.

Statistical analysis

The genotype distributions were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the χ2 test was used for comparisons of mean eGFRs and CKD prevalences between genotypes, and the polymorphisms with a significant difference in the mean eGFR or CKD prevalence were selected for multivariate analyses. The mean eGFRs, adjusted for age (continuous variable), sex, comorbid hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and history of cardiovascular diseases by multiple linear regression models, were compared between genotypes using the homozygous for the major allele as the reference. Odds ratios (ORs) for CKD prevalence adjusted for these covariates were estimated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Standard errors were adjusted for the study areas. The analyses were carried out using STATA ver. 9 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Results

The characteristics and the genotype frequencies of the subjects are summarised in Table 1 and Table 2. Seven subjects had a history of kidney disease, and two were categorised into the CKD group. The genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (data not shown), except for IL6 C-572G (57.5% for CC, 35.7% for CG, and 6.8% for GG, P = 0.026, in comparison with the expected values of 57.2%, 36.9%, and 5.9%, respectively) [13].
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of study subjects

 

CKD

Non-CKD

Total

 

(n = 546)

(n = 2,777)

(n = 3,323)

Age (years)

60.6 ± 7.2

55.9 ± 8.7

56.7 ± 8.6

Male

252(46.2%)

1,364(49.1%)

1,616(48.6%)

Body mass index

23.5 ± 3.1

23.4 ± 3.3

23.4 ± 3.3

Hypertension

245(44.9%)

1,050(37.8%)

1,295(39.0%)

   Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

130.5 ± 19.8

128.1 ± 19.3

128.5 ± 19.4

   Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

79.1 ± 12.4

78.6 ± 11.9

78.7 ± 12.0

   Anti-hypertensive medication

146(26.7%)

503(18.1%)

649(19.5%)

Diabetes mellitus

54(9.9%)

220(7.9%)

274(8.2%)

   Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)

5.49 ± 1.23

5.55 ± 1.17

5.54 ± 1.17

   HbA1c (%)

5.22 ± 0.69

5.22 ± 0.66

5.22 ± 0.67

   Glucose-lowering medication

28(5.1%)

117(4.2%)

145(4.4%)

Cardiovascular diseases

34(6.2%)

80(2.9%)

114(3.4%)

Total cholesterol (mmol/l)

5.66 ± 0.88

5.46 ± 0.83

5.50 ± 0.88

HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.60 ± 0.41

1.64 ± 0.42

1.63 ± 0.42

Lipid-lowering medication

68(12.5%)

233(8.4%)

301(9.1%)

Uric acid (μmol/l)

333 ± 89

303 ± 77

309 ± 83

Current smokers

68(12.5%)

495(17.8%)

563(16.9%)

Results are expressed as mean ± SD or number (%). CKD = chronic kidney disease. CKD is defined by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Hypertension = blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg or under anti-hypertensive medication. Diabetes mellitus = fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl, HbA1c ≥ 6.5% or under glucose-lowering medication.

Table 2

Genotype frequencies of study subjects

Genotype

CKD

non-CKD

Total

 

(n = 546)

(n = 2,777)

(n = 3,323)

IL1B T-31C (rs1143627)

   

T T

163 (29.9%)

791 (28.5%)

954 (28.7%)

C T

266 (48.7%)

1,355 (48.8%)

1,621 (48.8%)

C C

117 (21.4%)

631 (22.7%)

748 (22.5%)

IL2 T-330G (rs2069762)

   

T T

244 (44.9%)

1,225 (44.1%)

1,469 (44.2%)

T G

241 (44.3%)

1,239 (44.6%)

1,480 (44.6%)

G G

59 (10.9%)

312 (11.2%)

371 (11.2%)

IL4 T-33C (rs2070874)

   

T T

259 (47.4%)

1,193 (43.0%)

1,452 (43.7%)

T C

241 (44.1%)

1,226 (44.2%)

1,467 (44.2%)

C C

46 (8.4%)

357 (12.9%)

403 (12.1%)

IL6 C-572G (rs1800796)

   

C C

312 (57.1%)

1,600 (57.6%)

1,912 (57.6%)

G C

208 (38.1%)

977 (35.2%)

1,185 (35.7%)

G G

26 (4.8%)

199 (7.2%)

225 (6.8%)

IL8 T-251A (rs4073)

   

T T

254 (46.5%)

1,281 (46.5%)

1,535 (46.5%)

A T

235 (43.0%)

1,204 (43.7%)

1,439 (43.6%)

A A

57 (10.4%)

273 (9.9%)

330 (10.0%)

IL10 T-819C (rs1800871)

   

T T

252 (46.2%)

1,175 (42.5%)

1,427 (43.1%)

C T

239 (43.8%)

1,222 (44.2%)

1,461 (44.1%)

C C

55 (10.1%)

370 (13.4%)

425 (12.8%)

IL13 C-1111T (rs1800925)

   

C C

370 (67.9%)

1,847 (66.5%)

2,217 (66.8%)

T C

158 (29.0%)

840 (30.3%)

998 (30.1%)

T T

17 (3.1%)

89 (3.2%)

106 (3.2%)

TNFA C-857T (rs1799724)

   

C C

373 (68.3%)

1,788 (64.4%)

2,161 (65.0%)

C T

155 (28.4%)

887 (31.9%)

1,042 (31.4%)

T T

18 (3.3%)

102 (3.7%)

120 (3.6%)

TNFA T-1031C (rs1799964)

   

T T

383 (70.2%)

1,934 (69.6%)

2,317 (69.7%)

C T

144 (26.4%)

764 (27.5%)

908 (27.3%)

C C

19 (3.5%)

79 (2.8%)

98 (2.9%)

CD14 T-260C (rs2569190)

   

T T

144 (26.4%)

785 (28.3%)

929 (28.0%)

T C

275 (50.4%)

1,412 (50.9%)

1,687 (50.8%)

C C

127 (23.3%)

580 (20.9%)

707 (21.3%)

Results are expressed as number (%). CKD = chronic kidney disease. CKD is defined by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

The mean eGFRs and CKD prevalences were compared among the genotypes of the 10 cytokine SNPs (Table 3). The mean eGFRs differed for the IL4 T-33C (rs2070874) and IL6 C-572G (rs1800796) genotypes (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively), while the CKD prevalences differed for the IL4 T-33C genotypes. Thus, the IL4 and IL6 genotypes were subjected to multivariate analyses.
Table 3

Mean eGFRs and CKD prevalence with respect to cytokine polymorphism genotypes

Genotype

n

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

 

CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2)

  

mean ± SD

P-value†

 

n

(%)

P-value‡

IL1B T-31C (rs1143627)

       

T T

954

74.0 ± 14.9

  

163

(16.6%)

 

C T

1,621

73.9 ± 14.6

0.576

 

266

(16.3%)

0.727

C C

748

74.6 ± 15.3

  

117

(15.6%)

 

IL2 T-330G (rs2069762)

       

T T

1,469

74.0 ± 14.8

  

244

(16.6%)

 

T G

1,480

74.2 ± 14.9

0.860

 

241

(16.3%)

0.938

G G

371

74.3 ± 14.5

  

59

(15.9%)

 

IL4 T-33C (rs2070874)

       

T T

1,452

73.4 ± 14.6

  

259

(17.8%)

 

T C

1,467

74.4 ± 15.1

0.012

 

241

(16.4%)

0.009

C C

403

75.8 ± 14.5

  

46

(11.4%)

 

IL6 C-572G (rs1800796)

       

C C

1,912

74.2 ± 14.7

  

312

(16.3%)

 

G C

1,185

73.4 ± 14.8

0.004

 

208

(17.6%)

0.082

G G

225

76.9 ± 15.9

  

26

(11.6%)

 

IL8 T-251A (rs4073)

       

T T

1,535

74.1 ± 14.4

  

254

(17.3%)

 

A T

1,439

73.9 ± 15.2

0.745

 

235

(16.3%)

0.917

A A

330

74.6 ± 15.4

  

57

(16.5%)

 

IL10 T-819C (rs1800871)

       

T T

1,427

73.6 ± 14.7

  

252

(17.7%)

 

C T

1,461

74.2 ± 14.8

0.155

 

239

(16.4%)

0.070

C C

425

75.2 ± 15.0

  

55

(12.9%)

 

IL13 C-1111T (rs1800925)

       

C C

2,217

74.0 ± 14.9

  

370

(16.7%)

 

T C

998

74.3 ± 14.7

0.734

 

158

(15.8%)

0.827

T T

106

74.7 ± 14.3

  

17

(16.0%)

 

TNFA C-857T (rs1799724)

       

C C

2,161

73.6 ± 14.7

  

373

(17.3%)

 

C T

1,042

74.9 ± 15.0

0.054

 

155

(14.9%)

0.212

T T

120

75.5 ± 15.4

  

18

(15.0%)

 

TNFA T-1031C (rs1799964)

       

T T

2,317

73.9 ± 14.6

  

383

(16.5%)

 

C T

908

74.5 ± 15.4

0.641

 

144

(15.9%)

0.652

C C

98

74.1 ± 14.6

  

19

(19.4%)

 

CD14 T-260C (rs2569190)

       

T T

929

74.5 ± 14.5

  

144

(15.5%)

 

T C

1,687

74.2 ± 14.9

0.226

 

275

(16.3%)

0.403

C C

707

73.3 ± 14.9

  

127

(18.0%)

 

†P for ANOVA, ‡P for the χ2 test. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. CKD = chronic kidney disease. CKD is defined by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Bold style represents P < 0.05.

Higher eGFRs and lower CKD prevalences were observed for the IL4 -33CC and IL6 -572GG genotypes (Table 4). The mean eGFRs were 75.7 and 73.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 for the IL4 CC and TT genotype carriers, and 76.9 and 74.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 for the IL6 GG and CC genotype carriers, respectively. The CKD prevalences were 11.4% and 17.8% for the IL4 CC and TT genotype carriers (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37-0.95, P = 0.029 after adjustment), and 11.6% and 16.3% for the IL6 GG and CC genotype carriers (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50-0.90, P = 0.008 after adjustment), respectively. These differences were greater when the two genotypes were combined (Table 5). Subjects with both the IL4 CC and IL6 GG genotypes showed the highest mean eGFR (79.1 ml/min/1.73 m2) and lowest CKD prevalence (0.0%), while subjects carrying both the IL4 TT and IL6 CC genotypes showed the lowest mean eGFR (73.4 ml/min/1.73 m2) and highest CKD prevalence (17.9%). There was no interaction between the IL4 CC and IL6 GG genotypes, and their effects were additive.
Table 4

Mean eGFRs and CKD prevalence for IL4T-33C and IL6C-572G genotypes

Genotype

n

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

 

CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2)

   

mean ± SD

β†

(95% CI)

P-value†

 

n

(%)

OR†

(95% CI)

P-value†

IL4 T-33C

            
 

TT

1,452

73.4 ± 14.6

0

(reference)

-

 

259

(17.8%)

1

(reference)

-

 

TC

1,466

74.4 ± 15.1

0.9

(-1.2-2.9)

0.346

 

241

(16.4%)

0.91

(0.78-1.07)

0.269

 

CC

403

75.7 ± 14.5

2.2

(-1.9-6.3)

0.240

 

46

(11.4%)

0.59

(0.37-0.95)

0.029

IL6 C-572G

            
 

CC

1,911

74.2 ± 14.7

0

(reference)

-

 

312

(16.3%)

1

(reference)

-

 

CG

1,185

73.4 ± 14.8

-1.1

(-2.3-0.1)

0.065

 

208

(17.6%)

1.13

(0.98-1.31)

0.091

 

GG

225

76.9 ± 15.9

2.6

(-0.1-5.2)

0.055

 

26

(11.6%)

0.67

(0.50-0.90)

0.008

†adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases. Standard errors were adjusted for study areas. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. CKD = chronic kidney disease. CKD is defined by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Table 5

Mean eGFRs and CKD prevalence for IL4T-33C and IL6C-572G genotypes combined

Genotype

n

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

 

CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2)

   

mean ± SD

β†

(95% CI)

P-value†

 

n

(%)

OR†

(95% CI)

P-value†

IL4 TT/

IL6 CC

849

73.4 ± 14.4

0

(reference)

-

 

152

(17.9%)

1

(reference)

-

IL4 TC/

IL6 CC

854

74.5 ± 14.9

1.1

(-0.3-2.4)

0.108

 

140

(16.4%)

0.89

(0.75-1.06)

0.200

IL4 TT/

IL6 CG

512

72.5 ± 14.5

-0.8

(-2.8-1.1)

0.337

 

98

(19.1%)

1.08

(0.90-1.30)

0.387

IL4 TC/

IL6 CG

512

74.0 ± 15.2

0.2

(-3.1-3.5)

0.890

 

84

(16.4%)

0.94

(0.68-1.28)

0.686

IL4 CC /

IL6 CG

161

74.0 ± 14.4

0.3

(-3.8-4.4)

0.867

 

26

(16.1%)

0.89

(0.42-1.90)

0.768

IL4 TC/

IL6 GG

100

75.6 ± 17.0

2.1

(-1.5-5.7)

0.217

 

17

(17.0%)

0.94

(0.67-1.32)

0.720

IL4 CC /

IL6 CC

208

76.5 ± 14.6

3.1

(-1.2-7.4)

0.127

 

20

(9.6%)

0.48

(0.39-0.58)

< 0.001

IL4 TT/

IL6 GG

91

77.6 ± 15.4

4.2

(0.4-8.1)

0.036

 

9

(9.8%)

0.49

(0.37-0.63)

< 0.001

IL4 CC /

IL6 GG

34

79.1 ± 13.4

5.2

(0.3-10.2)

0.041

 

0

(0.0%)

0.00

-

-

†adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases. Standard errors were adjusted for study areas. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate. CKD = chronic kidney disease. CKD is defined by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

We previously reported an association between the CD14 A-260G SNP and kidney function among a population living in the north part of Japan using an eGFR derived from the MDRD Study equation [14]. However, the present study did not show such an association.

Discussion

Our explorations revealed that the subjects with the genotypes IL4 -33CC (a genotype that produces high levels of IL-4) and IL6 -572GG (a genotype that produces low levels of IL-6) had better kidney function and a lower risk of CKD in a large Japanese population.

Cytokines are important modulators of inflammation, and the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines determines the inflammatory response and may mediate the progression of atherosclerosis and subsequent CKD [6, 7]. Genetic polymorphisms of these cytokines have been shown to be associated with comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, in ESRD patients [3–5], or with ESRD susceptibility [8], but there are controversial results that no polymorphisms of the IL6, IL10, and IL1 genes were associated with ESRD [11]. The evidence for polymorphisms in cytokine genes affecting the risk of CKD itself is scarce and this issue has not been fully clarified, especially in the general population.

IL-4 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that exerts immunosuppressive effects on macrophages and suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine production [21]. The promoter polymorphism IL4 T-33C (which is in complete linkage disequilibrium with IL4 T-589C) affects IL-4 expression [15], and the CC genotype shows a high level of IL-4 protein [9]. Accordingly, subjects with the CC genotype showed a lower risk of ischemic stroke relapse [22], consistent with our data indicating a lower risk of CKD in CC genotype carriers.

An elevated level of the main pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 predicts cardiovascular mortality in ESRD patients [3]. The IL6 C to G variation at position -572 reduces the transcriptional activity of the IL6 promoter, and the levels of IL-6 are lower in carriers of the IL6 -572GG genotype [10, 11]. Accordingly, the IL6 -572GG genotype was associated with lower risks of kidney allograft survival [23] and abdominal aortic aneurysm [24], consistent with our data showing a lower risk of CKD in GG genotype carriers.

The combined effect of high IL-4- and low IL-6-producing genotypes has been shown to lead to a lower risk of ESRD [8]. We also found that no CKD subjects carried high IL-4- and low IL-6-producing (low-risk) genotypes, and that their mean eGFR was 5.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 higher than that in carriers of the low IL-4- and high IL-6-producing (high-risk) genotypes. This difference is almost equivalent to a 14-year difference in a healthy Japanese population [25], and has a significant impact with respect to cardiovascular disease prevention, especially among healthy individuals who are not aware of a possible risk of CKD.

The evidence for polymorphisms in cytokine genes affecting the risk of CKD is scarce. No cytokine genes were identified as susceptibility loci for CKD in a Caucasian population in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) [1]. However, this may simply mean that no cytokine genes were highly statistically significantly associated in the context of the multiple testing related to the GWAS, and therefore not presented in the GWAS report. Yoshida et al. [2] showed that some genetic variants were associated with CKD in a large Japanese population, but only TNFA and IL10 were included as representative cytokine genes and did not show associations. In contrast, we selected candidate genes that are assumed to be of physiological interest based on the associations between pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokines and CKD [6, 7]. The other difference is that the former study participants were mixed, and comprised patients with various symptoms, health check-up examinees and aged subjects [2]. In contrast, our study participants were enrolled from the population with an age range of 35 to 69. Thus, our study contains the largest general Japanese population investigated to date for associations among pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokine gene variants and CKD.

No haplotype analyses were needed because IL4 T-33C and IL6 C-572G are the only SNPs that affect the IL-4 and IL-6 levels in Japanese subjects. IL4 T-589C, IL4 T-33C, and a 70-bp variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism (VNTR) within intron 3 are in complete linkage disequilibrium, thus there are only two IL4 gene haplotypes in Japanese populations; -589T/-33T/B1 (183 bp) (allele frequency, 0.670) and -589C/-33C/B2 (253 bp) (0.330) [15]. In addition, IL6 transcription is influenced by four promoter polymorphisms (C-572G, A-597G, -373AnTn and C-174G) [26], but A-597G and C-174G do not exist or are very rare in Japanese populations. Only three prevalent haplotypes have been identified in Japanese populations [10]: -572C/-373A10T10 (allele frequency 0.733), G/A10T11 (0.136), and G/A9T11 (0.104). The serum levels of IL-6 were high in C/A10T10 and low in both G/A10T11 and G/A9T11, with no difference between the IL-6 levels in G/A10T11 and G/A9T11. Thus, IL4 T-33C and IL6 C-572G could be the only SNPs that affect the transcriptional activity of IL-4 and IL-6 in Japanese populations.

A limitation of our study was that IL6 C-572G was not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. However, the absolute difference between the actual and expected frequencies was only 1%. Thus, the errors in genotyping seem unlikely to result in substantial misclassification [13], although the large number in the study population might account for the statistically significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Another limitation is the possible misclassification of CKD subjects owing to the single measurement of SCr. As our subjects were presumably healthy volunteers or health check-up examinees, their kidney function might have been stable. Thus, the possibility that a single measurement of SCr could result in misclassification is low. Since we lacked a replication cohort, adjustment of the p-values for the multiple comparisons, and biomarkers of inflammation, further confirmation using another cohort of subjects is needed so that there is a high chance that our study results represent a false positive finding. As this was a cross-sectional study, a prospective study is needed to further confirm the decrease in eGFR and the incident risk of CKD.

Conclusions

The functional cytokine polymorphisms IL4 T-33C (rs2070874) and IL6 C-572G (rs1800796), which are the only SNPs identified to date that affect the IL-4 and IL-6 levels in Japanese subjects, were associated with kidney function and CKD prevalence in a large Japanese population. The IL4 -33CC and IL6 -572GG genotypes (high IL-4-and low IL-6-producing genotypes) showed better kidney function and a lower risk of CKD compared with the other variants. These differences were greater when the two genotypes were combined. This study supported the hypothesis that genetic variations in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL4 and pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 genes may predispose subjects to the development of CKD. Determination of the genotypes involved may prove informative for identifying individuals at a lower or higher risk of CKD. Further confirmation in another study is needed.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kyota Ashikawa, Tomomi Aoi and other members of the Laboratory for Genotyping Development, Center for Genomic Medicine, RIKEN, for support with genotyping, and Yoko Mitsuda, Keiko Shibata and Etsuko Kimura at the Department of Preventative Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, for their technical assistance. This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Nos. 17015018 and 221S0001).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
(2)
Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
(3)
Department of Health Science, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
(4)
Department of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
(5)
Department of International Island and Community Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Kagoshima, Japan
(6)
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
(7)
Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Health Biosciences, University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
(8)
Department of Epidemiology for Community Health and Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
(9)
Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
(10)
Division of Cancer Registry, Prevention and Epidemiology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
(11)
Laboratory for Genotyping Development, Center for Genomic Medicine, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan

References

  1. Köttgen A, Pattaro C, Böger CA, Fuchsberger C, Olden M, Glazer NL, Parsa A, Gao X, Yang Q, Smith AV, O'Connell JR, Li M, Schmidt H, Tanaka T, Isaacs A, Ketkar S, Hwang SJ, Johnson AD, Dehghan A, Teumer A, Paré G, Atkinson EJ, Zeller T, Lohman K, Cornelis MC, Probst-Hensch NM, Kronenberg F, Tönjes A, Hayward C, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, Launer LJ, Harris TB, Rampersaud E, Mitchell BD, Arking DE, Boerwinkle E, Struchalin M, Cavalieri M, Singleton A, Giallauria F, Metter J, de Boer IH, Haritunians T, Lumley T, Siscovick D, Psaty BM, Zillikens MC, Oostra BA, Feitosa M, Province M, de Andrade M, Turner ST, Schillert A, Ziegler A, Wild PS, Schnabel RB, Wilde S, Munzel TF, Leak TS, Illig T, Klopp N, Meisinger C, Wichmann HE, Koenig W, Zgaga L, Zemunik T, Kolcic I, Minelli C, Hu FB, Johansson A, Igl W, Zaboli G, Wild SH, Wright AF, Campbell H, Ellinghaus D, Schreiber S, Aulchenko YS, Felix JF, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Imboden M, Nitsch D, Brandstätter A, Kollerits B, Kedenko L, Mägi R, Stumvoll M, Kovacs P, Boban M, Campbell S, Endlich K, Völzke H, Kroemer HK, Nauck M, Völker U, Polasek O, Vitart V, Badola S, Parker AN, Ridker PM, Kardia SL, Blankenberg S, Liu Y, Curhan GC, Franke A, Rochat T, Paulweber B, Prokopenko I, Wang W, Gudnason V, Shuldiner AR, Coresh J, Schmidt R, Ferrucci L, Shlipak MG, van Duijn CM, Borecki I, Krämer BK, Rudan I, Gyllensten U, Wilson JF, Witteman JC, Pramstaller PP, Rettig R, Hastie N, Chasman DI, Kao WH, Heid IM, Fox CS: New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 376-384.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Yoshida T, Kato K, Fujimaki T, Yokoi K, Oguri M, Watanabe S, Metoki N, Yoshida H, Satoh K, Aoyagi Y, Nishigaki Y, Suzuki T, Nozawa Y, Yamada Y: Association of genetic variants with chronic kidney disease in Japanese individuals. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 4: 883-890.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Luttropp K, Lindholm B, Carrero JJ, Glorieux G, Schepers E, Vanholder R, Schalling M, Stenvinkel P, Nordfors L: Genetics/Genomics in chronic kidney disease--towards personalized medicine?. Semin Dial. 2009, 22: 417-422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rao M, Wong C, Kanetsky P, Girndt M, Stenvinkel P, Reilly M, Raj DS: Cytokine gene polymorphism and progression of renal and cardiovascular diseases. Kidney Int. 2007, 72: 549-556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balakrishnan VS, Guo D, Rao M, Jaber BL, Tighiouart H, Freeman RL, Huang C, King AJ, Pereira BJ, HEMO Study Group: Cytokine gene polymorphisms in hemodialysis patients: association with comorbidity, functionality, and serum albumin. Kidney Int. 2004, 65: 1449-1460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrero JJ, Park SH, Axelsson J, Lindholm B, Stenvinkel P: Cytokines, atherogenesis, and hypercatabolism in chronic kidney disease: a dreadful triad. Semin Dial. 2009, 22: 381-386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Silverstein DM: Inflammation in chronic kidney disease: role in the progression of renal and cardiovascular disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009, 24: 1445-1452.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mittal RD, Manchanda PK: Association of interleukin (IL)-4 intron-3 and IL-6 -174 G/C gene polymorphism with susceptibility to end-stage renal disease. Immunogenetics. 2007, 59: 159-165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tindall EA, Severi G, Hoang HN, Ma CS, Fernandez P, Southey MC, English DR, Hopper JL, Heyns CF, Tangye SG, Giles GG, Hayes VM: Australian Prostate Cancer BioResource: Comprehensive analysis of the cytokine-rich chromosome 5q31.1 region suggests a role for IL-4 gene variants in prostate cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2010, 31: 1748-1754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Komatsu Y, Tai H, Galicia JC, Shimada Y, Endo M, Akazawa K, Yamazaki K, Yoshie H: Interleukin-6 (IL-6)--373 A9T11 allele is associated with reduced susceptibility to chronic periodontitis in Japanese subjects and decreased serum IL-6 level. Tissue Antigens. 2005, 65: 110-114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckham TA, McKnight AJ, Benevente D, Courtney AE, Patterson CC, Simmonds M, Gough S, Middleton D, Borrows R, Maxwell AP: Evaluation of five interleukin genes for association with end-stage renal disease in white Europeans. Am J Nephrol. 2010, 32: 103-108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamajima N, J-MICC Study Group: The Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (J-MICC Study) to detect gene-environment interactions for cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007, 8: 317-323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wakai K, Hamajima N, Okada R, Naito M, Morita E, Hishida A, Kawai S, Nishio K, Yin G, Asai Y, Matsuo K, Hosono S, Ito H, Watanabe M, Kawase T, Suzuki T, Tajima K, Tanaka K, Higaki Y, Hara M, Imaizumi T, Taguchi N, Nakamura K, Nanri H, Sakamoto T, Horita M, Shinchi K, Kita Y, Turin TC, Rumana N, Matsui K, Miura K, Ueshima H, Takashima N, Nakamura Y, Suzuki S, Ando R, Hosono A, Imaeda N, Shibata K, Goto C, Hattori N, Fukatsu M, Yamada T, Tokudome S, Takezaki T, Niimura H, Hirasada K, Nakamura A, Tatebo M, Ogawa S, Tsunematsu N, Chiba S, Mikami H, Kono S, Ohnaka K, Takayanagi R, Watanabe Y, Ozaki E, Shigeta M, Kuriyama N, Yoshikawa A, Matsui D, Watanabe I, Inoue K, Ozasa K, Mitani S, Arisawa K, Uemura H, Hiyoshi M, Takami H, Yamaguchi M, Nakamoto M, Takeda H, Kubo M, Tanaka H, J-MICC Study Group: Profile of participants and genotype distributions of 108 polymorphisms in a cross-sectional study of associations of genotypes with lifestyle and clinical factors: A Project in the Japan Multi-institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) Study. J Epidemiol. 2011, 21: 223-235.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Okada R, Suzuki K, Ito Y, Nishio K, Ishida Y, Kawai S, Goto Y, Naito M, Wakai K, Hamajima N: Association between decreased kidney function and endotoxin receptor CD14 C-159T polymorphism among Japanese health check-up examinees. Ren Fail. 2007, 29: 967-972.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakashima H, Miyake K, Inoue Y, Shimizu S, Akahoshi M, Tanaka Y, Otsuka T, Harada M: Association between IL-4 genotype and IL-4 production in the Japanese population. Genes Immun. 2002, 3: 107-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamajima N, Naito M, Kondo T, Goto Y: Genetic factors involved in the development of Helicobacter pylori-related gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2006, 97: 1129-1138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Oda K, Tanaka N, Arai T, Araki J, Song Y, Zhang L, Kuchiba A, Hosoi T, Shirasawa T, Muramatsu M, Sawabe M: Polymorphisms in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine genes and susceptibility to atherosclerosis: a pathological study of 1503 consecutive autopsy cases. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16: 592-599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ohnishi Y, Tanaka T, Ozaki K, Yamada R, Suzuki H, Nakamura Y: A high-throughput SNP typing system for genome-wide association studies. J Hum Genet. 2001, 46: 471-477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A, Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR: Revised Equations for Estimated GFR From Serum Creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009, 53: 982-992.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. National Kidney Foundation: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002, 39: S1-266.Google Scholar
  21. von der Thüsen JH, Kuiper J, van Berkel TJ, Biessen EA: Interleukins in atherosclerosis: molecular pathways and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Rev. 2003, 55: 133-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marousi S, Ellul J, Antonacopoulou A, Gogos C, Papathanasopoulos P, Karakantza M: Functional polymorphisms of interleukin 4 and interleukin 10 may predict evolution and functional outcome of an ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2011, 18: 637-643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller-Steinhardt M, Fricke L, Müller B, Ebel B, Kirchner H, Härtel C: Cooperative influence of the interleukin-6 promoter polymorphisms -597, -572 and -174 on long-term kidney allograft survival. Am J Transplant. 2004, 4: 402-406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Smallwood L, Allcock R, van Bockxmeer F, Warrington N, Palmer LJ, Iacopetta B, Norman PE: Polymorphisms of the interleukin-6 gene promoter and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008, 35: 31-36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Imai E, Horio M, Yamagata K, Iseki K, Hara S, Ura N, Kiyohara Y, Makino H, Hishida A, Matsuo S: Slower decline of glomerular filtration rate in the Japanese general population: a longitudinal 10-year follow-up study. Hypertens Res. 2008, 31: 433-441.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Terry CF, Loukaci V, Green FR: Cooperative influence of genetic polymorphisms on interleukin 6 transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 18138-18144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    27. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/13/2/prepub

Copyright

© Okada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us